Not to sound silly, but what questions?
answer?
Gospels describing the court scene failed to produce one piece of evidence which would prove the identity of the accused.
Now if we examine the answers the accused gave in court will surely indicate that the accused could probably not be Jesus.
Luke :"67: "If you are the Christ, tell us." But he said to them, "If I tell you, you will not believe;
68: and if I ask you, you will not answer. "
when he was asked a point blank question :"Are you the Son of God, then?" And he said to them, "You say that I am."
A clear statement of defense, he is saying YOU SAY I AM THE SON OF GOD but he still gave no clear answer. Furthermore, add to the fact that when he died he said :" God, God, why have you forsaken me" this is a statement that is the least below the dignity of a leader.
MAtthew has a similar account but the other two gospels don't. None of the Gospels agree on these important facts.
Here is what Mark had to say about the account:
Mark:"61: But he was silent and made no answer. Again the high priest asked him, "Are you the Christ, the Son of the Blessed?"
62: And Jesus said, "I am; and you will see the Son of man seated at the right hand of Power, and coming with the clouds of heaven."63: And the high priest tore his garments, and said, "Why do we still need witnesses?
64: You have heard his blasphemy. What is your decision?" And they all condemned him as deserving death.
Obviously the gospels don't even agree on what Jesus really said in the court or when he died. They totally depended on witnesses. Different witnesses report different things.
One more thing that just came up to my mind. Why did the Jews fail to understand their scriptures which they have been reading for thousands of years and know that GOD will come down and die. Why is it that only Paul is the one who got it all?
That's part of my original post whihc wasn't answered.
7 All who see me mock me;
they hurl insults, shaking their heads:
8 "He trusts in the LORD ;
let the LORD rescue him.
Let him deliver him,
since he delights in him."
-Pslam 22:7-8
He didn't rescue him man according to your belief.
35When they had crucified him, they divided up his clothes by
casting lots
heh
Isn't this amazing!
How can this be dismissed?
Isn't this enough proof for the Crucifiction?
Isaiah and David didn't know that they were prophecizing.
Since they wrote under the influence of the Holy Spirit, they wrote esoteric prophecies into their writings.
I would be more than impossible for these prophecies to of been for another person. These and many other are clearly for Jesus Christ
Search yahoo man. See how jewish scholars interpret all this. David and Isaiah never referred to Jesus. You really need to read about this subject man. I have a bunch of jewish books that amazingly tell you why David sang this song. It's never meant to be for Jesus man, because according to your belief God never SAVED him.