Aineo wrote:fdjohan wrote:Pls open this web:
http://portal.unesco.org/en/ev.php-URL_ ... N=201.html
Type "ISRAEL" in the seach box.
How many result you find? 100.
So, Israel omitted from day planners doesn't mean it is not admitted.
Prove me that UNESCO is a BIASED organization.
Salaam
What do day planners have to do with this discussion?
I revisit first page. I can't see when I talked about day planners.
Joseph comes with it. Not me. So you better talk to him
I see you did not respond to my question on page one.
You come with the word BIASED or UNBIASED.
How come this discussion will continue if 2 of us keep claiming each other part as BIASED. I have 2 logical questions about it. So please response.
From the U.N. site:
People: This manuscript is the earliest extant written version of the Koran reviewed to Prophet Muhammed. It is specially associated with the third Caliph Othman, who ordered its compilation, who was assassinated while reading it.
Compiled from what? Neither one of your sites disproves what Apple pie has posted.Has this manuscript been dated scientifically or are you simply appealing to some long held tradition
Those manuscripts being nominated as MEMORY OF THE WORLD PROGRAMME by UNESCO are pass through forensic examination.
3. Documents that include colours, such as illuminated manuscripts and maps, and items that may require forensic type examination require full-colour digitisation.
(MEMORY OF THE WORLD PROGRAMME GENERAL GUIDELINES TO SAFEGUARD DOCUMENTARY HERITAGE
Page : 63
Prepared for UNESCO, on behalf of IFLA, by Stephen Foster and Roslyn Russel, Australian Heritage Projects Jan Lyall, National Library of Australia
Duncan Marshall)