The moon god - al-ilah

Archived and locked <i>Read Only</i>
Light
Preacher
Preacher
Posts: 458
Joined: Wed Aug 06, 2003 05:43 pm

The moon god - al-ilah

Postby Light » Sun Nov 16, 2003 09:11 pm

Moon worship has been practiced in Arabia since 2000 BC. The crescent moon is the most common symbol of this pagan moon worship as far back as 2000 BC, in Mecca, there was a god named Hubal who was Lord of the Kabah and this Hubal was a moon god. The idol of moon god Hubal was placed upon the roof of the Kaba about 400 years before Muhammad,This may in fact be the origin of why the crescent moon is on top of every minaret at the Kaba today and the central symbol of Islam atop of every mosque throughout the world:

About four hundred years before the birth of Muhammad one Amr bin Lahyo ... a descendant of Qahtan and king of Hijaz, had put an idol called Hubal on the roof of the Kaba. This was one of the chief deities of the Quraish before Islam. (Muhammad The Holy Prophet, Hafiz Ghulam Sarwar (Pakistan), p 18-19, Muslim)



The moon god was also referred to as "al-ilah". This is not a proper name of a single specific god, but a generic reference meaning "the god". Each local pagan Arab tribe would refer to their own local tribal pagan god as "al-ilah". "al-ilah" was later shortened to Allah before Muhammad was born in 610 AD.

There is evidence that Hubal was referred to as "Allah".
When Muhammad came along, he dropped all references to the name "Hubal" but retained the generic "Allah".
Muhammad retained almost all the pagan rituals of the Arabs at the Kaba and redefined them in monotheistic terms.
Regardless of the specifics of the facts, it is clear that Islam is derived from paganism that once worshiped a moon-god.
Although Islam is today a monotheist religion, its roots are in paganism.

oneGOD
Preacher
Preacher
Posts: 565
Joined: Sun Oct 12, 2003 08:25 am

Postby oneGOD » Sun Nov 16, 2003 09:32 pm

Sup,

This has been discussed before anyway. Allah means God in Arabic. How can a monotheist religion be derived from a pagan religion. HUbal had daughters as angels asthose pagans claimed and they fought Muhammad because he told them that this god of moon was false and there is only one true God creator of the universe that can not be an idol or a stone.

Al-ilah ---> single form
aliha ---> plural form

Allah--> only single and can not have a plural form. Just like elohim which is really similar to arabic word allah.

Allah clearly defined himself in the Quran as the God of everything not the Moon God. If Islam was derived from a pagan religion, then at least the moon god would have claimed to create everything and still keep the name moon god or hubal. If the moon god was Allah then muhammad wouldn't have destroyed Hubal when he took Mecca back.

And for your information. Meccans believed in Allah as creator of everything and they also believed that Hubal (moon god) was helping God rule everything.

The claim that Islam came from a pagan religion is rather funny to me. To us the God of the OT is the same God as the Quran which is the creator of everything.

The moon sign was used later hundreds of years after Muhammad, I believe that this sign resembles how we follow the moon calendar especially for determining Ramadan.

Light
Preacher
Preacher
Posts: 458
Joined: Wed Aug 06, 2003 05:43 pm

Postby Light » Sun Nov 16, 2003 09:58 pm

I swear by the moon, And the night when it departs, And the daybreak when it shines; Surely it (hell) is one of the gravest (misfortunes)" (Koran 74:32)

But nay! I swear by the sunset redness, And the night and that which it drives on, And the moon when it grows full, That you shall most certainly enter one state after another. But what is the matter with them that they do not believe, And when the Qur'an is recited to them they do not make obeisance? (Koran 84:16)

Yusuf Ali comments on these two passages:

"Nay, verily by the Moon," Yusuf Alli comments, "The moon was worshipped as a deity in times of darkness." (Qur'an, translated by Yusuf Ali, footnote 5798, pg. 1644, explanation of why the Qur'an swears by the moon in Surah 74:32)


Interesting....

Image



Harran, City of the Moon God Image
At the Northernmost end of the Sumerian empire the city of Harran likewise had the Moon Deity as patron God, under the name of Sin. From about 2000 BC to 1200 AD Harran continued an evolving tradition of Moon God worship. Harran is the place of Abraham's family and ancestors and the centre of many of the early events of genesis, including the naming of Israel. As described by Ezekiel 27:23, Harran along with Sheba and other cities were traders 'in blue clothes and broidered work, in chests of rich apparel , bound with cords and made of cedar.'

Light
Preacher
Preacher
Posts: 458
Joined: Wed Aug 06, 2003 05:43 pm

Postby Light » Sun Nov 16, 2003 10:07 pm

An interesting note...

Hubal was the Lord of the Kabah, being the highest ranking god of the 360 gods worshipped in the Kabah. Allah however was also worshipped as the Lord of the Kabah, yet, Allah was never represented by any idol of physical nature.

Was Allah Hubal?
Did the Arabs stand beside Hubal and pray to him, referring to him as Allah.

Hmm, before Muhammad appeared, the Kaaba was surrounded by 360 idols, and every Arab house had its god. Arabs also believed in jinn (subtle beings), and some vague divinity with many offspring. Among the major deities of the pre-Islamic era were al-Lat ("the Goddess"), worshiped in the shape of a square stone; al-Uzzah ("the Mighty"), a goddess identified with the morning star and worshiped as a thigh-bone-shaped slab of granite between al Talf and Mecca; Manat, the goddess of destiny, worshiped as a black stone on the road between Mecca and Medina; and the moon god, Hubal, whose worship was connected with the Black Stone of the Kaaba.

oneGOD
Preacher
Preacher
Posts: 565
Joined: Sun Oct 12, 2003 08:25 am

Postby oneGOD » Sun Nov 16, 2003 10:09 pm

An advice?

Don't use Yusuf Ali's translation man, it has proven really out of context.

Here is abetter translation: (READ IT ALL NOT JUST ONE LINE)

[74:32] Absolutely, (I swear) by the moon
[74:33] And the night as it passes.
[74:34] And the morning as it shines.
[74:35] This is one of the great miracles

[84:16] I solemnly swear by the rosy dusk.
[84:17] And the night as it spreads.
[84:18] And the moon and its phases.
[84:19] You will move from stage to stage.

Did you not read what I wrote above? or should I write it again?

Allah clearly defined himself in the Quran as the God of everything not the Moon God. If Islam was derived from a pagan religion, then at least the moon god would have claimed to create everything and still keep the name moon god or hubal. If the moon god was Allah then muhammad wouldn't have destroyed Hubal when he took Mecca back.

And for your information. Meccans believed in Allah as creator of everything and they also believed that Hubal (moon god) was helping God rule everything.


Did I not tell you that this symbol is used hundredsd of years after the prophet Muhammad, or would you rather live in denial about it?///////

oneGOD
Preacher
Preacher
Posts: 565
Joined: Sun Oct 12, 2003 08:25 am

Postby oneGOD » Sun Nov 16, 2003 10:17 pm

I just realizede we were responding at the same time. You talked about Hubal and how they associated him with God when I write that before you even responded. So please, if you are to respond : Fully read what I wrote other wise your just putting your thoughts and not discussing things.

Islam removed all those gods Meccans used to worship, there is no moon god or elephants god none of that. Pure worship of the One and only God.

[112:1] Proclaim, "He is the One and only GOD
[112:2] "The Absolute GOD
[112:3] "Never did He beget. Nor was He begotten.
[112:4] "None equals Him."

Light
Preacher
Preacher
Posts: 458
Joined: Wed Aug 06, 2003 05:43 pm

Postby Light » Sun Nov 16, 2003 10:25 pm

Did I not tell you that this symbol is used hundredsd of years after the prophet Muhammad, or would you rather live in denial about it?///////


The symbol is used over and over again hundreds of years before Muhammad also, where else do you think Muhammad got the symbol from?


I have seen Yusuf Ali mentioned on every Muslim site i Have visited, Is not Yusuf Ali a reputable souce?

oneGOD
Preacher
Preacher
Posts: 565
Joined: Sun Oct 12, 2003 08:25 am

Postby oneGOD » Sun Nov 16, 2003 10:28 pm

I don't think Yusuf ALi is a good source since he made alot of mistakes translating the Holy Quran.

However, Muhammad never used that symbol. There are some Hadiths that comdemn using that symbol also.

Light
Preacher
Preacher
Posts: 458
Joined: Wed Aug 06, 2003 05:43 pm

Postby Light » Sun Nov 16, 2003 10:44 pm

You do not think Yusuf ALi is a good souce but many others do (qualified people who defend the Qur'an), how would you go about reconciling this conflict?

However, Muhammad never used that symbol. There are some Hadiths that comdemn using that symbol also.


Many times in the Qur'an and Hadiths, Muhammad does not practise what he preaches. I have many many examples, I'm sure you are aware of them, "the amount of wives he had being one".

Lady Fatima
Preacher
Preacher
Posts: 702
Joined: Mon Oct 06, 2003 02:19 pm
Location: Australia

Postby Lady Fatima » Mon Nov 17, 2003 12:50 am

Peace Light,

Really this concept of the "moon God" is really beginning to get boring. No offence but get over it already! :roll:

Many times in the Qur'an and Hadiths, Muhammad does not practise what he preaches. I have many many examples, I'm sure you are aware of them, "the amount of wives he had being one".


I've explained already why the prophet had more than 4 wives. You can find it in one of my posts. I'm interested, what where the "many" cases where Muhammad didn't practice what he preached?

Peace and Blessings be to the Believers :D
This nation will get sick but it will never die and will doze but never sleep so do not lose your hope. You will return your glory.

User avatar
Bushmaster
Moderators
Moderators
Posts: 781
Joined: Sun Nov 09, 2003 03:35 am
Location: Camp Humphreys, South Korea

Postby Bushmaster » Mon Nov 17, 2003 04:20 pm

Lady Fatima wrote: Really this concept of the "moon God" is really beginning to get boring. No offence but get over it already! :roll:


Exactly, same as 3 God-Trinity... :roll: Annoying, ey? (eh?) :lol:
"Maiorem hac dilectionem nemo habet ut animam suam quis ponat pro amicis suis " Evangelium secundum Iohannem 15:13

U.S. ARMY
AH-64D "Armt Dawg"

User avatar
Believer
Preacher
Preacher
Posts: 1462
Joined: Mon Oct 06, 2003 03:42 am
Location: South

Postby Believer » Tue Nov 18, 2003 02:57 am

I've explained already why the prophet had more than 4 wives. You can find it in one of my posts. I'm interested, what where the "many" cases where Muhammad didn't practice what he preached?


Doesn't matter, Lady, he didn't always practice what he preached.
Is hypocrisy a sin in Islam?
In times past, God spoke in partial and various ways to our ancestors through the prophets;
in these last days, he spoke to us through a son, whom he made heir of all things and through whom he created the universe,
-Hebrews 1:1-2

Lady Fatima
Preacher
Preacher
Posts: 702
Joined: Mon Oct 06, 2003 02:19 pm
Location: Australia

Postby Lady Fatima » Wed Nov 19, 2003 03:02 pm

Peace all,

Bushmaster wrote:
Exactly, same as 3 God-Trinity... Annoying, ey? (eh?)


The trinity is a fundemental belief of Christianity, while this is so called "moon god" doesn't even exist in the authentic hadiths or the Quran. Catch the difference? :wink:

Believer wrote:
Doesn't matter, Lady, he didn't always practice what he preached.



The marrying of up to 4 wives was not applied to Muhammad because his marriages held many purposes, one of which was to unite the tribes so they wouldn't fight with him.

Is hypocrisy a sin in Islam?


Ofcourse it is!

Peace and Blessings be to the Believers :D
This nation will get sick but it will never die and will doze but never sleep so do not lose your hope. You will return your glory.

gif
Sunday School Teacher
Sunday School Teacher
Posts: 30
Joined: Wed Nov 19, 2003 07:50 pm
Location: internet

Postby gif » Thu Nov 20, 2003 04:08 am

hi iam gif!

what is trinity?

is alah a god of the moon?
i thought htere was only 1 god or is jesus god?
iam seeking the truth of god, iam sorry if i m stupid. :cry:
i know

gif
Sunday School Teacher
Sunday School Teacher
Posts: 30
Joined: Wed Nov 19, 2003 07:50 pm
Location: internet

Postby gif » Thu Nov 20, 2003 04:11 am

this verse scares me :(


Behold, he cometh with clouds; and every eye shall see him, and they also which pierced him: and all kindreds of the earth shall wail because of him. Even so, Amen.
:(
i know

Lady Fatima
Preacher
Preacher
Posts: 702
Joined: Mon Oct 06, 2003 02:19 pm
Location: Australia

Postby Lady Fatima » Thu Nov 20, 2003 02:33 pm

Peace gif,

what is trinity?


The trinity is God in three persons; the father, the son and the holy Ghost. The father being God, the son being God and the Holy Ghost being God, but apparently they are not three God, but one God :-? However Christians don't understand it, but they blindly follow it. That's it in a nutshell. I believe I was fair! :P

is alah a god of the moon?


Absolutely not! Allah is the one God, the creator of the heavens and the earth, and He created you and I, and we shall all return back to Him. He sent messengers to guide mankind and those who obey him will go to heaven and if you disobey, then take your position in the fire!

Peace and Blessings be to the Believers :D
This nation will get sick but it will never die and will doze but never sleep so do not lose your hope. You will return your glory.

Omega

Postby Omega » Thu Nov 20, 2003 04:12 pm

Gif wrote:


this verse scares me
Behold, he cometh with clouds; and every eye shall see him, and they also which pierced him: and all kindreds of the earth shall wail because of him. Even so, Amen.


I would be scared too if I were you!

Alexei
Preacher
Preacher
Posts: 307
Joined: Thu Nov 20, 2003 07:42 pm
Location: Great Lebanon

Postby Alexei » Fri Nov 21, 2003 12:43 pm

The moon god was also referred to as "al-ilah". This is not a proper name of a single specific god, but a generic reference meaning "the god". Each local pagan Arab tribe would refer to their own local tribal pagan god as "al-ilah". "al-ilah" was later shortened to Allah before Muhammad was born in 610 AD.


The answer for this heresy can be shocking for Christian brothers. The answer is found here:
http://www.answering-christianity.com/allah.htm


Alexei

User avatar
Believer
Preacher
Preacher
Posts: 1462
Joined: Mon Oct 06, 2003 03:42 am
Location: South

Postby Believer » Fri Nov 21, 2003 04:48 pm

Peace Alexei,

"allah" is just a word for "the god"
This doesn't mean your god is mine because God isn't limited to linguistics.
In times past, God spoke in partial and various ways to our ancestors through the prophets;

in these last days, he spoke to us through a son, whom he made heir of all things and through whom he created the universe,

-Hebrews 1:1-2

kyas
Preacher
Preacher
Posts: 136
Joined: Wed Feb 05, 2003 02:21 am

Re: The moon god - al-ilah

Postby kyas » Tue Dec 02, 2003 05:56 am

Light wrote:Moon worship has been practiced in Arabia since 2000 BC.
The moon god was also referred to as "al-ilah". This is not a proper name of a single specific god, but a generic reference meaning "the god". Each local pagan Arab tribe would refer to their own local tribal pagan god as "al-ilah". "al-ilah" was later shortened to Allah before Muhammad was born in 610 AD.

There is evidence that Hubal was referred to as "Allah".
When Muhammad came along, he dropped all references to the name "Hubal" but retained the generic "Allah".
Muhammad retained almost all the pagan rituals of the Arabs at the Kaba and redefined them in monotheistic terms.
Regardless of the specifics of the facts, it is clear that Islam is derived from paganism that once worshiped a moon-god.
Although Islam is today a monotheist religion, its roots are in paganism.


indonesian bible refers god as "Allah"

http://www.sabda.org/sabdaweb/bible/cha ... e=original


malay bible refers god as "Allah"

http://www.godrules.net/austronesian.ht ... ar12.htm&2

does this means indonesian and malay CHRISTIANS WORSHIP THE MOON GOD???

Alexei
Preacher
Preacher
Posts: 307
Joined: Thu Nov 20, 2003 07:42 pm
Location: Great Lebanon

Postby Alexei » Tue Dec 02, 2003 11:33 am

One thing to add to brother kyas excellent answer is that all the Arab Christians are also worshipping the moon god :lol:

This silly and naive question about about moon god has been answered 55554670946 times :lol: :
http://www.answering-christianity.com/allah.htm


Alexei

786
Sunday School Teacher
Sunday School Teacher
Posts: 40
Joined: Sun Oct 05, 2003 02:29 am

Postby 786 » Thu Dec 11, 2003 05:19 pm

damn am i seeing day sha vu or or the Christians that keep coming up with this topic senile

farside
Assitant Deacon
Assitant Deacon
Posts: 71
Joined: Thu Dec 04, 2003 01:06 pm

Postby farside » Thu Dec 11, 2003 10:55 pm

Image For more information on the pagan origins of the star and crescent symbol, go to
http://members.lycos.nl/whatsthisthen/c ... -star.html Image


Image

From the Farside Image

Omega

Postby Omega » Fri Dec 12, 2003 12:56 am

Keep em coming farside!

Alexei
Preacher
Preacher
Posts: 307
Joined: Thu Nov 20, 2003 07:42 pm
Location: Great Lebanon

Postby Alexei » Fri Dec 12, 2003 11:30 am

For more information on the pagan origins of the star and crescent symbol, go to


For a good rebuttal go to:
http://islam.about.com/library/weekly/aa060401a.htm

And it's good to cite this paragraph from Encarta Encyclopedia:

Mithraism, one of the major religions of the Roman Empire, the cult of Mithra, the ancient Persian god of light and wisdom... Mithraism was similar to Christianity in many respects, for example, in the ideals of humility and brotherly love, baptism, the rite of communion, the use of holy water, the adoration of the shepherds at Mithra's birth, the adoption of Sundays and of December 25 (Mithra's birthday) as holy days, and the belief in the immortality of the soul, the last judgment, and the resurrection. Mithraism differed from Christianity in the exclusion of women from its ceremonies and in its willingness to compromise with polytheism. The similarities, however, made possible the easy conversion of its followers to Christian doctrine. (Encarta Encyclopedia CD, 2001).

Alexei

H2O
Preacher
Preacher
Posts: 782
Joined: Thu Jun 03, 2004 09:00 pm
Location: Boca Raton, Florida

Postby H2O » Fri Jun 04, 2004 12:25 am

I was amused by the amount of ignorance expressed by those who claim that Allah was the moon-god Hubal that was worshiped at the Kaa'abah. I will try to FULLY exaust this issue and hope that those sincere Christians that are seeking for the truth in this matter dont fall into that poisonous propaganda. :roll: So, we will look at their source of information in a scientific manner.

The propaganda being spread has only 2 prongs or foundation in which its evidence is based on, however, the evidence is mere conjecture and is not based on documentary sources from that era in which we shall provide in rejecting the propaganda. The Quoted sources are no more than other missionaries work repeating the same thing Quoting from one another, kinda like the monkey see monkey do thing. None of the sources refer to Arabic Lexicons, Arabic Scholars.

The first foundation is the general information that the Arabic word "Allah" is a contraction of the two arabic words "al ilah ~ the god" which was a general designated title given to an idol or idols that had supreme status. Habul the moon god was an idol worshiped which was also known as Sin ie Nanna through out various parts of the arabian penensula that was designated by such title.
It is then conjectured that the title(al ilah) after a period of time was shortened as "Allah" which became the official name of Hubal. All those who claim the name Allah is a contraction of al-ilah make no reference to Arabic authorities such as Arabic Scholars or Arabic Lexicons. Those who make such blunt statements are mere ENGLISH MEN that have construed in manipulating the transliteration of the Arabic to assume a contraction which is not possible in Arabic http://www.geocities.com/uwas2001/Dunleep.htm , http://www.answering-islam.org/Quran/So ... laha2.html .

The second foundation is the often talked about now symbol of the Crescent Moon in Islam, linking the current Symbol with that of the crescent symbol of the moon god Hubal ie Sin Ie Nanna. However, the symbol of islam today is an inovation adopted from the Turks, whereas before the Turkish or Ottoman empire the muslims never used or regarded the crescent star as a symbol of islam and neither was its orgin from the crescent star symbol of the moon god. The Flag and symbol research refutes this http://www.fotw.net/flags/islam.html . This site provides concrete proof about how islam adopted the crescent star symbol and when, and that it has no afiliation with the aledge proganda being circulated.

Since we have CLEARLY refuted the al-ilah contraction of the name Allah and also the association of the Crescent Symbol in islam with the Crescent Symbol of the pre-islamic moon god, what are we left with since this is the main foundation of christian critizism ?

For those who are Viewing this page I collected some Quranic verses and authentic muslim Hadeeth which explain the reality of Allah that contradicts such propaganda.

Allah cannot be seen


No vision can grasp Him(Allah). But His grasp is over all vision: He is above all comprehension, yet is acquainted with all things. (Koran 6:103)
He(Allah) is the First and the Last, the Evident and the Hidden: and He has full knowledge of all things. (Koran 57:3)



Allah not a sun or moon god

Among His(Allah's) Signs are the Night and the Day, and the Sun and the Moon. No not prostrate (in worship) to the Sun nor the Moon, but prostrate (in worship) to Allah who created them both, if it is Him ye wish to serve. (Koran 41:37)


What the Crescent Moon(New Moons) in the time of Muhammad meant

They ask thee(Muhammad) concerning the New Moons(the Crescent Moons). Say: They are but signs to mark fixed periods of time in (the affairs of) men, and for pilgrimage. It is no virtue if ye enter your houses from the back: it is virtue if ye fear Allah. Enter houses through the proper doors: and fear Allah: that ye may prosper. (Koran 2:189)


Allah was not one of "the gods" to the pagans

And they(the pagans) wonder that there has come to them a warner from among themselves, and the disbelievers say: This IS an enchanter, a liar.
What! makes he(Muhammad) the gods(al aaliha plural of al ilah) a single God? A strange thing is this, to be sure!
And the chief persons of them break forth, saying: Go and steadily adhere to your gods; this is most surely a thing sought after. (Koran 38:4-6)


Allah was not worshiped by the Arab pagans

Say(Muhammad to the pagans): O ye that reject Faith! I(Muhammad) worship not that which ye worship, Nor will ye worship that which I worship, And I will not worship that which ye have been wont to worship, Nor will ye worship that which I worship, To you be your Way, and to me mine. (Koran 109:1-6)


Hubal the moon-god and Allah were not the same God

Sahih Al-Bukhari Volumn 005, Book 059, Hadith Number 375.
-----------------------------------------
Narated By Al-Bara : We faced the pagans on that day (of the battle of Uhud) and the Prophet placed a batch of archers (at a special place) and appointed 'Abdullah (bin Jubair) as their commander and said, "Do not leave this place; and if you should see us conquering the enemy, do not leave this place, and if you should see them conquering us, do not (come to) help us," So, when we faced the enemy, they took to their heel till I saw their women running towards the mountain, lifting up their clothes from their legs, revealing their leg-bangles. The Muslims started saying, "The booty, the booty!" 'Abdullah bin Jubair said, "The Prophet had taken a firm promise from me not to leave this place." But his companions refused (to stay). So when they refused (to stay there), (Allah) confused them so that they could not know where to go, and they suffered seventy casualties. Abu Sufyan ascended a high place and said, "Is Muhammad present amongst the people?" The Prophet said, "Do not answer him." Abu Sufyan said, "Is the son of Abu Quhafa present among the people?" The Prophet said, "Do not answer him." Abd Sufyan said, "Is the son of Al-Khattab amongst the people?" He then added, "All these people have been killed, for, were they alive, they would have replied." On that, 'Umar could not help saying, "You are a liar, O enemy of Allah! Allah has kept what will make you unhappy." Abu Safyan said, "Superior may be Hubal!" On that the Prophet said (to his companions), "Reply to him." They asked, "What may we say?" He said, "Say: Allah is More Elevated and More Majestic!" Abu Sufyan said, "We have (the idol) Al-'Uzza, whereas you have no 'Uzza!" The Prophet said (to his companions), "Reply to him." They said, "What may we say?" The Prophet said, "Say: Allah is our Helper and you have no helper." Abu Sufyan said, "(This) day compensates for our loss at Badr and (in) the battle (the victory) is always undecided and shared in turns by the belligerents. You will see some of your dead men mutilated, but neither did I urge this action, nor am I sorry for it." Narrated Jabir: Some people took wine in the morning of the day of Uhud and were then killed as martyrs.


The arabic speaking Christians and Jews in their pride preached to Mohammed that they were "abnaaullaah " meaning "children of Allah" corresponding to english terminology "children of God" .

(Both) the Jews and the Christians say: "We are children of Allah, and His beloved." Say(Mohammad to them): "Why then doth He punish you for your sins? Nay, ye are but men, of the men He hath created: He forgiveth whom He pleaseth, and He punisheth whom He pleaseth: and to Allah belongeth the dominion of the heavens and the earth, and all that is between: and unto Him is the final goal (of all)." (Koran 5:18)


The Koran reflects the beliefs and concepts of the Arabic speaking Jews and Christians who Dialoged with Mohammed :

The Jews call 'Uzair a son of Allah, and the Christians call Christ the son of Allah. That is a saying from their mouth; (in this) they but imitate what the Unbelievers of old used to say. Allah's curse be on them: how they are deluded away from the Truth! (Koran 9:30)

They do blaspheme who say: Allah is the third of three, while there is only one single God. If they desist not from their word (of blasphemy), verily a grievous penalty will befall the blasphemers among them.(Koran 5:73)

Say(Muhammad to them): He Allah is One; Allah, the Eternal; He begetteth not, nor is He begotten; And there is none like unto Him. (Koran 112:1-4)


I think this just about does it. If the Arabic Speaking Jews and Christian did not use the name Allah then what namedid they use in Arabic ? There is only one name and that is Allah.

I hope the readers Christian and Non Christian benefit from this post and I hope to see this childish uneducated propaganda stops.

For futher reading the name Allah can be found in the oldest Arabic bible dating 867 AD http://www.arabicbible.com/bible/codex_151.htm , http://www.arabicbible.com/bible/codex151_p1.htm , http://www.arabicbible.com/bible/codex151_heb.htm , http://www.arabicbible.com/bible/codex151_article.htm .

Also the Aramaic form of the name Allah which is "Aalah" is found in the earlies new testament Aramaic writtings which was the mother tongue of Jesus himself http://www.peshitta.org/ click on TOOLS/LEXICON then enter the word GOD into the search drive and there you have it with the bible reference
Download Quran and Hadeeth for Free here http://www.islamasoft.co.uk/downloads.html Learn about Islam from a Non dictatorial view

Liberate
Preacher
Preacher
Posts: 200
Joined: Sat Apr 10, 2004 04:41 pm

Postby Liberate » Sun Jun 06, 2004 02:54 pm

You know it becomes pointless if all anybody does is quote and plagiarise what academics have to say on a matter, what about their own God given logic when applied to their scruptures? what exactly does the holy books have to say, what does the quran and sunnah have to say this should take precedence over any apologetic material.


The first foundation is the general information that the Arabic word "Allah" is a contraction of the two arabic words "al ilah ~ the god"


All those who claim the name Allah is a contraction of al-ilah make no reference to Arabic authorities such as Arabic Scholars or Arabic Lexicons. Those who make such blunt statements are mere ENGLISH MEN that have construed in manipulating the transliteration of the Arabic to assume a contraction which is not possible in Arabic http://www.geocities.com/uwas2001/Dunleep.htm , http://www.answering-islam.org/Quran/So ... laha2.html .


Let us apply some common sense here, the alledged christian missionaries and orientalists did not reach the conclusion that allah is a contraction of " al ilah" by themselves, I am quite frankly surprised you can make such a claim that the arabic language makes no leeway for such a contraction, when we both know arabic is a difficult language precisely because words can be contracted and have several meanings based from the contraction.

Look at this phrase:

"La ilaha illa-llah"

Every arabic speaker knows it literally means " there is no god except the god"

so which term is the god? and which term simply means 'god'?

The term 'Rasulu-llah' or "rasullah" means "slave of god" which term is god?

There are numerous muslim material that state that "allah" is a contraction of "al -ilah" are you honestly telling us they are all in error?


It is then conjectured that the title(al ilah) after a period of time was shortened as "Allah" which became the official name of Hubal.



Imagine this scenario if you will, say I created my own religion, I saw a piece of granite and I decided that this piece of granite was to hold my god, the house of my god, but the local pagans already had a name for that piece of granite and already had their stone idols in it, and I tell them "my god is the one true god", but I call my god, and the house that he purportedly lives in after the name the local pagans had already given it ie house of the god.

My point is this if I created any old idol and claimed it to be the one true God and the same God as the jews and the christians serve does it make it so?

Does it make it so even if I call that idol by the name of God used by other arab christians that have simply assimilated the name into their language centuries after I initiated it?


I would like to show extracts from http://www.prophetofdoom.net/ the whole site is worth reading purely for the sunnah material which many muslims have no information about.

Tabari VII:20/Ishaq:288 “The Quraysh said, ‘Muhammad and his Companions have violated the sacred month, shed blood, seized property, and taken men captive.’ The polytheists spread lying slander concerning him, saying, ‘Muhammad claims that he is following obedience to Allah, yet he is the first to violate the holy month and to kill our companion in Rajab

Have a look at the above hadith, why on earth would the ploytheists associate allah with a sacred month this is directly implied by the statement "Muhammad claims that he is following obedience to Allah, yet he is the first to violate the holy month and to kill our companion in Rajab"

This tells me the polytheists/pagans were already aware of allah and even associated him with the ritual of Rahab it implies they were already worshipping allah, as a side note what kind of a god respects pagan festivals and declares them the perfect religion:

sura 9:36
"The count of months, as far as GOD is concerned, is twelve. This has been GOD's law, since the day He created the heavens and the earth. Four of them are sacred. This is the perfect religion; you shall not wrong your souls (by fighting) during the Sacred Months. However, you may declare all-out war against the idol worshipers (even during the Sacred Months), when they declare all-out war against you, and know that GOD is on the side of the righteous.
"


Ishaq:66/Tabari VI:2 “It is alleged, and Allah only knows the truth, that Abdul Muttalib encountered opposition when he was digging Zamzam. He vowed that if given ten sons, to make his labor less arduous and to protect him, he would sacrifice one of them to Allah [ This is a pagan praying to allah a generation before Mohammed] at the Ka’aba.”

Ishaq:67 “They used to conduct their affairs according to the decisions of the arrows.”
By throwing arrows at the feet of the head idol in the ka'aa which was Hubal. Am I to believe that the man would be praying to allah and then ask another idol for the decision? does that make any sense?



Ibn Ishaq’s Sira opens with a section entitled: “Muhammad’s Pure Descent from Adam.” Ishaq:3 “This is the book of the Biography of the Apostle of Allah. Muhammad was the son of Abdallah, bin Abdul Muttalib, bin Hashim, bin Abd Manaf, bin Qusayy,”

Tabari VI:20 “Qusayy asked his mother which tribe he came from. She answered, ‘You are the son of Kilab ibn Murra ibn Ka’b ibn Luhayy ibn Ghalib ibn Fihr ibn Malik ibn al-Nadr ibn Kinana al-Qurashi.’”

“Your tribe lives in Mecca by the Ka’aba. …This revelation awoke in Qusayy a strong desire to return to Mecca and join his people, the Quraysh.”

“‘Wait for a sacred month and go with the pilgrimage.’ Qusayy waited until the sacred month arrived and the pilgrims set out. When he reached Mecca and had completed the pilgrimage, he remained there.”

“At the time Hulayl was in charge of the Ka’aba and ruled in Mecca. Qusayy asked him for the hand of his daughter Hubba in marriage

“Hubba bore him Abd al-Dar, Abd Manaf, Abd al-Uzza and Abd. His progeny increased, his wealth multiplied and he became greatly honored.”

Ishaq:49 “Qusayy thought he had a better right to the Ka’aba and to rule over Mecca than the Khuza’a since the Quraysh were the most noble and pure descendants of Ishmael."

Tabari VI:20 “He called upon his fellow tribesmen, the Quraysh, to expel the Khuza’a and seize Mecca for themselves. They accepted his proposal and swore an oath of allegiance to him.”

“The Arabs, recognizing their religious duty, accompanied Qusayy. Marching to the Ka’aba they said, ‘We have better right to this than you.’ At that they opposed one another and began to fight. A fierce battle broke out, as a result of which…Qusayy wrested from them the privileges which had been in their hands, thus denying them.”

Tabari VI:21 “Qusayy purchased the custodianship of the Ka’aba for a skin full of wine and a lute.”

“I have heard, and Allah knows best, that the Khuza’a were seized by an outbreak of pustules which nearly wiped them out. They abandoned Mecca.”

Ishaq:52 “Both sides called for peace and for the appointment of one of the Arabs to arbitrate between them on their differences.”

“The verdict was that Qusayy [read “Arabs or Muslims”] had a better claim to the Ka’aba [read “Temple Mount”] and to rule Mecca [read “Jerusalem”] than the Khuza’a [read “the Jews”]. All the injuries inflicted and blood shed by Qusayy [read “suicide bombers” or “Arab armies”] upon the Khuza’a [read “the Jews”] were cancelled and disregarded [read “forgotten, excused, or justified”], while all injuries inflicted by the Khuza’a [“the Jews”] upon the Quraysh [read “Muslims or Arabs”] should be compensated for by blood money


Mohammed was the son of Abdallah, bin Abdul Muttalib the custodian of the kab'a, Mohammed was the heir to the custodianship of the ka'baa, Mohammed's father and uncle were called abdallah or Abdullah, the strange thing about this is Mohammed's father and uncle were notably pagans, but yet their names mean "servant of allah" if they were pagans and had names called "servant of allah" which allah were they serving?

Ishaq:52 “Thus Qusayy gained authority over the Ka’aba and the lordship over the people of Mecca. He behaved like a king over his tribe so they made him a king.”

