ArchivedQustions about your bible. ...........Aineo your not steam rolling xmmx, like you did GM are you?? for example, looking over there reply/quote and reposting a reply you've already posted in the past,just to get out of answering questions,is this what you are doing? And don't hit me with you rBIG "powerful" admin tools either. Its Only a question.
Hello Aineo,
I thought I explained thoroughly why the KJV's rendering of "Easter" is correct. Try to understand, It should NOT be translated "passover" because the Passover had already passed.
The "days of unleavened bread" had already begun, "THEN were the days of unleavened bread" {Acts 12:3} That "Then" in verse 3 means, at that time, not then later}. It was first passover, THEN were the days of unleavened bread that Peter was arrested. Peter was arrested not on passover. "THEN" which means the Passover was over, and it was THEN the days of unleavened bread. Peter was arrested THEN. check out these verses in the old testament concerning the passover, Num. 28:16-18; Exo. 12:13-18. The Passover was always the fourteenth day of the first month, while the days of unleavened bread ran from the fifteenth through the twenty-first. Herod could not have been waiting for the Passover. Besides, why would a Gentile king like Herod be concerned about a Jewish feast day? "Easter" is from the pagan "Ishtar", the goddess that the pagans worshipped--Rome included. Herod wanted to wait until his pagan holiday was over before bringing Peter out to the people. You misunderstood the word "Then" in verse 3 Aineo
One more thing, I did not say that a person grows into salvation, I said that the NASB implys to that. I don't think you had read the entire post carefully, otherwise you might not have misunderstood me. Oh and something else, how about you giving me proof that all those errors in the KJV that you had posted before, REALLY are errors ok? and from what authority are you getting all this information on all these so called errors? As far as "Easter" being in the KJV, I'm not going to debate with you anymore on that because it is pointless. I believe whole heartedly that God is able to preserve his word in a translation that is without error, and the KJV is it, and to think that God can not have a translation without errors is a slap in the face to him.
Hello Aineo, hope your day is a blessed one.
By attempting to void the rules he demonstrated he lacks integrity, and since you registered today to defend him and you have the same IP address I am going to presume you are acually GM and you don't have the personal integrity to admit it.
I know about IP Addresses, once a person disconnects from the internet, their IP Address changes every time.
I'm learning you Aineo, don't take what I said here and make a federal case out of it. the main part of this message is your opinion on xmmx's reply about the translations.
GM was warned via PM and on this thread concerning his tactics and disobedience to rules he agreed to abide by when he registered
.
Everyone seen that you called GM a bigot,even in PM. SO, so what's your excuse.
May I add, please don't ignore xmmx on his reply.
Aineo,
I am certainly not trying to sound insulting, but what makes you an authority on which translation is a better one? Are you getting your information off of web sites that criticize the KJV bible in support of the NASB, NIV etc.? With all the omittions in the NIV, NASB, RSV and others, I am reminded of Jeremiah 23:36, "Ye have perverted the words of the living God", and also Mark 4:15, "....Satan cometh immediately and taketh away the word.......'
Here is some information,
The Greek text used to translate the NIV, NASB and others was an edition drastically altered by a Spiritualist {a person who conducts seances}, who believed he was in the "new age". Two other 'new' version editors were also involved in spiritualism.Westcott was a Spiritualist.
Contrary to advertising claims, the new versions are more difficult to read than the KJV, according to research using the Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level Indicators.
It really amazes me that so many people think they know better than the KJV translators with all the hog wash about the KJV being full of errors, and the KJV should have rendered it this way instead of that way etc. Of all the omittions that are in the NIV, NASB,RSV and others, plus all the different versions which do nothing but confuse people, it puzzels me that people are so naive that they don't suspect satanic deception. You mean to tell me that God Almighty could not find men that could accurately translate his word into english? Is there anything too hard for him? He found the men to do it, and it was the 54 men who translated the KJV, but God's enemy the devil comes along with all these lies that the KJV is full of errors, and that things were added to the KJV that shouldn't be in there, and that King James was a homosexual, and all kinds of crap, and people fall for all that. Satan would love to make Jesus appear less than who he really is, and he uses these perversions of the bible that leave out important words like Christ, Lord, God, Jesus, etc.
He has so called smart people that say things like, "Oh the KJV rendered this verse wrong because it is not in the original Greek, and the KJV should say this" bla bla bla. The other translations are from other "original" manuscripts that the KJV translators wouldn't touch, but so called modern scholars, so called smart men think they know better. If certain verses in the KJV should have said differently, then it would have, and that would go for any translation, depending which one God would use to preserve his word, which I believe is the KJV.
Dear Aineo, I'd like to know if you are a christian? no offence intended.. but no true born again believer would treat people the way you have been.
Seriously, xmmx gave you fact& so did GM and I'd like to know your opinion on this matter Aineo. so please stop ignoring what is being presented to you and answer xmmx's quote above.
| View Parent Message View dfilename Return Home |