Science, Creation & EvolutionDarwin...did he recantI think you missed the point. Creation is the option, not the assertion. I don't need evidence "for creation", the evidence against evolution is empherical and as much evidence "for" creation as anything direct. You seem to not understand that the posited explanation for life is "evolution", hence, the evidence should support that. Dr.'s Ross and Rana, would disagree with me somewhat, and they have a book entitled "Origins of Life: Theories face off"...it deals with the testable creation vs. evolution models, and the evidence for both. There are certain predictions that evolution would exect to see if it is true, and certain predictions that we can follow from the theory of creation, and empherically observe to see if they are true. Their book evalutates the data from both theories to see which fits observational data the best. They actually propose a "testable and verifiable" creation model, that they have presented in many major university settings, and asked for them to find any data to disprove the theory. To date, their theory is holding up very well against all evolutinary models, and in fact, better. I recommend you read their book. |
🌈Pride🌈 goeth before Destruction
When 🌈Pride🌈 cometh, then cometh Shame