Greetings H2O,
Thanks for your reply…
Apple Pie wrote:
First of all…if you are going to quote Lane’s Lexicon…please refer to a page number like you did when you began to pull the lies out from your gluteus region - by directly referencing specific page numbers from lane’s Lexicon….which you made up and never existed in the first place…..all in order to save face…
You have just exposed yourself to your lying conundrum as the CDROM that you bought (because you are on a limited budget due to being a manager at Denny’s), does NOT show the page numbers to the lexicon that you are now slavishly referencing…
So where is the Lie here. You just said I have Edward Lanes Lexicon on CD which of course d
oes not have page numbers.
Apple Pie wrote:
Thus proving and exposing you to your previous lies.
Come on…show us the page(s) that you are referring too….just like you did before…
What lies ? The lies you are having illusions about. I assume you are talking about our quotation from Lane before we had obtained the CD-Rom version of his work. We already responded to your gullable deceite :
Quote:
2) I didnt not make up an imaginary quote from Lanes Lexicon as Apple Pie asserted. It is obvious the copy of Lanes work Apple has is by a different publication from what I had which was borrowed whereas he jumped to conclusion in assumption that we both had the same copy of Lane's work by the same publication. If they are from different publications then the pages will be numbered differently.
http://www.jesus-christ-forums.com/home/viewtopic ... 8799#58799
I dont know what your problem is but if the quotation is a lie why dont you post Lanes works showing something else different since you have the books with their page numbers ? All you have been doing is yapping.
Looks like you are lying again…this time to cover up your previous lies…this is evident from your usage of the word "yap"...which means that you are on the ropes...
Your lie has been duly noted here…
H20 also claims to have purchased yet another classic Arabic Lexicon…This time E.W. Lanes’ Arabic/English lexicon.
H20 begins to lie through his teeth by pulling an imaginary quote from Lane’s volume five; that he claims is on pp. 1113 – 1114.
Trouble is, Volume five does NOT begin until p. 1759…!
He cannot even lie very well…
http://www.jesus-christ-forums.com/home/viewtopic ... 6626#36626
You started lying even before you had access to Lane’s Lexicon.
Lane’s Lexicon comes in three flavors:
1) 8 volume book set
2) 2 volume Book set
3) CDROM (without page numbers)
We already know, from process of elimination, that you could not have quoted from the CDROM due to the fact that it contains
NO page numbers.
So…the CDROM is not a contender.
We also know that you quoted volume 5, which leaves out the two volume set.
So…the 2 volume set is not a contender.
That leaves ONLY the original 8 volume set (which I personally own)…..and guess what?
Volume five does not even begin until page 1759…!
A far cry from your imaginary “googled” guess of 1113 -1114…
So…yes…..you are caught in the act of lying.
Just be a man and admit that you lied…
Perhaps you did it in the name of your “god”…..or perhaps in the name of your false prophet…
Apple Pie wrote:
Please reference some classic Arabic grammar rule that would apply to your line of reasoning…
We already did, and you still wouldnt understand a twit if it was to slap you in the face. We even quoted Christian sources previously that even explained the grammar that it is not from Ilah :
Fact is…..you will need to know how to reference your position when you enter Junior High School next year…..
So…it’s never to early to start referencing your position…..with truthful references, that is….
Now…run along…