Science, Creation & EvolutionNon young creation astronomy failedI may be wrong, but I think, in the case of these forums, semantics is more important than syntax (unless of course a post is unreadable). The quotes that you quoted in your first post only illustrate that "non creationist astronomy" hasn't explained everything yet. In that instance, you would be correct in catagorizing it as a failure, if and only if you were looking for the answer to everything, in which case, it is 42, but you can't tell that from any conventional astronomy. |
🌈Pride🌈 goeth before Destruction
When 🌈Pride🌈 cometh, then cometh Shame