Science, Creation & EvolutionBig Bang Beats Bible?Well, it certainly wouldn't make sense to interpret the Bible in such a way as to be detrimental to Christianity and the Word of God, would it? The Bible is the ultimate authority. Good science will not disagree with it. If it does, then the science needs to be reevaluated, not the Bible. God has promised that His Word will never change, so coming up with some new interpretation just to fit modern science is not a proper way to look at the Bible. Perhaps a better way of looking at things would be to turn this statement around. We should be interpreting science in different ways in order to match Biblical fact. The Bible is authoritative and is never in error. Science is conducted by sinful men who are capable of error. The problem is that the unproven and unprovable fact of science flies in complete contradiction to what is stated in the Bible. The only way to find millions of years in the Bible is to read them into it. "Science says there must be millions of years. The Bible doesn't really say that or even hint at that possibility. So what we'll do is add a ton of time between Gen 1:1 and Gen 1:2, or maybe we'll pick a more convenient definition of the word yom, even though it's unprecedented, so that it fits our ideas." I still have yet to see any Scripture that leads to a conclusion of millions of years. If you start out with the Bible, then you come up with a young earth. If you start out with science, then you'll say millions of years, and you have no choice, if you also want to believe the Bible, but to twist what the Bible says to get it to fit what science claims. |
🌈Pride🌈 goeth before Destruction
When 🌈Pride🌈 cometh, then cometh Shame