slp wrote:Aineo wrote:I see a lot of double talk, if science does not involve proof why can you teach evolution as a fact? All you have are some people making educated guesses.
Isn't that better than a bunch of people making uneducated guesses?
Or a bunch of people making uneducated assertions?
However, evolutionary biology is nothing more than speculation based on what people want to see in the fossil record with no real application to everyday life. Evolution of reptiles to mammals, more speculation based on how some would interpret what they see.
And how would YOU interpret these things?
I have a BA in business from Western State College of Colorado. By profession I was an accountant. I know how one can make numbers do what you want numbers to do. In other words I know that "facts" can be manipulated to come to a false conclusion.
Since when are people earning BAs in business required to take science courses?
Tell me - how do you feel when people with, say, backgrounds in biology or physics make proclamations about business that you know are incorrect?
Do you nod in quiet assent, believing that all are entitled to their version of the facts, or do you try to correct their falsehoods?