Sure, I will spell out why I used the word hyporisy.
- Joe Meert refuses to address the science of ID scientists because they have not been published in scienific journals.
- Joe Meert and the others call ID science psuedoscience.
- Joe Meert and the others admit they have not read the science of ID scientists, yet label their science psuedoscience based on point 1.
- Joe Meert and the others oppose ID because of its supposed socio-political agenda.
- Joe Meert and the others ignore the fact that Darwin, Lyell, and Huxley had a socio-political agenda.
- Joe Meert and others change the meaning of "evolution" at their convenience.
- Joe Meert and others are using non-scientific sources to denegrate a movement they admit they have not read.
- ID is not a "science"; ID is a method of approaching science in the same manner that all scientists approach science.
In other words Joe Meert and his cohorts have hit this board to denigrate the science of men without any intention of discussing science; there only goal is to disparage the socio-political basis of ID.
BTW, all life according to Darwin started with a one-celled animal and progressed to fish to reptiles and then to mammals so my statement although not perfect is accurate.
The Ancestors of Mammals
Or you can pick and choose which of the 150,000 sites to read by checking on this link:
http://www.google.com/search?sourceid=n ... to+mammals