First the Hebrew translated Lord in those verse is not "adown". Check out an interlinear instead of referring to Strong's. Strong's does not make a distinction between "adown" and the combining forms of words that contain "adown", which is the root for "adonay". Second the Hebrew word used in Psalms 135:5 is the same word used in your other references and Strong's list the Hebrew as #136 or "adonay" not #113 or "adown".
If you are depending on Strong's you are depending on a less than reliable lexicon.
Like I posted your study has been superficial and your conclusion is therefore incorrect. Also the fact you are avoiding commenting on the Messianic prophesies demonstrates you cannot interpret them and twist them to prove your thesis and neither can Trinitarians, which is why they tend to avoid discussing those prophesies.
Webmaster brought up a valid point, after the First Council of Nicea it was dangerous to one's health to deny the Trinity, especially in the west. The pure monotheism of Judaism was perverted by men who lacked a comprhensive background in the OT Scriptures. It was these same Scriptures that Peter used to preach the Man Jesus Christ was highly exalted by God to be our Prince and Savior, not that God took on human form and died on a cross.