The post just preceding this one was by Admiral and had no substance other than mocking. It added nothing to the discussion. tuppence
***********
don't need fairy books. There are pictures of known large reptiles that don't exist now on some Roman pottery. The writings of Alexander's history are not fairy tales. The chronicles/histories of some of the Chinese dynasties are considered history. There is absolutely no need to go into even questionable evidence to know that men and dinosaurs were contemporaneous! It's just not acceptable today to consider seriously anything that does not 'fit' with current evolutionary theory!
I'll ask you to think about just one thing with as open a mind as you can. The Chinese 'zodiac' of animals that represent the different years (I'm not sure if it is called a zodiac... but I think you know what I mean: year of the dog, year of the rat, etc...) -- all are known real animals except one -- the dragon. WHY would they include the dragon in a list of normal, everyday animals? Could it have been that long ago the dragon was also a normal, everyday animal?
Just a thought. Just a sliver of evidence. But it fits with enough slivers to make something pretty substantial once you start researching the subject.