Liberate wrote:unity wrote:...
well in debate dr william campbell could not answer even one question from naik but naik answered to 22 allleged contradictions...
What does this have to do with the validity of islam?
this debate was at higher level than the debate we have on this forum. thus the validity of debate between two learned scholars is multiple time more than forum can provide.
Islamic apologetics is simply beyond belief the lengths people will go to to defend the indefensible.
the truth of the matter is that muslim do not have media support as you may have. muslims are maligned in the media through lies,deceptions. in spite of this relegion of islam is growing in west due to frredom of speech there.
Do you worship Zakir Naik?
this one looks so silly
we do not worship anyone except ALLAH. we can not be taken to ride by anyone as we have quran to fall back upon for truth
If he has a subjective view to defend rape, pillage and cold blooded murder, how does this justify islam as being a religion that came from God?
because he is defending it? Does that make it right?
rape pillage murders are going on in western democracies more than anywhere else. every minute 2 to 3 rapes takes place in USA alone. people are being killed by occupying force by use of missiles bombs etc etc. last 100 years many horrible wars took place and muslims are not part of them.
muslims are defending through use of intellect and not by bombs.
Can you answer one simple question for me:
why are YOU a muslim?
you should better ask reverts to islam who can give you better responce since they know better part of both religion
thanks you brother liberate
________________