Whoa.... Time out both sides. Let's not get bitchy about this. Water under the bridge and all that........
Let's focus:
Radiometric dating: Not a fact?
Evidence to back this up which has not been refuted earlier in this thread? [Particularly in the big link I posted]
If there are still doubts I'll do my best to explain the physics behind it, I've just done a course on nuclear physics, focusing on radioactive decay, and might be able to shed some light on any confusion if needed.
What any proponents of "recent" dinosaurs need to do here is succesfully explain why the VAST majority of dinosaur remains found date to a time considerably earlier than the scientific and biblical ascent of man.
What I believe is that the notion of an ancient earth with prehistoric creatures is not mutually exclusive with an inerrant Bible, and I'm hoping some of the obdurate fundamentalists here might start to agree with me...
God Bless
Nick