Ishaq:53 “Qusayy assumed control and kingship. He was obeyed. He held the keys to the shrine, being the doorkeeper of the Ka’aba. He held the right to water the pilgrims from the well of Zamzam and to feed them. He presided at the assemblies and held the right to hand out the war banners. In his hands lay all the dignities of Mecca, all of which he took for himself.”

“He also divided the property in Mecca among his followers, settling every clan of the Quraysh in the dwelling places assigned to them. No issue regarding public affairs was decided nor was any banner of war entrusted without Qusayy’s permission.”

“Qusayy’s authority among the Quraysh during his lifetime and after his death was like a religion which the people followed and which could not be infringed; they always acted in accordance with its laws. They regarded it as filled with good omens and recognized his superiority and nobility…. He took for himself the assembly house which led from it to the mosque (place of prostration) of the Ka’aba.”

“When they were about to fight another tribe, banners were tied only in his house, where one of his own sons would hand them out.”

Ishaq:53 “Umar confirmed the story of Qusayy and how he gained control of the Ka’aba and the affairs of Mecca.”

"I heard a man telling Umar bin al-Khatab, when he was Caliph, this story of Qusayy and how he gathered his own tribe together, expelled tribes from Mecca, and gained control of the Ka’aba. Umar did not reject it or disavow it.”

Ishaq:49 “The pilgrims gathered in Mecca, went out to the mawqif, completed the hajj and went to Mina…. Nothing now remained of the ritual of the pilgrimage but the ceremony of dispersal from Mina.”

“On the day of the dispersal they went to stone the jimar, and a man of the Sufah used to throw pebbles for the pilgrims, none throwing until he had thrown.”

Tabari VI:31 “Qusayy instituted the lighting of the fire at al-Muzdalifah when the wuquf took place so that those being driven away from Arafat could see it. This fire continued to be lit in this place throughout the Jahiliyyah. This fire was also lit in the time of the Messenger, and of Abu Bakr, Umar, and Uthman.”

Tabari VI:25 “Qusayy’s tribe held him in honor and high esteem. No one opposed his rule in any way.” “His commands were never disobeyed and nothing he did was opposed.” “As regards the hajj, he confirmed the right of the Arabs to continue their previous customs. This is because he considered these to be a religious duty which he should not change.”

“Qusayy had a house built in Mecca which was the house of assembly in which the Quraysh used to decide their affairs.”

Ishaq:55 “The rifada was a tax which the Quraysh paid from their property to Qusayy at every festival.”

Ishaq:55 “Abd al-Dar, by Allah, I shall make you the equal of the others, even though they have been raised in dignity over you. No man of them shall enter the Ka’aba until you have opened it, no [war] banner shall be tied for the Quraysh to go to battle except by your hand, no man shall drink water in Mecca [from the well of Zamzam] except that which you have provided, no man shall eat food in the pilgrimage season other than your food, and the Quraysh shall not decide their affairs anywhere but in your house.”

Tabari VI:25 “Then he gave Abd al-Dar the house in which the Quraysh always made their decisions, and gave him the office of being Ka’aba’s custodian, declaring war, presiding over the assembly, and collecting the rifadah, a tax levied in every pilgrimage season by the Quraysh according to their wealth and handed over to Qusayy. It was imposed on the Quraysh by Qusayy, who said to them when he commanded them to pay it, ‘Quraysh, you are neighbors of Allah, people of his Ka’aba and people of the sacred precincts of the Haram. The pilgrims are guests of Allah and visitors to His House. They did so, and every year they levied a tax on their property and paid it to Qusayy and he would use it for the pilgrims during the days of Mina. This institution of his became the state of affairs among the Quraysh during the whole of the Jahiliyyah [pre-Islamic period of Ignorance] up to the time Allah brought Islam, and then became a part of Islam, continuing to this day.” Ishaq:57 “Allah’s Apostle said, ‘Whatever deal there was in the days of ignorance Islam strengthens it.’”

Tabari VI:25 “Qusayy’s tribe held him in honor and high esteem. No one opposed his rule in any way.” “His commands were never disobeyed and nothing he did was ever opposed.” Ishaq:56 “Qusayy was never contradicted nor was any measure of his overthrown.”

Tabari VI:24 “His authority among the Quraysh during his lifetime and after his death was like a religion which the people followed; they always acted in accordance with it.”

Bukhari:V1B2N50 “‘Apostle, order us to do some religious deeds that we may enter Paradise.’ The Prophet asked them, ‘Do you know what it means to believe in Allah Alone?’ They replied, ‘Allah and His Apostle know better.’ The Prophet said, ‘It means: 1. To testify that none has the right to be worshipped but Allah, and Muhammad is Allah’s Apostle. 2. To perform prayers perfectly. 3. To pay the Zakat obligatory tax. 4. To observe the Ramadhan fast. 5. And to pay one fifth of the booty taken in Allah’s Cause.’”


Do you see that Mohammed simply incorporated the values set by his pagan ancestor Qusayy into islam?


The second foundation is the often talked about now symbol of the Crescent Moon in Islam, linking the current Symbol with that of the crescent symbol of the moon god Hubal ie Sin Ie Nanna. However, the symbol of islam today is an inovation adopted from the Turks, whereas before the Turkish or Ottoman empire the muslims never used or regarded the crescent star as a symbol of islam and neither was its orgin from the crescent star symbol of the moon god


I do not see a valid point here, 400 years before Mohammed the symbol of Hubal was already being put atop of roofs.

Islam was obtained from paganism, it is seethed in paganism, you are a pagan, it is an insult to us, the apostles, christianity and to God for you to claim you serve the same God.

H2O
Preacher
Preacher
Posts: 782
Joined: Thu Jun 03, 2004 09:00 pm
Location: Boca Raton, Florida

Postby H2O » Mon Jun 07, 2004 03:47 am

I was begining to enjoy your formal until you went off into a whole new different topic which was irrelevant to the point I brought up backed by hard core proof and evidence. It seems you want to apply your own rules of logic and reasoning which is not authenticated with an unbiased approached in which you seriously lacked in.

You know it becomes pointless if all anybody does is quote and plagiarise what academics have to say on a matter,

Let us apply some common sense here, the alledged christian missionaries and orientalists did not reach the conclusion that allah is a contraction of " al ilah" by themselves, I am quite frankly surprised you can make such a claim that the arabic language makes no leeway for such a contraction,...


What you call academics have produce no proof but mere conjecture, as a matter of fact I dont think you ever even read the posted sites on the technicalities of the word http://www.geocities.com/uwas2001/Dunleep.htm , http://www.answering-islam.org/Quran/So ... laha2.html These men are acquinted with the language and the word Allah from its original source in Arabic it self. If you did, you would of seen that these men clearly with the knowledge of the Language who speak it and live it have laid down the foundations of constructive criticism against the contrary. As I said from before:

All those who claim the name Allah is a contraction of al-ilah make no reference to Arabic authorities such as Arabic Scholars or Arabic Lexicons
.

The missionaries and oreintalists fail to Quote Arabic Scholars and Lexicons only other contemporaries, however, they never failed in doing this when it comes to their own scripture or with the name "YHWH" they quote Hebrew and Aramaic Lexicons and scholars, but why wont they do the same for the name "Allah" by quoting the PROFESIONALS ~ the scholars of the Language ? This seems to be prejudice if you ask me. You apply a rule of logic to your self but you dont apply the same rule to another...that is being bias.

...what about their own God given logic when applied to their scruptures? what exactly does the holy books have to say, what does the quran and sunnah have to say this should take precedence over any apologetic material


This is your statement, I was enjoying this part till you started to prejudice the matter. I did make reference to this as you can see above in my last quote and proved that Allah and Hubal where not the same deity from the sources it self the Quran and Authentic Hadeeth (Sunnah) but you over looked this and got stuck on another agenda, and you failed to acknowldge that in the ISLAMIC TEACHING it explains those so called alledged practices that you called PAGAN:

In islam based on the Quran and Sunnah when Adam and his wife finally came down to the Earth from the paradise (Quran 2:30-39) they received words from their Lord of how to repent in which they learnt and weeped unto their Lord with these words upon the earth (Quran 7:23). This place on earth was named after the commemoration of the even of Adam and his wife called "Bakka" meaning "a place of weeping or wailing" where the first house of worship for mankind (Quran 3:96) was built by Adam and his wife when mankind was only ONE NATION before they became divided (Quran 2:213,10:19). After a period of time man fell into idolotry and started to worship other things, and currupted the sacred house in which prophets were sent to them to warn them ( Quran 2:219 ) but they became divided and began to disperse through out the land each group following their own desires of a deity. Due to the sins of the people the land of Bakka that was once an Oasis like Egypt became a desolation that made the region uninhabitable. After a period of time Allah chose and guided Abraham out of his home land to a blessed land and gave him a son called Ishmael and then guided them both to the anchient and sacred land of Bakka to re-establish His sacred house and to pruify it from idols (Quran 2:124-129). Thus the foundations of the sacred house was the only remains that was there from former times in which Abraham and his son lefted up, rebuilt, and purified when Ishmael passed the age of puberty. Before this, Ismael and his mother was left in the sacred land of Bakka by Abraham per the instructions of Allah. Hajjar (Haggar) Ishmael's mother sought for water for her son but could not find none, and feared death of her son and her self if she did not soon. She cried unto Allah in which Allah answered her prayer and sent an angel to root up a well. A well was sprung and water flourished for her and her son. The water drew the attention of wild life that drew the attention of passing bedouin travelers that showed signs of water. Tribes began to be attracted to the location cause of its water in which they settle there in which the land was now and again inhabitable. After this the place had began to be called "Makka" meaning "a place of water" and Bakka remained as its anchient name due to the commemoration of Adam and his Wife. Thus a community evolved with Ishmael and his mother. Abraham returned after his son passed the age of Puberty to rebuild the ancient house (Shahih Al- Bukhari Volumn 004, Book 055, Hadith Number 583) From Hence the right of Ramadhan, Al-Hajj, Ummrah, and the Salah was taught to Ishmael by Abraham through inspiration from Allah (Quran 2:129-132,135; 14:35-41). After this Ishmael taught these rights and practices to his family and tribe who became the custodians of the sacred House. After generations passed, like before, the descendants of Ishmael fell into idolorty and incorporated other practices into the once pure religion and practice taught by Abraham to his son. These descendants idoltorated the religion, and inovated pratices into it that became customs and traditional practices among the Arabs of that region NOT originally belonging to the Religion of Abraham "millatu Ibraheem" ie the religious practice of Ibraheem in which later was purified and restored by the advent of Muhammad as a prophet of Allah whom was revealed the Quran as a divine book of Guidance (Quran 3:67-68,95-97)


You showed a partial of the picture but didnt dare to elaborate on the rest of the Islamic teachings pertaining to this subject which was fully presented above. In other words you took things out of their context from their correct prospective into your own. You went back only so far but didnt go back more into the history of the islamic tradition and teaching. Of course this goes against your christian teachings so you desregarded it as false but only presented that which you can use against islam that does not conflict with you beliefs, but strengthens it, to prove in your eyes islam is a pagan religion.
It seems you are the one here very biased and dishonest, but your veiw was not a SCIENTIFIC and UNBIASED approach, but strickly a christian indoctrinated view which natural will be biased, and does not constitute the ramification of truth.
I can also polk holes into Christianity showing its parallel beliefs to that of other pagan and anchient religions of the world in the light of comparitive religion, but this is not my motive, and I dont wish to lower my self down to such a degree. I came to this post to clearify what WESTERN CHRISTIANS keep making propaganda about an arabic name "Allah".

...I am quite frankly surprised you can make such a claim that the arabic language makes no leeway for such a contraction, when we both know arabic is a difficult language precisely because words can be contracted and have several meanings based from the contraction


Do you know Arabic ? What type of words can you contract in Arabic, and when does this rule apply ? Well I will jump the gun and say that you dont know not a thing about arabic grammar nor about the clusterization of words and how they are applied, nor the science of Arabic Orthography. Let us look at what is said about the flaw in the supposed contraction:

“Alllaah”
Not a contraction

The English customary spelling “Allah” syllable as “al - lah” in English dictionaries and encyclopedias has often been misrepresented as to its etymology or nature of the word without any Arabic authoritive sources such as Arabic Dictionaries, Lexicons, or Arabic Scholars them selves.
Due to its English customary spelling it is often viewed by western writers that the English transliterated letters “a,l,l,a,h” are a contraction of two Arabic words based on a linguistical prestige (in English not Arabic). Thus being ignorant of the fact, and the language it self, that the second “L” in Arabic script called “laam” is a double consonant letter.
The first two letters “al” is perceived as the definite article (the), and the three following letters “laah” ( sometimes rendered in English as “lah” ) is the contracted Arabic word “ilaah (deity)” where the weak radical “a”, in Arabic called “alif” - pronounced as an “i” in “ilaah”, is dropped for a contraction.

Example
1) al ilah (the deity)
2) al lah
3) al-lah
4) Allah


Based on this western hypothesis, and its manipulative fraudulent philosophy which is misleading, the word is assumed to mean ‘the god’ or ‘the deity’ denoting the supreme deity out of others as the main one. The double consonant “L”(laam) in the original Arabic has been edited in English exegesis of the word as a single consonant giving it a linguistical prestige in English as an
“al ilah” contraction. This reason because, the double consonant “L”, which would be properly spelled with three L’s(Alllah) serves no purpose in English as it does in Arabic. If the customary English spelling of the name it self is transliterated back into Arabic it would spell “ alif, laam, laam, fatah, ha” reading “allah(a)” (Note: This word in Arabic has NO article) which would be a different word in Arabic meaning “Deification” whereas the name in its original Arabic is spelled as “alif, laam, laam, laam, alif maqsoorah, ha’a” reading “alllaah”. On the other hand, a contraction of the words “al-ilah” is not possible in the Arabic language because the grammar behind it does no permit it as will be shown in the reality of the words in their original language which have been manipulated in English.
In The Arabic language when the second radical letter of a word is doubled, by stressing it, it either enhances the word or changes its meaning all together. When the Arabic word “ilaah”(deity) is pronounced as “illaah” by stressing its second radical consonant “L” to double “ll” it changes the meaning from “deity” to “except him” where the “h” consonant is converted into a masculine suffix pronoun.
With the contraction theory of “al ilah” applied in Arabic, rather than in English, the second radical letter “L” in the Arabic word “ilaah” is doubled when the “i”(alif kasrah) is dropped to take the word “al” in order to contract “al” and “lah” in the Arabic language.

EXAMPLE

1) al ilaah
2) al-llaah
3) alllaah

Such an etymological contraction is not possible in the Arabic language in which the word would be meaningless therefore prohibited http://www.geocities.com/uwas2001/Dunleep.htm


Please go back to above link Quote to read the full article.

Now let us see what our knowledgeable christians who have some sort of knowledge of arabic have to say :

The spelling (rasm) "'lyh" was even involved in finding the ultimate orthography
for God's name "Allaah" in Arabic. It is hard to believe that "Allaah" goes back
to Arabic "al-'ilaah", as Edward William Lane summarizes the traditional
theoretical efforts of the Arab grammarians in his Arabic-English Lexicon. http://www.answering-islam.org/Quran/So ... laha2.html


These are plain logical facts presented in the light of Arabic grammar and Orthography and Lexiconic reality.

Every arabic speaker knows it literally means " there is no god except the god"

so which term is the god? and which term simply means 'god'?

The term 'Rasulu-llah' or "rasullah" means "slave of god" which term is god?

There are numerous muslim material that state that "allah" is a contraction of "al -ilah" are you honestly telling us they are all in error?


Again do you speak arabic ? I speak fus'ha Arabic and when I read the statement "laa ilaaha illallaah" it means only " there is no ilaah ~ (God/god) except Allah " . The name Allah in arabic is a proper noun. It does not mean "there is no god but the god" which is a contradiction to it self cause "the god" is vague as you implied, but denoting the main god out of others which still would give the notion of other gods.

Yes I would agree that many Muslims think the name Allah is a contraction of al-ilah. They are merely following something they have no knowledge of and cannot produce proof from an Arabic Dictionary or Lexicon cause NONE of the Arabic Lexicon or Dictionaries confirm the name is a contraction. Most of these same muslims believe suicide bombing is allowed in islam but when you turn the pages of the Quran we find the opposite :

Oh You who believe ! Do not eat up your wealth among you selves in vainity except that it be traffic and trade by mutual good-will; and do not kill your selves, verily Allah has been to you most merciful (Quran 4:29)


Some of those who speak arabic do not even know there own language, the same for people who speak english but are horrible in grammar and lack of understanding the definition of words, Whom both, are ignorant of the actual meaning but only follow that which they hear in tradition.

I do not see a valid point here, 400 years before Mohammed the symbol of Hubal was already being put atop of roofs.


There is a very valid point here. Islam never had incorporated the symbol of the Crescent Moon until after the Ottoman empire in which it was adopted from. Please visit the facts http://www.fotw.net/flags/islam.html this is not a muslim web site this is Flags and Symbols research site with numerous reference by the ELITE scholars, historians, and theologians, and not one of them are muslim.

Islam was obtained from paganism, it is seethed in paganism, you are a pagan, it is an insult to us, the apostles, christianity and to God for you to claim you serve the same God.


No love in those words at all. But they are noted and respected as your opinion and I am happy to be assualted for the sake of the truth for the son of Maryam the servant of God. Yes you are right about one thing WE do not worship the same God. If you beleive Jesus is God, or for the Arabic speaking Christians Jesus is Allah, no we DO not worship the same God, and any muslims that says such a thing obviously does not know his own book

Indeed those(Arabic speaking Christians) have disblieved who say: Verily Allah is he the Messiah son of Maryam...(Quran 5:17,72)


Now as for those Christians who do not beleive the son of Maryam is God or Allah or YHWH or Aalaha (aramaic) then yes we all Jews, Chrisitians and muslims worship the same God. As me being a former Jew, Jews also say the same about Christians who worship Jesus as pagans, and that they do not worhip the same God as those Christians that worship Jesus in which the Jews deny him all together as an imposter and false prophet. please read the Jewish Thalmud.

What name did Jesus use to refer to the almighty creator in his mother tongue ? The Aramaic name was Aalah the Aramaic form of the Arabic name Allaah. Reference goto www.peshitta.org Click on TOOLS/LEXICON then enter into search drive the word GOD click on search and there you have it from the Aramaic lexicon new testament bible concordance.
Download Quran and Hadeeth for Free here http://www.islamasoft.co.uk/downloads.html Learn about Islam from a Non dictatorial view

Liberate
Preacher
Preacher
Posts: 200
Joined: Sat Apr 10, 2004 04:41 pm

Postby Liberate » Tue Jun 08, 2004 09:43 pm

All those who claim the name Allah is a contraction of al-ilah make no reference to Arabic authorities such as Arabic Scholars or Arabic Lexicons
.


Let me ask you a few simple questions, just in case anybody reading your post falls for this old regurgitated trick of sleight of hand.

Did the koran alter the arabic language?
Did it affect the rules of the arabic language?
Did it add words to the arabic language?
There is a copy of the koran in heaven in perfect arabic so who has to back down when it comes to a grammatical error the koran? alledgedly from the lips of allah via jibreel or the rules of the arabic language?


Once you have found out the answers to these questions you will have a clearer understanding of your classical arabic.



...what about their own God given logic when applied to their scruptures? what exactly does the holy books have to say, what does the quran and sunnah have to say this should take precedence over any apologetic material


In islam based on the Quran and Sunnah when Adam and his wife finally came down to the Earth from the paradise (Quran 2:30-39)


And why did they come down to earth?
Did Mohammed have an answer? or is this one of his many plagiarised stories he didn't comprehend?

they received words from their Lord of how to repent in which they learnt and weeped unto their Lord with these words upon the earth (Quran 7:23).


They received words and how to weep for repentance for what crime exactly?



This place on earth was named after the commemoration of the even of Adam and his wife called "Bakka" meaning "a place of weeping or wailing" where the first house of worship for mankind (Quran 3:96) was built by Adam


Let us see what your sunnah has to say about the black stone:

Tabari I:189 “The Messenger took me by the hand and said, ‘Allah created soil on Saturday. Upon it, He created the mountains on Sunday. He created the trees on Wednesday, scattered animals on Thursday, and made Adam as the last of His creatures after the afternoon prayer on Friday

What afternoon prayer? which direction? Who was involved in this prayer when Adam hadn't been created yet? soil before mountains?.... what on earth is this?

Tabari I:294 “Adam built the House with materials from five mountains: Mount Sinai, the Mount of Olives, Mount Lebanon, and al-Judi. He constructed its foundations with materials from Mount Hira near Mecca. When he was finished with its construction the angel went out with him to Arafat. He showed him all the rites connected with the pilgrimage that people perform today. Then he went with him to Mecca and Adam circumambulated the House for a week. Returning to the land of India, he died upon Mount Nudh.”

Tabari I:298 “The Black Stone which was originally whiter than snow was brought down with Adam as well as the staff of Moses. It was made from the myrtle of Paradise, which, like Moses, was ten cubits (five meters) tall, and also myrrh and incense. Then anvils, mallets, and tongs were revealed to him. When Adam was cast down upon the mountain, he looked at an iron rod growing on the mountain. The first thing of iron he hammered was a long knife [also known as a sword]. Then he hammered the oven, the one which Noah inherited and that boiled with the punishment in India. When Adam fell down, his head brushed against heaven. As a result, he became bald and passed on baldness to his children.”


“The stone turned black because it was fingered by menstruating women.”

Tabari I:302 “Eventually, when Allah drowned the people of Noah, He lifted it up, but its foundation remained. Allah established it as a residence for Abraham who (re)built its later form.”

Tabari I:303 “When we were sitting in the mosque, Mujhid said, ‘Do you see this?’ I replied, you mean the Stone?’ He said, ‘You call it a stone?’ I said, ‘Is it not a stone?’ He said, ‘I was told by Abdallah bin Abbas that it was a white jewel that Adam took out of Paradise to wipe his tears—tears that did not stop for 2,000 years. I said, ‘Why and how did it turn black?’ He replied, ‘Menstruating women were touching it in the Jahiliyyah [the Time of Ignorance—i.e. pre-Islam]’”

Tabari I:189 “The Jews asked the Prophet, ‘What about Sunday?’ The Messenger answered, ‘On it, Allah created the earth and spread it out.’ They asked about Monday, and he replied: ‘On it He created Adam.’” . “Then they asked about Saturday and mentioned God’s resting on it. Then the Prophet got very angry so Allah then revealed to him: ‘We have created the heavens and the earth and what is between them in six days and fatigue did not touch Us.’” This became Qur’an 50:38.



Islam was obtained from paganism, it is seethed in paganism, you are a pagan, it is an insult to us, the apostles, christianity and to God for you to claim you serve the same God.


No love in those words at all.


I am sorry but I cannot love your idolatry sugarcoated with monotheism, sometimes the truth hurts and must be said for your own good.


But they are noted and respected as your opinion and I am happy to be assualted for the sake of the truth for the son of Maryam the servant of God. Yes you are right about one thing WE do not worship the same God. If you beleive Jesus is God, or for the Arabic speaking Christians Jesus is Allah, no we DO not worship the same God, and any muslims that says such a thing obviously does not know his own book


I am sorry I find it very hard to come to terms that you are happy at the thought of obtaining houris/whores? with regenerative hymens in the eternal brothel you call paradise, just because you call it paradise does not make it paradise, just because you call your god God does not make him God, this has been the sole emphasis of my point.

What name did Jesus use to refer to the almighty creator in his mother tongue ? The Aramaic name was Aalah the Aramaic form of the Arabic name Allaah. Reference goto www.peshitta.org Click on TOOLS/LEXICON then enter into search drive the word GOD click on search and there you have it from the Aramaic lexicon new testament bible concordance.


Ok if you would like to go down that route what does alah mean in aramaic and hebrew? isn't alah more close to allah than elah?

Pls refer to my first post.

Now as for those Christians who do not beleive the son of Maryam is God or Allah or YHWH or Aalaha (aramaic) then yes we all Jews, Chrisitians and muslims worship the same God. As me being a former Jew, Jews also say the same about Christians who worship Jesus as pagans, and that they do not worhip the same God as those Christians that worship Jesus in which the Jews deny him all together as an imposter and false prophet. please read the Jewish Thalmud.


I find it incredulous you can utter such a statement, if you are indeed a former jew I must assume you are an islamic neophyte having lived in an islamic ruled country myself for 11 years I hope you are aware of this hadith:

""The Day of Resurrection will not arrive until the Moslems make war against the Jews and kill them, and until a Jew hiding behind a rock and tree, and the rock and tree will say: 'Oh Moslem, oh servant of Allah, there is a Jew behind me, come and kill him!'" (Sahih Bukhari 004.52.176) "

Are you one of those that chose to ignore parts of islam to soothe your conscience?

H2O
Preacher
Preacher
Posts: 782
Joined: Thu Jun 03, 2004 09:00 pm
Location: Boca Raton, Florida

Postby H2O » Wed Jun 09, 2004 03:12 am

Did the koran alter the arabic language?

No the Quran did not alter the arabic language it preserved it, and its grammar. The Quran was revealed at the time when the Arabic language was at its peak. The Quran was revered by the Greatest Orators and Poets of that time, it was unchallendge in its composition and elloquence. It is the standard of the Arabic language it self, which conformed to the science of the southern arabic language spoken in the time of Muhammads that remained more stable and closest to the original semitic language. http://www.studylight.org/enc/isb/view.cgi?number=T664, http://linguistics.byu.edu/classes/ling ... rabic.html , http://www.fas.harvard.edu/~nelc/lang_d ... islam.html , http://arabworld.nitle.org/introduction.php?module_id=1 , http://www.student.virginia.edu/~arabweb/language.htm , http://www.al-islam.org/Seal/13.htm .

Did it affect the rules of the arabic language?

It standardized it, which does not mean it altered it. The reference sites above by the Professors, Institutes, even Christian scholars confirm this.

Did it add words to the arabic language?

No. There are words in the Quran which are arabicized that have NO ARABIC ROOT WORD which only make up 1% of the Quran, the 99% majority of the Quranic words all have arabic root words which are of semetic origin shared by the Semetic family of lanuguages .The total vocabulary of words in the Quran is 1,500 which make up 77,943 of the number of words used in the Quran all together http://www.zikr.org/fast/vocabularyofquran.htm . A Christian list of 24-30 words are criticized as borrowed or foreign words. As for my self I looked into these words, to the contrary, most of them are derived from arabic root words, the form of its usage appears only for the first time in the Quran which could not be found in pre-islamic literature drove them to conclude these words are foreign or borrowed from another language. Where the lack of research comes in is did arabic speaking Chrisitains and Jews use these words ? If no, how do you know this ? In order to prove other wise you must produce evidence from arabic speaking Jews and Christian literature dating before and during the time of Muhammad that uses other words. The Strongest evidence of literature is the Quran cause where these words are mentioned they are addressing the Arabic speaking Jews, Chrisitians, Sabians, and Pagans in Muhammad's time that he in encountered whom were already acquinted with the jargon in which they understood clearly.

Once you have found out the answers to these questions you will have a clearer understanding of your classical arabic.

Do you think you are speaking to a sunday school student of Arabic ? Please dont under estimate me, I know more Arabic than you can Fathom. If you ever wanna hear me speak Arabic and converse with Arabs them selves you can always come and hear my lectures on Yahoo Islamic Chat:9. I go by the Yahoo ID: DunleepX .
The problem I see with you which I have noticed is that your form of research and learning is higly relied and schooled on Christian criticism rather than, and again I would say it, from the PROFESSIONALS of the Arabic Language and the Semetic Language it self. I know where your form of thinking is coming from and it is not SCIENITIFIC by any means but strickle a passive view.

[b]Liberate Goes off again into another topic.[/b]

Your posts now go off into another direction. Any person who reads this with sense will see it. Now you have gone off in full assualt on the religion of islam deviating from the topic of this forum "The moon god - al - ilah". What does the rest of that stuff that follows after your last post that I answered have to do with the topic ? If people dont see your deviation then something must be mentally wrong them. However, I will answer your "off the topic criticism" on another board for a new topic " Christianity v.s. Islam " where I would be more than glad to exert censure. http://www.jesus-christ-forums.com/home/viewtopic ... 3319#33319

Alllaah not the Moon God Hubal

We have establish one thing here on this post which you failed to prove other wise is that Alllaah is NOT the Moon God Hubal and was never viewed by pagan Arabs of having no assocciation with any Idol that you so aledgedly claim. Also, there was a new discovery made by an Archeologist which follows :

Recently Father Pecerillo, a famous Franciscan Archiologist, found morethan twenty churches in Madaba at the south of Jordan. From the Forth Century we found houses in Syria, Lebanon, Iraq and Palestine with this inscriptionin Arabic :"Bism El-Lah al Rahman al Rahim" that showed that Christians were the first to use this name so as to indicate their beliefin the Holy Trinity, more than two hundred years before Islam. http://www.al-bushra.org/arbhrtg/arbxtn04.htm


"Bism El-Lah al Rahman al Rahim" (Arab Christian) and " Bism illah irRahman irRahim "(Quranic) both mean " In the name of Alllaah(properly spelled) The most compasionate The most Merciful", where the name Allah is literally, USED.
Download Quran and Hadeeth for Free here http://www.islamasoft.co.uk/downloads.html Learn about Islam from a Non dictatorial view

User avatar
webmaster
Admin
Admin
Posts: 5186
Joined: Fri Mar 15, 2002 12:00 am
Location: Tobaccoville NC

Postby webmaster » Wed Jun 09, 2004 03:29 am

H2O wrote:Did the koran alter the arabic language?

No the Quran did not alter the arabic language it preserved it, and its grammar. The Quran was revealed at the time when the Arabic language was at its peak. The Quran was revered by the Greatest Orators and Poets of that time, it was unchallendge in its composition and elloquence. It is the standard of the Arabic language it self, which conformed to the science of the southern arabic language spoken in the time of Muhammads that remained more stable and closest to the original semitic language. http://www.studylight.org/enc/isb/view.cgi?number=T664, http://linguistics.byu.edu/classes/ling ... rabic.html , http://www.fas.harvard.edu/~nelc/lang_d ... islam.html , http://arabworld.nitle.org/introduction.php?module_id=1 , http://www.student.virginia.edu/~arabweb/language.htm , http://www.al-islam.org/Seal/13.htm .


H2O wrote:Did the KJV alter the english language?

No the KJV did not alter the english language it preserved it, and its grammar. The KJV was revealed at the time when the english language was at its peak. The KJV was revered by the Greatest Orators and Poets of that time, it was unchallendge in its composition and elloquence. It is the standard of the english language it self.....blah blah blah!



This sounds like the KJV only people, who worships a spirit, created out of a man made Language!
http://www.av1611.org/kjv/knowkjv.html

H2O
Preacher
Preacher
Posts: 782
Joined: Thu Jun 03, 2004 09:00 pm
Location: Boca Raton, Florida

Postby H2O » Wed Jun 09, 2004 03:49 am

The Funny thing is that the KJV cannot be compared with the Quran. The Bible was originally revealed in the Hebrew and Aramaic languages not English. The Quran is in Arabic not English. English didnt exist in the time of when the bible was originally revealed nor during the time of when the Quran was also revealed. Also, you may not be aware of this, but when you translate from one language into another you LOSE MEANING, which makes the translation subject to interpretation of one veiws based on culture and ideology, So your not getting the 100% meaning in which you would have to go back to the original to be explicit. 8) Also the muslims have an orignial text, you dont. :lol:
Download Quran and Hadeeth for Free here http://www.islamasoft.co.uk/downloads.html Learn about Islam from a Non dictatorial view

User avatar
webmaster
Admin
Admin
Posts: 5186
Joined: Fri Mar 15, 2002 12:00 am
Location: Tobaccoville NC

Postby webmaster » Wed Jun 09, 2004 04:10 am

An orginal text of what?
What Muhammad wrote down with his own hands?
I would love to see this!

The KJV can be compared to the Quran because Muslims and Christians both do the same thing. They take a human language and make it into an idol.

idol
That on which the affections are strongly (often excessively) set; an object of passionate devotion; a person or thing greatly loved or adored.

This idol within their minds becomes the spirit they use to understand what they are reading.

They don't use the Spirit of God to understand what they are reading, they use this man made spirit.

If this man made spirit doesn't have all the answers then they create commentaries written by men to answer them.

Where do you fit?

H2O
Preacher
Preacher
Posts: 782
Joined: Thu Jun 03, 2004 09:00 pm
Location: Boca Raton, Florida

Postby H2O » Wed Jun 09, 2004 04:45 am

An orginal text of what?
What Muhammad wrote down with his own hands?
I would love to see this!


You obviously dont know what a TEXT is different from a MANUSCRIPT. What am I writing write now. This is a TEXT format of words. Can you touch it ? The QURAN is a RECITAL OF WORDS which were writen down and transmitted in text, and verbally. The Text remained the same word for word as it was transmitted. Do you need the dictionary for the meaning of text ? Remember I said Original TEXT not original Manuscripts. The same TEXT we have today is the same TEXT in words that was utters by Muhammad.
Download Quran and Hadeeth for Free here http://www.islamasoft.co.uk/downloads.html Learn about Islam from a Non dictatorial view

Liberate
Preacher
Preacher
Posts: 200
Joined: Sat Apr 10, 2004 04:41 pm

Postby Liberate » Wed Jun 09, 2004 10:30 am

Alllaah not the Moon God Hubal

We have establish one thing here on this post which you failed to prove other wise is that Alllaah is NOT the Moon God Hubal and was never viewed by pagan Arabs of having no assocciation with any Idol that you so aledgedly claim. Also, there was a new discovery made by an Archeologist which follows :


Did you read the hadiths I posted about Hubal and how the pagan arabs conducted their prayers to the idol Hubal and allah?

Ishaq:66/Tabari VI:2 “It is alleged, and Allah only knows the truth, that Abdul Muttalib encountered opposition when he was digging Zamzam. He vowed that if given ten sons, to make his labor less arduous and to protect him, he would sacrifice one of them to Allah at the Ka’aba.”

