Aineo wrote:With all do respect Geshtinnanna, if gay activists are going to appeal to anecdotal studies of the animal kingdom in a vain attempt to prove that homosexuality is genetic posting accounts of spontaneous change in animal sexuality is germaine to the debate, especially when the spontaneous change occurs in specific animals that have been used by gay activists as proof that a gay sexual orientation is found in animals.
If you have followed gay activism propaganda over the years this is a major blow to their insistence that sexual orientation is cut in stone and cannot be changed. My personal views are immaterial to the big picture.
With all due respect they do no worse then the Christian Right Wing propoganda either. Call a spade a spade. And both are spades.
If they are going to use anecdotal studies to prove them right when you use the same study to prove them wrong then you all live in the same boat. Sink while the rest of the world enjoys the ocean.