Salaam Unite,
How I respond to Muslims and attention given to forum ( only 30+ posts since December '03) should be ample evidence of my "take it easy." Also, please understand, it's not up to you decide what is relevant to topic.
Maybe you recall the following statement.
"Take "everything should have a reason" argument for example. Even Gazzali says that this argument cannot be used to prove existence of God. Because existence of the Absolute Being cannot be proven using arguments that we cannot know that are absolute. What if that argument we derive by our mind is wrong. Common sense may tell that arguemtn is true, but is it really absolutely true. But beleievers here and there continue to use this argument. Because they cannot produce newer things." --Unite
The above is good of example of thoughts being a mile wide and an inch deep, and same theme is found in all your posts. Gazzali's proposition (and other notables) may have been an excellent tools for meaningful discussion, but your bent for the self-serving application renders them miserable. Ignorance and convenient fiction do not combine into common sense or sound reasoning, nor become truth by repetition and (supposedly) new productions. I have more to say, but I have already lectured enough.
Hopefully you will answer Liberate. Imo: he deserves to know how you formulated, innate human attribute with non-testable theory and concluded Islam. I truly wish the best for you, Unite.
regards, joseph