I have been far to busy lately to be able to sit down and respond to all the replies from Muslims on the post 'Sexual attrocities in Islam'. However, a lot of issue that come out are sidetracking, such as the issues on slavery.
As someone has noted, oh I will rob the bank but dont worry I will bring some of the money back later.
As the first post clearly revealed, Muhammad and his followers, took captive women as slaves, these women were raped on the battlefields, possibly gang-raped, and the nightmare continued as these women were shared among the Muslim males who used them for sexual activities in addition to their wives.
As I also pointed to with the evidences from the Hadiths, young girls down to the age of nine were married to fifty year old men, and most probably raped under Islamic invasions.
That Muhammad at the age of 56 or so, engaged in sexual relationship to a nine year old girl, is nothing but pedofilism.
The argument that she had reached puberty leads nowhere, since girls are not sexually mature until at least three years after puberty, thus sexual activity can damage them dreadfully.
I have lived in Muslim countries, my wife is from a Muslim country, I do know what is going on, and there are tens of thousands of little girls in the world today who are sexually damaged both physically and mentally because and old guy has touched them around their body and penetrated them.
As for Aisha, how would a nine year old girl take it, when a man old enough to be her grandfather undressed her, sexually touched her, and penetrated her. Are we saying this man was a prophet, a man of God, the zeal of prophethood?
I dont think so!