[ This is a pagan praying to allah a generation before Mohammed]

Ishaq:67 “They used to conduct their affairs according to the decisions of the arrows.” By throwing arrows at the feet of the head idol in the ka'aa which was Hubal. Am I to believe that the man would be praying to allah and then ask another idol for the decision? does that make any sense?


Recently Father Pecerillo, a famous Franciscan Archiologist, found morethan twenty churches in Madaba at the south of Jordan. From the Forth Century we found houses in Syria, Lebanon, Iraq and Palestine with this inscriptionin Arabic :"Bism El-Lah al Rahman al Rahim" that showed that Christians were the first to use this name so as to indicate their beliefin the Holy Trinity, more than two hundred years before Islam. http://www.al-bushra.org/arbhrtg/arbxtn04.htm


"Bism El-Lah al Rahman al Rahim" (Arab Christian) and " Bism illah irRahman irRahim "(Quranic) both mean " In the name of Alllaah(properly spelled) The most compasionate The most Merciful", where the name Allah is literally, USED.


A word of advice before copying and pasting articles from answering-christianity be sure to check it has not already been refuted in answering-islam, this particular discovery has already been exposed as a pack of lies. The first term is aramaic not arab christian and it means "In the name of the Father, the Son and the Holy Spirit" in aramaic, you can see where the plagiarism of bismillah came from. You do know that rahman in aramaic means 'son' isn't allah also known as al rahman? with the definitive article meaning "the son"?

H2O
Preacher
Preacher
Posts: 782
Joined: Thu Jun 03, 2004 09:00 pm
Location: Boca Raton, Florida

Postby H2O » Wed Jun 09, 2004 09:32 pm

Did you read the hadiths I posted about Hubal and how the pagan arabs conducted their prayers to the idol Hubal and allah?

Ishaq:66/Tabari VI:2 “It is alleged, and Allah only knows the truth, that Abdul Muttalib encountered opposition when he was digging Zamzam. He vowed that if given ten sons, to make his labor less arduous and to protect him, he would sacrifice one of them to Allah at the Ka’aba.”


That Hadith mentions nothing of Hubal directly or indirectly, and Did you read the Hadith and Quran Verse's I posted ?

Allah cannot be seen



Quote:
No vision can grasp Him(Allah). But His grasp is over all vision: He is above all comprehension, yet is acquainted with all things. (Koran 6:103)
He(Allah) is the First and the Last, the Evident and the Hidden: and He has full knowledge of all things. (Koran 57:3)

Allah not a sun or moon god


Quote:
Among His(Allah's) Signs are the Night and the Day, and the Sun and the Moon. No not prostrate (in worship) to the Sun nor the Moon, but prostrate (in worship) to Allah who created them both, if it is Him ye wish to serve. (Koran 41:37)

Hubal the moon-god and Allah were not the same God


Quote:
Sahih Al-Bukhari Volumn 005, Book 059, Hadith Number 375.
-----------------------------------------
Narated By Al-Bara : We faced the pagans on that day (of the battle of Uhud) and the Prophet placed a batch of archers (at a special place) and appointed 'Abdullah (bin Jubair) as their commander and said, "Do not leave this place; and if you should see us conquering the enemy, do not leave this place, and if you should see them conquering us, do not (come to) help us," So, when we faced the enemy, they took to their heel till I saw their women running towards the mountain, lifting up their clothes from their legs, revealing their leg-bangles. The Muslims started saying, "The booty, the booty!" 'Abdullah bin Jubair said, "The Prophet had taken a firm promise from me not to leave this place." But his companions refused (to stay). So when they refused (to stay there), (Allah) confused them so that they could not know where to go, and they suffered seventy casualties. Abu Sufyan ascended a high place and said, "Is Muhammad present amongst the people?" The Prophet said, "Do not answer him." Abu Sufyan said, "Is the son of Abu Quhafa present among the people?" The Prophet said, "Do not answer him." Abd Sufyan said, "Is the son of Al-Khattab amongst the people?" He then added, "All these people have been killed, for, were they alive, they would have replied." On that, 'Umar could not help saying, "You are a liar, O enemy of Allah! Allah has kept what will make you unhappy." Abu Safyan said, "Superior may be Hubal!" On that the Prophet said (to his companions), "Reply to him." They asked, "What may we say?" He said, "Say: Allah is More Elevated and More Majestic!" Abu Sufyan said, "We have (the idol) Al-'Uzza, whereas you have no 'Uzza!" The Prophet said (to his companions), "Reply to him." They said, "What may we say?" The Prophet said, "Say: Allah is our Helper and you have no helper." Abu Sufyan said, "(This) day compensates for our loss at Badr and (in) the battle (the victory) is always undecided and shared in turns by the belligerents. You will see some of your dead men mutilated, but neither did I urge this action, nor am I sorry for it." Narrated Jabir: Some people took wine in the morning of the day of Uhud and were then killed as martyrs.


Your interpretation of Tabari's hadith contradicts Quran and the hadith above which is SAHIH (Authentic) that declares Allah is Greater than Hubal. To remind you Tabari's collection of Hadith are not ruled as Sahih. Also in the religon of ISLAM Hadiths are not inspired nor are they the WORDS OF ALLAH, they do not supersede the Quran in Islam.
Islam does not deny the history that the pagans gave reverence to Allah. This does not denote that Allah was an Idol as you interpretated it to be that contradicts my posting that supersede yours by authority. If you dont know the levels of authority of hadeeth I think you need to go do a lot more studying. Tabari hadiths are hasan (good) there are not Sahih (sound/authentic), hasan hadiths DO NOT supersede Sahih hadiths in authority. Anyhow, regardless, your quote of Tabari hadith doesnt say anything of Allah being an Idol. As again, the Abrahamic religion was idolterated by the descendants of Ishmael in which the rights of sacrifice to Allah was originally part of the Abrahamic religion that was still practiced by the idolterous descendance of Ishmael.

To every people did We(Allah and his majesty) appoint rites (of sacrifice), that they might celebrate the name of Allah over the sustenance He gave them from animals (fit for food), but your God is One God: submit then your wills to Him (in Islam): and give thou the good news to those who humble themselves, (Quran 22:34)

It is not their meat nor their blood, that reaches Allah: it is your piety that reaches Him: He has thus made them subject to you, that ye may glorify Allah for His guidance to you: and proclaim the Good News to all who do right. (Quran 22:37)


The quotation from the quran makes it clear that the practice of sacrifice was apointed upon all people in whom Allah sent messengers to including the children of Israel whom are spoken of more times in the Quran than any other people. The Blood atonement of sin in Islam is pagan and is rejected where as the meat and blood of the sacrificial animal means nothing to Allah.

Forbidden to you (for food) are: dead meat, blood, the flesh of swine, and that on which hath been invoked the name of other than Allah; that which hath been killed by strangling, or by a violent blow, or by a headlong fall, or by being gored to death; that which hath been (partly) eaten by a wild animal; unless ye are able to slaughter it (in due form); that which is sacrificed onto any Idol...(Quran 5:3)


So if Allah was an idol why would He say not to eat food that is sacrifice to any Idol. Thus would include Allah himself then all of us muslims would have to starve to death. You interpretation is silly in quoting Tabari hadiths and again prejudiced. You dont know nothing about the teaching of Islam you are just following what some web site keeps on rambling about that keeps you quoting Tabari hadiths from and not one quote form the supreme authority which is the Quran. This is the foundation of the Muslims faith, hadiths are subject to error and contradiction not Quran, and if you wish to debate on what you may claim to be contradictions in the Quran we can do this on another forum " Does the Quran have contradictions " http://www.jesus-christ-forums.com/home/viewtopic ... 3357#33357 . and I hope you are versed in Arabic.

[ This is a pagan praying to allah a generation before Mohammed]

Ishaq:67 “They used to conduct their affairs according to the decisions of the arrows.” By throwing arrows at the feet of the head idol in the ka'aa which was Hubal. Am I to believe that the man would be praying to allah and then ask another idol for the decision? does that make any sense?


Your repeating your self. I already refuted this with the islamic tradition and Quranic teaching of how the Abrahamic faith was once pure and then currupted and then restored to its original status. Thus is per your own words "what about their own God given logic when applied to their scruptures? what exactly does the holy books have to say, what does the quran and sunnah have to say this should take precedence over any apologetic material." in which you never posted a single Quranic verse is superior to any hadith.What you are doing is to the same manner if I was to go back to the history of the Jews when they idolterated the religion of Moses when they started woshiping Baal and other deities but still revered YHWH along with other deities. So does this mean that YHWH in the Bible was a pagan god ? SubhaanaAlllaah !.

A word of advice before copying and pasting articles from answering-christianity be sure to check it has not already been refuted in answering-islam, this particular discovery has already been exposed as a pack of lies


Here you go again. You never checked the reference link, this tells me you can careless of what proof is presented, this shows your zeal of arrogance in this dialogue. If you had checked the link you will see it is not answering-christianity it is an Arab Christian web site http://www.al-bushra.org/arbhrtg/arbxtn04.htm .
I am being scientific in the matter which you cannot do. Now I would agree with you on one thing though until this new discovery has become more general and published with pics to show proof of its discovery then we all can doubt its authenticity but it can still be considered until warranting evidence is shown contrary.

The first term is aramaic not arab christian and it means "In the name of the Father, the Son and the Holy Spirit" in aramaic, you can see where the plagiarism of bismillah came from. You do know that rahman in aramaic means 'son' isn't allah also known as al rahman? with the definitive article meaning "the son"?


I would like know where you learnt Aramaic from ? Umm you forgot I use to be Jewish, and one of the things, just like in islam, we stressed is to learn Hebrew and Aramaic to be less reliable on translations. Father ? what word means father in that so called aramaic phrase in " Bism El-Lah al Rahman al Rahim " ? Rahman in Aramaic means Son ? Hmmm why havent you produced your proof from an Aramaic Lexicon source ? The Hebrew and Aramaic word for father is " ab " http://www.studylight.org/lex/heb/view.cgi?number=01 so where is "ab" in " Bism El-Lah al Rahman al Rahim " ? Rahman in Arabic and Aramaic both come from the semetic root " rahim (arabic), racham (hebrew), rakhem (aramaic) http://www.studylight.org/lex/heb/view.cgi?number=07355 both meaning to be have compassion or mercy .
Rahman (Arabic), Rachman (Hebrew fem. Rachmaniy) Rakhmiyn [mRakhman] (aramaic) all mean merciful or compassionate http://www.studylight.org/lex/heb/view.cgi?number=07362 . These links are for both Hebrew and Aramaic. But if you want Aramaic only then you can go here http://www.atour.com/cgi-bin/lexicon.cgi If you dont know how to type Aramaic then type the root code " Mxr " or the root word number 19813 . As for " Rakhmiyn " the lexical code is 29799 and for "mRakhman" is 19770 which are all derived from the aramaic root Mxr = rakhem ~ to have mercy or compassion. In "mRakhman" the prefixed aramaic letter "mem" or "m" is gramatical to make the word a proper adjective . For the Aramaic words for "SON" please go to http://www.atour.com/cgi-bin/lexicon.cgi then Type "Son" into the search drive.
Liberate you are making stuff up. The Phrase " Bism El-Lah al Rahman al Rahim " does not mean " In the name of the Father, the Son and the Holy Spirit " Prove it, I just proved it is not using Christian sources with Hebrew/Aramaic Lexicons, You are fagricating things here.
Download Quran and Hadeeth for Free here http://www.islamasoft.co.uk/downloads.html Learn about Islam from a Non dictatorial view

Liberate
Preacher
Preacher
Posts: 200
Joined: Sat Apr 10, 2004 04:41 pm

Postby Liberate » Thu Jun 10, 2004 03:36 am

Did you read the hadiths I posted about Hubal and how the pagan arabs conducted their prayers to the idol Hubal and allah?

Ishaq:66/Tabari VI:2 “It is alleged, and Allah only knows the truth, that Abdul Muttalib encountered opposition when he was digging Zamzam. He vowed that if given ten sons, to make his labor less arduous and to protect him, he would sacrifice one of them to Allah at the Ka’aba.”


That Hadith mentions nothing of Hubal directly or indirectly, and Did you read the Hadith and Quran Verse's I posted ?


I read your hadiths and your quranic verses, the hadiths makes it very obvious hubal was being worshipped and people were praying to allah (pagans) and then asking hubal for the decision, none of the verses and ahadith you regurgitated had anything to do with denying explicitly that allah and hubal were not one and the same.

This is from the sirat rasullah:

""After his [Mohammed's] birth his mother sent to tell his grandfather Abd al-Muttalib that she gave birth to a boy...It is alleged that Abd al-Muttalib took him before HUBAL IN THE MIDDLE OF THE KAABA,where he stood and PRAYED TO ALLAH, thanking him for his gift"

I don't know how explicit you want me to be, have you ever wondered why Hubal is never alluded to in the whole koran, if hubal or Sin as you call it was the lord of the ka'bah and the ka'bah was the house of allah how come the quran does not mention hubal even once, knowing how Mohammed likes to boast about defeating the pagans surely he would have had an inspiration to : say "Hubal is no more and his worshippers" but he didn't, ask yourself why.

Also note that Mohammed's father was called abdullah meaning slave of allah he was a pagan if his father (Mohammed's grandfather) named him a slave of allah and he was a pagan if he was a pagan, then whose slave was he? simple logic brings us to the conclusion that hubal is allah.

For 2 years Mohammed stayed with his grandfather whilst he was taught the rites associated with the ka'baa.

Here is an example of one of the legends that was taught to Muhammad by his grandfather.In the Koran we read about the Christian King of Abyssina who wanted to take over the Kaaba, and make it Christian. Look at what Muhammad says in the Koran: "Have you not considered how God [Allah] dealt with the army of the elephant? Did he not confound their stratagem and send against them flocks of birds which pelted them with clay stones..." (Surah 105).

This happened in the year of his birth, and it was still fresh in the minds of the Meccans. Also his grandfather at the time witnessed it first hand, and taught Muhammad this story as a boy.

This is what the sirat says:

"Abd al-Muttalib offered a last prayer to the MOON GOD [Hubal] to preserve the Kaaba...The Meccans expected the Abyssinians to Advance but HUBAL HEARD THEIR PRAYERS, overnight, and epidemic perhaps an aggravated form of small pox swept through the army...No one could doubt the power of the MOON GOD [Hubal] who kept the army of the elephants at bay"

Now he told Muhammad that Allah, i.e Hubal was the one that saved them. This incident was still fresh in the minds of the Meccans at the time of Muhammad. Why is it in the Koran?, you don't hear the Meccans rebuking Muhammad saying that Hubal saved them and not Allah if these two deities were different. Instead there is silence from the Meccans about Hubal because they already knew who ALLAH WAS, HUBAL, THE ALLAH OF THE MECCANS, AND Muhammad UNDERSTOOD IT THE SAME WAY, THAT'S WHY THERE IS NO DISPUTE

Allah cannot be seen

One of the innovations of Mohammed instead of being one of the 360 idols allah is now invisible and only talks to Mohammed via an epileptic fit, I am curious I have to take your word for it that you are jewish, but how does a jew reconcile abrogation with a "a God whose words changeth not"


Quote:
No vision can grasp Him(Allah).



Except Mohammed ofcourse

But His grasp is over all vision: He is above all comprehension, yet is acquainted with all things. (Koran 6:103)



Sounds like a poem the jinn possessed Hassan Bin Thabbit would sing.

He(Allah) is the First and the Last,


I don't need to tell you where this was plagiarised from


Allah not a sun or moon god


But allah has 3 daughters. Maybe that was abrogated too.


Quote:
Among His(Allah's) Signs are the Night and the Day, and the Sun and the Moon. No not prostrate (in worship) to the Sun nor the Moon, but prostrate (in worship) to Allah who created them both, if it is Him ye wish to serve. (Koran 41:37)



Maybe you need to read the sunnah to see the history of these verses, I assure you there is nothing divine about it. Mohammed or whoever edited the koran wanted to give the air of respectability and monotheism to combat judaism and christianity, something for the arabs in their language as they were 'unlettered'

Hubal the moon-god and Allah were not the same God


You have not proved this, you have extrapolated hadiths and made your own conclusion instead of asking some simple logical questions.


Your interpretation of Tabari's hadith contradicts Quran


Really? I had the impression they explained those verses they are the only biographical data we have on islam, written by and I can't emphasis this any more they were written BY MUSLIMS not western orientalist missionaries the hadiths of tabari and Ishaq condemn islam for the superstitious misogynist dribble it is.

and the hadith above which is SAHIH (Authentic) that declares Allah is Greater than Hubal.


Are you sure it says so, or do you take the generic term for pagans to mean hubal? What makes you think that after Mohammed had elevated allah over the daughters of allah and the other 360 idols that muslims didn't go about destroying all references to hubal and allah? the early muslims were very good at not leaving any evidence behind, don't you agree?

To remind you Tabari's collection of Hadith are not ruled as Sahih. Also in the religon of ISLAM Hadiths are not inspired nor are they the WORDS OF ALLAH, they do not supersede the Quran in Islam.


But they explain a great deal about islam, they explain the verses and the give body to the whole religion without those hadiths you have 114 epileptic utterances you call suras with no chronological basis.

Islam does not deny the history that the pagans gave reverence to Allah. This does not denote that Allah was an Idol as you interpretated it to be that contradicts my posting that supersede yours by authority
.

supercedes mine by authority? pls elaborate on how it does, if the pagans venerated allah then how did they do it? surely you understand how pagans need something physical in relation to their god the need to kiss it, to circumnavigate it...

If you dont know the levels of authority of hadeeth I think you need to go do a lot more studying.


Pls you are preaching to the choir, to me they are so many lies in the hadiths lies to make Mohammed look good, read the sahih and Abu Dawod, and Malik hadiths only gullible individuals would believe Mohammed initiated the Lord's prayer,

Narrated Abu Huraira: The Prophet said, "ALLAH SAID, ‘I have prepared for My righteous slaves (such excellent things) as no eye has ever seen, nor an ear has ever heard nor a human heart can ever think of.’" (Sahih Al-Bukhari, Volume 9, Book 93, Number 589)


However, as it is written: "No eye has seen, no ear has heard, no mind has conceived what God has prepared for those who love him." (1 Corinthians 2:9)


Narrated AbuUmamah Allah's Messenger (peace be upon him) said, "Blessed is he who has seen me, but seven times blessed is he who has not seen me but has believed in me."Ahmad transmitted it. (Number 1688; taken from the ALIM CD-ROM Version)

"Then Jesus told him, ‘Because you have seen me, you have believed; blessed are those who have not seen and yet have believed.’" John 20:29

Narrated AbudDarda': I heard the Apostle of Allah (peace_be_upon_him) say: If any of you is suffering from anything or his brother is suffering, he should say: Our Lord is Allah Who is in the heaven, holy is Thy name, Thy command reigns supreme in the heaven and the earth, as Thy mercy in the heaven, make Thy mercy in the earth; forgive us our sins, and our errors;

Thou art the Lord of good men; send down mercy from Thy mercy, and remedy, and remedy from Thy remedy on this pain so that it is healed up. (Sunan Abu Dawud, Book 28, Number 3883)


"After this manner therefore pray ye: Our Father which art in heaven, Hallowed be thy name. Thy kingdom come, Thy will be done in earth, as it is in heaven. Give us this day our daily bread. And forgive us our debts, as we forgive our debtors. And lead us not into temptation, but deliver us from evil: For thine is the kingdom, and the power, and the glory, for ever. Amen." Matthew 6:9-13

Tabari hadiths are hasan (good) there are not Sahih (sound/authentic), hasan hadiths DO NOT supersede Sahih hadiths in authority. Anyhow, regardless, your quote of Tabari hadith doesnt say anything of Allah being an Idol. As again, the Abrahamic religion was idolterated by the descendants of Ishmael in which the rights of sacrifice to Allah was originally part of the Abrahamic religion that was still practiced by the idolterous descendance of Ishmael.



I know the world has allsorts but for a former jew to utter this is just plain shocking. Do you honestly believe the children of Ishmael the uncle of Jacob had prophethood in their lineage, do you not see the significance of the descandants of Ishmael vying for the birth right akin to Esau and Jacob? Do you honestly believe Adam had a book, and so did Abraham all divinely revealed by frothing at the mouth, heart palpitations, swooning, bell ringing and bee buzzing sounds? Do you honestly believe this is how God inspired the prophets?




A word of advice before copying and pasting articles from answering-christianity be sure to check it has not already been refuted in answering-islam, this particular discovery has already been exposed as a pack of lies


Here you go again. You never checked the reference link, this tells me you can careless of what proof is presented, this shows your zeal of arrogance in this dialogue. If you had checked the link you will see it is not answering-christianity it is an Arab Christian web site http://www.al-bushra.org/arbhrtg/arbxtn04.htm .
I am being scientific in the matter which you cannot do. Now I would agree with you on one thing though until this new discovery has become more general and published with pics to show proof of its discovery then we all can doubt its authenticity but it can still be considered until warranting evidence is shown contrary.



Rest assured I read it, all credibility you had with me are now suspect. Let me get this straight you are referring me to a 'christian' website to show that the arab 'christian' had "in the name of allah" in their inscriptions?

The first term is aramaic not arab christian and it means "In the name of the Father, the Son and the Holy Spirit" in aramaic, you can see where the plagiarism of bismillah came from. You do know that rahman in aramaic means 'son' isn't allah also known as al rahman? with the definitive article meaning "the son"?


I would like know where you learnt Aramaic from ? Umm you forgot I use to be Jewish,


So you say, for all I know it is incumbent on a good muslim to lie for the benefit of the religion.

and one of the things, just like in islam, we stressed is to learn Hebrew and Aramaic to be less reliable on translations. Father ? what word means father in that so called aramaic phrase in " Bism El-Lah al Rahman al Rahim " ? Rahman in Aramaic means Son ? Hmmm why havent you produced your proof from an Aramaic Lexicon source ?


Maybe I should have stressed that it was a syriac phrase from arab christians. (Source: http://www.answer-islam.org/Osamalie.html)

not related to the lexicon website you are so happy to show.

It is a good thing you stress that the archealogical discovery on the website has to be taken with a pinch of salt as it doesn't look very professional, because it can easily be shown to be the other way round, pagan arabs being the first to utter the bismillah; this doesn't help you, either the website information is a lie in which case pagan arabs were the first to utter the bismillah, or the website is telling the truth about christian arabs praising God in a different language than aramaic or arabic which the nearest equivalent in arabic is what you are so happy to quote.

I don't have to remind you how efficient muslims were at converting former places of worship regardless of the religion into theirs, a muslim could simply have put that inscription in a former church.

I also suggest you read the arabic catholic website again

This is what http://www.answering-christianity.com/allah.htm the original source you plagiarised your material said:


Most Recent Discoveries:

Recently Father Pecerillo, a famous Franciscan Archiologist, found more than twenty churches in Madaba at the south of Jordan. From the Forth Century we found houses in Syria, Lebanon, Iraq and Palestine with this inscription in Arabic :"Bism [u]Allah al Rahman al Rahim" which showed that Christians were the first to use this name, Allah for GOD Almighty[/u], which proves that the name of GOD Almighty in the Noble Quran, "Allah" is the correct one. This also proves to us that the Bible is not all found. There are still missing pieces in it that disprove trinity.

This is what the Arabic Catholic site says: -
http://www.al-bushra.org/arbhrtg/arbxtn04.htm


Recently Father Pecerillo, a famous Franciscan Archiologist, found morethan twenty churches in Madaba at the south of Jordan. From the Forth Century we found houses in Syria, Lebanon, Iraq and Palestine with this inscriptionin Arabic :"Bism El-Lah al Rahman al Rahim" that showed that Christians were the first to use this name so as to indicate their beliefin the Holy Trinity, more than two hundred years before Islam.


Can you see it? Hint (about the Trinity)
Last edited by Liberate on Thu Jun 10, 2004 05:06 pm, edited 8 times in total.

Omega

Postby Omega » Thu Jun 10, 2004 03:42 am

farside wrote:Image For more information on the pagan origins of the star and crescent symbol, go to
http://members.lycos.nl/whatsthisthen/c ... -star.html Image


Image

From the Farside Image


:lol: :lol: .. :lol: :lol: :lol: .. :lol: ........ :lol: :lol:

H2O
Preacher
Preacher
Posts: 782
Joined: Thu Jun 03, 2004 09:00 pm
Location: Boca Raton, Florida

Postby H2O » Fri Jun 11, 2004 02:34 am

I read your hadiths and your quranic verses, the hadiths makes it very obvious hubal was being worshipped and people were praying to allah (pagans) and then asking hubal for the decision, none of the verses and ahadith you regurgitated had anything to do with denying explicitly that allah and hubal were not one and the same.


The Hadith that you posted makes no indication of the such.

Ishaq:66/Tabari VI:2 “It is alleged, and Allah only knows the truth, that Abdul Muttalib encountered opposition when he was digging Zamzam. He vowed that if given ten sons, to make his labor less arduous and to protect him, he would sacrifice one of them to Allah at the Ka’aba.”


There were 360 Idols at the Ka'abah everyone of them had their own position and people made sacrifices to them. Your interpretation of the Tabari hadith is that Abdul Muttalib, a pagan, intended to sacrifice one of his children to Allah in which at the Ka'abah sacrifices were also made to Hubal. This is your conjecture with the prestige that Hubal and Allah are the same. The flaw in your interpretation is that Hubal was not the only deity at the Ka'abah that sacrifices of children were made to.

Even so, in the eyes of most of the Pagans, their false deities made alluring the slaughter of their children, in order to lead them to their own destruction, and cause confusion in their religion. If Allah had willed, they would not have done so: but leave alone them and their inventions. [6:137]


The SAHIH Al-Bukhari hadith which is superior to the Tabari hadith you quoted makes it clear that Hubal and Allah were not the same deity as Allah was proclaimed to be greater than Hubal and al-Uzza:

Sahih Al-Bukhari Volumn 005, Book 059, Hadith Number 375.

...Abu Sufyan ascended a high place and said, "Is Muhammad present amongst the people?" The Prophet said, "Do not answer him." Abu Sufyan said, "Is the son of Abu Quhafa present among the people?" The Prophet said, "Do not answer him." Abd Sufyan said, "Is the son of Al-Khattab amongst the people?" He then added, "All these people have been killed, for, were they alive, they would have replied." On that, 'Umar could not help saying, "You are a liar, O enemy of Allah! Allah has kept what will make you unhappy." Abu Safyan said, "Superior may be Hubal!" On that the Prophet said (to his companions), "Reply to him." They asked, "What may we say?" He said, "Say: Allah is More Elevated and More Majestic!" Abu Sufyan said, "We have (the idol) Al-'Uzza, whereas you have no 'Uzza!" The Prophet said (to his companions), "Reply to him." They said, "What may we say?" The Prophet said, "Say: Allah is our Helper and you have no helper..."


The above hadith is clear. What you are doing would be like if I was to say " YHWH" was an Idol because in the past Jews used to worship Baal and other Idols, so YHWH and Baal are the same cause "the Tanakh or OldTestament makes it very obvious Baal was being worshipped and people were praying to YHWH (pagans) and then asking Baal for the decision.(I quoted you in the reverse of words)" Allah forbid !! There is a parallel of history with the Jews and Arabs that both fell to idolotry and adopted pagan inovated practices into their once pure religion, in which YHWH/Alllah sent a Prophet to them to warn them and to purify the religion from inovations.


Quote:
Among His(Allah's) Signs are the Night and the Day, and the Sun and the Moon. No not prostrate (in worship) to the Sun nor the Moon, but prostrate (in worship) to Allah who created them both, if it is Him ye wish to serve. (Koran 41:37)

Maybe you need to read the sunnah to see the history of these verses, I assure you there is nothing divine about it. Mohammed or whoever edited the koran wanted to give the air of respectability and montotheism to combat judaism and christianity, something for the arabs in their language as they were 'unlettered'


Irrelevant. We are following the standard of what you said :

You know it becomes pointless if all anybody does is quote and plagiarise what academics have to say on a matter, what about their own God given logic when applied to their scruptures? what exactly does the holy books have to say, what does the quran and sunnah have to say this should take precedence over any apologetic material.


This is not a debate of if the Quran is from Allah or not. This is about what does the teaching of Quran and Sunnah say relating to the topic of this forum. We have produce numerious Quran verses and hadith that speak of the reality of Allah in the time of Muhammad contrary to your views.

Quote:
Allah not a sun or moon god


But allah has 3 daughters. Maybe that was abrogated too
.

Well lets see what the Quran says about this :

[53:19] Have you (pagans) seen Lat, and 'Uzza,

[53:20] And another, the Third (goddess), Manat?

[53:21] What! for you(pagans) the male sex, and for Him, the female?

[53:22] Behold, such would be indeed a division most unfair!

[53:23] These are nothing but names which you (pagans) have devised, - ye and your fathers - for which Allah has sent down no authority (whatever). They follow nothing but conjecture and what their own souls desire! Even though there has already come to them Guidance from their Lord!

[39:3] Is it not to Allah that sincere devotion is due? But those(pagans) who take for protectors others than Allah (say): "We only serve them (the Idols) in order that they may bring us nearer to Allah." Truly Allah will judge between them in that wherein they differ. But Allah guides not such as are false and ungrateful.


As was said before Muhammad came and purified the religion of Abraham from its poletheism and inovated practices by the descendance of Ishmael.

Quote:
Your interpretation of Tabari's hadith contradicts Quran


Really? I had the impression they explained those verses they are the only biographical data we have on islam, written by and I can't emphasis this any more they were written BY MUSLIMS not western orientalist missionaries the hadiths of tabari and Ishaq condemn islam for the superstitious misogynist dribble it is.


Obviously yoou have no Idea of how hadith are selected. If a hadith contradicts Quran it is automatically rejected.

Quote:

and the hadith above which is SAHIH (Authentic) that declares Allah is Greater than Hubal.


What makes you think that after Mohammed had elevated allah over hubal that muslims didn't go about destroying all references to hubal and allah? the early muslims were very good at not leaving any evidence behind, don't you agree?


Nice wishful thinking. Prove it ! It seems you are in a bit of delima now as to Hubal and Allah. How could Muhammad elevate Allah over Hubal if the two were the same deity ? It sounds rediculous if you ask me. You can only elevate one thing over another if they are distinct.
Whats so interesting here in your statemtent above is that you recognize that the hadeth makes the distinction between Allah and Hubal but earlier in you post you say :

Quote:
Hubal the moon-god and Allah were not the same God


You have not proved this, you have extrapolated hadiths and made your own conclusion instead of asking some simple logical questions.


I have indeed proved it before and I will quote more Quranic verses that prove Allah was not an Idol in Makkah :

The Pagans could not see Allah

[17:90] They(the pagans) say: "We shall not believe in thee(Muhammad), until thou cause a spring to gush forth for us from the earth,

[17:91] "Or (until) thou have a garden of date trees and vines, and cause rivers to gush forth in their midst, carrying abundant water,

[17:92] "Or thou cause the sky to fall in pieces, as thou sayest (will happen), against us, or thou bring Allah and the angels before (us) face to face;

[210] Will they(the pagans) wait until Allah comes to them in canopies of clouds, with angels (in His train) and the question is (thus) settled? But to Allah do all questions go back (for decision).

Allah not recognized as one of the Idols

[29:17] "For you (pagans) do worship idols besides Allah, and ye invent falsehood. The things that ye worship besides Allah have no power to give you sustenance: then seek ye sustenance from Allah, serve Him, and be grateful to Him: to Him will be your return.


Thus you said "..none of the verses and ahadith you regurgitated had anything to do with denying explicitly that allah and hubal were not one and the same." You must be have bad reading comprehension. I would leave that to the visitors of this post who are unbias to determine that.

Quote:
To remind you Tabari's collection of Hadith are not ruled as Sahih. Also in the religon of ISLAM Hadiths are not inspired nor are they the WORDS OF ALLAH, they do not supersede the Quran in Islam.


But they explain a great deal about islam, they explain the verses and the give body to the whole religion without those hadiths you have 114 epileptic utterances you call suras with no chronological basis.


"114 epilptic utterances" ? Hmm lets see. The reports said whenever Muhammad received the revelation of the Quran it was always in public, he would fall down shaking in cold feverish sweat even in cold weather where they had to cover him up in blankets. Also his weight would increase more than three times its regular that even caused a camel that he was riding to fall to the floor when he was recieving revelation. Thus in the eyes of the pagans led them to think and believe that Muhammad was possesed in which they accused him of.
In the field of medicine and the study of neurology Epilepsy are iregulare discharge impulses of the brain that burst at one time over loading the centural nervuse system causing the Body to go into a state of shock giving temporary uncontiousness. The type of epilepsy to be identified with the nature of Muhammad's condition would be a Granmal Seizure. However, there is no report of foaming of the mouth nor him loosing his tongue which are two things that occure in a Granmal Seizure. If they were able to subdue his biting of the tongue then there should have been foaming of the mouth. Also, when having a Granmal Seizure the temperture of the body does not increase to the point of where one would start to sweat but to the contrary the body temperture starts to decrease due to abnormal shock, and then again for him to sweat in cold climate makes it very doubtful. Another thing when you have Granmal Siezure there is a loss in memory after recovery, not gain. So let us look at some examples of this "epileptic untterance".

[91:1] washshamsi wa dhuHaahaa ~ By the Sun and its appearance

[91:2] walqamari idzaa talaahaa ~ By the Moon when it succeeds it

[91:3] wannahaari idzaa jallaahaa ~ By the Day when reveals it

[91:4] wallayli idzaa yaghshaahaa ~ By the Night when it conceals it

[91:5] wassamaa'i wa maa banaahaa ~ By the Sky and what erected it

[91:6] walardhi wa maa TaHaahaa ~ By the Earth and what hurls it

[91:7] wa nafsiwwa maa sawwaahaa ~ By the soul and what proportioned it

[91:8] fa'alhamahaa fujoorahaa wa taqwaahaa ~ and then infused into it it's iniquity and its piety


Notice how the arabic of each verse all rhyme with each other ? the gender in arabic is exact no mistakes at all. Through out the whole Quran this style of rhyme occures at the ending of every verse.

