Aineo, could we leave evolution itself out of this one? [not only cos i'm not an expert on it, but ther are a whole lot of other threads focusing on it]. Why don't we have a look at the whole astronomy for ancient universe lark, I know you've got knowledge in this area too, and it would be good to discuss it with other Christians, as well as others on the forum.
Ecclesiastices76, we're not rubbishing you or your beliefs, but DrDino and his webpages are, to be honest, bo**ox. Talk of the speed of light "decaying" is equivocal to saying that the number one is slightly less than it used to be. In his page he's keen to claim that astronomers can only guess distances in space, but does not elucidate on the plethora of alternative means they utilise other than parallax.
More worryingly, he goes on to talk about cooling light down, seconds after claiming that no-one knows exactly WHAT light is! You can only cool down actual matter, by definition, so how he interprets cooling light down I do not know. More importantly, if the speed of light had been shown to vary in a vacuum beyond experimental uncertainty, it would be no little thing. Not just a notion pasted on a website or a couple of articles in a magazine. Ask any physics professor at any university, and they'll tell you just how much.
Breaking the speed of light would mean the removal of one of the most scientifically verified theories of all time. The accuracy of general relativity has been tested to a degree almost unimaginable. In fact, it's the science that claims the universe actually has a beginning.
In short, claiming that the constancy of light is insubstantial enough to produce worthy debate in other fields is akin to saying arithmetic can't be used to count apples.
Nick