Aineo wrote:Non-Christian wrote:Aineo wrote:Actually in this stage of the investigation there are many sciences that can show Darwinian evolution is false. What evolutionists fail to take into account is life at the cellular level, which is extremely complex and cannot be explained by Darwins theory.
Life at the cellular level is complex? Compared to what?
Also keep in mind that Darwin's theories are old and have themselves evolved over time as new information is made available and new methods of research are discovered.
Besides, what's the alternative? The bible? A work of fiction created by man over 1000 years ago?
Compared to how Darwinian evolution depends on biological life developing from pond scum, which evolved from non-living geology. Have you ever heard of Michael J. Behe? Get his book "Darwin's Black Box; the Biochemical Challenge to Evolution". I could list many more books by eminent scientists in the fields of physics, astronomy, geology, philosophy of science, and other scientific disciplines that can show that Darwinian evolution cannot be substantiated by science and when these disciplines are added to the debate show how Darwinian evolution is nothing but a pipe dream. If you don't want to buy lots of individual books you can find a synopsis of the latest scientific evidence that defeats Darwinian evolution in just one book - The Case For A Creator by Lee Strobel, a Pulitzer Prize winning journalist (he also has a law degree) who abandoned his atheism after researching what real science has discovered in the last 50 years. I am not talking about creationist scientists who use science to prove a 6 day creation, but scientists who use the scientific method to uncover and explain the laws of science. If you want to read what some other scientists believe then you can get "In 6 Days; Why Fifty Scientists Choose to Believe in Creation". Here again the 50 include scientists not usually associated with creation science.
I have never accepted Darwinian evolution since to me it is illogical to believe that rocks and chemicals can produce biology or that random chance can produce the plethora of life on this planet. Study the science of DNA and you will find that DNA can defeat Darwinian evolution. The preponderance of real scientific evidence does not point to evolution.
I have studied the science of DNA. Let me ask you some questions:
Why do humans share 50% of the SAME EXACT DNA as every other animal?
Why do humans and chimpanzees share 98% of the same DNA?
How do you explain the speciation of animals like dogs?
Now, one other thing I would like to know is why you keep referring to "Darwinian evolution" as opposed to just "evolution"? Surely you believe that what Darwin said has not remained the ONLY chain of thought regarding evolution, right? That's like referring to the "Talmud bible" instead of just "bible"...