ah...but zams2001
what we are doing here is definitely debate.. I've told you what I believe and given you chance to "debate" it and prove me wrong or "argue" with me about it. By not being willing to give me your belief system, arn't you giving the impression mine might be true?
In order for true debate to take place, each person has a certain amount of time to speak to their point of view and why their point of view is the true one.
In this case, I've taken the biblical view as my point of view that history and the Bible narrative themselves to do two things 1. confirm the Bible and what it says of itself and of God, and 2. pointed out that history confirms the Bible and it's historicity, and have expressed it here..
now, what do you personally believe about these things and what do you have to support your viewpoints?
When I present the plan of salvation as Christians know it and believe it.. you can then present your version of how we can be "saved" according to a Muslim perspective.
Debate has as it's purpose to sway the thinking of the listeners towards your point of view.. in this case my point of view is that "there is no other name under heaven by which you can be saved."