Girolamo wrote:Gee.... maybe, just maybe, stalactites and stalagmites that form on
concrete ceilings and
floors form much more quickly than in the natural cave environment?
Especially when a super saturated solution is created
artifically, which did not happen when men who did not reuse the same water over and over again when cleaning the Washington monument. Did you read the article or does your personal agenda override your common sense?
The same solution was passed through the concrete several times a day for three days. The solution then was dripped from an opening in the bottom of the container and was re-deposited into the tray. This created a continuous super-saturated solution. Overall findings indicated that researchers could replicate the growing process and, with minor alterations to the solution, would be able to replicate the exact construction of a stalactite.
Creationist science is an oxymoron. You don't start with a conclusion and make up whatever evidence you can to support it. You start with a hypothesis which is a reasonable guess, and only once it is tested and observed by other scientests can you determine if it is accurate. You already have a conclusion; that everything scientests say happened in millions of years really happened in only a few thousand years or less, and you are only willing to accept the made up reasoning and evidence of exclusively those who want to reach the same conclusion.
Interesting statements, especially since scientists who start with a conclusion and then seek to interpret the available evidence to support their conclusion are your experts. BTW, what is your rebuttal to the age of Niagra Falls?