Nicolaj wrote:However, is it not just as rational to see it as women accepting anal sex with men rather than intercourse? They would be committing an act that does not procreate, thus it is a sin. They would be doing with men that which the men "in the same way" were doing with other men, which is in line with the text. And since the entire section of the text is concerned with lust and uncontrollable adultery without consideration for the results, then women allowing anal sex when there is a viable alternative...well, lets just say that fits as well!
I understood it to mean anal sex...but I now reading it again and considering...I expect it means both kinds...of sex because they are both un-natural