Reply
Here's the NIV explanation for the mistake that is found in 2 Samuel 21:19
<I>Elhanan...killed Goliath.</I> See NIV text note. Since it is clear from 1Sa 17 that David killed Goliath, it is possible that an early copyist misread the Hebrew for "Lahmi the brother of" (see 1Ch 20:5) as "the Bethelehemite" (in Hebrew the word for "killed stands first in the clause).
Once again, I'm tired of people preaching that the KJV is the only true Bible out there. (I'm not including you in this rant, Eddie.)
Also, the "morning star" thing. Satan is known for wanting to imitate the Lord in every way. So it would make sense that he would want to be called the "morning star," since Jesus is known as the Bright and Morning Star. Perhaps the person who wrote this article failed to realize that the Hebrew for "morning star" is translated "Lucifer" in the Latin Vulgate.
Daniel 3:25 notes - See Ps 91:9-12. <I>son of the gods.</I> Nebuchadnezzar was speaking as a pagan polytheist and was content to conceive of the fourth figure as a lesser heavenly being (v.28) sent by the all-powerful God of the Israelites.
Isaiah 14:2-15 notes: Some believe that Isaiah is giving a description of the fall of Satan (cf. Lk 10:18 - where, however, Jesus seems to be referring to an event contemporary with himself). But the passage clearly applies to the king of Babylon, who is later used as a type (prefiguration) of the "beast" who will lead the Babylon of the last days (see Rev 13:4; 17:3). Cf. the description of the ruler of Tyre in Eze 28.
Anyway, I'm finished playing the "my Bible's better than your Bible" game. The message is still the same.
BTW: You're forgiven, Eddie.