Christian/Muslim Threadsa must readPeace Humbleguest, Fixation? You mean like you have a fixation on how our bible is corrupted and doesn't promote the coming of your beloved mohammed? Ok then tell me this. If you are not concerned, why not? Wouldn't it bother you if something that you are trying to use to state that Jesus is only the messenger has no other binding evidence that supports it? Wouldn't it bother you or make you think that maybe there is something wrong with the Gob all together? If you are not interested, then you shouldn't bring it into the debate because as you know, it will be debunked like all of the other arguments you and your friends have tried to use. So since the dialogue is "similar" as you state it, that means it's valid? I can learn a different language or be a part of some other organization that is going against some "party" as such. I can learn their dialect and come up with my own story just to prove everyone wrong who is against them? That's not a valid logical thought. They were asking John the Baptist these questions, not Jesus. Are we talking about John the Baptist or Jesus here? I thought we were trying to disprove that Jesus is only a prophet. How did John the Baptist get involved all of a sudden? But you failed to go on with this and you will see: John 1 26-27 : John told them, "I baptize with water, but right here in the crowd is someone you do not know, who will soon begin his nimistry. I am not even worthy to be his slave." Try again. =) If that's the case, why did this person translate it to this? False. Please prove this. I can ask you the same question. How closely did Mohammed even know God? He got testimony from a so called angel to give out the will of God. He couldn't read or write so he would have to tell his "stories" to some people. How well is word of mouth going from one person to the next and then to the next when they had to write it down? Why was only Zaid the only one to have his recordings be official whilst others were destroyed? Actions speak louder than words. Let's not ad hominem here. The quran is not the final statement. The quran also has contridictions of their own. You just fell into your own words with the gob because I don't regard it as anything but heresy. However you were the one that wanted to bring it up into the argument and both Believer and I have debunked it. If anyone has issues with picking and choosing, I would believe that to be you since you state that the Bible is corrupted and only "some" of the passages in the Bible can be believed. I accept the entire bible to be true. I'm not picking and choosing here. "but rather to fufil it." since 2/3rd of the OT were phrophesy of His coming.
That's a simple excuse. You need to prove without a doubt that gob is relevant to quran or else your entire argument is debunked. Since you cannot do that, you have nothing to stand on. You can't see that you're picking and choosing here? You want to show a without a doubt document providing that Jesus is only the prophet. Try another heretic story and we can see if we can help you find the "proof" you're looking for. I know you won't be able to do it. 1-The only? why? because it has Muhammed in there? Give me a break. Try harder. If there were at least 3 more "books" like this, then MAYBE we would think otherwise. Just taking the statement of only one person claiming to be one of Jesus' disciples is going to make me change my mind. People lie all the time. You only need one liar to make problems in a community. 2-Actually we can't tell you that since they are all heretic. LOL HOwever, if you do read them, let me know, but from what I've seen so far, the Book of Mary supports the NT, SHEPHEARD OF HERMES. Epistle of Barnabas as well. I guess I could go on, but you wouldn't believe me anyway. 3- Trust me, I don't get angry so easily as you would like to think. I'm actually very entertained thank you very much. Peace to you too. |
🌈Pride🌈 goeth before Destruction
When 🌈Pride🌈 cometh, then cometh Shame