Peace Alexei,
You've just given me a load of your typical jibberish.
Have you even read through the site? This isn't about me at all, it's all about your Quran.
Believer you keep going in circles and circles and keep repeating like a parrot the same song. Most of your questions have been refuted in "Could Allah have a son" thread and you keep repeating and repeating and repeating your same shallow heresies.
You're keeping repeating the same things always and always till we got bored
You're being an idiot.
This is all very new.
These are all facts.
When will your misguided soul realize that the Quran is an eclectic book that has borrowed loads of things from mystical Jewish texts and other sources?
The Noble Qur'an tells us that Solomon wrote a letter to the Queen of Sheba beginning with Bismillah ir-rahman ir-rahim (In the name of Allah, Most Gracious, Most Merciful) (27:30).
Thus the Noble Qur'an itself leads to the clear conclusion that this expression was used long before Islam by the prophets of God.
So since this expression existed long before Zoroastrians, so one must ask: Who borrow from who ?
First of all, I don't believe a word the Quran says.
It's a book of falsehood and lies meant to decieve idiots like you.
Second of all, Zoroaster lived way before Solomon.
So if this Believer critic has discovered a like phrase in Zoroastrian scriptures, that actually confirms the conclusion we reach from the Noble Qur'an that this phrase was used before by all the prophets of God. His discovery goes to show the truth of the Noble Qur'an being Divinely revealed, the opposite of what he intended to prove !
It only confirms that the Quran BORROWED many different things.
The Avesta and the Bible didn't come from the same God.
Allah must be Ahura Mazda and Yahweh at the same time for your statement to be true.
Yahweh isn't Ahura Mazda--you have a predicament!
And we still find some stooges who still repeating and repeating and repeating that The Noble Qur'an copied or borrowed from the Bible ? So why didn't the Noble Qur'an borrow the stupid Biblical appearance of Adam in 3796 BC ? And why didn't the Noble Qur'an borrow the naive Biblical Universal flood in 2000 BC ? And why didn't the Noble Qur'an the idotic Biblical expression "and there was an evening and there was a morning" ? And why didn't the Noble Qur'an borrow the ignorant Biblical rabbit who turned into a ruminant animal ? And why didn't the Noble Qur'an borrow the alien Biblical insect with four legs ? And why didn't the Noble Qur'an borrow the flagrant Biblical error of space emptiness ? And why didn't the Noble Qur'an borrow the gullible Biblical pillars of earth and heaven? etc..
3796 BC? Adam lives about 900 years!
You're taking every line of early Genesis way way too literally, very unwise.
OH YEAH, these are real hot reasons to dump an entire holy book.
Rabbits and cud! Come one!
Go on and keep giving me your jibberish.
It's quite a proven fact that the Quran borrows so many things from apocryphal Jewish, Christian, and Zoroastrian books.
Keep denying reality man. :roll:
Check this out:
Qoran refers to priests competing as to who would raise Mary. They throw their rods into the river, only Zacharias’ rod floats [ from the History of our Holy Father the Aged, the Carpenter (Joseph), Arabic Apocryphal Book] ;
How did that myth from an ARABIC APOCRYPHAL BOOK made it's way into the Quran.
Gee, does it take a rocket scientist to figure this out?
Oh wait! Muhammed was an Arab, right?
Did he have access to these crazy apocryphal Jewish and ARABIC books?