Science, Creation & EvolutionGenesis Wrong => Bible Wrong?If this was ture, then you skepticism would be valid. Unfortunately, your statement is a wrong one, because Paul does not contradict the teachings of Christ. And you do not have to worry about the innerrancy of scripture. All the evidence the Holy Bible has to support it shows its innerrancy. (Scratched out letters and faded words in old manuscripts--things of that nature--have nothing to do with inerrancy. Inerrancy has to deal with the true interpretation of scripture and what it generally teaches). Has it ever occured to you that the sons of Adam and Eve married the daughters of Adam and Eve? God condemned incest when man started to grow in large number, not at the beginning of creation. But is it true that God created Adam and Eve first, then other humans? I don't know. The Holy Bible does not mention that, but it is not out of the realm of the possibility. The thing is, whatever Genesis says happened, that's what happened. There might have been other stuff that happened which Genesis does not mention and has nothing to do with our salvation, but whatever Genesis says happened, it happened. Why do I say this? Because the Holy Bible time and time again shows that it is Divine rather than human in origin. And that's the point of this whole topic. If Genesis is wrong, then the Bible is no longer Divine because in many other parts in the Bible, it makes a referance to the accounts in Genesis. And if those accounts are wrong, the books who make reference to those accounts are wrong. But fortunately, the Holy Bible is inerrant. |
🌈Pride🌈 goeth before Destruction
When 🌈Pride🌈 cometh, then cometh Shame