Trinity DebateWHAT DOES THE BIBLE THINK OF JESUSare you serious? you're asking why someone (God in this case) would speak about future events? Jesus does (Luke 18:32-33), Peter does (2 Peter 2:2-3). They even talk about past events like the Flood and Adam and Eve and Enoch and Moses. what's your point? that's just a lie, or bad grammar on your part. nowhere is there any sign of writing in the 3rd person. it's all 1st. God's Words through David. you said something that wasn't true. ahhh...but there IS a distinction between "his" (David) and "horn" meaning that David is not the horn, nor is the horn David. which makes perfect sense with what i'm saying, but flies in the face of your argument. and again, what's your point? i agree about the "horn". i'm talking about David here, which is clearly who these verses are referring to. i can't believe that you don't see that. you're trying not to. no He isn't a man. the Divine Jesus took on human form and became a man while retaining His Divinity. and this verse from Numbers is taken out of context. it's referring to God and morality, saying that God doesn't lie or tell false things or break His promises like men. so Jesus, never having done any of these things keeps the criteria. there are qualifications "that He should lie", "that He should repent". you talk about context so much, practice it. using these verses in Numbers in this way is as silly as those who try and use 2 Peter 3:8 to refer to the days of Genesis. Son of Man is a Messianic title that affirms His humanity. and these verses in Numbers have qualifiers. you don't seem to understand that. you keep ignoring what i write. you have taken the position of an ABSOLUTE NEGATION. your position is unsustainable, no matter how stubborn you are in trying to keep it. and ONCE AGAIN, to call Jesus Judge is to call Him God. i explained this already:
to us Jesus DID have a God. and i have taken the whole Word into account. once again, like i said, you've taken the stance of an absolute negation. which means that every verse has to support what you say. if there's one verse that contradicts you, then your stance is untennable because a man claiming to be Divine (as Jesus does) is blasphemy, but the Divine Jesus taking on human form and being made in the likeness of a man, is not blasphemy, but the mercy and love of God for us sinners. you need to understand that before you continue to talk about "context" and the Word. and the fact that you refuse to address the scriptures i put up and many of my arguments demonstrates your inability to refute them. this conversation is getting really old man. i understand you're older and more stubborn, and have a lot of time on your hands, but you're being far too unreasonable. please give me a little respect and read what i've posted and stop making me repeat myself. i quote every word you say back to you with an answer. respect me enough to do the same. thanks. |
🌈Pride🌈 goeth before Destruction
When 🌈Pride🌈 cometh, then cometh Shame