Evidence for ID and creationrapid geologic processes
Hmm, as I mentioned earlier, there is no geologist who would disagree with the notion that some geologic processes happen quickly. I also noted the logical fallacy hinted at that says because one thing could happen quickly, they all could happen quickly. That's really what ye-creationists must document. Of course, tuppence is all too aware that all of this was hashed out in science some 150+ years ago to the satisfaction of all but a few dogmatic theocrats. That theocracy has held on to become 'modern' creation science, but the arguments are no stronger now than they were 150+ years ago. So, the question I pose to you again based on your OP is 'so what'? Your evidence is meaningless when it comes to showing the earth is young. -E |
🌈Pride🌈 goeth before Destruction
When 🌈Pride🌈 cometh, then cometh Shame