eccozmaig wrote:The bible is an unreliable historical document. The new testament was written 400 years after what they are written about [thats not what makes it unreliable]. What makes it unreliable is the fact that a group of people came together to write it, if they were written independantly of eachother then it would be reliable because that significantly redouces the chance of a lie. There are no letters from Romans mentioning Jesus, someone who causes that much of a stir should get lots of recognition from the people of the day. We have letters from medium ranking soldiers, Jesus should have been far more important than them.
The only real proof of Jesus is the bible.
*what i wrote may not have been written very well, if you need clarification because what i said was not comprehensable just ask"
eccozmaig, you still have not brought forth your evidence and all that you have said is hearsay which is exactly what the the da vinci code is. Unless you can give resources to your claim, I will not hesitate to have your post remove.
Also, one more time and this is the last time....READ the
Forum Rules. I edited two of you post so fair for language.