Rejoicing and Praising Jesus Christ Forum!The irrationality of SalvationI just read about Stephen`s announcement myself, neat. Actually it has everything to do with it. Every creationist theory seems to have to parallel scripture. The big question is why creationists continuously claim science can`t explain this or that, so the result must be that a select group of Hebrews who lived 2500-3000 years ago and innocently started what would become one of the largest religious beliefs in the world must be right. This is probably the biggest answer I would like to hear, because it makes the least sense. Back to evolution, The theory doesn`t describe one species suddenly transforming into a species of a completely different family. If this were observed, Evo theory would be proven false in every aspect. You seem to be imagining that the appearances of new species is a sudden event. Evolution is based on tiny changes, gradual changes. It has been observed in the fossil record in some species but obviously not all. Yes this includes man. The problem with fossils is they need to have the right conditions to last for so long. Odds are actually against fossilization of animal remains. The Evolutional theory says that since we can see these observed changes in a species, we know that evolution occurs, so even though we have missing data on human developement we can theorise that all species go through an evolutionary process. It`s quite sound, and it works. As for your eyeball talk, Evolution theory does not say that a blind animal suddenly gave birth to one with an eye. There are many examples of creatures on the earth with everything from complex eyeballs to blindness. There are even simple organisms with light-sensitive single cells. "Mitochodrial Eve" as you bring up existed 200,000 years ago. The science used traces our DNA back to her bloodline. The results are not said to be perfectly accurate, but for some reason our species "bottlenecked" at a certain point in time. Eve most certainly had ancestors, by that I mean there was a multiple of Eves before her Genes managed to dominate. The reason we can`t trace any further is because of this "bottleneck". But how does this help your case when The projected timeline extends back 200,000 years? Mitochondrial Eve is only beneficial to the evolution camp I`m afraid. Theoretical science is based on observation and is open to alteration through continued observation, you don`t seem open to observation though? Come on man, similarities in my last dump can be used to demonstrate a divine designer. There really isn`t any cap on what you could attribute to a designer, and I can`t follow you into the realm of the supernatural. |
🌈Pride🌈 goeth before Destruction
When 🌈Pride🌈 cometh, then cometh Shame