[23:13] And indeed We have Created Man (male and female) from an extaction of clay

[23:14] Then We placed him as a sperm into a thing that sojournes and implants

[ 24:15] Then We made the sperm as a thing that clings and then We made the thing that clings as something that is chewed, and then We made the chewing as bones and then We clothed the bones with muscle then He (Allah) brings it out as another creation; and sublime is Allah the best of makers


The same rhyming pross is in the arabic of the above verse but this time it speaks about how we are created. The above is a stage by stage discription of embryo development.

I find it amazing that a man who was suppose to have an epileptic attack started to uttere these words right after. Go an show any Neurologist this and tell him the man who uttered these words did it right after having a granmal seizure, he would laugh at you silly.

"no chronological bases" You are right. If you ever took the time to read the Quran from A-Z, not a part here and there, and understood the character of its non chronological order. Do you know why every chapter in the Quran is called SURAH. Surah means "Step". Thus the Quran has a 114 STEPS. Step 1 Step 2 Step 3 etc...These steps are laid down in lessons. When you go to the next step or chapter it goes more into debt in matters and subjects previously mentioned or new ones. Also the order it is in starts out with longer to shorter verses and words. The vocabulary is harder in the begining that decreases to the end. This is easier for memorization purposes. Thus the composition of the Quran was DELIBERATELY set like this with a PURPOSE void to your understand.

Quote:
Islam does not deny the history that the pagans gave reverence to Allah. This does not denote that Allah was an Idol as you interpretated it to be that contradicts my posting that supersede yours by authority
.

supercedes mine by authority? pls elaborate on how it does


Yes the islamic authority Tabari you use to criticize islam with is superseded by Quran and SAHIH hadith if it contradicts either one of the two.

Quote:
If you dont know the levels of authority of hadeeth I think you need to go do a lot more studying.


Pls you are preaching to the choir, to me they are so many lies in the hadiths lies to make Mohammed look good, read the sahih hadiths only gullible individuals would believe Mohammed initiated the Lord's prayer,


If the whole thing is a LIE then why use hadith to your discretion. This makes you a hyprocrite on double standards cause you presented your self in this manner " what about their own God given logic when applied to their scruptures? what exactly does the holy books have to say, what does the quran and sunnah have to say this should take precedence over any apologetic material. " you reneged on this. Your motive was to use that what you believe is false against another, what does that make you?

I think our dialogue is over on this subject. I have laid the bases of refutation against your propaganda that you so deceitfully us when you your self acknowledge the falsness of hadiths. Oh I see. The hadiths that speak good about Muhammad are the false ones and the hadiths that speak bad or that can be interpreted as bad are the thrue ones. This is your prejudice.

Quote:
Recently Father Pecerillo, a famous Franciscan Archiologist, found morethan twenty churches in Madaba at the south of Jordan. From the Forth Century we found houses in Syria, Lebanon, Iraq and Palestine with this inscriptionin Arabic :"Bism El-Lah al Rahman al Rahim" that showed that Christians were the first to use this name so as to indicate their beliefin the Holy Trinity, more than two hundred years before Islam. http://www.al-bushra.org/arbhrtg/arbxtn04.htm ~H2O


Quote:
"Bism El-Lah al Rahman al Rahim" (Arab Christian) and " Bism illah irRahman irRahim "(Quranic) both mean " In the name of Alllaah(properly spelled) The most compasionate The most Merciful", where the name Allah is literally, USED. H2O


The first term is aramaic not arab christian and it means "In the name of the Father, the Son and the Holy Spirit" in aramaic, you can see where the plagiarism of bismillah came from. You do know that rahman in aramaic means 'son' isn't allah also known as al rahman? with the definitive article meaning "the son"? ~ Liberate


Again show us where the aramaic words for father, son, holy spirit is in "Bism El-Lah al Rahman al Rahim" with a dictionary. I showed the meaning of those words from Hebrew/Aramaic Lexicons and they mean no such thing as you claim. I think you have bad reading comprehension lets re-read what the article say again :

Recently Father Pecerillo, a famous Franciscan Archiologist, found morethan twenty churches in Madaba at the south of Jordan. From the Forth Century we found houses in Syria, Lebanon, Iraq and Palestine with this inscriptionin Arabic :"Bism El-Lah al Rahman al Rahim" that showed that Christians were the first to use this name so as to indicate their beliefin the Holy Trinity, more than two hundred years before Islam. http://www.al-bushra.org/arbhrtg/arbxtn04.htm


"this name" not "these names" as would be refering to "the Father, the Son and the Holy Spirit". What name (singular) they are talking about here? Also you didnt pay attention to the article very well, they said the "Bism El-Lah al Rahman al Rahim" INDICATED the holy trinity in Christianity, not its meaning per the words. "this name" is refering to "El-Lah" in "Bism El-Lah al Rahman al Rahim" in which "Bism El-Lah = Bism illah " > El-Lah = illah is the sufixed reading of the name "Allah" in Arabic with spelling transliterated variants rendered in english.

Alllaah (Arabic) = Aalah (Aramaic) = Elowahh (Hebrew) ~ God

Rahman (Arabic) = mRakhman (Aramaic) = Rachman (Hebrew) ~ Compassionate

Above is shown the linguistical cognates of the name Alllaah in Aramaic and Hebrew
Etymologically the foundation of the name Alllaah in Arabic is "llah or llaah" where the "A" is the uniform of the word due to its arabicization.

An interchangeable formula of the Semitic lyh or lwh sounds


lyh or lwh = layah or lawah (This is Arabic Orthagraphy)

ll = y are interchangable

Y and W are week radicals that are usually dropped in sound or pronounced as an “a” consonant called “alif maqsurah” when a particular word is modified.

llyh = yaah or yah

llwh = yaah or yah

As said from before the foundation of the name Alllaah is “llaah” which is without doubt interchangeable with “yahh” or “yaahh” (The ancient Hebrew Israelite name for GOD) that is based on dialect. "llah" and "yahh" are used in the same manner in both languages by their suffixation to nouns such as "abdullah" ~ servant of llah (Alllaah)and "Eliyahh" ~ strength of yahh (Yahowah)

If you dont know the Science of Semetic Linguistics then you would not understand this.
Download Quran and Hadeeth for Free here http://www.islamasoft.co.uk/downloads.html Learn about Islam from a Non dictatorial view

Liberate
Preacher
Preacher
Posts: 200
Joined: Sat Apr 10, 2004 04:41 pm

Postby Liberate » Fri Jun 11, 2004 01:49 pm

For some strange reason my edited post made some 9 hours before yours didn't get through in time it seems.

I am well aware you would use "elevated allah over hubal" that is one of the reasons why I edited the post, without stressing on what type of elevation I meant (Mohammed simply made allah invisible to make islam in line with the jews and christians according to one of the 10 commandments thou shalt have no graven images, if he wanted the jews and christians to come along to his religion this is one of the most logical things to do, but the jews and christians were laughing at him (read the hadiths) thats why he hated them so much).

Without the need to double post, I suggest you have a look at my post again.

And for all those reading this thread the reason why our friend is so adamant to defend allah against hubal is for this simple reason:

hubal ...hu'baal...ha'baal...BAAL.

Baal meant lord, ha'baal meant the lord, as al ilah meant the god. This is the same god that was warned about numerous times in the old testament yet it just seemed to reincarnate itself.

Now you see why our friend is so quick to put rest to the matter that allah is not hubal, it opens up a whole can of worms.

H2O
Preacher
Preacher
Posts: 782
Joined: Thu Jun 03, 2004 09:00 pm
Location: Boca Raton, Florida

Postby H2O » Sat Jun 12, 2004 12:20 am

I
am well aware you would use "elevated allah over hubal" that is one of the reasons why I edited the post, without stressing on what type of elevation I meant (Mohammed simply made allah invisible to make islam in line with the jews and christians according to one of the 10 commandments thou shalt have no graven images, if he wanted the jews and christians to come along to his religion this is one of the most logical things to do, but the jews and christians were laughing at him (read the hadiths) thats why he hated them so much).


This is your conjecture. This is not what you set forth as a standard for a debate, you said :

You know it becomes pointless if all anybody does is quote and plagiarise what academics have to say on a matter, what about their own God given logic when applied to their scruptures? what exactly does the holy books have to say, what does the quran and sunnah have to say this should take precedence over any apologetic material.


This what you said, and now you reneged. We agreed to fight with bullets, you ran out of bullets, then you threw the gun at me, then you went for what every else that can to throw....lol

What type of elevation ? Lets look at this again :

...Abu Safyan said, "Superior may be Hubal!" On that the Prophet said (to his companions), "Reply to him." They asked, "What may we say?" He said, "Say: Allah is More Elevated and More Majestic!...

The hadith uses the word "ELEVATE" ...what type of ELEVATE is this ? hmm lets see .


elevate
SYLLABICATION: el·e·vate
PRONUNCIATION: AUDIO: l-vt KEY
TRANSITIVE VERB: Inflected forms: ele·vat·ed, ele·vat·ing, ele·vates
1. To move (something) to a higher place or position from a lower one; lift.
2. To increase the amplitude, intensity, or volume of.
3. To promote to a higher rank.
4. To raise to a higher moral, cultural, or intellectual level.
5. To lift the spirits of; elate. See synonyms at


Your trying to squirm yourself out of this one. Also remember I Quoted many Quranic verses in which the Quran was written way before the hadith. Hadith was officially written almost two centuries after the Quran. Saying Muhammmad made Allah to be invisble is your conjecture to justify for those verses in Quran that make it clear Allah is not an Idol and He cannot be seen contrary to the reality of Hubal an Idol. Also you just came up with this, you started making cunjecture of this when you saw that there are verses in Quran that make it evident and clear from islamic doctrine about the relative existence of Alllaah that is contrary to the reality of Hubal. You didnt argue this in the begining which demonstrated this development of conjecture after the eveidence was presented to you per your standards.

And for all those reading this thread the reason why our friend is so adamant to defend allah against hubal is for this simple reason:

hubal ...hu'baal...ha'baal...BAAL.


Here you go again. The people reading this forum should start asking the Question of " Why does he say that such and such means this but doesnt give reference to a dictionary or Lexicon of the language of that word ? " The reason why is cause he/she is making things up.

Baal meant lord, ha'baal meant the lord, as al ilah meant the god. This is the same god that was warned about numerous times in the old testament yet it just seemed to reincarnate itself


:roll: O boy ! The word "Hubal" is an arabicized word linguistically conveying "husky one". It has no etymology in the arabic language cause its an arabicized word. The word only has a root in Hebrew and Aramaic http://www.studylight.org/lex/heb/view.cgi?number=01891 which means "to be vain". The word in arabic for "lord" is "Rabb".

I got alot more to throw at any of you, more versus from Quran and more reference from those Grammarians and Lexiconists who are non musilms

The name Alllaah (Allah) Unknown and not a contraction of the Arabic words "al-ilah" by a Christian critic of islam.

From a grammatical-lexical point of view, allaah doesn’t comply with the rules and its root still remains mysterious and unidentifiable, while, al-ilaah conforms perfectly with the rules and its root verb ‘alaha means to deify. Therefore al-ilaah is the accurate common name of the divine and Arabic translation of ‘eloah, ho-theos and God. The only option where Allah could be used is if it was a translation or synonym of either YHWH or ‘adonay. All the odds go against such possibility and rule out the option.



Up until now, the meaning of Allah is still a mystery! We have been able to understand why technically it is not a valid name for the Divine, either as a proper name or a tittle, yet its origin and root are still undisclosed. The next article will be dedicated to the search of the possible and real meaning and origin of the name Allah. http://www.abrahamic-faith.com/Allah.html


I read this critic's asualts against islam with pride, even though I despise some of the comments he made, however this man who is aquinted with the language gave his compeling evidence and concluded for a fact the name Alllaah (Allah) is not a contraction of al-ilah . I could refute many of his comments as for example to disprove Muhammad's prophethood in leu manner is because in the Quran the name YHWH is never mention.
What came accross my mind was well then what about Jesus ? No where in the new testament of the bible he uses the word YHWH but instead he uses "Aalah" in his Aramaic mother tongue. So does this mean because Jesus did not even utter these words which cannot be found in any of the GOSPELS in Aramaic or Greek that he was an imposter ? I think not.
However the cognate arabic forms of YHWH can be found in the Quran, "Al-hayy"~ The Living or Existing one (2:255) which is derived from the same root word as YHWH that is mentioned numerous of times in the Quran, and another "Assamad" ~ the self existing one (112:2) which corresponds to YHWH.
Another when he Quoted some irrelevant source of a muslim writer who claimed the name Allah is a common word which contradicts Quran, in which the Christian writer shows evidence that it is a Proper Noun as how it is used in the Quran and not a common noun whereas I agreed with him on this
Most of his Linguistical and Etymological analysis I agree with except for his theological bases that are influenced by indoctrination.

Alllaah and Hubal not the same deity (part 2 of 10)

I have tentatively reviewed Dr. Pavlovitch "On the Problem of the Pre-Islamic Lord of the Ka`ba" and have gathered some initial thoughts about the interpretations of Hubal in the article. I think that the concept that Allah is pre-Islamic Hubal is highly ambivalent and unfounded. To this end I would like to mention a few remarks that might assist in reconstructing the definition of this deity "Hubal". There are a few slight inaccurate Arabic translations of some words in verses and texts in the article that can change the meaning of the relevant statement. I can send a list of these words if desired.

a. The definition and use of the term-statements "Rabb al-Bayt": Lord (head) of the House, "Rabb al-Manzil": Lord (head) of the House (Mansion), "Rabb al-`A'ilah": Lord (head) of the Family, "Rabb al-'Usrah": Lord (head) of the House have the same meaning. That is the head of the family and in other situations the head of the city, the territory and the state. The terms "Rabb al-`A'ilah" and "Rabb al-'Usrah" are still used in the Arab world and convey exactly the same pre-Islamic definition. In government records and statistic information you find the term "Rabb al-`A'ilah" and "Rabb al-'Usrah" to designate the head of the family who is usually the male, the father.

a. The term "Rabbat al-Bayt" is also used to designate the wife as second in command after the husband, "Rabb al-Bayt". This definition has been in use in the Arab world since the pre-Islamic period through to the present time. In both cases the term Rabb and Rabbat do not imply any exaltation or deification.

a. Hubal can not be assumed to have been the sole lord of the Ka`ba in pre-Islamic times, and cannot be assumed to have had the status of "Allah". Interestingly enough, Hubal's presence was not as strong as Allat or al-`Uzza. Mohammed himself was not concerned with the cult of Hubal as much as with Allat, al-`Uzza, and Manat.

a. If the "sanam" of Hubal which occupied the Ka`ba in Mecca represented the image and the "deity" Allah, then why did Mohammed destroy it. He could easily have spared the statue and justified it as the image of Allah.

b. The "Ahnaf" of pre-Islamic Arabia were fully aware of the Ibrahimic (monotheistic) religion that Mohammed resumed in the form of Islam. They, the "Ahnaf" and the contemporaneous inhabitants of Arabia, were aware of the concept of Allah as the supreme God and of the fact that Hubal, Allat, al-`Uzza, Manat, and the other deities were but man-made mediators between human beings and God.

c. Finally I would like to present an excerpt from my Ph.D. dissertation "Early Arab Icons: Literary and Archaeological Evidence for the Cult of Religious Images in Pre-Islamic Arabia" (University of Iowa, 1993) related directly to Hubal with some details concerning this sanam that might shed more light on the concept and the definition of this idol.


Hubal was a deity worshipped at Mecca, who held an extremely important position in the ancient Arabian pantheon. A cornelian statue of Hubal stood inside the Ka`ba at Mecca and was in the form of a massive male figure. His cult involved divination and forecasting of future events.
The origin of the word "HBL" is uncertain. It may mean "fat", "fleshy" or "heavy". It has been suggested that Hubal is a later version of the Mesopotamian deity Ba`l, whose cult must have traveled into the Sinai and was called Ba'lu and Hab`al. This hypothesis is further supported by the fact that despite the preeminence of Hubal's cult at Mecca, he is never mentioned in the Qur'an. But instead, a mention of Ba`al is found: "Do you invoke Ba`al and discount the best creator (God)."

The tribe of Kalb, who dwelt in the Syrian Desert, used Hubal in proper names and in clan names, as is the case with Hubal ibn `Abdullah ibn Kinanah al-Kalbi.

Hubal is mentioned in a Nabataean inscription along with Dusares and Manat. This inscription is dated to the year 1 A. D. or B. C. and [is] still in situ at al-Hijr (Mada'in Salih) in northeast Saudi Arabia. Another Nabataean inscription dated to 5 A. D. mentions the name of the builder of a tomb "Ben-hobal," [that is], Ibn Hubal, meaning son of Hubal. As a deity, The name Hubal is found only in North Arabian inscriptions.

According to Ibn al-Kalbi and others, Khuzaymah ibn Mudrikah ibn al-Ya's ibn Mudhar erected the statue of Hubal inside the Ka`ba at Mecca. Therefore it was called the idol (sanam) of Khuzaymah. In front of the statue there were seven divination arrows. It was before the statue of Hubal that we are introduced to an analogous legend on the line of Abraham's sacrifice. `Abd al-Muttalib, grandfather of the Prophet Mohammed, shuffled the divination arrows in order to find out which of his ten children he should sacrifice in fulfillment of a vow. The arrow pointed to his son Abdullah, father of Mohammed. Ibn Ishaq relates that `Abd al-Muttalib held his son `Abdullah with a knife in his hand and went to the statues of Isaf and Na'ilah to execute the sacrifice. The Qurayshites deterred him, arguing that his act would establish a precedent that other Arabs might follow.

On the eve of the battle of "Badr" in 623, between the Qurayshites and the Prophet, the Qurayshites consulted the statue of Hubal to foretell the result of the war. Zaid ibn `Amr ibn Nufayl, a pre-Islamic Hanifi, recorded in a poem his intention to abandon the worship of all idols including Hubal: "Nor do I pay visit to [the icon of] Hubal and adore it, although it was our God (Rabb) when I was young."

In 624 at the battle called "Uhud", the war cry of the Qurayshites was, "O people of `Uzza, people of Hubal." By the end of that war, the victorious Abu Sufyan cried: "O Hubal be exalted, O Hubal be exalted." The Prophet answered him: "God is the highest and the most exalted."

According to al-Azraqi the cult of Hubal was well organized inside the Ka`ba at Mecca. A custodian guarded the statue, received the offerings and sacrifices and conducted future-forecasting to pilgrims. The arrows of divination that were associated with the cult of Hubal are mentioned in a poem that was customarily recited upon approaching the statue:

"We have disagreed, so grant us solution. Three, O Hubal, explicit matters, Death, apology and marriage. Caring the sick and the healthy, If you do not say it then order the arrows."

As was the case with Allat at Ta'if, when a Meccan returned from travelling he would circumambulate the Ka`ba and pay a thanksgiving visit to Hubal before rejoining his family.

Most references attribute the origin of the statue of Hubal to "Ma'ab" in Syria but al-Azraqi alone claims that `Amr ibn Luhayy brought it from Hit in Iraq. He erected the statue by the well on the right side of the entrance of the Ka`ba. The well, about three yards deep, was thought to have been dug by the prophet Abraham to receive the offerings brought to the Ka`ba.

The life-size statue of Hubal was a sculpture in the round made of cornelian in the form of a standing man with the right hand broken off, which the Qurayshites restored by replacing it with a golden hand. In 610 when the Meccans rebuilt the Ka`ba, the statue of Hubal was removed and set beside the Ka`ba. After the rebuilding was completed, the statue was returned to its place.

We know that several mural paintings existed inside the Ka`ba. One of which represented Abraham depicted as an old man holding arrows. The connection between the cult of Hubal involving arrow divination and the narrative painting is not totally clear, but the original broken hand of the statue could likely have held arrows.

References to the events surrounding the destruction of the statue of Hubal are vague and general. In 630 A. D. the Prophet Mohammed reentered Mecca and destroyed the supposed 360 standing statues in and around the Ka`ba. It is reported that he did not enter the sanctuary until all images were removed and all paintings were erased except a narrative of the Madonna which he protected.

Aside from the few inscriptions which mention Hubal, no significant archaeological find has yet substantiated the cult of this deity. It is interesting to mention that around the second decade of this century, C. Doughty reported that at Ta'if he was introduced to the remains of what was believed to have been a statue of Hubal (Fig. 38). Due to its damaged condition and questionable authenticity this 5 to 6 foot broken granite rock does not help in telling us much about the actual appearance of Hubal. Since archaeological investigation has not been undertaken in Mecca, the confirmation of the literary information awaits further visual evidence


2. PAVEL PAVLOVITCH

The letter [of Dr. Hashim Al-Tawil] was very interesting for me, but I have to say that the question about Hubal is not the primary topic of my article. What I am trying to discuss is the plausibility of the Islamic assumption that Allah was the lord of Ka'ba during the Jahiliyya. The information about Hubal presented by Dr. At-Tawil is very interesting indeed, but it does not imply any new information relevant to my article. Please, find my additional comments in the body of the letter marked with "PP" [ and Dr. Al-Tawil's text marked with "HT"]. In view of this I would not make any changes to the article.

HT

I have tentatively reviewed Dr. Pavlovitch "On the Problem of the Pre-Islamic Lord of the Ka`ba" and have gathered some initial thoughts about the interpretations of Hubal in the article. I think that the concept that Allah is pre-Islamic Hubal is highly ambivalent and unfounded. To this end I would like to mention a few remarks that might assist in reconstructing the definition of this deity "Hubal". There are a few slight inaccurate Arabic translations of some words in verses and texts in the article that can change the meaning of the relevant statement. I can send a list of these words if desired.

a. The definition and use of the term-statements "Rabb al-Bayt": Lord (head) of the House, "Rabb al-Manzil": Lord (head) of the House (Mansion), "Rabb al-`A'ilah": Lord (head) of the Family, "Rabb al-'Usrah": Lord (head) of the House have the same meaning. That is the head of the family and in other situations the head of the city, the territory and the state. The terms "Rabb al-`A'ilah" and "Rabb al-'Usrah" are still used in the Arab world and convey exactly the same pre-Islamic definition. In government records and statistic information you find the term "Rabb al-`A'ilah" and "Rabb al-'Usrah" to designate the head of the family who is usually the male, the father.

a. The term "Rabbat al-Bayt" is also used to designate the wife as second in command after the husband, "Rabb al-Bayt". This definition has been in use in the Arab world since the pre-Islamic period through to the present time. In both cases the term Rabb and Rabbat do not imply any exaltation or deification.

PP

I think the point here is that the term "rabb" is relevant to two basic semantic fields--the field of secular terminology (exaltation) and the field of religious concepts (deification). As far as the first semantic field is concerned, Ibn Manzur states: "wa-qad qaluhu [rabb, P.P.] fi 'l-jahiliyya li-l-malik [short alif and ya', P.P.]" (Lisan al-'arab, r-b-b), thus implying that the term was indeed used to designate exalted people. In addition "rabb" means "lord", "possessor", etc., which imply a kind of hierarchy between the possessor and the possessed. In the religious field, if the term "does not imply any exaltation or deification", the question stands why Allah is called "rabb" in a number of instances meant to glorify Him, for instance "rabbu 's-samawati wa-l-'ard", "rabbu 'l-'alamin", etc.

HT

a. Hubal can not be assumed to have been the sole lord of the Ka`ba in pre-Islamic times, and cannot be assumed to have had the status of "Allah". Interestingly enough, Hubal's presence was not as strong as Allat or al-`Uzza. Mohammed himself was not concerned with the cult of Hubal as much as with Allat, al-`Uzza, and Manat.

PP

I do not assume Hubal to have been the "sole lord of the Ka'ba". In my article I only say that there is a lot of source data, which could lead to the conclusion that Hubal and al-'Uzza played major roles in the pre-Islamic Meccan sanctuary. Yes, there may have been other deities claiming that role, and I do not exclude this possibility. In the conclusion of the article I say the following: "As for the pre-Islamic Lord of the Ka'ba, only tentative conjectures can be made. Our sources definitely show the importance of Hubal and al-'Uzza before Islam. Yet to what extent these reports can be trusted remains to be studied. Both Hubal and al-'Uzza, as well as other deities, were highly venerated at Mecca, but the extant data is insufficient to tell whether they were deemed lords of the Ka'ba." I think it is clear from this passage that I do not view Hubal as the sole lord of the Ka'ba.

HT

a. If the "sanam" of Hubal which occupied the Ka`ba in Mecca represented the image and the "deity" Allah, then why did Mohammed destroy it. He could easily have spared the statue and justified it as the image of Allah.

PP

And thus he would have justified the old heathenism. The main emphasis of the monotheistic religion is to sever the shirk (ASSOCIATION) tie between man and his deity. The God of monotheism is transcendent, and Islam being a pure monotheistic cult would never have tolerated any kind of anthroposophy, which it discerns in Christian icons and other cultic images.

HT

b. The "Ahnaf" of pre-Islamic Arabia were fully aware of the Ibrahimic (monotheistic) religion that Mohammed resumed in the form of Islam. They, the "Ahnaf" and the contemporaneous inhabitants of Arabia, were aware of the concept of Allah as the supreme God and of the fact that Hubal, Allat, al-`Uzza, Manat, and the other deities were but man-made mediators between human beings and God.

PP

The question of the old Abrahamic religion, which Muhammad resumed in the form of Islam is a tentative one. I do not possess any tangible source data about it. In Sirat ibn Hisham we find only vague references to a group of pious people, who decided to eschew the heathen rites of the Jahiliyya. It is remarkable that in the sequel many of them adopted either Christianity (Waraqa b. Nawfal, 'Ubayd Allah b. Jahsh, 'Uthman b. Huwayrith) or refused to worship the idols without becoming a proselyte of Judaism or Christianity as Zayd b. 'Amr (Sira, 1: 242-251). When Jawad Ali discusses the question of the "Ahnaf" he relates it to the influence of Christianity and Judaism (al-Mufassal fi ta'rikh al-'arab qabla 'l-islam, 6:449-511). As to what extent those people and the ancient Arabs were aware of the concept of Allah and the mediators remains to be seen. Most of the accounts related to that effect are subject to doubts concerning later interpolations and modifications, but this could be a subject for a whole book.

http://enlil.ff.cuni.cz/jais/v002cmt/pavcmt01.htm
Download Quran and Hadeeth for Free here http://www.islamasoft.co.uk/downloads.html Learn about Islam from a Non dictatorial view

Liberate
Preacher
Preacher
Posts: 200
Joined: Sat Apr 10, 2004 04:41 pm

Postby Liberate » Sat Jun 12, 2004 10:58 am

am well aware you would use "elevated allah over hubal" that is one of the reasons why I edited the post, without stressing on what type of elevation I meant (Mohammed simply made allah invisible to make islam in line with the jews and christians according to one of the 10 commandments thou shalt have no graven images, if he wanted the jews and christians to come along to his religion this is one of the most logical things to do, but the jews and christians were laughing at him (read the hadiths) thats why he hated them so much).


This is your conjecture. This is not what you set forth as a standard for a debate, you said :


You know it becomes pointless if all anybody does is quote and plagiarise what academics have to say on a matter, what about their own God given logic when applied to their scruptures? what exactly does the holy books have to say, what does the quran and sunnah have to say this should take precedence over any apologetic material.


This what you said, and now you reneged. We agreed to fight with bullets, you ran out of bullets, then you threw the gun at me, then you went for what every else that can to throw....lol


I have not withdrawn from what I said, your own sunnah shows the foundations of islam to be nothing more than paganism, I find it amazing you fail to see it yourself

What type of elevation ? Lets look at this again :

...Abu Safyan said, "Superior may be Hubal!" On that the Prophet said (to his companions), "Reply to him." They asked, "What may we say?" He said, "Say: Allah is More Elevated and More Majestic!...


Am I the only one reading your extrapolation of this hadith with amazement, let us read the whole paragraph of that hadith in context:

Abu Sufyan ascended a high place and said, "Is Muhammad present amongst the people?" The Prophet said, "Do not answer him." Abu Sufyan said, "Is the son of Abu Quhafa present among the people?" The Prophet said, "Do not answer him." Abd Sufyan said, "Is the son of Al-Khattab amongst the people?" He then added, "All these people have been killed, for, were they alive, they would have replied." On that, 'Umar could not help saying, "You are a liar, O enemy of Allah! Allah has kept what will make you unhappy." Abu Safyan said, "Superior may be Hubal!" On that the Prophet said (to his companions), "Reply to him." They asked, "What may we say?" He said, "Say: Allah is More Elevated and More Majestic!" Abu Sufyan said, "We have (the idol) Al-'Uzza, whereas you have no 'Uzza!" The Prophet said (to his companions), "Reply to him." They said, "What may we say?" The Prophet said, "Say: Allah is our Helper and you have no helper." Abu Sufyan said, "(This) day compensates for our loss at Badr and (in) the battle (the victory) is always undecided and shared in turns by the belligerents. You will see some of your dead men mutilated, but neither did I urge this action, nor am I sorry for it." Narrated Jabir: Some people took wine in the morning of the day of Uhud and were then killed as martyrs.


Let us be clear this is what you are saying: a pagan calls out for Mohammed and his friends, he then says that since they didn't answer they must be dead, one of Mohammed's companion calls him a liar and then says "You are a liar, O enemy of Allah! Allah has kept what will make you unhappy." , and the pagan then says " superior maybe hubal", do you not see that the pagan's statement is not mutually exclusive from what Mohammed's friend Umar said?

it's like me saying "you are a liar, God has let you believe what will make you unhappy" then you reply " superior maybe the lord" is this the kind of statement someone makes when their statement is meant to be contradictory to what I said? where do you see in that statement that hubal and allah are not the same? The statement is ambiguous at best and at worst Abu Sufyan is calling allah by his other name saying "superior maybe hubal" this is not the kind of statement someone makes when they want to establish their god is better than yours, the english translation makes it very ambiguous as to what Abu Sufyan meant.


Your trying to squirm yourself out of this one. Also remember I Quoted many Quranic verses in which the Quran was written way before the hadith.


You extrapolated quranic verses and gave them your own interpretation even though they were not so explicit, good thing with arabic you can always express it in the way you want for your own agenda, so instead of beat it is beat(lightly) or instead of have sexual intercourse with your wives whenever and however you like it is (do some charity afterwards for verily allah is merciful!)

Also you just came up with this, you started making cunjecture of this when you saw that there are verses in Quran that make it evident and clear from islamic doctrine about the relative existence of Alllaah that is contrary to the reality of Hubal
.

I didn't make this conjecture up; common logic and your sunnah has led me to the conclusion allah is hubal, your hadiths tells me so, I would have to throw away all reasonable rationality to believe otherwise, it's a pity you are so fervent to defend this when the evidence is contradictory why haven't you addressed the hadith I showed about Abrah's army and what Mohammed's grandfather did?



And for all those reading this thread the reason why our friend is so adamant to defend allah against hubal is for this simple reason:

hubal ...hu'baal...ha'baal...BAAL.


Here you go again. The people reading this forum should start asking the Question of " Why does he say that such and such means this but doesnt give reference to a dictionary or Lexicon of the language of that word ? " The reason why is cause he/she is making things up.


Ok...

"The Funk and Wignall's Dictionary of Folklore, Mythology and Legend says under "Allah," "The pre-Mohammedan Arabic god HUBAL HAD AS HIS TITLE ALLAHU meaning 'THE GOD'...As the PATRON OF THE KAABA AT MECCA, ALREADY SUPREME he was MAINTAINED IN MOHAMMEDAN THEOLOGY AS THE ONE GOD..."

"the same dictionary says, "Some say that Hubal, was the REAL NAME OF ALLAHU, THE CHIEF GOD OF PRE-ISLAMIC TIMES, WHO BECAME THE ONE GOD OF ISLAM..."

Even the Dictionary of Islam had to admit: "ITS REMARKABLE that there is NO DISTINCT ALLUSION TO THE IDOL [Hubal] in the WHOLE QURAN"

In Ibn Warraq's book, Why I Am Not A Muslim, he writes about Hubal, and who he really is: "Hubal was worshipped at Mecca, and his idol...Hubal's position next to the black stone [ Muslims kiss this stone today] suggests there is some CONNECTION between the two..."



The Old Testament abounds with warnings against Baal worship. According to the Apostle Paul those warnings "are there for our admonition on whom the ends of the world are come" (1 Cor.10:11)

1 Kings 18: 17: And it came to pass, when Ahab saw Elijah, that Ahab said unto him, Art thou he that troubleth Israel?
18: And he answered, I have not troubled Israel; but thou, and thy father's house, in that ye have forsaken the commandments of the LORD, and thou hast followed [b]Baalim
.

The word Baalim is the Hebrew plural for BAAL, the pagan god of nature and fertility. I quote from the Westminster Dictionary of the Bible article 'BAAL' :
"... Baal worship apparently had its origin in the belief that every tract of ground owed its productivity to a supernatural being, or baal, that dwelt there. The farmers probably thought that from the Baalim, or fertility gods, of various regions came the increase of crops, fruit and cattle ... The worship of Baal was accompanied with lascivious rites [Hajj](1 Kings 14:24), the sacrifice of children in the fire by parents [As Mohammed grand father was going to do and countless others did] (Jer.19:5), and kissing the image (1 Kings 19:18; Hos 13:2) [Still eing done on pilgrimages to the ka'baa]. Baal was often associated with the goddess Astoreth (Judg.2:13) [I don't need to tell you about the shi'ite festival in memory of Ali by the same name, incidentally the priests of baal would regularly cut themselves up I was disgusted to see muslim women cutting up the foreheads of their infant children for this insanity of a festival] , and in the vicinity of his altar there was often an Asherah. (Judg.6:30; 1 Kings 16:32-33,R.V.)"


Topple this with the evidence from your own hadiths it is damning.

