Are you saying animals are incapable of making moral decisions? I have seen real life scenarios which contradict what you are saying. I have seen a lioness raise two gazels. she had found them abandoned and then raised them as if they were her cubs, defending them from other lions.
I have read accounts and been aware of dogs raising an abused human child who was once again abandoned. The girl behaved and lived like a dog, it took years before she was 're-humanised'.
To me those are acts of morality. The lioness could have eaten the two gazel calfs, Or the dogs could have left or killed the human child, but in both instances they chose to save the life of another, even though it went against their natural instinct.
Orangutans, gorillas have also displayed an understanding (by our understanding) of wright and wrong.
To me, this is morality, the ability to decipher by right and wrong. It would also be the same as with other cultures, though we do not share the same morals all the time, we do not say other cultures are incapable of moral judgment. Therefore isn't it possible to that the 'morals' of an animal are different from our own, and that they can tell right from wrong (from their perspective)?
Sorry to be rude but, that view is very egotistic (in my opinion). I know it is not solely yours. However I do not feel we are more superior than animals. Sure we have accomplished things like splitting the atom, reaching the moon, developing motorised transport. However, animals are not depleting the earth's supply of fossil fuels, they are not contributing to global warming. To me the superior way of life is preserving the planet. Rather than destroying it!!!