Science, Creation & EvolutionDinosaurI did not suggest anything. These scientist did: (McDougall, A.A. Polach and J.J. Stipp, "Excess Radiogenic Argon in Young Subaerial Basalts From Auckland Volcanic Field, New Zealand," Geochemica et Cosmochemica Acta 33:1485-1520, 1969.)
Then you must agree that the carbon dating method is absurd because the original test found the lava to be 485,000 years old and yet you just claim otherwise. The point is, you can't trust the carbon dating logic because it still based on assumptions. |
🌈Pride🌈 goeth before Destruction
When 🌈Pride🌈 cometh, then cometh Shame