Sardab your post, which obviously is copyed from another website (as ussual), clearly reveals that Christians are not to fight, the revenge belongs to the Lord.
That is what we have been telling you all the time.
In your post, you were not able to present even one verse from the New Testament which permits attrocities, compare that to Islam (DO I NEED TO POST ALL THE PASSAGES AGAIN).
Your post even reveals that later Christians (if we can call them Christians) did not follow their Christian Scriptures, when considering a violent approach.
The again I have nowhere stated that a government should turn the other cheak in terms of crime or breaking of the Law. In fact the New Testament encourages the strictness of a government, yet at the same time the justice and balance of the government. This is not what is seen in Islam at all.
And no, we do not need the non-Christian to do the dirty job. Within any nation, a Christian is permitted to engage in legal matters, whether joining the police force or juridical system. In that case he will fulfil his job.
Say a nation is predominently Christian and the ruling body consists of Christians, law and order will still have to be implemented. Yet such needs not to be strictly thight to the Christian religion. In fact even nazi Germany despite its diabolical agenda fought injustice and crime. You certainly do not need a Christian or Islamic government to fulfil that role.
As to the crusades, the post reveals that this action was not according to Christianity either. Go ahead read the New Testament, in which passage is Jesus Christ glorified by the killing of non-Christian; but I think your post answers that.
So Sardab, again, what am I to defend, and what am I to be ashamed off?