ThirdAndLong wrote:Alpha wrote:
Therefore the argument still stands that those 7 books which you mentioned have not proven to be authentic. And Christ did not refer to the "removed books."
They haven't been proven false either since they were a part of the Septuagint which was the Bible of the Apostles ..and BTW Jesus never discounted them ..makes you wonder whether their removal in fact violated the law in Deuteronomy 4:2 ? and if they unlawfully removed : chances are they unlawfully added & altered .
Yes, but if something is claimed to be a part of the word of God, and has no evidence to back it up whatsoever, then why should it be included? Especially since it is essentially God who provides man with the evidence so that we can discern the truth.