Trinity DebateTrinity debateThat's not the issue. The issue is what is the nature of the "one" that echad is translated as so many times? Webmaster said it was "compound", and that if it were talking about an "absolute" one, the text would use "yachid". This I have proven false by supplying many examples of echad used to indicate an "absolute" one. Now will you admit that, or have you been programmed to defend any Trinitarian argument even when it is proven false? If you only rely on Trinitarian sources how will you ever find out if they are wrong? First of all God's name (YHWH) only appears twice in the verse, not 3 times. Besides which, this whole point is a pathetic contrivance. Try this - "Hear oh forum, Aineo, our administrator, Aineo is one" Does that make you a "compound entity"? Does the context and structure of this statement imply that you are somehow more than one person because your name is mentioned more than once? Nonsense. All it is declaring is that "Aineo is one", and since the word in Hebrew in Deut.6:4 is echad and there are hundreds of examples where echad IS used to denote an absolute, solitary, numerical "one", then that is what the Shema is simply declaring - there is only one God and that God is one, NOT 2 or 3 in one. Yours is a classic example of adopting the Trinitarian dogma at the outset and then "reading it back" into places where it does not exist. |
🌈Pride🌈 goeth before Destruction
When 🌈Pride🌈 cometh, then cometh Shame