Its interesting to see time after time that muslims often use the argument of the BiBle being corrupt as a way to duck the question...but theres a problem here...
When you debate, you should know that there is what you call Historical Precedence...
The Bible was here before the Koran, and its here to stay. The Koran is like the new kid on the block, the burden of proof should logically be on the Koran, not on the Bible...
I think if we started to say that the Quran is corrupt and has not been preserved as an excuse to avoid answering your questions, this wouldn't be fair right?
can i point out that I often see that muslims will often use circular reasoning...e.g, You use Mohammed to prove the Quran, and use the Quran to prove Mohammed. But when we talk about the Bible, people dismiss what it says as being corrupt.
Please be more fair when you debate guys.