Alpha my friend
I didn't at all supported brother ThirdAndLong in that thread.
I just posted 2 replies there:
In my first reply, I was just objecting why Believer used Encyclopedias to authenticate his claims and earlier he refused my posts whenever I used Encyclopedias :
Well it's really weird how rabbi Believer now count on Encyclopedias!!! In "The Bible is accurate " thread, when Encarta Encyclopedia told Believer that many civilisations arose before 3700 BC, Believer refused Encarta and was still insisting that all civilisations existed in 3200 BC to justify the Adam existence error in the Holy Bible!!! Failed, then Believer turned into symbolic genealogies!!!
Now we see rabbi Believer counting on Encyclopedias to justify his sayings.
Double standards Rabbi????
In my second reply, I just said that the Kaaba subjest was discussed in full details in another thread, so why do we have to repeat the same song each time, and more I asked brother ThirdAndLong to stop arguing about this subject:
Why did the descendants of Abraham in the Holy Bible choose a stone to perform their religious service on or around it? Genesis 28:10-22, Genesis 35, Genesis 31:45-55.
Brother ThirdAndLong you don't have to argue here, each time they will repeat the same song. The Kaaba was discussed in details in another thread and they still going in circles and still coming back to the same question.
I didn't support anything in that thread.
I read the number 19 theory in the Noble Qur'an and I found that verses was manipulated by Mr Khalife so he can reach its conclusion. Mathematically and statically speaking, this number 19 theory is not accurate at all (at least to me).
The same is applied to the Holy Bible.
Alexei