Science, Creation & EvolutionNoah catching his animals...
So when God said "behold the behemoth," He really should have said "here, look at this picture of a dinosaur from millions of years ago"? :roll: The whole point of the passage was that God was proving His power to Job. Do you think God would have made an argument for His power on the basis of a picture or some vision that He put in Job's head, and do you think if He did that Job would have accepted that as proof? The whole scientific community wants tangible evidence as proof that something is the way it is. Yet when God, who is held to a higher standard, offers proof of something, you're content to say that the proof he offered was really nothing more than a picture? BTW, thanks for the link about the 2nd law. I look forward to reading it! |
🌈Pride🌈 goeth before Destruction
When 🌈Pride🌈 cometh, then cometh Shame