For some strange reason my edited post made some 9 hours before yours didn't get through in time it seems.
I am well aware you would use "elevated allah over hubal" that is one of the reasons why I edited the post, without stressing on what type of elevation I meant (Mohammed simply made allah invisible to make islam in line with the jews and christians according to one of the 10 commandments thou shalt have no graven images, if he wanted the jews and christians to come along to his religion this is one of the most logical things to do, but the jews and christians were laughing at him (read the hadiths) thats why he hated them so much).
Without the need to double post, I suggest you have a look at my post again.
And for all those reading this thread the reason why our friend is so adamant to defend allah against hubal is for this simple reason:
hubal ...hu'baal...ha'baal...BAAL.
Baal meant lord, ha'baal meant the lord, as al ilah meant the god. This is the same god that was warned about numerous times in the old testament yet it just seemed to reincarnate itself.
Now you see why our friend is so quick to put rest to the matter that allah is not hubal, it opens up a whole can of worms.