Baal meant lord, ha'baal meant the lord, as al ilah meant the god. This is the same god that was warned about numerous times in the old testament yet it just seemed to reincarnate itself


:roll: O boy ! The word "Hubal" is an arabicized word linguistically conveying "husky one". It has no etymology in the arabic language cause its an arabicized word. The word only has a root in Hebrew and Aramaic http://www.studylight.org/lex/heb/view.cgi?number=01891 which means "to be vain". The word in arabic for "lord" is "Rabb".


LOL why have you tried to be deceptive here?, why didn't you look at the one called baal, plural baalim, and read what I typed, the old testament was not written in arabic:

http://www.studylight.org/lex/heb/view.cgi?number=01168

The first line says "baal = lord"




The name Alllaah (Allah) Unknown and not a contraction of the Arabic words "al-ilah" by a Christian critic of islam.

From a grammatical-lexical point of view, allaah doesn’t comply with the rules and its root still remains mysterious and unidentifiable


Who is to say those rules weren't amended and altered after the concept of islam?

Remember http://www.al-bushra.org/arbhrtg/arbxtn04.htm? that you accused me of not reading? This is what it said about arabic:

"" By "Arab Christian heritage"Arab means: the Arabic language known and spoken in the Arabian peninsula and by the Arab kingdoms before Islam...It is known thatthe Arabic Northern characters used by the Quran were created by the Chistian Missionaries of Hira, centuries before Islam, as says C. Rabin in art."Arabiyya, in "Encyclopedie de l'Islam", "

And while we are discussing this would you like to show us where Eli or El is in the aramaic we have today? didn't Jesus say " Eli ELi Lama sa bachthani?"





Up until now, the meaning of Allah is still a mystery! We have been able to understand why technically it is not a valid name for the Divine


This is your advocate?


I read this critic's asualts against islam with pride, even though I despise some of the comments he made, however this man who is aquinted with the language gave his compeling evidence and concluded for a fact the name Alllaah (Allah) is not a contraction of al-ilah . I could refute many of his comments as for example to disprove Muhammad's prophethood in leu manner is because in the Quran the name YHWH is never mention.


God's name to Moses was Yahweh, meaning "I AM" if Mohammed was serving the same God surely he would have mentioned "I AM" sent me, the fact that he doesn't brings us to the rational conclusion that he is not serving the same God, his whole manner contradicts what the God of the bible says and acts, God doesn't pick one lone prophet and speak to him and him alone, God doesn't send epileptic fits to as "divine inspiration" God doesn't abrogate His commands, it is plain laughable to believe this man who has absolutely nothing in terms of prophecies or miracles has the nerve to call himself a prophet after the God of the bible, asking for 5% of booty in the process.

And btw your comments about Mohammed's utterings after an epileptic seizure, the text in your koran you have in your hand can only be traced to 150 years after the death of Mohammed plenty of time for editing and proof reading even then there are words in it people do not understand, the translators don't know what to do with those words as in the standard of islamic miracles since it cannot be understand it is a miracle!, how about the language had simply changed?

I also hope you are aware of the hadith Mohammed was boasting about when he was a young child and had two men split him open ( after yet another epileptic fit), washed his heart and put what he called "the sakinah" in him which looked like a cat, for a former jew do you honest believe that dribble that the Shekinah is a small cat?

What came accross my mind was well then what about Jesus ? No where in the new testament of the bible he uses the word YHWH but instead he uses "Aalah" in his Aramaic mother tongue


Not so fast where does it mention this? Jesus said " Eli ELI Lama sabach thani", would you like to show us where ELI is, in the aramaic we have access to now?




On the eve of the battle of "Badr" in 623, between the Qurayshites and the Prophet, the Qurayshites consulted the statue of Hubal to foretell the result of the war. Zaid ibn `Amr ibn Nufayl, a pre-Islamic Hanifi, recorded in a poem his intention to abandon the worship of all idols including Hubal: "Nor do I pay visit to [the icon of] Hubal and adore it, although it was our God (Rabb) when I was young."


What you are arguing can also be seen as building a statue of God and going to worship it, this hadith does not explicitly say hubal is not allah it just indicates allah does not reside in a statue, as I said earlier this is one of the first things Mohammed would do to impress the jews and the christians that his demonic revelations were from God. Something you should understand regarding the manner christians view Mohammed, it doesn't really matter how ordered the suras or the isnad or the matd or how many quirra if the message renegades from the perfect law of Christ a fulfillment of all God had said before it is a FALSE message, Mohammed may indeed have had some kind of message some kind of revelation, some kind of epileptic attack but it wasn't from God, his prophethood was nothing more than an excuse to loot and plunder women and booty, added with obsessive compulsive disorders like not urinating in the direction of mecca and using odd numbers of stones. At worst Mohammed was making things up as he went along, his friends would ask him for things like "is it ok to rape captured women" or "shouldn't your wives be veiled" and viola "all married women are unlawful unto you except captives your right hands possess"..."if you must talk to the wives of the prophet do so behind a veil,... and don't marry his wives after him ...such behaviour annoys the prophet..."

At worst Mohammed is making it up as he went along, at best he is being spiritually deceived, by the real shaitan not the idiot who sits with his jinns in a straight line in the stars listening to the recitation of the koran or sleeping in people's ears.

In 624 at the battle called "Uhud", the war cry of the Qurayshites was, "O people of `Uzza, people of Hubal." By the end of that war, the victorious Abu Sufyan cried: "O Hubal be exalted, O Hubal be exalted." The Prophet answered him: "God is the highest and the most exalted."


Again this does not explicitly state that allah is not hubal.


I do not assume Hubal to have been the "sole lord of the Ka'ba". In my article I only say that there is a lot of source data, which could lead to the conclusion that Hubal and al-'Uzza played major roles in the pre-Islamic Meccan sanctuary. Yes, there may have been other deities claiming that role, and I do not exclude this possibility


Again I ask this is your advocate?




The question of the old Abrahamic religion, which Muhammad resumed in the form of Islam is a tentative one.



For a former jew you are basically saying the jews don't have a religion and they lost it from the onset, now Mohammed an ishmaelite 3000+ yrs has the monopoly on truth, so God couldn't protect his revelation to Moses, or Samuel, or David, or Jesus, or the disciples, do you honestly believe God would allow this to happen?

I do not possess any tangible source data about it. In Sirat ibn Hisham we find only vague references to a group of pious people, who decided to eschew the heathen rites of the Jahiliyya. It is remarkable that in the sequel many of them adopted either Christianity (Waraqa b. Nawfal, 'Ubayd Allah b. Jahsh, 'Uthman b. Huwayrith) or refused to worship the idols without becoming a proselyte of Judaism or Christianity as Zayd b. 'Amr (Sira, 1: 242-251).


Christianity was already on the shores of the arabian peninsula, however they were heretical sects there too like the Marianites who believed Mary was part of the trinity, could this have been the source for the quran's utterance that in the last day allah will ask Jesus why Mary was part of the trinity?

H2O
Preacher
Preacher
Posts: 782
Joined: Thu Jun 03, 2004 09:00 pm
Location: Boca Raton, Florida

Postby H2O » Sun Jun 13, 2004 12:44 am

I have not withdrawn from what I said, your own sunnah shows the foundations of islam to be nothing more than paganism, I find it amazing you fail to see it yourself


Other than the hadith that you quoted from Tabari...

Did you read the hadiths I posted about Hubal and how the pagan arabs conducted their prayers to the idol Hubal and allah?

Ishaq:66/Tabari VI:2 “It is alleged, and Allah only knows the truth, that Abdul Muttalib encountered opposition when he was digging Zamzam. He vowed that if given ten sons, to make his labor less arduous and to protect him, he would sacrifice one of them to Allah at the Ka’aba.


... which mentions nothing of the name Hubal, but you interpreted this hadith to be refering to Hubal based on you preconceived conjecture that Hubal also was made sacrifices to at the Ka'abah.
However, I posted numerous versus from the Quran refuting your allegation and you never quoted ONE verse to support the contrary.
Also we went over this and brought up testamony from Quran that the pagans worshiped IDOLS to bring them selves closer to Allah, the practice of this is that they would go to an Idol and pray through that idol as a mediator. Hubal was not the only one this was done with, Lat, Uzza, and Mannat were also mediators.

It is significant that while the sources, Islamic as well as others, mention idols of many Gods and Goddesses in the Ka‘ba and elsewhere, they nowhere mention an idol of Allãh. The only explanation is that every God and Goddesses was seen by the pagan Arabs as representing Allãh who could be prayed to through any one of them. In fact, the Meccans pointed out to Muhammad (Qur’ãn 6.149; 37.68) that “Allãh had never forbidden them to worship other gods with him.”16 Ibn Ishãq reports that ‘Abdu’l-Muttalib “stood by Hubal praying to Allah.”17 The Qur’ãn is never tired of saying that those whom the idolaters associate with Allah will not intercede for them on the last day. For the pagan Arabs, however, Allãh is no other than his associates; he is them and they are he. Of course, the pagans have no notion of the last day when alone Allãh will visit them; instead, they are aware of him every moment of their lives.http://www.bharatvani.org/books/htemples2/ch11.htm


(Quran 6:148/9) Those who are pagans say : If Allaah so willed we would not have made partners (with Him), nor our fathers, neither are we going to prohibit such a thing.

(Quran39:3) Is it not for Allah that sincere devotion is due? But those(pagans) who take for protectors others than Allah (say): "We only serve them (the Idols) in order that they may bring us nearer to Allah." Truly Allah will judge between them in that wherein they differ. But Allah guides not such as are false and ungrateful.


What part of this you dont get ? They worshiped the idols which included Hubal as intercessors with Allah. This does not mean because they prayed through Hubal or any of the idols to Allah that Hubal or any of those Idols were Allah. They Also prayed through al-Uzza to Allah, does this mean Al-Uzza is Allah ? When the Jews prayed through Baal to YHWH does this mean YHWH is Baal ?

(Quran 10:18) and they ( pagans) worship besides Allah what cannot harm them nor benefit them, and they say: These (Idols) are our intercessors with Allah...

As for those Hadith (sunnah) that you keep on quoting to show islam is derived from paganism, like wise, I posted Quranic Verses and Hadith that explain the history of how the religion of Abraham and Ishmail became paganized and then when it was purified it maintained practices accociated with pagan practices ~ whom them selves adopted it from the practice of Abraham and Ishmail. What I did is went back further in the history of islamic teachings of where some of those alleged practices were derived from which you could never prove contrary.

In islam based on the Quran and Sunnah when Adam and his wife finally came down to the Earth from the paradise (Quran 2:30-39) they received words from their Lord of how to repent in which they learnt and weeped unto their Lord with these words upon the earth (Quran 7:23). This place on earth was named after the commemoration of the even of Adam and his wife called "Bakka" meaning "a place of weeping or wailing" where the first house of worship for mankind (Quran 3:96) was built by Adam and his wife when mankind was only ONE NATION before they became divided (Quran 2:213,10:19). After a period of time man fell into idolotry and started to worship other things, and currupted the sacred house in which prophets were sent to them to warn them ( Quran 2:219 ) but they became divided and began to disperse through out the land each group following their own desires of a deity. Due to the sins of the people the land of Bakka that was once an Oasis like Egypt became a desolation that made the region uninhabitable. After a period of time Allah chose and guided Abraham out of his home land to a blessed land and gave him a son called Ishmael and then guided them both to the anchient and sacred land of Bakka to re-establish His sacred house and to pruify it from idols (Quran 2:124-129). Thus the foundations of the sacred house was the only remains that was there from former times in which Abraham and his son lefted up, rebuilt, and purified when Ishmael passed the age of puberty. Before this, Ismael and his mother was left in the sacred land of Bakka by Abraham per the instructions of Allah. Hajjar (Haggar) Ishmael's mother sought for water for her son but could not find none, and feared death of her son and her self if she did not soon. She cried unto Allah in which Allah answered her prayer and sent an angel to root up a well. A well was sprung and water flourished for her and her son. The water drew the attention of wild life that drew the attention of passing bedouin travelers that showed signs of water. Tribes began to be attracted to the location cause of its water in which they settle there in which the land was now and again inhabitable. After this the place had began to be called "Makka" meaning "a place of water" and Bakka remained as its anchient name due to the commemoration of Adam and his Wife. Thus a community evolved with Ishmael and his mother. Abraham returned after his son passed the age of Puberty to rebuild the ancient house (Shahih Al- Bukhari Volumn 004, Book 055, Hadith Number 583) From Hence the right of Ramadhan, Al-Hajj, Ummrah, and the Salah was taught to Ishmael by Abraham through inspiration from Allah (Quran 2:129-132,135; 14:35-41). After this Ishmael taught these rights and practices to his family and tribe who became the custodians of the sacred House. After generations passed, like before, the descendants of Ishmael fell into idolorty and incorporated other practices into the once pure religion and practice taught by Abraham to his son. These descendants idoltorated the religion, and inovated pratices into it that became customs and traditional practices among the Arabs of that region NOT originally belonging to the Religion of Abraham "millatu Ibraheem" ie the religious practice of Ibraheem in which later was purified and restored by the advent of Muhammad as a prophet of Allah whom was revealed the Quran as a divine book of Guidance (Quran 3:67-68,95-97)


The Jews also had a parallel history of falling into Idolotry and then later the religion was purified to an extant by the advent of prophets that came to them.

You used islamic sources to criticize by taking it out of its perspective ignoring the other teachings that explain how those pagan practices came to be.

I saved one other thing for this debate waiting for you to hang you self. Do you know about the family ideology of the Idols that was at the Ka'abah ?
What was the Idelogical family of Hubal ? Who was the mother of Hubal in the pagan phylosophy ?


Hubal was the son of Al-Uzza

"Two deities appear in pre-Islamic times to have been worshipped at the Kaaba, Al-Uzza and Hubal. These the Meccans invoked at the battle of Ohod. These deities were represented by two stones in the Kaaba, a white stone and a black stone. There is much evidence that Al-Uzza was a mother-goddess and Hubal was her son. The goddess was apparently identified with the white stone, which is still in the Kaaba, and her son with the black stone. The Kaaba was the shrine of these deities; the Zem-zem was a well sacred to them, and the Ghabghab the place where their sacrifices were slain. In the Zemzem golden gazelles were once found, and the finder placed them in the Kaaba. The goddess is said to have had another shrine at a point called Nakhla, or ‘Palm.’ The star Venus was sacred to her, and the Quraish held a feast to her every year.
"Christian writers testify that her feasts were accompanied by lewed practices. Doves (pigeons) were sacred to her, and are still protected in the Kaaba as Allah’s birds. There can be no doubt that Al-Uzza and Hubal were survivors of that primitive cult with which the names of Athtar and Athirat (Ishtar and Asherah) are so indissolubly associated. Hubal is here the counterpart of Dhu-’l-Shara, the god of the Nabathaeans, and Al-Uzza of his mother. Al-Uzza. ‘The powerful one,’ is clearly an epithet, which has superseded an earlier name.
http://www.hanskrause.de/HKHPE/hkhpe_35_03.htm


Now tell me How could Allah be Hubal if Al-Uzza was the daughter of Allah in which Al-Uzza was the mother of Hubal ?

Am I the only one reading your extrapolation of this hadith with amazement, let us read the whole paragraph of that hadith in context
:

Hmm lets see if I am interpolating my own meaning lets see what others say about this hadith:


Many other also understood the same Hadith hadith I Quoted that Allah and Hubal were not the name

It was before [Hubal] that 'Abd-al-Muttalib[61] shuffled the divination arrows [in order to find out which of his ten children he should sacrifice in fulfilment of a vow he had sworn], and the arrows pointed to his son 'Abdullah, the father of the Prophet[62]. Hubal was also the same idol which abu-Sufyan ibn-Harb[63] addressed when he emerged victorious after the battle of Uhud[64], saying:

"Hubal, be thou exalted" (i.e. may thy religion triumph);
To which the Prophet replied:

"Allah is more exalted and more majestic[65]."
http://www.answering-islam.org/Books/Al-Kalbi/uzza.htm

Hubal
“Hubal was worshipped at Mecca; his idol stood in the Ka‘ba, and appears to have been in reality, the god of that sanctuary… It would be unsafe to trust the descriptions of the idol in question which are given by writers of a later period; there is reason, however, to believe that the god had a human form. We may likewise accept as historical the statement that near him were kept divining arrows, used for the purpose of ascertaining his will or forecasting future events. It is related that the idol was brought by ‘Amr b. LuHai from Ma‘ãb (Moab), a tradition which may contain some elements of truth, for we have independent evidence indicating that the god was known in the North. He seems to be mentioned in a Nabataean inscription at Hejr; and the tribe of Kalb, who dwelt in the Syrian Desert, used the name of Hubal as the name of a person or clan; the same tribe… used in like manner the names of Îsãf and Nã’ila, two other deities peculiar to Mecca. Moreover, ‘Amr b. LuHai is the representative of the Huzã‘a, a tribe who, according to tradition, occupied the sacred territory of Mecca before it passed into the hands of the Quraish. The assertion that’Amr introduced the worship of idols into Mecca for the first time is, of course, utterly incredible. But the hypothesis that Hubal was a late importation from a foreign country is further supported by the fact that we hear nothing of him in other parts of Arabia, and even at Mecca personal names compounded with Hubal were unknown. When the Meccans gained a victory over the Prophet in the immediate neighbourhood of Medina, their leader shouted, ‘Hurrah for Hubal!’ Thus they regarded him as the natural enemy of the God preached by Muhammad.”58
http://www.bharatvani.org/books/htemples2/ch11.htm

In 624 at the battle called "Uhud", the war cry of the Qurayshites was, "O people of `Uzza, people of Hubal." By the end of that war, the victorious Abu Sufyan cried: "O Hubal be exalted, O Hubal be exalted." The Prophet answered him: "God is the highest and the most exalted."
http://enlil.ff.cuni.cz/jais/v002cmt/pavcmt01.htm


So I guess they are interpolating to huh ? Or is it that you just want it to have a meaning to fit your agenda ?

You extrapolated quranic verses and gave them your own interpretation even though they were not so explicit, good thing with arabic you can always express it in the way you want for your own agenda, so instead of beat it is beat(lightly) or instead of have sexual intercourse with your wives whenever and however you like it is (do some charity afterwards for verily allah is merciful!)


Now I am interpolating Quran verses ? Hmm ok let the people who read this forum decide that. As far as I know those who have read it so far that I know see it clearly that the Quran rejects Allah of being an Idol. As a matter of fact lets see what you contempories say to this manner:

More confirmation by Christian propaganda that Allah was not an Idol to the pagans of Arabia.

".... The most convincing piece of evidence that the latter was at work is the fact that of all the gods of Mecca, Allah alone was not represented by an idol....
How did the pagan Meccans view their god Allah? The Quran provides direct and primary evidence.

If you ask them [the pagan Quraysh] who created the heavens and the earth and made subject the sun and the moon, they will certainly reply "Allah.". . . And indeed if you ask them who sends down the rain from the sky and so restores life to the earth after its death, they will certainly reply, "Allah." (Quran 29:62, 63)
And if you ask them who created them, they will certainly reply, "Allah." (Quran 43:87)
Say: Who is it who sustains you from the sky and from the earth? Or who is it who has power over hearing and sight? And who is it who brings out the living from the dead and the dead from the living And who is it who rules and regulates all affairs? They will soon answer, "Allah."
If you ask them who created the heavens and the earth, they will certainly say "Allah." Say: Those (female) things you call upon apart from Allah, do you think that if God wills evil to me, they can remove this evil, or, if He wills mercy to me, they can hold back this mercy? (Quran 39:38)

In this latter verse the "high god" relationship is quite marked. On the one hand, there is Allah, the creator, sustainer, and ruler of the universe, and on the other, a host of minor deities-the "daughters of Allah" among them-who intercede with the lord of the gods, precisely the view that is attacked in the Quran:

They serve apart from Allah that which neither harms nor benefits them, and they say, "These arc our intercessor’s with Allah." Say.- Are You informing God of something He knows not in the heavens or on earth? Glory be to Him! He is far above any partners. (Quran 10:18)
When they embark upon ships, they call upon Allah, putting their faith in Him (alone); but once He has delivered them safely back to land, they associate (others With Him). (Quran 29:65)

The Quran is our most certain testimony to the religious life in Mecca before the appearance of Islam. At least at the beginning of his career, Muhammad was concerned not with regulating the life of a community of believers, as he later was in Medina, but rather with reforming the beliefs and practices of his fellow Meccans. "Reforming" is a more appropriate term than "converting," because the Quran also reveals, as we have seen, that the worship of Allah was already well established there before Muhammad.
http://www.allah-muhammad-quran.de/Engl ... pping.html


Your Christian brethren who have read the Quran for them selves obviously see this explicit distinction but you cant see it. Maybe your reading level isnt that great. Why dont you pick up the Quran and rad it for your self an come up with your own criticism rather doing the "MONEY SEE MONKEY DO" game.

Quote:
From a grammatical-lexical point of view, allaah doesn’t comply with the rules and its root still remains mysterious and unidentifiable


Who is to say those rules weren't amended and altered after the concept of islam?


And who is to say that the rules of "Allahumma" was later change to Elohim used in the Bible to refer to YHWH when Elohim can be pronounced in Hebrew as Allahumma in which both are made up of the consonants "alhm" after Christianity

LOL why have you tried to be deceptive here?, why didn't you look at the one called baal, plural baalim, and read what I typed, the old testament was not written in arabic:

http://www.studylight.org/lex/heb/view.cgi?number=01168

The first line says "baal = lord"


Irrelivant ! I address your wishful thinking of saying Hubal had the same meaning as Baal ~ in which I would agree meant lord. I produced proof that Hubal had no such meaning as Baal. Also you forgot that the Hebrew language is a mixture of Babylonian language in which they adopted many words like Adonai, and El etc. So the roots for Hubal can only be found in Hebrew/Aramaic where as in Arabic it has no root word but only a Linguistical meaning "Husky one". I did not try to refute if Hubal had any association with Baal. You dont even know the language but you are giving meanings to words while making no reference to confirm its meaning. What do you expect people to do, believe everything you say cause your a christian ?

Who is to say those rules weren't amended and altered after the concept of islam?...
....."" By "Arab Christian heritage"Arab means: the Arabic language known and spoken in the Arabian peninsula and by the Arab kingdoms before Islam...It is known thatthe Arabic Northern characters used by the Quran were created by the Chistian Missionaries of Hira, centuries before Islam, as says C. Rabin in art."Arabiyya, in "Encyclopedie de l'Islam",


Again you have some terrible reading comprehension you keep hellusinating on seeing things and meanings that arent even there. The underline in the above you quotedis speaking about the Arabic alphabet characters not the Arabic Gramma or Orthograph. The Hebrew of the Old Testament was first written in Phoenician Charaters then later rendered into early Aramaic Characters http://www.omniglot.com/writing/aramaic.htm , http://www.omniglot.com/writing/hebrew.htm . Did this change its grammar ?

And while we are discussing this would you like to show us where Eli or El is in the aramaic we have today? didn't Jesus say " Eli ELi Lama sa bachthani?"


Now tell me this... Jesus is suppose to be your god or the son of G-D but why would he use a PAGAN word "El" or call upon "El" which was a pagan Canaanite deity.

El was a sky god in Canaanite mythology, whose rain fertilized the earth, making agriculture possible. In a country dependent on rain, his role (and cult) were crucial, and he rapidly emerged as the chief deity in the Canaanite pantheon. El was the father of Baal in Ugaritic texts of the second millennium BCE. He was apparently adopted by the Israelite scribes, who lived in the southern hill district of the region and conflated with Yahweh. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/El_(god)


The Assembly of Gods
"...Genesis is in two parts: 1:1 - 11:9 is the first part, and is probably Babylonian in origin, since it ends with the founding of Babylon. The second part, 11:10 - 50:9 is probably Arabian in origin, since it focuses on desert tribes, and their God, El. El is the most common Babylonian-Syrian-Arabian name for God."
- Paul Trejo (pet@netcom.com)
"The Canaanites evidently knew nothing of the elaborate pantheon and cosmogony of the Mesopotamians, which probably reflects the relative simplicity of their lives. Their interest was to correlate and explain the various forces of nature and society in all the complexity of harmony and tension, but to declare their dependence on the gods and to placate them"
"Corresponding to Anu in Mesopotamia, the king paramount in the celestial court was El ('God'), who give his sanction to all decisions among the gods affecting nature and society. He is father of the divine family and president of the divine assembly on the 'mount of assembly', the equivalent of Hebrew har mo'ed, which became through the Greek transliteration Armageddon. In Canaanite mythology he is known as 'the Bull', symbolizing his strength and creative force, and is probably represented in the elderly god who is blessing a worshipper on a limestone sculpture from Ras Shara. In the myths he is termed bny bnwt, which might mean 'Creator of Created Things', but which we take to mean 'Giver of Potency', according to his role in two royal legends from Ras Shamra, but he is generally depicted as sitting aloof and indeed remote, enthroned at 'the outflowing of the (two) streams'. This recalls the Biblical Garden of Eden, from which a river flowed to form the four rivers, Tigris, Euphrates, Gihon and Pishon."
- John Gray, Near Eastern Mythology


"Thou givest them water from the flowing stream of thy delights (gan 'eden, the Garden of Eden.)
For with thee is the fountain of life."
- Psalm 36:9
El "was known as the Creator God, the Kindly One, the Compassionate One. He expressed the concept of ordered government and social justice. It is noteworthy that the Bible never stigmatizes the Canaanite worship of El, whose authority in social affairs was recognized by the Patriarchs. His consort was Asherah, the mother goddess, represented in Canaanite sanctuaries by a natural or stylized tree (Hebrew ashera).
- Magnus Magnusson, BC - The Archaeology of the Bible Lands

In Canaan, the king "is described as 'the Servant of El', as King David was 'the Servant of God'. This describes the status of the king as the executive of the will of the divine king. This duty is understood to be a privilege as well as a burden."
- John Gray, Near Eastern Mythology
http://www.freerepublic.com/forum/a37560b7b083d.htm


Here is another reference with a pic of the Idol El that the Jews adopted as worship.

El - (also called Latipan, and possibly Dagon)
He is known as the Father of the gods, 'the father of mankind', the 'Bull', and 'the creator of creatures'. He is grey haired and bearded and lives at Mt. Lel. He is a heavy drinker and has gotten extremly drunk at his banquets.
As a young god, he went out to the sea and, spying two ladies, one of whom is presumably Athirat, becomes aroused, roasts a bird and asks the two to choose between being his daughters or his wives. They become his wives and in due course they give birth to Shachar, Shalim, and possibly other gracious gods, who could be Athirat's seventy children and/or much of the rest of the pantheon. The new family raises a sanctuary in the desert and lived there for eight years

http://members.bellatlantic.net/~vze33g ... aq.html#A2


"El" is the proper name of the canaanite god that was adopted, and worshiped by the Jews. Why would Jesus who is suppose to be god or the son of G-D call on El when which was a Canaanite god ?

Now of course you are going to come back on this one with every tactic way possible. There is without doubt "El" was adopted by the Jews and was a word incorporated into hebrew in which the Jews worshiped the IDOL pagan canaanite false god.

How ever for us, Jesus did not call upon El or he did not say Eli ~ my El, cause the one who uttered such unbelief of "WHY HAVE YOU FORSAKEN ME !?" Could not have come out of the mouth of The Messiah Son of Maryam the messenger of Alllaah/YhWH.

" and they (the enemies of Jesus) said: We killed the Messiah Jesus Son of Maryam ! But they killed him not nor crucified but however it APPEARED TO THEM SO... (Quran 4:157)


Allah has not association with Baal


[37:125-126] "Will ye call upon Baal and forsake the Best of Creators Allah your Lord and Cherisher and the Lord and Cherisher of your fathers of old?"


Lets see what else the wishful thinker Liberate has got to say:

And btw your comments about Mohammed's utterings after an epileptic seizure, the text in your koran you have in your hand can only be traced to 150 years after the death of Mohammed plenty of time for editing and proof reading even then there are words in it people do not understand


O really ! Where is the proof ? The same thing could have happened to the Gospels. Anyhow. 150 Years after Muhammad they still at that time didnt know anything about embryology. Embryology was not founded until after the invention of the telescope/microscope which was after the 16-17 century almost 900 years after. With out the microscope and sophesticated technology after the 17 century it was merely imposible to know concieve.
Amazing whenever you cant refute something you always come up with these littel tactics like what you stated above with no Proof. Wanna debate about the authencity of the Quran also ? We can do this on another board if ya like ? Anyhow, lets see what other back flip maneuvers your going to come up with.
Download Quran and Hadeeth for Free here http://www.islamasoft.co.uk/downloads.html Learn about Islam from a Non dictatorial view

Liberate
Preacher
Preacher
Posts: 200
Joined: Sat Apr 10, 2004 04:41 pm

Postby Liberate » Sun Jun 13, 2004 08:16 pm

I have not withdrawn from what I said, your own sunnah shows the foundations of islam to be nothing more than paganism, I find it amazing you fail to see it yourself


Other than the hadith that you quoted from Tabari...


There are plenty more:

Tabari VI:67 “Aisha reported: ‘Solitude became dear to Muhammad and he used to seclude himself in the cave of Hira where he would engage in the Tahannuth worship for a number of nights before returning to Khadija and getting provisions for a like period, till truth came upon him while he was in a cave. The first form of revelation was a true vision in sleep. He did not see any vision but it came like the break of dawn.’”

What is this Tahannuth worship?, so Mohammed goes to a cave to practice this tahannuth worship and goes back to his pagan wife to obtain provisions to go back to this cave for a like period, am I to believe his pagan wife is giving him provisions to go retreat himself in a cave and worship the one true God?

Tabari VI:67: “The Prophet said, ‘I had been standing, but fell to my knees; and crawled away, my shoulders trembling. I went to Khadija and said, ‘Wrap me up! When the terror had left me, he came to me and said, ‘Muhammad, you are the Messenger of Allah.’ Muhammad said, ‘I had been thinking of hurling myself down from a mountain crag, but he appeared to me as I was thinking about this and said, ‘I am Gabriel and you are the Messenger.’ Then he said, Recite!’ I said, ‘What shall I recite?’ He took me and pressed me three times. ‘I fear for my life.’ She said, ‘Rejoice, for Allah will never put you to shame.”

I would like you to focus on the quote in bold, this is from Khadijah Mohammed's first wife a notable pagan, what does she mean by this? is she worshipping the one true God as a pagan!?

Ishaq:105 “Aisha said that when Allah desired to honor Muhammad, the first sign of prophethood was a vision in brightness of day shown to him in his sleep. He liked nothing better than to be alone. ["idle hands are the devil's workshop" truer words were never said when applied to Mohammed. In hindsight we know Mohammed liked to fondle young girls, there is a repulsive hadith about it, considering his wife Khadija was older than him but she was rich, and Mohammed liked young girls we can see why he liked to be alone, his wife was approaching 70 it would explain why he would place himself on her thigh in the foetal position, a psychiatrist would have a field day diagnosing Mohammed but thats a completely different topic ] When he left Mecca and there was no house in sight, every stone and tree that passed by said, ‘Peace be unto you, Allah’s Apostle.’ [Wait a minute jibreel hadn't come to choke him 3 times yet for his crime of not being able to read or recite!, but already trees and stones are calling him allah's apostle? no wonder he wanted to commit suicide] Muhammad would turn around and see naught but trees and stones. He stayed seeing and hearing things as long as it pleased Allah. Then Gabriel came to him with the gift of Allah’s grace [This was the choking that led him to run home to khadija and ask her to cover him with a blanket hardly a gift] while he was on Hira in the month of Ramadhan. The Apostle would pray in seclusion on Hira every year for a month to practice Tahannuth as was the custom of the Quraysh in the heathen days. . After praying in seclusion, he would walk around the Ka’aba seven times.”

As was the custom of the pagan Quraysh as noted in this hadith they would practice ramadan, and "Tahannuth worship" in seclusion in a cave all the while calling the name of allah, Mohammed was simply a pagan, he even incorporated the paganistic rites of walking around the ka'ba 7 times, and had the nerve to justify it by claiming this is the religion of Abraham, that Abraham, Isaac, Jacob, Moses, and the prophets all circumnavigated and kissed that abomination you call a black stone, how do you justify this?


Did you read the hadiths I posted about Hubal and how the pagan arabs conducted their prayers to the idol Hubal and allah?

Ishaq:66/Tabari VI:2 “It is alleged, and Allah only knows the truth, that Abdul Muttalib encountered opposition when he was digging Zamzam. He vowed that if given ten sons, to make his labor less arduous and to protect him, he would sacrifice one of them to Allah at the Ka’aba.



Also we went over this and brought up testamony from Quran that the pagans worshiped IDOLS to bring them selves closer to Allah, the practice of this is that they would go to an Idol and pray through that idol as a mediator. Hubal was not the only one this was done with, Lat, Uzza, and Mannat were also mediators.


This is from a verse in the koran written after the facts with the intention of aligning the god of the koran with the God of the bible, it is nothing major, more like a haphazard attempt to deflect focus, the hadiths indicate otherwise, where is the evidence in the hadiths that the pagans were using their idols as mediators to get to allah?

Remember what we agreed on scriptures and our God given logic, I am using your sunnah in that process, if indeed there is a conflict between the sunnah and the quran I would rather use my God given logic to decipher what is the more logical story.



What part of this you dont get ? They worshiped the idols which included Hubal as intercessors with Allah. This does not mean because they prayed through Hubal or any of the idols to Allah that Hubal or any of those Idols were Allah. They Also prayed through al-Uzza to Allah, does this mean Al-Uzza is Allah ? When the Jews prayed through Baal to YHWH does this mean YHWH is Baal ?


Again read my post above, and please I would like to see your evidence the jews prayed to Yahweh through baal.

As for those Hadith (sunnah) that you keep on quoting to show islam is derived from paganism, like wise, I posted Quranic Verses and Hadith that explain the history of how the religion of Abraham and Ishmail became paganized and then when it was purified it maintained practices accociated with pagan practices




How can you 'purify' a religion from paganistic practices by still incorporating those paganistic practices?



