Show me in 2 Peter 1:20-21 that Peter wrote we should not interpet God's word "wrongly". The fact is he did not.
2 Peter 1:20-21
20 But know this first of all, that no prophecy of Scripture is a matter of one's own interpretation, 21 for no prophecy was ever made by an act of human will, but men moved by the Holy Spirit spoke from God. NAS
The people who have decided to interpret Scripture are those who refuse to take God as His word, like you when you interpret "one" to mean a compound unity, a concept that can be shown to be false based on common usage of the word "one". One herd is just that, one herd composed of many animals. The plurality is found in the word "herd" not the word "one". The same is true of "one church". The "church" is composed of all true believers.
Your Hebrews proof text tells us the Son was "made", not that the Son preexisted with God and is God, that again is a "personal interpretation". The same is true of Philippians 2:6:
Philippians 2:5-11
5 Have this attitude in yourselves which was also in Christ Jesus, 6 who, although He existed in the form of God, did not regard equality with God a thing to be grasped, 7 but emptied Himself, taking the form of a bond-servant, and being made in the likeness of men. 8 And being found in appearance as a man, He humbled Himself by becoming obedient to the point of death, even death on a cross. 9 Therefore also God highly exalted Him, and bestowed on Him the name which is above every name, 10 that at the name of Jesus every knee should bow, of those who are in heaven, and on earth, and under the earth, 11 and that every tongue should confess that Jesus Christ is Lord, to the glory of God the Father.
NAS
The fact is the Lord was created as God's servant as I have adequately demonstrated with the Messianic prophesies that you disagree with based on your own personal interpretation of the Bible.
Here is what you posted on the Messianic Prophesies vs. Trinity thread:
absolutetruth wrote:But it seems you reject even those Scriptures used to support that Jesus is the Messiah of the OT by Trinitarians.
i also reject the false ideas of "long-agers" and false interpretations of Bible passages by men. you seem to be implying that "since these people are Trinitarians, therefore you should trust what they say." i don't care what these "Trinitarians" say. if they're wrong, i VEHEMENTLY disagree with them.
Why should I accept the interpretation of a man who denies the Bible is true and then interprets "one" to mean a compound unity when this concept has been rejected by most Trinitarians?
Your proof texts tell us the Son was made, not that the Son preexisted creation as God.