ArchivedOSAS revisitedYou mean two rules, right Aineo? 1. No personal attacks or dealing in personalities. 2. No "they weren't saved in the first place" arguments. Agreed. I've never argued against the teaching that some will fall away. Who those people are is where we disagree. You believe they are Christians. I believe they..... dare I say it...... were never saved in the first place. Again, agreed. The issue here is not the teaching itself, but who the teaching applies to. Since you started this thread (and not to mention the fact that you're a moderator), I don't have a problem with you setting the ground rules for what should and shouldn't be discussed here. Where I do have a problem is with you saying "It is unacceptable for you to defend a teaching that you believe is supported by Scripture simply because I do not believe it is supported by Scripture." I reiterate what I said in the "predestination questions" thread: Why don't you just say what you mean? "We can address OSAS again if you are willing to agree with me. All those who disagree with me will either have their posts deleted or will be labeled as appealing to a copout explanation, all with a simple waving of my hand. " |
🌈Pride🌈 goeth before Destruction
When 🌈Pride🌈 cometh, then cometh Shame