You quote Scripture and then put a Trinitarian spin on those Scriptures while ignore the plain language meaning of Scriptures like:
Deuteronomy 6:4
4 "Hear, O Israel! The LORD is our God, the LORD is one! NAS
Malachi 2:10
10 "Do we not all have one father? Has not one God created us? NAS
John 20:17
17 Jesus said to her, "Stop clinging to Me, for I have not yet ascended to the Father; but go to My brethren, and say to them, 'I ascend to My Father and your Father, and My God and your God.'"
NAS
1 st Corinthians 8:5-6
5 For even if there are so-called gods whether in heaven or on earth, as indeed there are many gods and many lords, 6 yet for us there is but one God, the Father, from whom are all things, and we exist for Him; and one Lord, Jesus Christ, by whom are all things, and we exist through Him.
NAS
Ephesians 4:4-8
4 There is one body and one Spirit, just as also you were called in one hope of your calling; 5 one Lord, one faith, one baptism, 6 one God and Father of all who is over all and through all and in all. 7 But to each one of us grace was given according to the measure of Christ's gift. 8 Therefore it says,
"When He ascended on high,
He led captive a host of captives,
And He gave gifts to men."
NAS
1 st Timothy 2:5-6
5 For there is one God, and one mediator also between God and men, the man Christ Jesus, 6 who gave Himself as a ransom for all, the testimony borne at the proper time. NAS
You see Donny if you are right and I am wrong then you have a religion busting contradiction in Scripture. One God does not mean Jesus a man and Yehovah who is spirit are in fact one.
For a fact your interpretation of only part of Isaiah 9:6 contradicts the other part of Isaiah 9:6, which tells us "a child will be born, a son will be given" and "whose name will be callled". Was God born of a woman? Does a name equate to an innate nature? Caleb was a mighty warrior who believed and trusted God. In Hebrew Caleb means dog. Therefore if we follow your line of reasoning Caleb was really a Rottweiler or maybe a Pit Bull.
You insist you have only quoted Scripture, well so have I. However, you have also decided that although Jesus was in the form of God means Jesus is innately the real God and this Donny requires one to interpret the plain language meaning of "in the form" and this interpretation also requires one to ignore the definition of the Koine word "morfee".
Now, if you let the Bible explain the Bible and also understand the cultural background of the Bible you will then understand your interpretation of select Scriptures is wrong. I have used this example before but I think it is worth repeating. In England the phrase "knock up" means to visit a person, in America this same phrase has a different meaning and yet both countries are English speaking countries. If a man told me they were going to "knock up" my sister they would have a fight on their hands.
You are in fact interpreting Scripture instead of believing Scripture. You are depending on translations that are translated with a Trinitarian bias that contradict the cultural background of the men God used to write the Bible and how Hebrew and Greek words were used and understood in the cultures of the time each book was written.