We don't need another thread on evolution since about 1/2 of the threads in this forum deal with that one subject. And before you get going all of this has been discussed on other threads without evolutionists changing our minds.
What it boils down to is scientists want to use big words for something they cannot empirically prove. Microevolution has been observed, however macroevolution has not been empirically proven by anyone. Also there are eminent scientists who disagree with macroevolution and put forth sound arguments against the theory.
And another thing we don’t need is a scientific explanation of a “theory”. When I was taking science classes the current definition was yet future. Changing definitions to make a case is self-serving and does not establish truth.