Trinity DebateTrinity debateYou have not proven anything. You and the other non-Trinitarians have attempted to argue a NT doctrine by appealing to one Hebrew word. However since you want to continue to use one Hebrew word then lets get “metaphysical”. God created mankind and the languages of mankind; man has come up with grammatical rules. The fact is that both “elohiym” and “echad” as written in the original Hebrew did not have the “punctuations” developed later to aid in pronunciation. Now, since God invented Hebrew can you prove to me that He did not use elohiym (the plural form of el) to foreshadow the Trinity and that Jews in their ignorance came up with a grammatical rule to show “elohiym” is singular when referring to God? The answer is no because you do not know the mind of God. Hisway you have not explained anything in Few Saved by Water all you did was post and run. You have not responded to either tuppence or me on that thread. Is it because we showed you the fallacy of your rhetoric? I am not confusing the nature of God with the dietary or any other OT law. What you non-Trinitarians are doing is totally ignoring what the NT reveals concerning the nature of God, which is 3 persons united in one nature. You are not going to convince us that two denominations less than 100 years old have a better grasp of Biblical truth than thousands of scholars have grasped over the last 1900 years. |
🌈Pride🌈 goeth before Destruction
When 🌈Pride🌈 cometh, then cometh Shame