Discussion dealing with the speed of light:
Speed of Light
badme, all examples used to show the validity of macroevolution are observations of microevolution. Despite what evolutionists want to believe there is no real evidence in the fossil record for macroevolution other than assumptions based on what evolutionists want to believe.
As to ignoring DNA, which is a blueprint for building an organism, have you ever checked blueprints for buildings? You may find this a weak analogy but no matter if you are building a one-room shack or a 100-story skyscraper the basic plan is the same. Therefore similarities in DNA can also be used to demonstrate intelligent design.
justforfun000, what is interesting about your link to the HIV causes AIDS site controversy is it can be used to question any scientific theory taught as fact. BTW, AIDS is not a disease. AIDS is an acronym for Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome. No one dies of AIDS; they die of cancer, pneumonia, organ failure or some other opportunistic disease. My brother’s death certificate listed his cause of death as liver failure. It does not mention he was being treated for cancer (KS) and other opportunistic diseases. My brother was never treated with antivirales. But then some people will discount this as personal experience and as anecdotal. This sites contention that people die as a result of the medications is both ludicrous and denies the fact that early victims of this pandemic were being treated for opportunistic diseases not the HIV virus. 60% of the early AIDS related deaths were due to Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia (PCP).
Now back on topic; science asks if something is true; science does not ask that something is true.