The Jews also had a parallel history of falling into Idolotry and then later the religion was purified to an extant by the advent of prophets that came to them.


The difference being the religion was not 'purified' by making sacred pilgrimages to the idol sanctuaries the idol temples were destroyed and they were brought back to the worship of Yahweh without any pagan rituals, pilgrimages or lascivious rites.


You used islamic sources to criticize by taking it out of its perspective ignoring the other teachings that explain how those pagan practices came to be.


There is no evidence Abraham Isaac or Jacob set foot anywhere near that black stone, there is no evidence it came from heaven, and there is no evidence it turned black because of menstruating women.

I saved one other thing for this debate waiting for you to hang you self. Do you know about the family ideology of the Idols that was at the Ka'abah ?
What was the Idelogical family of Hubal ? Who was the mother of Hubal in the pagan phylosophy ?


Hubal was the son of Al-Uzza

"Two deities appear in pre-Islamic times to have been worshipped at the Kaaba, Al-Uzza and Hubal. These the Meccans invoked at the battle of Ohod. These deities were represented by two stones in the Kaaba, a white stone and a black stone. There is much evidence that Al-Uzza was a mother-goddess and Hubal was her son. The goddess was apparently identified with the white stone, which is still in the Kaaba, and her son with the black stone. The Kaaba was the shrine of these deities; the Zem-zem was a well sacred to them, and the Ghabghab the place where their sacrifices were slain. In the Zemzem golden gazelles were once found, and the finder placed them in the Kaaba. The goddess is said to have had another shrine at a point called Nakhla, or ‘Palm.’ The star Venus was sacred to her, and the Quraish held a feast to her every year.
"Christian writers testify that her feasts were accompanied by lewed practices. Doves (pigeons) were sacred to her, and are still protected in the Kaaba as Allah’s birds. There can be no doubt that Al-Uzza and Hubal were survivors of that primitive cult with which the names of Athtar and Athirat (Ishtar and Asherah) are so indissolubly associated. Hubal is here the counterpart of Dhu-’l-Shara, the god of the Nabathaeans, and Al-Uzza of his mother. Al-Uzza. ‘The powerful one,’ is clearly an epithet, which has superseded an earlier name.
http://www.hanskrause.de/HKHPE/hkhpe_35_03.htm


Now tell me How could Allah be Hubal if Al-Uzza was the daughter of Allah in which Al-Uzza was the mother of Hubal ?


Before addressing the rest of your post this alone should send alarm bells through you "The goddess was apparently identified with the white stone, which is still in the Kaaba," Are you trying to tell me your purified religion has a symbol to a pagan goddess still enshrined in your most holy site!!!?

Also please do recall what we universally agreed on what the holy books have to say with our God given logic , Why on earth are you sending me a website that contradicts what you believe, what are you trying to prove?
This is what the website says:

"Indeed, scanty as our sources are, a reconstruction of the pre-Islamic religion of Arabia, even in the dim outline which is all that is possible for us, reveals the fact that, much as Mohammed may have been influenced by Jewish and Christian ideas, the substructure of his religious edifice lay deep in that of heathenism... Allah, whom the Prophet proclaimed, was not a new god; he was Al-Ilah, ‘The Ilah’ that had long been known both in North and South Arabia, whose name was an epithet which had been applied here and there to the supreme deity of local pantheons, and had gradually superseded local names. ... His beginnings reached back into prehistory and had its roots in that complex of ideas suggested by the names Athtar (Ishtar, Ashtart) and Athirat (Asherah)"


"Further, when the Prophet chose Mecca instead of Jerusalem as the holy city of Islam, and later followed the choice by the making of the pilgrimage, the performing of the ceremonies, and the capture of the sacred places of the Quraish, and enjoined these ceremonies upon his followers, he adopted as parts of his religion customs and rites that had their origin in the worship of Al-Uzza and Hubal

"The Kaaba and its sacred stones were originally the shrine and symbols of those gods, and the sacred doves of the Kaaba were the birds of Al-Uzza, and the sacrifices of sheep were originally sacrifices to these deities, since the Prophet’s early message of the oneness of Allah and the necessity of submission was a gospel that had in it no place for sacrifice. Indeed no one can read an account of the ceremony of the Hagg, ... without realizing that the ritual of the Hagg is a ritual of Al-Uzza and Hubal, purified and veneered with a coating of Islamism."


So since the site mentions that al-uzza and Hubal were mother and son with no sunnah reference it must be correct regardless of all the other disturbing picture it builds of Mohammed and islam, just select the parts you want your audience to see disregard the rest.

Am I the only one reading your extrapolation of this hadith with amazement, let us read the whole paragraph of that hadith in context
:

Hmm lets see if I am interpolating my own meaning lets see what others say about this hadith:



Many other also understood the same Hadith hadith I Quoted that Allah and Hubal were not the name

It was before [Hubal] that 'Abd-al-Muttalib[61] shuffled the divination arrows [in order to find out which of his ten children he should sacrifice in fulfilment of a vow he had sworn], and the arrows pointed to his son 'Abdullah, the father of the Prophet[62]. Hubal was also the same idol which abu-Sufyan ibn-Harb[63] addressed when he emerged victorious after the battle of Uhud[64], saying:

"Hubal, be thou exalted" (i.e. may thy religion triumph);
To which the Prophet replied:

"Allah is more exalted and more majestic[65]."
http://www.answering-islam.org/Books/Al-Kalbi/uzza.htm

Hubal
“Hubal was worshipped at Mecca; his idol stood in the Ka‘ba, and appears to have been in reality, the god of that sanctuary… It would be unsafe to trust the descriptions of the idol in question which are given by writers of a later period; there is reason, however, to believe that the god had a human form. We may likewise accept as historical the statement that near him were kept divining arrows, used for the purpose of ascertaining his will or forecasting future events. It is related that the idol was brought by ‘Amr b. LuHai from Ma‘ãb (Moab), a tradition which may contain some elements of truth, for we have independent evidence indicating that the god was known in the North. He seems to be mentioned in a Nabataean inscription at Hejr; and the tribe of Kalb, who dwelt in the Syrian Desert, used the name of Hubal as the name of a person or clan; the same tribe… used in like manner the names of Îsãf and Nã’ila, two other deities peculiar to Mecca. Moreover, ‘Amr b. LuHai is the representative of the Huzã‘a, a tribe who, according to tradition, occupied the sacred territory of Mecca before it passed into the hands of the Quraish. The assertion that’Amr introduced the worship of idols into Mecca for the first time is, of course, utterly incredible. But the hypothesis that Hubal was a late importation from a foreign country is further supported by the fact that we hear nothing of him in other parts of Arabia, and even at Mecca personal names compounded with Hubal were unknown. When the Meccans gained a victory over the Prophet in the immediate neighbourhood of Medina, their leader shouted, ‘Hurrah for Hubal!’ Thus they regarded him as the natural enemy of the God preached by Muhammad.”58
http://www.bharatvani.org/books/htemples2/ch11.htm

In 624 at the battle called "Uhud", the war cry of the Qurayshites was, "O people of `Uzza, people of Hubal." By the end of that war, the victorious Abu Sufyan cried: "O Hubal be exalted, O Hubal be exalted." The Prophet answered him: "God is the highest and the most exalted."
http://enlil.ff.cuni.cz/jais/v002cmt/pavcmt01.htm


So I guess they are interpolating to huh ? Or is it that you just want it to have a meaning to fit your agenda ?


Everybody is free to interpret it the way the like given the evidences they have at their disposal, but since I am of the "monkey see monkey do" mentality I should step in line?

I was careful to point out that the english translation makes it ambiguous as to what Abu Sayfan meant, and I stick by that.

If you ask them [the pagan Quraysh] who created the heavens and the earth and made subject the sun and the moon, they will certainly reply "Allah.". . . And indeed if you ask them who sends down the rain from the sky and so restores life to the earth after its death, they will certainly reply, "Allah." (Quran 29:62, 63)
And if you ask them who created them, they will certainly reply, "Allah." (Quran 43:87)
Say: Who is it who sustains you from the sky and from the earth? Or who is it who has power over hearing and sight? And who is it who brings out the living from the dead and the dead from the living And who is it who rules and regulates all affairs? They will soon answer, "Allah."
If you ask them who created the heavens and the earth, they will certainly say "Allah." Say: Those (female) things you call upon apart from Allah, do you think that if God wills evil to me, they can remove this evil, or, if He wills mercy to me, they can hold back this mercy? (Quran 39:38)

In this latter verse the "high god" relationship is quite marked. On the one hand, there is Allah, the creator, sustainer, and ruler of the universe, and on the other, a host of minor deities-the "daughters of Allah" among them-who intercede with the lord of the gods, precisely the view that is attacked in the Quran:


I believe there are lies in the koran, lies in the hadiths too, fabricated commentaries, conversations e.t.c, like Abraham calling himself a muslim, and Jesus speaking to His mother in the womb and commanding dates and water to come forth. Where are the hadith references that state that the Quraish believed this?, you have just the word of the koran alone but ofcourse you are looking at it from the perception that it is the word of God and perfect. Mohammed was the son of a caravan merchant and a politician I would give him that much, he first said the high flying cranes which were the daughters of allah were to be consulted, this was to appeal to the pagan section of his community to get them to accept islam,
it's like claiming the God of christianity and islam is the same to gain more converts, converts who were going to declare the shahadah and give him 5% of booty ( incidentally if Mohammed was following the same God where is the precedent for Moses, David, Samuel, Jesus, and the disciples collecting 5% of booty to be awarded to them and them alone?), when his followers confronted him that he said allah has no partners he simply renegued on it, hence the satanic verses in sura 53:19-20, mentioned by all early islamic historians and ofcourse no longer in the koran.

Quote:
From a grammatical-lexical point of view, allaah doesn’t comply with the rules and its root still remains mysterious and unidentifiable


Who is to say those rules weren't amended and altered after the concept of islam?


And who is to say that the rules of "Allahumma" was later change to Elohim used in the Bible to refer to YHWH when Elohim can be pronounced in Hebrew as Allahumma in which both are made up of the consonants "alhm" after Christianity


We can speculate as long as we want, supply the evidence please, judaism and christianity supercede islam, allah is nowhere in the bible, the Schofield bible that Ahmed Deedat obtained that information from was an erroneous footnote that has since been amended.

LOL why have you tried to be deceptive here?, why didn't you look at the one called baal, plural baalim, and read what I typed, the old testament was not written in arabic:

http://www.studylight.org/lex/heb/view.cgi?number=01168

The first line says "baal = lord"


Irrelivant ! I address your wishful thinking of saying Hubal had the same meaning as Baal


Did you? I said baal meant lord the site above says baal, plural baalim means lord, earlier on you mentioned you are were not refuting baal is related to hubal, what is your point?



And while we are discussing this would you like to show us where Eli or El is in the aramaic we have today? didn't Jesus say " Eli ELi Lama sa bachthani?"


Now tell me this... Jesus is suppose to be your god or the son of G-D but why would he use a PAGAN word "El" or call upon "El" which was a pagan Canaanite deity.



There is no evidence that associates Elohim with El, the pagans that believed in el as a tree god have no relation with the Elohim of Judaism, Elohim is not derived from el, again this is an Ahmed Deedat tactic, it is like me saying since hello and hell sound phonetically the same in english etymology they must have come from the same root source, coincidentally elah in hebrew means an oak as was the name of one of Esau's sons.

El was a sky god in Canaanite mythology, whose rain fertilized the earth, making agriculture possible. In a country dependent on rain, his role (and cult) were crucial, and he rapidly emerged as the chief deity in the Canaanite pantheon. El was the father of Baal in Ugaritic texts of the second millennium BCE. He was apparently adopted by the Israelite scribes, who lived in the southern hill district of the region and conflated with Yahweh. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/El_(god)


Why are you quoting this website? coincidentally the website mentions allah is derived from el, the sky god of the canaanite you are prepared to link to the One True God, I find it slightly amusing how polite it was when describing allah and how it attacked Elohim were they worried by a fatwa?. I have to ask you why you consider such sources that ridicule your own beliefs, are you so desperate to get one on the opposition you are prepared to degrade your own beliefs in the process? Is this an islamic way of thinking, it would explain why palestininian suicide bombers are prepared to blow themselves to bits to kill a pregnant jewish woman, since you claim you are a jew how do you feel about this? Are you in favour of your people being driven to the sea?
Do you want your own people to be subjected to islamic rule by force?
Do you belief the jews deserve the state of Israel?
What do you feel about the hadith that says "oh servant of allah there is a jew behind me come and kill him"? you never answered this question the first time round, it is a sahih hadith I am curious as to how you view it

Allah has not association with Baal


As your source says El is the god of nature, a tree god, a drunk who lives in a mountain (akin to Zeus), baal was his son, baal was worshipped for agricultural produce of the land, the same with hubal ofcourse you will never see the semblance.

[37:125-126] "Will ye call upon Baal and forsake the Best of Creators Allah your Lord and Cherisher and the Lord and Cherisher of your fathers of old?"


Sorry the lord and cherisher of their fathers of old was the moon god hubal. Need I remind of Mohammed's grandfather's prayer to the moon god for help against Abrah's army?

And btw your comments about Mohammed's utterings after an epileptic seizure, the text in your koran you have in your hand can only be traced to 150 years after the death of Mohammed plenty of time for editing and proof reading even then there are words in it people do not understand


O really ! Where is the proof ?


http://www.jesus-christ-forums.com/home/viewtopic ... 3&start=20

The same thing could have happened to the Gospels. Anyhow. 150 Years after Muhammad they still at that time didnt know anything about embryology
.

Let us have a look at this 'miracle' in embryonal description already well known in Mohammed's time

Clay : Sura 15:26 (Al-Hijr (Stoneland, Rock City)) "We created man from sounding clay, from mud moulded into shape;" Hardly an original creation story. From the pre-bible Epic Of Gilgamesh (I:101-104)

"The Goddess Aruru, she washed her hands, took a pinch of clay, threw it down in the wild. In the wild she created Endiku, the hero, offspring of silence, knit strong by Ninurta.". A much better story, too.


Water > Sura 25:54 (The Criterion (The Standard)) "It is He Who has created man from water: ... "

Hardly original a woman breaking her water during child birth could easily cause a superstitious and unlearned individual to believe people came from water.


Dust > Sura 30:20 (The Romans (The Byzantines)) "Among His Signs in this, that He created you from dust; ... "

The bible was already in circulation another case of plagiarism

Blood > Sura 96:2 (The Clot (Read!)) "Created man, out of a (mere) clot of congealed blood:"

With Mohammed's alledge 9 wives and umpteen concubines he would have seen lots of miscarriages, the only time a foetus looks like congealed blood!.

Your standard islamic response to this 'miracle' is to claim it is one thing and another, separate mentions of separate 'components', despite each being mentioned in isolation (and unnecessary if all he needs to do is say 'be'), but this is contradicted by the sequence shown below

Sura 23:12-14 (The Believers) "Man We did create from a quintessence (of clay); Then We placed him as (a drop of) sperm in a place of rest, firmly fixed; Then We made the sperm into a clot of congealed blood; then of that clot We made a (foetus) lump; then we made out of that lump bones and clothed the bones with flesh; then we developed out of it another creature."

This is not a miracle, it is the utterings of a superstitious mind using already existent material

I would like to show a quote from an arab christian about the koran:

""... It no more proves its inspiration than a man's strength demonstrates his wisdom, or a woman's beauty, her virtue. Only by its teachings, its principles, and content can a book be judged rightly; not by its eloquence, elegance, or poetic strength"

H2O
Preacher
Preacher
Posts: 782
Joined: Thu Jun 03, 2004 09:00 pm
Location: Boca Raton, Florida

Postby H2O » Mon Jun 14, 2004 02:18 am

What is this Tahannuth worship?, so Mohammed goes to a cave to practice this tahannuth worship and goes back to his pagan wife to obtain provisions to go back to this cave for a like period, am I to believe his pagan wife is giving him provisions to go retreat himself in a cave and worship the one true God?


You didnt prove anything here. It was already explained from islamic doctrine that the pagan worshiped idols in association with Allah. "Tahannuth" Do you know what this word means ? It is to withdraw to seclusion in the cause of religous purification, which is indeed and act of worship. Muhammad did withdraw to the cave on Mount Hira in the mountain to worship Allah. This is not a pagan pratice exclusively, Christian monks or Monophisite Christians did the same and the Essenes.
Now tell me If Allah is Hubal how could he go to Mount Hira in a cave for a month to worship Allah which is three miles north of Makka and that took 4 hours to climb when Hubal was in the Ka'abah in Makkah ?

Tabari VI:67: “The Prophet said, ‘I had been standing, but fell to my knees; and crawled away, my shoulders trembling. I went to Khadija and said, ‘Wrap me up! When the terror had left me, he came to me and said, ‘Muhammad, you are the Messenger of Allah.’ Muhammad said, ‘I had been thinking of hurling myself down from a mountain crag, but he appeared to me as I was thinking about this and said, ‘I am Gabriel and you are the Messenger.’ Then he said, Recite!’ I said, ‘What shall I recite?’ He took me and pressed me three times. ‘I fear for my life.’ She said, ‘Rejoice, for Allah will never put you to shame.”

I would like you to focus on the quote in bold, this is from Khadijah Mohammed's first wife a notable pagan, what does she mean by this? is she worshipping the one true God as a pagan!?


Just like the first one, your quote doesnt prove a thing. We already pointed out the fact from doctrine that the pagans worshiped the Idols as Intercessors with Allah. The Quotes on [ ] are interpolations, must be yours. All that assaulting has nothing to do with the topic.

As was the custom of the pagan Quraysh as noted in this hadith they would practice ramadan, and "Tahannuth worship" in seclusion in a cave all the while calling the name of allah, Mohammed was simply a pagan, he even incorporated the paganistic rites of walking around the ka'ba 7 times, and had the nerve to justify it by claiming this is the religion of Abraham, that Abraham, Isaac, Jacob, Moses, and the prophets all circumnavigated and kissed that abomination you call a black stone, how do you justify this?


You are mixing your christian perspective here. Who cares what you think, what does the doctrine say ? This has nothing to do with what you believe and that is what you are introducing "..Mohammed was simply a pagan, he even incorporated the paganistic rites of walking around the ka'ba 7 times, and had the nerve to justify it by claiming this is the religion of Abraham, that Abraham, Isaac, Jacob, Moses, .." You just cant keep you own personal vandata out of this. You believed this before you even got a whole of Hadith. It is common that if you are not a Christian then you are automatically a PAGAN.

This is from a verse in the koran written after the facts with the intention of aligning the god of the koran with the God of the bible, it is nothing major, more like a haphazard attempt to deflect focus, the hadiths indicate otherwise, where is the evidence in the hadiths that the pagans were using their idols as mediators to get to allah?


According to who ? Where is this comming from ? Again this is your own conjecture, your wishful thinking. Where is the proof ? we dont wanna here YAP YAP YAP ! Show some proof of this .

Remember what we agreed on scriptures and our God given logic, I am using your sunnah in that process, if indeed there is a conflict between the sunnah and the quran I would rather use my God given logic to decipher what is the more logical story.


No you are not. You are using hadith and you own unbias perspective in the light of Christianity. you have a habit of throwing sucker punches. You go off an attack another part of islam that doesnt have nothing to do with the topic.

Again read my post above, and please I would like to see your evidence the jews prayed to Yahweh through baal


I read your post. I disagree with you interpretation. Now you asking me to do something I dont want to do, but since you asked then sure:


Jeremiah 31:31-32:

"Behold, the days come, saith Yahweh, that I will make a new covenant with the house of Israel, and with the house of Judah:

"Not according to the covenant that I made with their fathers in the day that I took them by the hand to bring them out of the land of Egypt; which My covenant they brake, although I was husband (hebrew ~ Baal) unto them, saith Yahweh."


Please go back to your bible, get a concordance to get its Lexical # and then GO to a lexicon. Now why were christians translators trying to hide this by translating Baal in Hebrew as Husband ? Well to behonest. The Word Baal just doesnt only mean lord but its expresses to be married. I know what the hebrew says in my Tanakh. In the Hebrew the word Baal is not a common noun ending in tanween or that is to say a grammatical mark indicating the noun as being indefinite, it is a Proper noun refering to the pagan god BAAL.

The Verse above is explaining a particular history of the Jews of what they did after they broke their covenant they associated Baal with Yhwh. It is undisputed that they worshiped Baal. Our dispute is if they associated Baal with Yhwh. Note: A concordance is NOT a lexicon.

How can you 'purify' a religion from paganistic practices by still incorporating those paganistic practices?


Well the Jews after following the way of the heathen, their religion was REFORMED, mostly by the Sanhedrin after they reuturned from Babylon in which Christianity centuries later emerged from.

The difference being the religion was not 'purified' by making sacred pilgrimages to the idol sanctuaries the idol temples were destroyed and they were brought back to the worship of Yahweh without any pagan rituals, pilgrimages or lascivious rites.


Again this is your perspective. Your taking what you want out of the religion to claim it as pagan derived. Remember you dont believe whatsoever about anything of the religion having any ties to Abraham.
You are still on this issue when we have shown from doctrine about the history of the religion that is traced to Abraham from islamic doctrine. You want to use what you want out of the doctrine of islam but ignoring the other crucial evidence of Quranic versus that explain the descent of the religion.

There is no evidence Abraham Isaac or Jacob set foot anywhere near that black stone, there is no evidence it came from heaven, and there is no evidence it turned black because of menstruating women.


How did Isaac and Jacob get into this ? THe Quran only speaks of Abraham and Ishmael in connection with the Ka'abah this shows how much you dont know and you have never read the Quran before. By the way what evidence are you talking about ? I hope you are not talking about evidence out side islam teaching cause you would be reneging on what you said cause the only evidence we are going by is that which in islamic teachings. I guess the only evidence you are talking about is evidence out side Islam. YOu have a big problem sticking to what you said in the begining.

Also when I made the Quotes from those other writers it was that they understood the hadith the way I understood it to confirm that I was not interpolating, and also they recognized the same versus in Quran the as making a distinction that Alla is nto and Idol. I didnt want to quote a muslim source cause then it could be said to be biased so I quoted enemies of islam.
I quoted them on the bases that we agreed on one particular issue even though they were critics.

I believe there are lies in the koran, lies in the hadiths too, fabricated commentaries, conversations e.t.c, like Abraham calling himself a muslim, and Jesus speaking to His mother in the womb and commanding dates and water to come forth. Where are the hadith references that state that the Quraish believed this?, you have just the word of the koran alone but ofcourse you are looking at it from the perception that it is the word of God and perfect. Mohammed was the son of a caravan merchant and a politician I would give him that much, he first said the high flying cranes which were the daughters of allah were to be consulted, this was to appeal to the pagan section of his community to get them to accept islam


Exactly what I was talking about. Being that you look at islam as false, also means that you are not going to follow our chain of authority in Doctrine. So you will pick and choose what you want that you see fit you can use against us. Part of the islamic teaching is that the Quran supersedes hadith that you keep quoting. Also if the Hadith contradicts Quran or a particular INTERPRETATION that conflicts with QUran then it is also rejected as being a part of islamic Orthodaxical Teaching. Just like the Apocrypha Gospels. IF they contradict the Cannon versions they are rejected and not considered a part of the teaching of Chrisitianity.

The Quran is the supreme authority, not the Hadith. You will have to come from Quran to prove you allegation cause it is the supreme authority in islam this is part of the islamic teaching. By you rejecting this then you are not following your own words :

You know it becomes pointless if all anybody does is quote and plagiarise what academics have to say on a matter, what about their own God given logic when applied to their scruptures? what exactly does the holy books have to say, what does the quran and sunnah have to say this should take precedence over any apologetic material.


"..what does the quran and sunnah.." You showed nothing from Quran. You only Quoted hadith. Hadith in islam are not divine and they are not the words of Allah. Only the Quran is the word of Allah :

[3:1] Alif Lam Mim.

[3:2] Allah! there is no god but He, the Living, the Self-Subsisting, Eternal.

[3:3] It is He Who sent down to thee (Muhammad), in truth, the Book, truth verify for whatever is before it; and He sent down the Torah (of Musa) and the Injeel (Gospel) [


If the Quran authenticates something as false then it is rejected which is not recognised as a teaching of islam. This is islamic teaching you did not follow. You made up your own rules of authority and interpretation.

Quote:
[37:125-126] "Will ye call upon Baal and forsake the Best of Creators Allah your Lord and Cherisher and the Lord and Cherisher of your fathers of old?"


Sorry the lord and cherisher of their fathers of old was the moon god hubal. Need I remind of Mohammed's grandfather's prayer to the moon god for help against Abrah's army?


You amaze me. Ok lets see what else the Quran says Allah being LORD of :

[1:2] Praise be to Allah, the Lord and Cherisher of all worlds

[114:1] Say(Muhammad): I seek refuge with the Lord and Cherisher of Mankind,


So lets see here according to your form of thinking then Allah then must be Jesus, Yhwh, and whatever else mankind worships? Ma'aadzallah ! The statement is a statement of demand, and reality of whom mankind's Lord is even if they accept it or not.

Let us have a look at this 'miracle' in embryonal description already well known in Mohammed's time

Clay : Sura 15:26 (Al-Hijr (Stoneland, Rock City)) "We created man from sounding clay, from mud moulded into shape;" Hardly an original creation story. From the pre-bible Epic Of Gilgamesh (I:101-104)

"The Goddess Aruru, she washed her hands, took a pinch of clay, threw it down in the wild. In the wild she created Endiku, the hero, offspring of silence, knit strong by Ninurta.". A much better story, too.

Water > Sura 25:54 (The Criterion (The Standard)) "It is He Who has created man from water: ... "

Hardly original a woman breaking her water during child birth could easily cause a superstitious and unlearned individual to believe people came from water.


Dust > Sura 30:20 (The Romans (The Byzantines)) "Among His Signs in this, that He created you from dust; ... "

The bible was already in circulation another case of plagiarism

Blood > Sura 96:2 (The Clot (Read!)) "Created man, out of a (mere) clot of congealed blood:"

With Mohammed's alledge 9 wives and umpteen concubines he would have seen lots of miscarriages, the only time a foetus looks like congealed blood!.

Your standard islamic response to this 'miracle' is to claim it is one thing and another, separate mentions of separate 'components', despite each being mentioned in isolation (and unnecessary if all he needs to do is say 'be'), but this is contradicted by the sequence shown below

Sura 23:12-14 (The Believers) "Man We did create from a quintessence (of clay); Then We placed him as (a drop of) sperm in a place of rest, firmly fixed; Then We made the sperm into a clot of congealed blood; then of that clot We made a (foetus) lump; then we made out of that lump bones and clothed the bones with flesh; then we developed out of it another creature."

This is not a miracle, it is the utterings of a superstitious mind using already existent material

I would like to show a quote from an arab christian about the koran:



LOL ! When you get a correct translation let me know ok. By the way the challenge was EMBRYOLOGY. Man being made out of clay was not the issue of debate. I mentioned embryology and you went off into the clay issue...lol
You keep on going off the topic. Attack the topic it self not those things out side it.

Below is the correct translation of that verse. Have this reveiwed by you Christian Arab brothers at www.arabicbible.com

[23:13] And indeed We have Created Man (male and female) from an extaction of clay

[23:14] Then We placed him as a sperm into a thing that sojournes and implants

[ 24:15] Then We made the sperm as a thing that clings and then We made the thing that clings as something that is chewed, and then We made the chewing as bones and then We clothed the bones with muscle then He (Allah) brings it out as another creation; and sublime is Allah the best of makers


Sorry to say the word "alaqah" original means " a thing that clings" which is derived from the root word "aliqa" ~ to hang , dangle, cling . The meaning "a clot of congealed blood" are modern medical terminologies of the arabic word. The root of alaqah does not SUPORT the meaning of "a clot of congealed blood"

Have you ever studied Embryology ? How can you make a statement of "This is not a miracle, it is the utterings of a superstitious mind using already existent material" ? If you are a male more than likely you would know nothing about Embryology which is typical in this country.

Then We placed him as a sperm into a thing that sojournes and implants


Sperm is translated from the word "NUTFAH". However again the word sperm also is a modern medical terminolgy and is NOT the original meaning of the word. The word "NUTFAH" is a feminine verbal noun which is derived from the arabic word "natafa" meaning to trickle, or dribble, whereas the orignial meaning is "a thing that trickles".

This "alaqah" or thing that trickles is defined by another name in the Quran:

[80:19] Verily We create mankind from a tricking gamete (Nutfatin amshaajin) for Us to try him, and We made for him hearing and sight


The thing that Trickles ie NUTFAH is defines as AMSHAAJ meaning "a gemete or germ". So tell me what is a sperm ?

germ
PRONUNCIATION: AUDIO: jûrm KEY
NOUN: 1. Biology A small mass of protoplasm or cells from which a new organism or one of its parts may develop.
2. The earliest form of an organism; a seed, bud, or spore.
3. A microorganism, especially a pathogen.
4. Something that may serve as the basis of further growth or development: the germ of a project.

gamete
SYLLABICATION: gam·ete
PRONUNCIATION: AUDIO: gmt, g-mt KEY
NOUN: A reproductive cell having the haploid number of chromosomes, especially a mature sperm or egg capable of fusing with a gamete of the opposite sex to produce the fertilized egg.
ETYMOLOGY: New Latin gameta, from Greek gamet, wife gamets, husband, from gamein, to marry, from gamos, marriage. See gem- in Appendix


So we have confirmed what the NUTFAH is in the Quran. It is "a germ cell that trickles"

http://www.kumc.edu/instruction/medicin ... e/male.htm

The Quran says this thing the NUTFAH is placed into something that sojourns and implants or "Qararin Makeen" THe arabic words "Qarar" is a masculine noun that means a sojourner or one that temporarily stays or temoprarily resides often applied to a traveler. The second name it is called is "Makeen" an implanter or one that implants or something that implants itself which is also a masculine noun.

What is this "Qararin Makeen" the strickling germ cell is placed in ? The female Ovum. When the female Ovum is released from the Ovary it TEMPORILY RESIDES in the Fallopian Tube until fertilization by a SINGLE Germ Cell called a Sperm that trickles to its destined location or if not fertilized within a due time the Ovum will erupt resulting into a female's menstral cycle. After fertilization the Ovum proceeds to the Utterus wher it Implants its self. This is called the egg implantation. Note: At this stage the cells cannot be seen with the human eye.

Then We made the sperm as a thing that clings


After the implantation of the fertilized ovum it starts to cling to the walls of the Utterus of its mother in which the Umblimical Cord is developed from

and then We made the thing that clings as something that is chewed, and then We made the chewing as bones and then We clothed the bones with muscle then He (Allah) brings it out as another creation; and sublime is Allah the best of makers


This goes far as the clothing of bones with muscle. This is identified as the 12th stage of development in which you CANNOT IDINTIFY WITH THE NAKED EYE, cause the embro as this stage is at 3-5 mm! Go and ask any Embrologist. I worked in the medical field and in order for us to look at the embro at this stage is through a microscope.

You making the statement of "With Mohammed's alledge 9 wives and umpteen concubines he would have seen lots of miscarriages, the only time a foetus looks like congealed blood!." showed the visitors of this Forum your wantonness. Obviously you are unaware of the stages of embryology and I provided a link for your convienience in which the Quran is Identifying at its stage. Also please click on the picture for a closer look and see what looks like teeth marks that is the spinal development and also the Embryo its self looks like something chewed . These pics are microscopical images not poloride pics.

http://anatomy.med.unsw.edu.au/cbl/embr ... Stages.htm

Present this to an Embryolgist and have him send me his report that this is inaccurate with his PHD signiture and Medical facility and I will renounce Islam. However though, I would go back to Judaism, not Christianity, and reject Jesus as an imposter and a lier as being a former Jew beleived just like the charged you brong against Muhammad.

Also, If you doubt the translation that I posted then go to www.arabicbible.com email them (your arabic speaking Christian brothers) the translation with your choice of translation and ask them which one is more accurate. :D Have a Nice Day !
Download Quran and Hadeeth for Free here http://www.islamasoft.co.uk/downloads.html Learn about Islam from a Non dictatorial view

H2O
Preacher
Preacher
Posts: 782
Joined: Thu Jun 03, 2004 09:00 pm
Location: Boca Raton, Florida

Postby H2O » Mon Jun 14, 2004 08:32 pm

..where is the evidence in the hadiths that the pagans were using their idols as mediators to get to allah?

Volumn 004, Book 054, Hadith Number 461.
-----------------------------------------
Narated By Jabir bin 'Abdullah : That he heard the Prophet saying, "The Divine Inspiration was delayed for a short period but suddenly, as I was walking. I heard a voice in the sky, and when I looked up towards the sky, to my surprise, I saw the angel who had come to me in the Hira Cave, and he was sitting on a chair in between the sky and the earth. I was so frightened by him that I fell on the ground and came to my family and said (to them), 'Cover me! (with a blanket), cover me!' Then Allah sent the Revelation: 'O you (i.e. Muhammad)! wrapped up in garments!' Arise and warn, and magnify your Lord (Allah), and your garments (of righteousness) be purified and shun idolotry.' (74.1-5)


Volumn 003, Book 034, Hadith Number 438.
-----------------------------------------
Narated By Jabir bin 'Abdullah : I heard Allah's Apostle, in the year of the Conquest of Mecca, saying, "Allah and His Apostle made illegal the trade of alcohol, dead animals, pigs and idols." The people asked, "O Allah's Apostle! What about the fat of dead animals, for it was used for greasing the boats and the hides; and people use it for lights?" He said, "No, it is illegal." Allah's Apostle further said, "May Allah curse the Jews, for Allah made the fat (of animals) illegal for them, yet they melted the fat and sold it and ate its price."

