Christian/Muslim ThreadsWE, US. OUR !!!!!!!!!!Ok H2O I should have guessed you were going to fall into that hole, you do know what a phrase is don't you? it is obvious this is not your argument, see when you said: which part of the sentence were you referring to? en arche en ho logos kai ho logos en pros ton theon kai theos en ho logos houtos en en arche pros ton theon and when I said which part of the sentence do you think I am talking about? Do you know what a phrase is?? Do you know a phrase is limited to a sentence and not a completely different sentence? Let me elaborate for you what you have just done: John 1: 1 In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. (en arche en ho logos kai ho logos en pros ton theon kai theos en ho logos) There is no definite article in the final theos in this sentence because the noun has been defined from the context (pros ton theon "with God" is acting as the object of the verb)in other words the Word is with God and the Word was God ie the subject and object are of the same essence and there is still no ton or ho in the final case of theos in this phrase because the definite article of the object of the verb has already been defined in "pros ton theon" John 1:2 The same was in the beginning with God. (houtos en en arche pros ton theon) This is a completely different sentence and the noun has not been defined from the context hence the need for the definite article. You are basing your argument on a completely different sentence. |
🌈Pride🌈 goeth before Destruction
When 🌈Pride🌈 cometh, then cometh Shame