Apple Pie wrote:fdjohan wrote:
No, Still you don't understand.
First, the rules of making tafsir of Al-Qur'an, not necessary found inside Al-Qur'an. About what I mean by "Al-Qur'an's rules" is things that belongs to AL-Qur'an you have to consider especially when you make any tafsir.
We understand completely…
Rather than rebut our exegesis head-on, you would rather slavishly continue to hide behind your straw-man argument of why our exegesis cannot be true.
It appears that you are prepared to talk endlessly about meaningless excuses….because the truth contained in our exegesis is just too much for you to comprehend.
You have already agreed that our exegesis is rock-solid.
Further, you have brought forth absolutely
NOTHING to refute it..!
Not even so much as a whimper.
Zero.
I refure you by what are belongs to Al-Qur'an. So what? I am not talking nonsense. Don't make any complain because I used legal way to refute you.
You would think that the Muslims that you copied this lame excuse from, would have been able to muster at least one individual to counter our exegesis…..but no…
Get a grip…
Your arguments are lame without any consiteration to what belongs to Al-Qur'an.
How is what Islam’s “prophet” supposedly said going to change the facts…?
The fact that he knows what the concept of AL-Qur'an better than you.
Islam’s “prophet” never wrote the Koran in the first place. Nor is he responsible for the material contained within its collected pages…
He hold the key of the concept itself. He denied the theory of SON OF GOD.
You have no choice but to admit that Jesus was not created and that He is the Son of God….as boldly proclaimed in your book of faith….
You have no choice but to follow the rules of interpreting the verses.
No matter what you say, your argument is weak. Choosing Bible as the basic argument when you making any tafsir of AL-Qur'an is like you are making your self as a clown in front of Muslims.
Don't proclaim your self as a winner because I am using legal moves.
Salaam Apple pie