Volumn 002, Book 023, Hadith Number 479.
-----------------------------------------
Narated By Abu Aiyub : A man said to the Prophet "Tell me of such a deed as will make me enter Paradise." The people said, "What is the matter with him? What is the matter with him?" The Prophet said, "He has something to ask. (What he needs greatly) The Prophet said: (In order to enter Paradise) you should worship Allah and do not ascribe any partners to Him, offer prayer perfectly, pay the Zakat and keep good relations with your Kith and kin." (See Hadith No. 12, Vol 8).

Volumn 009, Book 093, Hadith Number 560.
-----------------------------------------
Narated By 'Ubada bin As-Samit : I, along with a group of people, gave the pledge of allegiance to Allah's Apostle. He said, "I take your Pledge on the condition that you (1) will not join partners in worship with Allah, (2) will not steal, (3) will not commit illegal sexual intercourse, (4) will not kill your offspring, (5) will not slander, (6) and will not disobey me when I order you to do good. Whoever among you will abide by his pledge, his reward will be with Allah, and whoever commits any of those sins and receives the punishment in this world, that punishment will be an expiation for his sins and purification; but if Allah screens him, then it will be up to Allah to punish him if He will or excuse Him, if He will."

Volumn 009, Book 093, Hadith Number 604.
-----------------------------------------
Narated By 'Abdullah : A priest from the Jews came (to the Prophet) and said, "On the Day of Resurrection, Allah will place all the heavens on one finger, and the Earth on one finger, and the waters and the land on one finger, and all the creation on one finger, and then He will shake them and say. 'I am the King! I am the King!'" I saw the Prophet smiling till his premolar teeth became visible expressing his amazement and his belief in what he had said. Then the Prophet recited: 'No just estimate have they made of Allah such as due to Him (up to)...; High is He above the partners they attribute to Him.' (39.67)
{ Note : A Jew using the Name Allah }


Book 004, Hadith Number 1812.
------------------------------

'Amr b. 'Abasa Sulami reported: I in the state of the Ignorance (before embracing Islam) used to think that the people were in error and they were not on anything (which may be called the right path) and worshipped the idols. In the meanwhile I heard of a man in Mecca who was giving news (on the basis of his prophetic knowledge); so I sat on my ride and went to him. The Messenger of Allah (may peace be upon him) was at that time hiding as his people had made life hard for him. I adopted a friendly attitude (towards the Meccans and thus managed) to enter Mecca and go to him (the Holy Prophet) and I said to him: Who are you? He said: I am a Prophet (of Allah). I again said: Who is a Prophet? He said: (I am a Prophet in the sense that) I have been sent by Allah. I said: What is that which you have been sent with? He said: I have been sent to join ties of relationship (with kindness and affection), to break the Idols, and to proclaim the oneness of Allah (in a manner that) nothing is to be associated with Him. I said: Who is with you in this (in these beliefs and practices)? He said: A free man and a slave. He (the narrator) said: Abu Bakr and Bilal were there with him among those who had embraced Islam by that time. I said: I intend to follow you. He said: During these days you would not be able to do so. Don't you see the (hard) condition under which I and (my) people are living? You better go back to your people and when you hear that I have been granted victory, you come to me. So I went to my family. I was in my home when the Messenger of Allah (may peace be upon him)came to Medina. I was among my people and used to seek news and ask people when he arrived in Medina. Then a group of people belonging to Yathrib (Medina) came. I said (to them): How is that person getting on who has come to Medina? They said: The people are hastening to him, while his people (the polytheists of Mecca) planned to kill him, but they could not do so. I (on hearing It) came to Medina and went to him and said: Messenger of Allah, do you recognise me? He said: Yes, you are the same man who met me at Mecca. I said: It is so. I again said: Prophet of Allah, tell me that which Allah has taught you and which I do not know, tell me about the prayer. He said: Observe the dawn prayer, then stop praying when the sun is rising till it Is fully up, for when it rises it comes up between the horns of Satan, and the unbelievers prostrate themselves to it at that time. Then pray, for the prayer is witnessed and attended (by angels) till the shadow becomes about the length of a lance; then cease prayer, for at that time Hell is heated up. Then when the shadow moves forward, pray, for the prayer is witnessed and attended by angels, till you pray the afternoon prayer, then cease prayer till the sun sets, for it sets between the horns of devil, and at that time the unbelievers prostrate themselves before it. I said: Apostle of Allah, tell me about ablution also. He said: None of you who uses water for ablution and rinses his mouth, snuffs up water and blows it, but the sins of his face, and his mouth and his nostrils fall out. When he washes his face, as Allah has commanded him, the sins of his face fall out from the end of his beard with water. Then (when) he washes his forearms up to the elbows, the sins of his arms fall out along with water from his finger-tips. And when he wipes his head, the sins of his head fall out from the points of his hair along with water. And (when) he washes his feet up to the ankles, the sins of his feet fall out from his toes along with water. And if he stands to pray and praises Allah, lauds Him and glorifies Him with what becomes Him and shows wholehearted devotion to Allah, his sins would depart leaving him (as innocent) as he was on the day his mother bore him. 'Amr b. 'Abasa narrated this hadith to Abu Umama, a Companion of the Messenger of Allah (may peace be upon him), and Abu Umama said to him: 'Amr b. 'Abasa, think what you are saying that such (a great reward) is given to a man at one place (only in the act of ablution and prayer). Upon this 'Amr said: Abu Umama, I have grown old and my bones have become weak and I am at the door of death; what impetus is there for me to attribute a lie to Allah and the Messenger of Allah (may peace be upon him)? Had I heard it from the Messenger of Allah (may peace be upon him) once, twice, or three times (even seven times), I would have never narrated it, but I have heard it from him on occasions more than these.

Book 015, Hadith Number 4043.
------------------------------

Abd al-Rahman b. Samura reported Allah's Messenger (may peace be upon him) as saying: Do not swear by idols, nor by your fathers.

Book 030, Hadith Number 4260.
------------------------------

Narated By Sa'id b. Jubair : I asked Ibn 'Abbas (about the verse relating to intentional homicide in Surat al-Nisa'). He said: When the verse "Those who invoke not with Allah any other god, nor slay such life as Allah has made sacred, except for just cause (Qur'an xxv. 68)" was revealed, the polytheists of Mecca said: We have killed the soul prohibited by Allah, invoked another god along with Allah for worship, and commited shameful deed. So Allah revealed the verse "unless he repents, beleives and works righteous deeds, for Allah will change the evil of such persons into good. (Qur'an xxv. 70)" This is meant for them. As regards the verse "If a man kills a beleiver intentionally, his recompense is Hell (Quran iv. 93)" he said: If a man knows the command of Islam and intentionally kills a beleiver, his repentance will not be accepted. I then mentioned it to Mujahid. He said: Except the one who was ashamed (of his sin).

The Arabic speaking Jews used the Name Allah

Volumn 004, Book 055, Hadith Number 546.
-----------------------------------------
Narated By Anas : When 'Abdullah bin Salam heard the arrival of the Prophet at Medina, he came to him and said, "I am going to ask you about three things which nobody knows except a prophet: What is the first portent of the Hour? What will be the first meal taken by the people of Paradise? Why does a child resemble its father, and why does it resemble its maternal uncle" Allah's Apostle said, "Gabriel has just now told me of their answers." 'Abdullah said, "He (i.e. Gabriel), from amongst all the angels, is the enemy of the Jews." Allah's Apostle said, "The first portent of the Hour will be a fire that will bring together the people from the east to the west; the first meal of the people of Paradise will be Extra-lobe (caudate lobe) of fish-liver. As for the resemblance of the child to its parents: If a man has sexual intercourse with his wife and gets discharge first, the child will resemble the father, and if the woman gets discharge first, the child will resemble her." On that 'Abdullah bin Salam said, "I testify that you are the Apostle of Allah." 'Abdullah bin Salam further said, "O Allah's Apostle! The Jews are liars, and if they should come to know about my conversion to Islam before you ask them (about me), they would tell a lie about me." The Jews came to Allah's Apostle and 'Abdullah went inside the house. Allah's Apostle asked (the Jews), "What kind of man is 'Abdullah bin Salam amongst you?" They replied, "He is the most learned person amongst us, and the best amongst us, and the son of the best amongst us." Allah's Apostle said, "What do you think if he embraces Islam (will you do as he does)?" The Jews said, "May Allah save him from it." Then 'Abdullah bin Salam came out in front of them saying, "I testify that None has the right to be worshipped but Allah and that Muhammad is the Apostle of Allah." Thereupon they said, "He is the evilest among us, and the son of the evilest amongst us," and continued talking badly of him.

{ Note: The Jews named them selves with the name of Allah, "Abdullah" means servant of Allah}


Book 019, Hadith Number 4431.
------------------------------

It has been narrated on the authority of Usama b. Zaid that the Prophet (may peace be upon him) rode a donkey. It had on it a saddle under which was a mattress made at Fadak (a place near Medina). Behind him he seated Usama. He was going to the street of Banu Harith al-Khazraj to inquire after the health of Sa'd b. Ubada This happened before the Battle of Badr. (He proceeded) until he passed by a mixed company of people in which were Muslims, polytheists, idol worshippers and the Jews and among them (the Jews) were 'Abdullah b. Ubayy and 'Abdullah b. Rawaha. When the dust raised by the hoofs of the animal spread over the company, 'Abdullah b. Ubayy (a Jew) covered his nose with his mantle and said: Do not scatter the dust over us (Not minding this remark), the Holy Prophet (may peace be upon him) greeted them, stopped, got down from his animal, invited them to Allah, and recited to them the Qur'an. 'Abdullah b. Ubayy said: O man, if what you say is the truth, the best thing for you would be not to bother us with it in our assemblies. Get back to your place. Whoso comes to you from us, tell him (all) this. Abdullah b. Rawaha said: Come to us in our gatherings, for we love (to hear) it. The narrator says: (At this), the Muslims, the polytheists and the Jews began to rebuke one another until they were determined to come to blows. The Holy Prophet (may peace be upon him) continued to pacify them (When they were pacified), he rode his animal and came to Sa'd b. 'Ubida. He said: Sa'd, haven't you heard what Abu Hubab (meaning 'Abdullah b. Ubayy) has said? He has said so and so. Sa'd said: Messenger of Allah, forgive and pardon. God has granted you a sublime position, (but so far as he is concerned) the people of this settlement had-decided to make him their king by making him wear a crown and a turban (in token thereof), but God has circumvented this by the truth He has granted you. This has made him jealous and his jealousy (must have) prompted the behaviour that you have witnessed. So, the Holy Prophet (may peace upon him) forgave him.

Volumn 009, Book 093, Hadith Number 510.
-----------------------------------------
Narated By 'Abdullah : A Jew came to the Prophet and said, "O Muhammad! Allah will hold the heavens on a Finger, and the mountains on a Finger, and the trees on a Finger, and all the creation on a Finger, and then He will say, 'I am the King.' " On that Allah's Apostle smiled till his premolar teeth became visible, and then recited:

'No just estimate have they made of Allah such as due to him... (39.67) 'Abdullah added: Allah's Apostle smiled (at the Jew's statement) expressing his wonder and believe in what was said.
Download Quran and Hadeeth for Free here http://www.islamasoft.co.uk/downloads.html Learn about Islam from a Non dictatorial view

H2O
Preacher
Preacher
Posts: 782
Joined: Thu Jun 03, 2004 09:00 pm
Location: Boca Raton, Florida

Postby H2O » Mon Jun 14, 2004 09:25 pm

Arabic speaking christians Used the name Allah

Volumn 004, Book 055, Hadith Number 605.
-----------------------------------------
Narated By 'Aisha : The Prophet returned to Khadija while his heart was beating rapidly. She took him to Waraqa bin Naufal who was a Christian convert and used to read the Gospels in Arabic Waraqa asked (the Prophet), "What do you see?" When he told him, Waraqa said, "That is the same angel whom Allah sent to the Prophet Moses. Should I live till you receive the Divine Message, I will support you strongly."


Evidence from Quran that the name Allah used by Jews and Chrisitians

(They are) those who have been expelled from their homes in defiance of right, (for no cause) except that they say, "Our Lord is Allah." Did not Allah check one set of people by means of another there would surely have been pulled down monasteries, churches, synagogues, and mosques, in which the name of Allah is commemorated in abundant measure. Allah will certainly aid those who aid His (cause); for verily Allah is Full of Strength, Exalted in Might, (able to enforce His Will). (Quran 22:40)

Other than this you have to provide contrary proof that the Arabic speaking Christians and Jews used another name other than "Alllaah".
Download Quran and Hadeeth for Free here http://www.islamasoft.co.uk/downloads.html Learn about Islam from a Non dictatorial view

User avatar
Believer
Preacher
Preacher
Posts: 1462
Joined: Mon Oct 06, 2003 03:42 am
Location: South

Postby Believer » Mon Jun 14, 2004 10:19 pm

You don't worship the same Allah as us.
Our God fuflilled His covenant with the Jews through Christ and through Him made a covenant with all people. Islam is uselsss, not necessary.
God always ensures His Word is taken care of and is fruitful. The idea of God's revelations becoming corrupt shows a weak god.
In times past, God spoke in partial and various ways to our ancestors through the prophets;

in these last days, he spoke to us through a son, whom he made heir of all things and through whom he created the universe,

-Hebrews 1:1-2

User avatar
webmaster
Admin
Admin
Posts: 5186
Joined: Fri Mar 15, 2002 12:00 am
Location: Tobaccoville NC

Postby webmaster » Mon Jun 14, 2004 10:36 pm

How about writings 100 hundred years before Muhammad was born that has anybody using the word Allah!

H2O
Preacher
Preacher
Posts: 782
Joined: Thu Jun 03, 2004 09:00 pm
Location: Boca Raton, Florida

Postby H2O » Mon Jun 14, 2004 11:03 pm

Believer ,

If you believe that Jesus is Allah then indeed we do not Worship the same Allah, as we do not believe that Jesus is Allah but as only the servant of Allah, the Messiah Son of Maryam.

So what comes between us and you is not a name, but an ideological concept of divinity in which our intentions and acts of worship is devouted to.
Download Quran and Hadeeth for Free here http://www.islamasoft.co.uk/downloads.html Learn about Islam from a Non dictatorial view

Omega

Postby Omega » Mon Jun 14, 2004 11:12 pm

H2O wrote:Believer ,

If you believe that Jesus is Allah then indeed we do not Worship the same Allah, as we do not believe that Jesus is Allah but as only the servant of Allah, the Messiah Son of Maryam.

So what comes between us and you is not a name, but an ideological concept of divinity in which our intentions and acts of worship is devouted to.


So i guess allah is just another name for God according to you muslims correct? or both?
Which one is it my friend?

T0 us Christians it is written in our hearts:
That at the name of Jesus every knee should bow, of things in heaven, and things in earth, and things under the earth; And that every tongue should confess that Jesus Christ is Lord, to the glory of God the Father. Philippians 2:10-11

And as far as i KNOW that there is only one LORD according to the Old Testament my friend!

God Bless!


And ac

H2O
Preacher
Preacher
Posts: 782
Joined: Thu Jun 03, 2004 09:00 pm
Location: Boca Raton, Florida

Postby H2O » Mon Jun 14, 2004 11:36 pm

How about writings 100 hundred years before Muhammad was born that has anybody using the word Allah!

I personally havent found any old Christian or Jewish writings dating that far back. One thing that has been founded in which I am trying to get more info on and find a way to get in contact with Father Peferillo for more information on the following

Recently Father Pecerillo, a famous Franciscan Archiologist, found morethan twenty churches in Madaba at the south of Jordan. From the Forth Century we found houses in Syria, Lebanon, Iraq and Palestine with this inscriptionin Arabic :"Bism El-Lah al Rahman al Rahim" that showed that Christians were the first to use this name so as to indicate their beliefin the Holy Trinity, more than two hundred years before Islam. http://www.al-bushra.org/arbhrtg/arbxtn04.htm


This is a new finding so it would be months or maybe years before more information comes out about this, just like the Dead sea scrolls.
"Bism El-Lah" is the same as "Bism illah". "El-Lah" and illah" are english transliterated variant spellings which are also the suffixed reading of the name Allah in arabic.

But if you want more information on the use of the name Allah by Arabic speaking Jews and Christians you would have to go to www.arabicbible.com and email them an inquiry as to this issue. They have access to much more info .
Download Quran and Hadeeth for Free here http://www.islamasoft.co.uk/downloads.html Learn about Islam from a Non dictatorial view

H2O
Preacher
Preacher
Posts: 782
Joined: Thu Jun 03, 2004 09:00 pm
Location: Boca Raton, Florida

Postby H2O » Tue Jun 15, 2004 12:21 am

So i guess allah is just another name for God according to you muslims correct? or both?
Which one is it my friend?

T0 us Christians it is written in our hearts:
That at the name of Jesus every knee should bow, of things in heaven, and things in earth, and things under the earth; And that every tongue should confess that Jesus Christ is Lord, to the glory of God the Father. Philippians 2:10-11

And as far as i KNOW that there is only one LORD according to the Old Testament my friend!


The name Allah is another name for GOD in the Arabic language that is a Proper Noun. In every language there is a name for GOD in which people refer to the all mighty creator.

The word "Jesus" is latin. The history of the name comes from the Aramaic "Yeshaa" or "Yeshu" in Hebrew it is "Yashuah". Please go to http://www.atour.com/cgi-bin/lexicon.cgi the word Number is 9573 . From the Aramiac, the word was translated into Greek as "Iesous" http://www.studylight.org/lex/grk/view.cgi?number=2424 Which was translated into Latin as "Jesus ~ pron. Hesus" which then found its way into english.

Jesus called upon GOD as "Aalah" http://www.atour.com/cgi-bin/lexicon.cgi {word number 904} which is the Aramaic form of the name "Allaah"
Download Quran and Hadeeth for Free here http://www.islamasoft.co.uk/downloads.html Learn about Islam from a Non dictatorial view

Omega

Postby Omega » Tue Jun 15, 2004 12:33 am

H2O wrote: The word "Jesus" is latin. The history of the name comes from the Aramaic "Yeshaa" or "Yeshu" in Hebrew it is "Yashuah". Please go to http://www.atour.com/cgi-bin/lexicon.cgi the word Number is 9573 . From the Aramiac, the word was translated into Greek as "Iesous" http://www.studylight.org/lex/grk/view.cgi?number=2424 Which was translated into Latin as "Jesus ~ pron. Hesus" which then found its way into english.

Jesus called upon GOD as "Aalah" http://www.atour.com/cgi-bin/lexicon.cgi {word number 904} which is the Aramaic form of the name "Allaah"


First of all thank you for responding to my post,

I am aware of the latin and hebrew names of Jesus and it's relation with strongs lexicon concordance my friend. Can you please show me where is the New Testament Jesus called upon Allah or as you would say Allaah?

Let me take a guess: Matthew 27:46 - And about the ninth hour Jesus cried with a loud voice, saying, Eli, Eli, lama sabachthani? that is to say, My God, my God, why hast thou forsaken me?

Confirmation please my friend!
God Bless!

User avatar
webmaster
Admin
Admin
Posts: 5186
Joined: Fri Mar 15, 2002 12:00 am
Location: Tobaccoville NC

Postby webmaster » Tue Jun 15, 2004 01:32 am

H2O wrote: The name Allah is another name for GOD in the Arabic language that is a Proper Noun. In every language there is a name for GOD in which people refer to the all mighty creator.


You know if that was true then we would have people using Dios on here also. Use Dios instead of Allah for all of your prayers and in all conversations. The Quran won't allow you to do that!

Here is what Muslims believe.

God's name is Allah.

If it wasn't then there wouldn't be no need to use Allah in English but the word God.

H2O
Preacher
Preacher
Posts: 782
Joined: Thu Jun 03, 2004 09:00 pm
Location: Boca Raton, Florida

Postby H2O » Tue Jun 15, 2004 02:10 am

I am aware of the latin and hebrew names of Jesus and it's relation with strongs lexicon concordance my friend. Can you please show me where is the New Testament Jesus called upon Allah or as you would say Allaah?


I think you are refering to the Aramaic name "Aalah" which is the Aramaic FORM of the Arabic form "Allaah"

The word "Aalah" is used in the oldest manuscripts of the new testament dating before the greek manuscripts which is called the Peshitta bible. The Peshitta Bible is the Aramaic standard source that the translators of the bible use to confirm the greek. For more information about the Peshitta Bible go to http://www.peshitta.org/ or read the preface or introduction to your Biblw Translation. If you go to http://www.atour.com/cgi-bin/lexicon.cgi {word number 904} if gives the passage where the word in used in the Aramaic.


Let me take a guess: Matthew 27:46 - And about the ninth hour Jesus cried with a loud voice, saying, Eli, Eli, lama sabachthani? that is to say, My God, my God, why hast thou forsaken me?


The predominant language of the Jews of that time was Aramaic, in which Hebrew was the religious language. The man who uttered those words was speaking Hebrew. "el" is not Aramaic, and there is no such word in the Aramaic language.

Remember Hebrew was also misnomered as Aramaic at that time especially to the Romans and Greeks which is now called Eastern Aramaic because it is mixed with Western Aramaic and Hebrew.
Download Quran and Hadeeth for Free here http://www.islamasoft.co.uk/downloads.html Learn about Islam from a Non dictatorial view

Omega

Postby Omega » Tue Jun 15, 2004 02:25 am

Thanks for responding to my post my friend!

I'll get back to you later my friend.

God Bless!

User avatar
webmaster
Admin
Admin
Posts: 5186
Joined: Fri Mar 15, 2002 12:00 am
Location: Tobaccoville NC

Postby webmaster » Tue Jun 15, 2004 02:33 am


H2O
Preacher
Preacher
Posts: 782
Joined: Thu Jun 03, 2004 09:00 pm
Location: Boca Raton, Florida

Postby H2O » Tue Jun 15, 2004 02:54 am

You know if that was true then we would have people using Dios on here also. Use Dios instead of Allah for all of your prayers and in all conversations. The Quran won't allow you to do that!

Here is what Muslims believe.

God's name is Allah.


Dios is used to refer to Allah in Spanish. El-Dios is proper in Spanish. I hear it all the time when I go to my Spanish Speaking brothers in Miami.
Also in some translation they use El-Dios in the Quran. But let me get you proof from out teachings:

The most beautiful names belong to Allah: so call on Him by them; but shun such men as use profanity in His names: for what they do, they will soon be requited (Quran 7:180)


We can call him by the most beatiful names that can be attributed to HIM alone as long as the names are not ascribed to another (person, place, or thing) or are pagan related.

Why do you think Jews dont use the name G-d ? The name Allah is only obligated to be used when reading the Quran, in which the "Salah" must be said in Arabic just like the Jewish Prayer that must be said in Hebrew. "Dua" ~ Suplication, can be said in ones own Language if desired.
Any muslim that says God's name is Allah (Only) is obviously IGNORANT of his or her own religion, and to add more, selfish. They are doing nothing more than imitating the prejudice of those who are anti islam or anti Arab.

Other than that, I prefer to use the name Allah because, as we believe, He uses this name as His PRIME name in the Quran. Even when I have dialogues with Arabic Speaking Christian or Jews we All use that name. Also, its just a name I am more comfortable with in using.
Download Quran and Hadeeth for Free here http://www.islamasoft.co.uk/downloads.html Learn about Islam from a Non dictatorial view

User avatar
webmaster
Admin
Admin
Posts: 5186
Joined: Fri Mar 15, 2002 12:00 am
Location: Tobaccoville NC

Postby webmaster » Tue Jun 15, 2004 03:04 am

The name Allah is only obligated to be used when reading the Quran, in which the "Salah" must be said in Arabic just like the Jewish Prayer that must be said in Hebrew. "Dua" ~ Suplication, can be said in ones own Language if desired.


Well I would welcome you to take this challenge but you just failed.
http://www.jesus-christ-forums.com/home/viewtopic.php?t=1404

Omega

Postby Omega » Tue Jun 15, 2004 03:05 am

webmaster wrote:
H2O wrote: The name Allah is another name for GOD in the Arabic language that is a Proper Noun. In every language there is a name for GOD in which people refer to the all mighty creator.


You know if that was true then we would have people using Dios on here also. Use Dios instead of Allah for all of your prayers and in all conversations. The Quran won't allow you to do that!

Here is what Muslims believe.

God's name is Allah.

If it wasn't then there wouldn't be no need to use Allah in English but the word God.


I can assure that any devout muslims prayer wil not be answered by the True God, because they are praying in the wrong direction{2 Ways}


It is written:
]Exodus 3:14 - And God said unto Moses,[b][u] I AM THAT I AM: and he said, Thus shalt thou say unto the children of Israel, I AM hath sent me unto you.


I AM THAT I AM:And not Allah! or the other Allah. :lol:

webmaster wrote:
H2O wrote: The name Allah is another name for GOD in the Arabic language that is a Proper Noun. In every language there is a name for GOD in which people refer to the all mighty creator.


You know if that was true then we would have people using Dios on here also. Use Dios instead of Allah for all of your prayers and in all conversations. The Quran won't allow you to do that!

Here is what Muslims believe.

God's name is Allah.

If it wasn't then there wouldn't be no need to use Allah in English but the word God.


I can assure that any devout muslims prayer wil not be answered by the True God, because they are praying in the wrong direction{2 Ways}

Not Mecca or Jerusalem but towards God, which is in Heaven.


It is written:
]Exodus 3:14 - And God said unto Moses,[b][u] I AM THAT I AM: and he said, Thus shalt thou say unto the children of Israel, I AM hath sent me unto you.


I AM THAT I AM:And not Allah! or the other Allah. :lol:

And the angel which I saw stand upon the sea and upon the earth lifted up his hand to heaven, And sware by him that liveth for ever and ever, who created heaven, and the things that therein are, and the earth, and the things that therein are, and the sea, and the things which are therein, that there should be time no longer: Revelation 10:5,6


His hands toward Heaven or Jerusalem. :lol:

God Bless!

Omega

Postby Omega » Tue Jun 15, 2004 03:13 am

Are you telling me that God is confined to one place at a time?
:lol: :lol: :lol:

If must pray towards Jerusalem or Mecca, would not make any sense :-? :lol:

The reason why muslims must pray to that direction is because there are many demons in that exact direction waiting to devour unbelievers, don't believe me?
Will just have to see about it in the hereafter!
Demons are powerless against any True Believers{100% SURE} that is why they tell unvelievers to pray in that direction, also they miserably failed in that category{And My God is laughing} So what now?
Now Satan dispatches alL HIS DEMONS to make it appear like he is everywhere! :lol:

God Bless!

H2O
Preacher
Preacher
Posts: 782
Joined: Thu Jun 03, 2004 09:00 pm
Location: Boca Raton, Florida

Postby H2O » Tue Jun 15, 2004 04:06 am

Are you telling me that God is confined to one place at a time?


If must pray towards Jerusalem or Mecca, would not make any sense


The muslims in the begining prayed toward Al-Quds or Jerusalem Just as the Jews did back then and as they do now. This is called "Qiblah" or direction of prayer in which one turns in reverence of Allah and as a symbol of Unity with the believers. This was the practice of All the Jewish Prophets in cluding David to worshiped Allah facing towards the holy temple.


[2:142] The Fools among the people will say: "What hath turned them from the Qibla to which they were used?" Say: To Allah belong East and West: He guideth whom He will to a Way that is straight.

[2:143] Thus have We made of you an Ummat justly balanced, that ye might be witnesses over the nations, and the Messenger a witness over yourselves; and we appointed the Qibla to which thou wast used (facing Jerusalem), only to test those who followed the Messenger from those who would turn on their heels (from the Faith). Indeed it was (a change) momentous, except to those guided by Allah. And never would Allah make your faith of no effect. For Allah is to all people most surely full of Kindness, Most Merciful.


Volumn 001, Book 008, Hadith Number 392.
-----------------------------------------
Narated By Bara' bin 'Azib : Allah's Apostle prayed facing Baitul-Maqdis for sixteen or seventeen months but he loved to face the Ka'ba (at Mecca) so Allah revealed: "Verily, We have seen the turning of your face to the heaven!" (2:144) So the Prophet faced the Ka'ba and the fools amongst the people namely "the Jews" said, "What has turned them from their Qibla (Bait-ul-Maqdis) which they formerly observed"" (Allah revealed): "Say: 'To Allah belongs the East and the West. He guides whom he will to a straight path'." (2:142) A man prayed with the Prophet (facing the Ka'ba) and went out. He saw some of the Ansar praying the 'Asr prayer with their faces towards Bait-ul-Maqdis, he said, "I bear witness that I prayed with Allah's Apostle facing the Ka'ba." So all the people turned their faces towards the Ka'ba.


Psalm 5:7
But as for me, I will come into thy house in the multitude of thy mercy: and in thy fear will I worship toward thy holy temple.
(Whole Chapter: Psalm 5 In context: Psalm 5:6-8)

Psalm 138:2
I will worship toward thy holy temple, and praise thy name for thy lovingkindness and for thy truth: for thou hast magnified thy word above all thy name.
(Whole Chapter: Psalm 138 In context: Psalm 138:1-3)


If your faith is as strong as you all present it in these forums, then why dont you read the Quran and SAHIH Hadeeth for your selves rather than reading other peoples perspective which can be influence by prejudice. If any of you would like access to the Quran and Authentic hadeeth you can go to http://www.islamasoft.co.uk/downloads.html for free. You will have to download the FreeWare first before you can use the Plug In software.
Go into it and develope your own criticism. I am muslim and I believe in what I believe in. I study and read all sorts of stuff on religions and criticism. If you are not interested in learning or obtaining knowledge about another religion then why even waist your time reading criticism about it when you can go DIRECTLY to the source it self ?

As you noticed in this forum I used no Bible verses to criticize christianity or looked for any flaws in the Bible. I am well acquinted with what the Bible teaches, and can probably quote more verses from it word for word than the average Christian can. I am not saying I am better that any of you or I am more HOLIER THAN THOU, but for you not to UNDERESTIMATE ME when it comes to Bible knowledge.
So why dont some of you read the Quran (from A-Z) and ALL the Authentic Hideeth (Sahih) and become versed in it and then make challenges of you own rather than copying from another.

2 Timothy 2:15
Study to shew thyself approved unto God, a workman that needeth not to be ashamed, rightly dividing the word of truth.
(Whole Chapter: 2 Timothy 2 In context: 2 Timothy 2:14-16)


In order for you to relate to a people and have an understanding between one another is to have knowledge of the other. As the saying goes "Man only tends to distroy what he does nto undertand". Do you think you would win people over to Christianity vis vis by BASHING and INSAULTING each other, how would this look to those seeking the TRUTH ?

Anyhow, I gave you all a link, for you to study and evalute the source it self rather than it being handed to you 3rd class and indulging into conjecture and speculation.

Peace to All
Download Quran and Hadeeth for Free here http://www.islamasoft.co.uk/downloads.html Learn about Islam from a Non dictatorial view

H2O
Preacher
Preacher
Posts: 782
Joined: Thu Jun 03, 2004 09:00 pm
Location: Boca Raton, Florida

To Webmaster

Postby H2O » Tue Jun 15, 2004 04:25 am

Well I would welcome you to take this challenge but you just failed.
http://www.jesus-christ-forums.com/home/viewtopic.php?t=1404


How could I fail before the challenge was presented :roll: ? I went to the Forum, and I couldnt take the test cause the forum is LOCKED from replies. :-?
Download Quran and Hadeeth for Free here http://www.islamasoft.co.uk/downloads.html Learn about Islam from a Non dictatorial view

H2O
Preacher
Preacher
Posts: 782
Joined: Thu Jun 03, 2004 09:00 pm
Location: Boca Raton, Florida

Postby H2O » Tue Jun 15, 2004 04:43 am

I can assure that any devout muslims prayer wil not be answered by the True God, because they are praying in the wrong direction{2 Ways}


Well lets see....I say in my prayer "BismillahirRahmanirRaheem" ~ " In the name of Allah the Most Compassionate the Most Merciful" I asked for many things and they were granted. I asked to be better in health, and right way I was cured, I asked for for forgiveness (wont know the answer about that until after I die) I asked for a beautiful pious wife and He granted me that, and so one and so on. Some requests that are asked are answered in my dreams of their approval. And also I am warned about events that will take place for me to prepare my self for their encounters.
So no your wrong.
Download Quran and Hadeeth for Free here http://www.islamasoft.co.uk/downloads.html Learn about Islam from a Non dictatorial view

Omega

Postby Omega » Tue Jun 15, 2004 04:57 am

H2O wrote:
I can assure that any devout muslims prayer wil not be answered by the True God, because they are praying in the wrong direction{2 Ways}


Well lets see....I say in my prayer "BismillahirRahmanirRaheem" ~ " In the name of Allah the Most Compassionate the Most Merciful" I asked for many things and they were granted. I asked to be better in health, and right way I was cured, I asked for for forgiveness (wont know the answer about that until after I die) I asked for a beautiful pious wife and He granted me that, and so one and so on. Some requests that are asked are answered in my dreams of their approval. And also I am warned about events that will take place for me to prepare my self for their encounters.
So no your wrong.
:lol:

Hello my Friend!!!
I'm wrong?

Your Prayer is in the Wrong Direction. :lol:
Furthermore, who are you devout too? I can assure you that you are Devout to the Wrong god!!! I'm not going to force this upon you anymore, it's your decision, I would not to be hear when Jesus comes back on the Clouds of Heaven with Power and Great Glory!!!

The Antichrist who gets his power from the Dragon, the Ancient Serpent Who DECEIVES The Whole World of Unbelievers is who you truly Worship. :lol:

Take Heed once again and don't be wise in your own sight, Do you understand this my friend?

God Bless!

Revelation 3:20 - Behold, I stand at the door, and knock: if any man hear my voice, and open the door, I will come in to him, and will sup with him, and he with me.

Omega

Postby Omega » Tue Jun 15, 2004 05:14 am

H2O wrote:
?


Hello once again my friend!

I can assure you that all the Studying that your'e doing is labor for Satan and his fallen flunkies. :lol: which adds up to NADA!
Please don't get upset by my words, i apologize if i sound that way.

