Science, Creation & EvolutionRadiometric Dating.......Chrys, I am not sure your take on this subject from the above post, but it seems that both papers you linked are supporting the relative accuracy of Old Earth theory. Science deals with repeatability, and preponderance of evidence. Scripture relies on Gods character as trustworthy and never deceiptful. Here is a quote from your second link: "Experimentation has determined that the rate of production of radiocarbon in the earth's atmosphere is not constant. This is due to variations in the heliomagnetic modulation of the galactic cosmic radiation. Differences of several percent have been observed in the radiocarbon concentrations of contemporary plants. Dating errors, independent of statistics or laboratory procedures, caused by these variations in the sun's magnetic field, can be as much as several hundred of years. It is generally considered that four radiocarbon dates on a specific feature is sufficient to identify the occurrence of this error." All this report is saying is it takes more than one test to get within a small window of accuracy, it does not say they are not reliabable tests. Maybe you can clerify for me where you stand on this issue. |
🌈Pride🌈 goeth before Destruction
When 🌈Pride🌈 cometh, then cometh Shame