Buddha, Hinduism, Mithraism, Baha'i, & etc.Well, love me all to hell...
I have changed nothing. You are simply confused. The entire time in this thread I have been arguing against a soul suffering endlessly. What is the basis for arguing against this? I have explained it umpteen times now. Review the thread. I am certainly explaining it as often as most of us change socks. It is not possible to have something and nothing in the same place. One contradicts the other. In this case, you cannot have eternal love and eternal suffering in hell co-existing. Eternal suffering in hell constitutes the absence of eternal love, but that is not possible because that which is eternal can have no absence. Therefore either eternal suffering exists, or eternal love exists. |
🌈Pride🌈 goeth before Destruction
When 🌈Pride🌈 cometh, then cometh Shame