Psuedo intellectuals just love to appeal to terms taught in high school and college logic classes as a way to avoid true dialogue. You are appealing to a logical fallacy when you state that no Muslim uses the phrase "hand of Allah" in regard to the black stone unless you know every Muslim. If you mean Muslims you know or the majority of Muslims then you are committing a logical fallacy known as an appeal to the majority. All Muslim's sites that attack the Trinity use this fallacious argument when they contain the statement that Christians believe in the Trinity. Not all Christians today or in the history of Christianity have believed in the Trinity.
It seems you do not have the time to refute archeological and anthropological evidence on this thread or the one you started that defeat your premise. There is enough archeological and anthropological truth on the site I linked to concerning the black stone that it seems your only tactic is to resort to "logical fallacies".
Now other than tradition do you have any evidence that the black stone, which was part of a pagan temple was not an idol? Muslims take the stance it was not, therefore you have the burden of proof to prove your assertion, it is not up to me to prove that the black stone was an idol. You see your appeal to logic works both ways. Also I asked a question concerning the Kabba, which you have side stepped by fallaciously appealing to logical fallacies.
Now, this thread was started to show that Islam is not the child of the pagan Arab moon god, therefore Muslims who post to this thread have the buden of proof to back up that statement. And the fact you have not posted any proof and have simply questioned accepted archeological and anthropological tenets by appealing to logical fallacies only demonstrates the weakness of your case.