Those who desire to study Theology is being tricked by Satan, don't believe me again?
HERES WHY?

Those who study Theology have NO FAITH!!! That is why they are searching for God, such as you.
Don't deny it because you are only deceiving yourself my friend through Satan, who is currently at work at all the sons of disobedience!.

God wants to build His Kingdom and expland it, thus the serpent will do anything in his power to put to try to stop to the growth!
Do you believe me?
NO? :lol:

The Truth is Right in Front of your eyes, don't believe me. The LORD told me so by the Spirit. Lean not unto your own understanding my friend, but trust the pull of the Spirit.

H2O
Preacher
Preacher
Posts: 782
Joined: Thu Jun 03, 2004 09:00 pm
Location: Boca Raton, Florida

Postby H2O » Tue Jun 15, 2004 06:17 am

It is written: Quote:
]Exodus 3:14 - And God said unto Moses,[b][u] I AM THAT I AM: and he said, Thus shalt thou say unto the children of Israel, I AM hath sent me unto you.


I AM THAT I AM:And not Allah! or the other Allah.


Ok now lets see what the Quran says as to this event in history:

[20:11] But when he came to the fire, a voice was heard: "O Musa!

[20:12] "Verily I am thy Lord! therefore (in My presence) put off thy shoes: thou art in the sacred valley Tuwa.

[20:13] "I have chosen thee: listen, then to the inspiration (sent to thee).

[20:14] "Verily I am, I am Allah: there is no god but I: so serve thou Me (only), and establish regular prayer for celebrating My praise.


In Hebrew G-D says in bible: "..ahyah ashar ahyah.." and in the Quran its says "..innanee anaa Alllaah.."


The Bible


..ahyah ashar ahyah.. ~ I am that I am


The Quran


..innanee anaa Alllaah.. ~ Verily I am, I am Alllaah


Verily close isnt it ? Hmm maybe the Jews edited the name out from text leaving "...ahyah ashar ahyah.." as an incomplete thaught cause it was too HOLY to pronounce and then they incrypted the name as yhwh as part of Jewish Kabbalahism. Thus leading people like Gentiles and then later Christians to be in delima as to "...ahyah ashar ahyah.." as to what it meant or what it is refering to.

Another thing I want to know is why Jesus never used the name YHWH in the New Testament when calling upon G-D ? There is somthing wrong here with the phylisophical conjecture on "...ahyah ashar ahyah.." in connection with the name or incryption "YHWH" if Jesus never used it but used another name instead to refer to G-D.

NOTE: BECAREFUL WHAT YOU QUOTE FROM THE BIBLE TO ME ! CAUSE I AM PLAYING CHESS NOW WITH YOU !

:lol: I gave you a hint so pay attention. My advice before you quote a verse from the new testament to answer this is that I hope your acquinted with koine greek and hebrew, cause if your not...Oooh Boy!
Download Quran and Hadeeth for Free here http://www.islamasoft.co.uk/downloads.html Learn about Islam from a Non dictatorial view

H2O
Preacher
Preacher
Posts: 782
Joined: Thu Jun 03, 2004 09:00 pm
Location: Boca Raton, Florida

Postby H2O » Tue Jun 15, 2004 07:11 am

Those who study Theology have NO FAITH!!! That is why they are searching for God, such as you.
Don't deny it because you are only deceiving yourself my friend through Satan, who is currently at work at all the sons of disobedience!.


Hmm ! I was muslim way before I began my studies of world theology. Your right the Devil indeed is at work. So why should I limit my self to one particular religion based on what someone says. Seeking for truth is not limited to one religion, but it is the cause to understanding them, the adheres, and their relation with each other. The reason why there is so much discrepancy between religious adheres is cause of their lack of knowledge of each other. Thats why Alllaah gave us a brain to use. I intend to use logic and reasoning in the light of science to obtain truth. Feelings and emotions are the easiest targets for the Devil in which man falls week in, easy to be manipulated by him.

Sorry I dont believe in Blind faith nor Feelings to guide me. When Alllaah sent his prophets to guide a people it wasnt based on Feelings or Blind Faith, but it was with HARD CORE LOGICAL proof.
Download Quran and Hadeeth for Free here http://www.islamasoft.co.uk/downloads.html Learn about Islam from a Non dictatorial view

Kai Hagbard
Preacher
Preacher
Posts: 459
Joined: Tue May 25, 2004 10:45 am
Location: Europe-Asia

Postby Kai Hagbard » Tue Jun 15, 2004 10:00 am

H20 writes:

Sorry I dont believe in Blind faith nor Feelings to guide me. When Alllaah sent his prophets to guide a people it wasnt based on Feelings or Blind Faith, but it was with HARD CORE LOGICAL proof.

I would like to challenge you on this one. What do you consider as HARD CORE LOGICAL proof, while according to my suspision, what you may consider to be solid ground, may prove itself to but the exact elements you claim to avoid.

I agree that knowledge is vital, however, a whole range of intelectuals are not Muslims, neither Christians, in other words, study and what we consider truth or possibilities based on our conclusions, biased or not, may indeed be stretched to reveal anything.

So, say you have HARD CORE LOGICAL PROOFS, can you explain to us what truth really is, and what are these proofs which seem to elevate Islam above everything else?

Kai

Omega

Postby Omega » Tue Jun 15, 2004 04:13 pm

The Quran

..innanee anaa Alllaah.. ~ Verily I am, I am Alllaah




It sounds familiar to blah blah blah! :lol: :lol: :lol:
See you around!
And P.S, Even if you win, you still lose!

Omega

Postby Omega » Tue Jun 15, 2004 04:34 pm

H20 wrote:Hmm ! I was muslim way before I began my studies of world theology. Your right the Devil indeed is at work. So why should I limit my self to one particular religion based on what someone says. Seeking for truth is not limited to one religion, but it is the cause to understanding them, the adheres, and their relation with each other. The reason why there is so much discrepancy between religious adheres is cause of their lack of knowledge of each other. Thats why Alllaah gave us a brain to use. I intend to use logic and reasoning in the light of science to obtain truth. Feelings and emotions are the easiest targets for the Devil in which man falls week in, easy to be manipulated by him.

Sorry I dont believe in Blind faith nor Feelings to guide me. When Alllaah sent his prophets to guide a people it wasnt based on Feelings or Blind Faith, but it was with HARD CORE LOGICAL proof.


Who really has Blind Faith? :lol: :lol:

Hebrews 11:1 - Now faith is the substance of things hoped for, the evidence of things not seen.


This big enough for you to see! :lol:
Do you know what the opposite of H20 is? :lol:

See you around and God Bless!

Liberate
Preacher
Preacher
Posts: 200
Joined: Sat Apr 10, 2004 04:41 pm

Postby Liberate » Tue Jun 15, 2004 04:57 pm

What is this Tahannuth worship?, so Mohammed goes to a cave to practice this tahannuth worship and goes back to his pagan wife to obtain provisions to go back to this cave for a like period, am I to believe his pagan wife is giving him provisions to go retreat himself in a cave and worship the one true God?



You didnt prove anything here. It was already explained from islamic doctrine that the pagan worshiped idols in association with Allah.


From a few verses in your koran, with the host of volumes of hadith you are unable to show me one clear cut case of any pagan associating hubal as a mediator to get to allah.

"Tahannuth" Do you know what this word means ? It is to withdraw to seclusion in the cause of religous purification


That is not what the word means:
"Tabari VI:70 “In the beginning of the Messenger’s prophetic mission he used to spend a month every year in religious retreat on Hira. This was part of the practice of Tahannuth in which the Quraysh used to engage during the Jahiliyyah. Tahannuth means self-justification.’”"

Tahannuth from that hadith means self justification the pagan quraysh already practiced it, it is a pagan ritual nothing to do with worshipping the One True God,(btw if you want to try out Mohammed's tahannuth; go out in a cave and stay there for a month in pitch darkness I promise you, you will meet something, just like Joseph Smith, it's nothing new, it is well known in the occult, american indians still do the same thing to find their spirit guide, are you telling me what they meet is God? Former occultists will tell you "ringing of bells" is synonymous with occultic behaviour) the whole idea of self justifying pervades throughout Mohammed's religion no matter how propostrous he was going to justify it, The ka'ba was circumnavigated by Abraham ( Since you claim to be of jewish descent I take it you realise Abraham's name was not always Abraham, I hope you realise the quran never acknowledges this fact it just parrots Abraham throughout the whole koran like that was always his name, precisely what you would expect if the listener had been hearing nothing but stories about Abraham and simply incorporated it into the religion with no chronological history of anybody which is what is expected from hearing aesop fables) and all the previous prophets, I deserve 5%, I deserve to marry more than 4 wives, no one should look at my wives except if they are wearing a blanket to make them deaf, dumb and blind, no one should marry my wives after I die. Mohammed is the epitome of arrogance and megalomania, which is what tahannuth made him.


Again read my post above, and please I would like to see your evidence the jews prayed to Yahweh through baal


I read your post. I disagree with you interpretation. Now you asking me to do something I dont want to do, but since you asked then sure:


Why don't you want to do it?, if you believe you have the monopoly on truth you should have no qualms exposing what you believe to be lies.

Jeremiah 31:31-32:

"Behold, the days come, saith Yahweh, that I will make a new covenant with the house of Israel, and with the house of Judah:

"Not according to the covenant that I made with their fathers in the day that I took them by the hand to bring them out of the land of Egypt; which My covenant they brake, although I was husband (hebrew ~ Baal) unto them, saith Yahweh."


This is what my lexicon says

1166 ba`al baw-al'

a primitive root; to be master; hence, (as denominative from 1167) to marry:--have dominion (over), be husband, marry(-ried, X wife).


I don't see the problem here this is not the same as baal/ha'baal the idol, and if you recall we agreed baal meant lord, the language existed before it was applied to the pagan idol:

1168 Ba`al bah'-al

the same as 1167; Baal, a Phoenician deity:--Baal, (plural) Baalim.


This is like saying since this is called an idol god it must be God. Since I call an idol baal lord he must be lord?

How did Isaac and Jacob get into this ? THe Quran only speaks of Abraham and Ishmael in connection with the Ka'abah this shows how much you dont know and you have never read the Quran before


Am I to believe your beliefs do not stress Abraham and his sons circumnavigated that abomination you call a shrine?

I didnt want to quote a muslim source cause then it could be said to be biased so I quoted enemies of islam.
I quoted them on the bases that we agreed on one particular issue even though they were critics.


I see; so you agree that allah is derived from the sky god el? This is like using the arguments of an atheist as a muslim to disprove christianity.

By the way the challenge was EMBRYOLOGY. Man being made out of clay was not the issue of debate. I mentioned embryology and you went off into the clay issue...lol


You are right my apologies I couldn't believe that you would honestly believe this was an accurate description of embryology, it sounded more like the many variations of man's creation.

Let us examine those verses using your translation :

[23:13] And indeed We have Created Man (male and female) from an extaction of clay [Alarm bells should be ringing at this stage what does clay have to do with embryology? ], this is not being taken out of context either, this verse is conjunctive with all the remaining "divine utterings" that follow it from your translation]

[23:14] Then We placed him as a sperm into a thing that sojournes and implants [ man's seed is implanted into the woman, this has been known since the dawn of mankind, hardly a miracle]

[ 24:15] Then We made the sperm as a thing that clings and then We made the thing that clings as something that is chewed, and then We made the chewing as bones and then We clothed the bones with muscle then He (Allah) brings it out as another creation; and sublime is Allah the best of makers


Aristotle was already dissecting the stomachs of pregnant animals to have a look at the foetus, the practice of looking at foetuses was done thousands of years before Mohammed, even Cleopatra did it, this is not a miracle, I am amazed you think it so.

I wonder if you have heard about the history about the quote in bold, one of the 42 scribes Mohammed used to write the alledged divine revelations said those words in bold, he actually renounced islam since Mohammed allowed him to interpolate his own words in and he knew this was not divine, all early islamic historians mention this. From the sirat rasullah:

"The apostle had instructed his commanders when they entered Mecca only to fight those who resisted them except a small number who were to be killed even if they were found beneath the curtains of the Ka`ba. Among them was `Abdullah b. Sa`d, brother of the B. `Amir b. Lu'ayy. The reason he ordered him to be killed was that he had been a Muslim and used to write down revelation; then he apostatized and returned to Qurahysh [Mecca] and fled to `Uthman b. `Affan whose foster brother he was. [`Uthman was one of Muhammad's closest friends, and later became the Caliph of Islam]"

All early islamic historians acknowledge it is him that this verse in the koran is pertaining to :

"Who is more wicked than the man who invents a falsehood about God, or says: "This was revealed to me", when nothing was revealed to him? Or the man who says, "I can reveal the like of what God has revealed"? " [Bear in mind there is a copy of the koran in heaven before the creation of the world!]

Again the reason why I chose hadiths is they make logic sense of koranic verses, this does not contradict the koran at all, are you being truthful that this verse on it's own makes logical sense to you? the hadiths expose islam for the fraud it is.

Sahih Muslim Number 6390: `Abdullah (b. Mas'ud) reported that Allah's Messenger ... said: "Verily your creation is on this wise. The constituents of one of you are collected for forty days in his mother's womb in the form of blood [sperm?], after which it becomes a clot of blood in another period of forty days. Then it becomes a lump of flesh and forty days later Allah sends his angel to it ..."

This does not contradict the koran that is why it is a sahih, since you are of the opinion I am quoting hadiths that contradict the koran I would like you to show me where they do. Sperm does not survive in the mother's womb for 40 days, according to Mohammed 120 days later the sperm is now a lump of flesh the word is alaqa (you interpret it as a thing that clings) and means something that can be chewed like a piece of meat. 120 days later the foetus does not look like anything that can be chewed, from your website source by the 60th day the foetus has a rounded head body and limbs hardly a piece of meat that can be chewed like plasticine.

The next stage of embrylogy development in the koran states that bones are created and then covered with flesh, we know that the mesoderm tissue which is responsible for bone development is also the same tissue that is responsible for the development of skin and muscle, it is also recognised that they develop simultaenously, right into an individual's teenage years, not bones first then covered with skin, btw this is plagiarised material from the greek doctor Galen, hardly original.

Galen: De Semine in Greek
But let us take the account back again to the first conformation of the animal, and in order to make our account orderly and clear, let us divide the creation of the foetus overall into four periods of time. The first is that in which. as is seen both in abortions and in dissection, the form of the semen prevails (Arabic nutfah). At this time, Hippocrates too, the all-marvelous, does not yet call the conformation of the animal a foetus; as we heard just now in the case of semen voided in the sixth day, he still calls it semen. But when it has been filled with blood (Arabic alaqa), and heart, brain and liver are still unarticulated and unshaped yet have by now a certain solidarity and considerable size, this is the second period; the substance of the foetus has the form of flesh and no longer the form of semen. Accordingly you would find that Hippocrates too no longer calls such a form semen but, as was said, foetus. The third period follows on this, when, as was said, it is possible to see the three ruling parts clearly and a kind of outline, a silhouette, as it were, of all the other parts (Arabic mudghah). You will see the conformation of the three ruling parts more clearly, that of the parts of the stomach more dimly, and much more still, that of the limbs. Later on they form "twigs", as Hippocrates expressed it, indicating by the term their similarity to branches. The fourth and final period is at the stage when all the parts in the limbs have been differentiated; and at this part Hippocrates the marvelous no longer calls the foetus an embryo only, but already a child, too when he says that it jerks and moves as an animal now fully formed (Arabic ‘a new creation’) ...

... The time has come for nature to articulate the organs precisely and to bring all the parts to completion. Thus it caused flesh to grow on and around all the bones, and at the same time ... it made at the ends of the bones ligaments that bind them to each other, and along their entire length it placed around them on all sides thin membranes, called periosteal, on which it caused flesh to grow


Basim Musallam, Director of the Centre of Middle Eastern Studies at the University of Cambridge concludes

"The stages of development which the Qur'an and Hadith established for believers agreed perfectly with Galen's scientific account ... There is no doubt that medieval thought appreciated this agreement between the Qur'an and Galen , for Arabic science employed the same Qur'anic terms to describe the Galenic stages

Maybe Galen was a muslim?


Why has Mohammed decided to only list 4 stages of embryonic development, are you honestly going to comply that the embryo has only 4 stages? nutfah (drop of water), alaqa (blood clot, leech like clot, congealed blood, clinging leech material (your interpretation are you superior in arabic translation than Yusuf Ali, Hilali and Khan, Pickthall et al, which one is it? The arabic dictionary Qamus al-Muheet calls it clot of blood; my own personal stance on this is that muslims can claim whatever they want precisely because the language can be so open to personal interpretation "the moon has split" can be allocated as a fulfilled prophecy by Armstrong and Aldrin landing on it in 1969 and taking off little bits of it (the split!)), mudghah ( a piece of meat which a man can chew) plus the stage of putting flesh on bones?

Let us look at this in perspective the alledged creator of the universe in a message to all mankind for all eternity when addressing embryonic development gives us these stages: drop of water... leech like clinging clot.... a piece of meat which a man can chew... flesh on bones.

I could ask a few embryologists giving them that sequence and telling them it came from the 7th century on embryological development I don't know if they would laugh or cry, if I then told them it is alledgedly from the Almighty, when such a scenario can easily be deduced just from stages of miscarriages alone.

I hope you have heard of Harith Bin Kalada (Haris ibn Kalda) a contemporary of Mohammed the islamic medical manuscripts website says Mohammed referred sick people to him(http://www.nlm.nih.gov/hmd/arabic/bioH.html) who studied medicine at one of the juri-shapur(Gorideshapur) in Persia a GALENIC school, so much for divine inspiration, when theres a galenic medical doctor to plagiarise from.

Present this to an Embryolgist and have him send me his report that this is inaccurate with his PHD signiture and Medical facility and I will renounce Islam


Uhm since allah is so compassionate and merciful you will have 3 days to come back to your senses (which is revert back to islam) before a mujaheddin comes and slits your throat according to all schools of jurispundence on apostates, which brings me to a serious point why would God need to threaten you to stay in the religion?

..where is the evidence in the hadiths that the pagans were using their idols as mediators to get to allah?


Volumn 004, Book 054, Hadith Number 461.
-----------------------------------------
Narated By Jabir bin 'Abdullah : That he heard the Prophet saying, "The Divine Inspiration was delayed for a short period but suddenly, as I was walking. I heard a voice in the sky, and when I looked up towards the sky, to my surprise, I saw the angel who had come to me in the Hira Cave, and he was sitting on a chair in between the sky and the earth. I was so frightened by him that I fell on the ground and came to my family and said (to them), 'Cover me! (with a blanket), cover me!' Then Allah sent the Revelation: 'O you (i.e. Muhammad)! wrapped up in garments!' Arise and warn, and magnify your Lord (Allah), and your garments (of righteousness) be purified and shun idolotry.' (74.1-5)


This does not prove the pagans were using idols as intermediaries to get to allah (No doubt once you are done you are going to tell us praying to Jesus is the same thing lol). All that hadith shows is Mohammed was a pagan

... " May Allah curse the Jews , for Allah made the fat (of animals) illegal for them, yet they melted the fat and sold it and ate its price."


I removed the early quotes of that hadith because like the first hadith you quoted it doesn't prove the pagans were using idols as an intermediary to get to allah; in fact none of the subsequent hadiths you have pasted have shown this. Look at the quote in bold, am I the only one that senses nothing but anti judaism emanating from islam, how do you feel if you really are a jew that your religion is saying "may God curse you", do you not see that something is terribly wrong here, I suspect you are probably going to say I am drifting from the subject, but this must be addressed you can't show me logical fallacies like this and tell me this message is coming from the one true God and expect me to swallow it.

Volumn 004, Book 055, Hadith Number 546.
-----------------------------------------
Narated By Anas : When 'Abdullah bin Salam heard the arrival of the Prophet at Medina, he came to him and said, "I am going to ask you about three things which nobody knows except a prophet: What is the first portent of the Hour? What will be the first meal taken by the people of Paradise? Why does a child resemble its father, and why does it resemble its maternal uncle" Allah's Apostle said, "Gabriel has just now told me of their answers." 'Abdullah said, "He (i.e. Gabriel), from amongst all the angels, is the enemy of the Jews." Allah's Apostle said, "The first portent of the Hour will be a fire that will bring together the people from the east to the west; the first meal of the people of Paradise will be Extra-lobe (caudate lobe) of fish-liver. As for the resemblance of the child to its parents: If a man has sexual intercourse with his wife and gets discharge first, the child will resemble the father, and if the woman gets discharge first, the child will resemble her." On that 'Abdullah bin Salam said, "I testify that you are the Apostle of Allah." 'Abdullah bin Salam further said, "O Allah's Apostle! The Jews are liars, and if they should come to know about my conversion to Islam before you ask them (about me), they would tell a lie about me." The Jews came to Allah's Apostle and 'Abdullah went inside the house. Allah's Apostle asked (the Jews), "What kind of man is 'Abdullah bin Salam amongst you?" They replied, "He is the most learned person amongst us, and the best amongst us, and the son of the best amongst us." Allah's Apostle said, "What do you think if he embraces Islam (will you do as he does)?" The Jews said, "May Allah save him from it." Then 'Abdullah bin Salam came out in front of them saying, "I testify that None has the right to be worshipped but Allah and that Muhammad is the Apostle of Allah." Thereupon they said, "He is the evilest among us, and the son of the evilest amongst us," and continued talking badly of him.


I have met this hadith many a time, to me it is one of the classic hadith fabrications, please apply some logic to this hadith, a jew comes to the prophet and says I am going to ask you three things which no one knows but a prophet ( then how does the jew know? is he a prophet too?). ""He (i.e. Gabriel), from amongst all the angels, is the enemy of the Jews." ..."The Jews are liars"" Since you claim to be a former jew, the more you paste me hadiths that demonises the jews begs the question do you really believe it? I am still waiting for an answer on how you view the Bukhari hadiths that says a tree will be saying "Oh servant of allah there is a jew behind me come and kill him"

In light of our dicussion on embryology how can you paste me this drivel? "As for the resemblance of the child to its parents: If a man has sexual intercourse with his wife and gets discharge first, the child will resemble the father, and if the woman gets discharge first, the child will resemble her.""


Well lets see....I say in my prayer "BismillahirRahmanirRaheem" ~ " In the name of Allah the Most Compassionate the Most Merciful"


This is a chant, are you aware of the relationship between occult and chants? If you don't say it your prayers are not answered?

I asked for many things and they were granted. I asked to be better in health, and right way I was cured, I asked for for forgiveness (wont know the answer about that until after I die) I asked for a beautiful pious wife and He granted me that, and so one and so on
.

Hindus, satanists, sikhs, Ba'hai, shintos, humanists even ask for requests and get their prayers answered does this mean they are serving the one true God, or their prayers are answered in spite of, we are living in a period of grace, where God's grace falls on the ungodly and the godly.

Some requests that are asked are answered in my dreams of their approval. And also I am warned about events that will take place for me to prepare my self for their encounters.


Spiritists, mediums, clairvoyants, clairaudients, voodoo priests also show the same gifts, if I were you I would be very worried. If the devil really exists, what on earth do you think he will be doing do you honestly believe he will be laughing at people as they yawn or sits in a straight line with his jinns running away from the recital of the koran or hiding in a sand storm in the arabian peninsula (maybe a genie lamp too) , don't you think he would be about creating counterfeit religions, attacking the one true one, in a world of ungodliness islam is the fastest growing religion what on earth does that tell you?
Last edited by Liberate on Tue Jun 15, 2004 07:33 pm, edited 2 times in total.

Omega

Postby Omega » Tue Jun 15, 2004 05:08 pm

I will leave you with this my friend H20,

Jesus was not arabic nor did He speak arabic, you and others are trying to conform the words Jesus uttered to your own false understanding and interpretation. Not only that, you are nitpicking the Truth, backing up scriptures within the Bible such as Jesus's words and at the same time persecuting the body of Christ and it's members.

http://www.jesus-christ-forums.com/home/viewtopic.php?t=1404

It is written:Matthew 13:14 - And in them is fulfilled the prophecy of Esaias, which saith, By hearing ye shall hear, and shall not understand; and seeing ye shall see, and shall not perceive:

The blind will continue to remain blind and the deaf will continue to remain deaf and their hearts will continue to remain shut and sealed, unless the glorious Gospel of Christ may one day open the door to their hearts and help them to understand that they may be converted and receive Eternal Life, by and through the precious blood of Christ which was shed for the sins of the world.

They didn't believe Jesus back then and some still do not believe Him as of now.

Matthew 26:64 - Jesus saith unto him, Thou hast said: nevertheless I say unto you, Hereafter shall ye see the Son of man sitting on the right hand of power, and coming in the clouds of heaven.


"Right hand of Power" or literally sitting on Gods Throne!!!

The True Christians on this forum will return with The Lord coming on the clouds of Heaven, and great fear will grip your heart because of rejection of the Truth, and my words will be brought back to rememberance to you via Holy Spirits conviction, but then it will be too late.

Open your eyes and open your ears and understand with your heart my friend! Then perhaps.....maybe............

God Bless!

H2O
Preacher
Preacher
Posts: 782
Joined: Thu Jun 03, 2004 09:00 pm
Location: Boca Raton, Florida

To Kai

Postby H2O » Tue Jun 15, 2004 08:43 pm

I would like to challenge you on this one. What do you consider as HARD CORE LOGICAL proof, while according to my suspision, what you may consider to be solid ground, may prove itself to but the exact elements you claim to avoid.


Well lets see...When G-D sent his prophets into the world, did he just sent them with words to preach to a people? No. With confirmation of the authentication of the prophethood of the messenger he assisted the prophets with SIGNS, MIRACLES, WONDERS,something for the people to fathom with, something conceivable but yet beyond comprehension, unnatural to human conception.

For example, we learn that Moses was assisted with 9 great signs, and more, that was a manifestation of the power of G-D. These signs were Hard Core proofs and evidence of which the message that Moses spoke to Pharoah and his people was indeed the truth. These miracles challenged the predominant science of their time which was Magic, sorcery, and witchcraft etc in which the miracles of Moses contested with, and prevailed over.

David, was also given an amazing sign, He was a man of strength whom slew Goliath with one blow with a single rock in a sling. David was given amazing strength and abilities which was unnatural for a normal human being. Soloman his son was give command over the elements of the earth and nature. These miracles challenged the predominant science of their time which was Warfare, Fighting Skills, and using nature as a stratagem of war against they enemies etc in which the miracles of David and Soloman contested with, and prevailed over.

We come now to our beloved Messiah Jesus Son of Maryam, He was assisted with wonders by G-D of healing the blind, raising the dead, curing the sick, speaking from the time of infancy to protect his mother from being stoned for alleged fornication, and brought to life something that was made out of mud. These miracles challenged the predominant science of their time which was doctors and physicians etc in which the miracles of Jesus contested with, and prevailed over.

And Now finally, another man came who claimed to be a prophet of G-D who came with one Miracle and that was a miracle of words and in those words there was intergrated many other miracles at a time when Poetry and Orators were revered even in which the most pious and religious men, or brave fighters were not held is such esteem with. This miracle(s) challenged the predominant science of their time which was Poetry and Orators etc in which the miracles (The Quran) of Muhammad contested with, and prevailed over.

There is a pattern here. G-D rarely in some cases and the majority of time did not repeat the same miraculous proof more than once whereas the majority of the Prophets were sent with Unique Miracles. Why send the same miracle over and over when the former people rejected it anyhow ?

Now before Muhammad, where is the proof that these Prophets did such miracles ? As we turn the pages it is Just History of claims what such and such did. But how do we know that this actually happened ? Where is the physical proof it happened to convince the people of our time ? We have archeology and prophecies to ascert to of the Bible and Tanakh and the aclaimed numerology of the Bible. This is identified as G-D's signiture for the seekers of truth in the future or for those who may enquire. However there is a slight problem with this signiture, in the light of science of our time the signiture is ambiguos.
I will be the first to say it, and to acknowledge it, that yes indeed the Bible has prophecies that have been fulfilled and are being fulfilled. An there are profound scientifical statements of unseen realities which was beyond human conception at that time. BUT, there are prophecies that are ambigious and vague in which Christians and Jews do not agree with, each has its on interpretation of what a particular prophecy means. The Jews in fact have an advantage and a better understanding of the Scripture cause there studies are not limited and confined alone to translations that do not convey the entire meaning from the Hebrew or the Greek due to the FACT you cannot translate from one language into another language word for word, thus you lose meaning, in which the translation is subject to error and the interpretation of the translator which could be biased.
MY OPINION is that most of the interpretation given to the bible by chrisitans, which allude to error that is TRADITIONAL, are major errors in translations that Chritians so heartly put their faith in. What are claimed to be contradiction, I would admit, are contradictions in translations, in which the Hebrew or greek clearifies. But there are some cases, which are minority, that not even the texts themselves cannot justify which are clear contradictions, which occured and demonstrate different points of views by the writters, which loses dependability of being divine. So in MY OPINION based on a Scientifical approach to the Bible, Christianity and Judaism, there becomes doubt as to the authenticity of the Bible as being the total WORD FOR WORD OF G-D; Cause in some cases we have a clear signiture of being divine related as to coming from G-D, and in other cases we find a clear signiture of men.

Where does the Quran stand in all this ? What is this so called miracle,this HARD CORE PROOF that the Quran possesses. The Quran, just like the Bible, has an archeological, prophetic, and scientific nature to ascert to it and a numerological system that gives us again a signiture of G-D for the seekers of truth in the future or for those who may enquire. But there is more, there is something about the composition and character of the words in the Quran in which I gave an example on the last forum page http://www.jesus-christ-forums.com/home/viewtopic ... c&start=20 post Thu Jun 10, 2004 10:34 pm.

[91:1] washshamsi wa dhuHaahaa ~ By the Sun and its appearance

[91:2] walqamari idzaa talaahaa ~ By the Moon when it succeeds it

[91:3] wannahaari idzaa jallaahaa ~ By the Day when reveals it

[91:4] wallayli idzaa yaghshaahaa ~ By the Night when it conceals it

[91:5] wassamaa'i wa maa banaahaa ~ By the Sky and what erected it

[91:6] walardhi wa maa TaHaahaa ~ By the Earth and what hurls it

[91:7] wa nafsiwwa maa sawwaahaa ~ By the soul and what proportioned it

[91:8] fa'alhamahaa fujoorahaa wa taqwaahaa ~ and then infused into it it's iniquity and its piety


The grammar is perfect with its gender discriptive, the composition of its words, and oration is intergrated in rythmic hyme. This is humanly impossible to do with the character of Arabic but here we find this nature in the Quran whereas also each verse is made up of six words which are broken down below, then they numerologically encrease to seven please count.

[91:1] wa (By) al (the) shamsi (Sun) wa (and) dhuHaa (appearance) haa (it) = 6

[91:2] wa (By) al (the) qamari (moon) idzaa (when) talaa (follows) haa (it) = 6

[91:3] wa (By) al (the) nahaari (Day) idzaa (when) jallaa (reveals) haa (it) = 6

[91:4] wa (By) al (the) layli (night) idzaa (when) yaghshaa (conceals) haa (it) = 6

[91:5] wa (By) al (the) samaa'i (Sky) wa (and) maa (what) banaa (erected) haa (it) = 6

[91:6] wa (By) al (the) ardhi (earth) wa (and) maa (what) TaHaa (hurls)haa (it) = 7

[91:7] wa (and) nafsi (soul) wa (and) maa (what) sawwaa (proportioned)haa (it) = 6

[91:8] fa (then) al (the) hama (infused) haa (it) fujoora (inquity) haa (it) wa (and) taqwaa (piety) haa (it) = 9

[91:9] = 5

[91:10] = 6

[91:11] = 5

[91:12] = 5

[91:13] = 11

[91:14] = 18

[91:15] = 5

This is the sequence of the composition of the words. As the numbers in crease the words are harder in speach that affects the rythmicization to a higher pitch in sound. This is through out the Quran, then to add, it exaplians scientific phenomenon such as the "hurling of the earth" which is a fact that the earth is being hurled in space. I already meantioned other scientific phenomenon in the Quran such as the Embryology:

[23:13] And indeed We have Created Man (male and female) from an extaction of clay

[23:14] Then We placed him as a sperm into a thing that sojournes and implants

[ 24:15] Then We made the sperm as a thing that clings and then We made the thing that clings as something that is chewed, and then We made the chewing as bones and then We clothed the bones with muscle then He (Allah) brings it out as another creation; and sublime is Allah the best of makers


Sorry to say the word "alaqah" original means " a thing that clings" which is derived from the root word "aliqa" ~ to hang , dangle, cling . The meaning "a clot of congealed blood" are modern medical terminologies of the arabic word. The root of alaqah does not SUPORT the meaning of "a clot of congealed blood"

Have you ever studied Embryology ? How can you make a statement of "This is not a miracle, it is the utterings of a superstitious mind using already existent material" ? If you are a male more than likely you would know nothing about Embryology which is typical in this country.

Quote:
Then We placed him as a sperm into a thing that sojournes and implants


Sperm is translated from the word "NUTFAH". However again the word sperm also is a modern medical terminolgy and is NOT the original meaning of the word. The word "NUTFAH" is a feminine verbal noun which is derived from the arabic word "natafa" meaning to trickle, or dribble, whereas the orignial meaning is "a thing that trickles".

This "alaqah" or thing that trickles is defined by another name in the Quran:

Quote:
[80:19] Verily We create mankind from a tricking gamete (Nutfatin amshaajin) for Us to try him, and We made for him hearing and sight


The thing that Trickles ie NUTFAH is defines as AMSHAAJ meaning "a gemete or germ". So tell me what is a sperm ?

germ
PRONUNCIATION: AUDIO: jûrm KEY
NOUN: 1. Biology A small mass of protoplasm or cells from which a new organism or one of its parts may develop.
2. The earliest form of an organism; a seed, bud, or spore.
3. A microorganism, especially a pathogen.
4. Something that may serve as the basis of further growth or development: the germ of a project.

gamete
SYLLABICATION: gam·ete
PRONUNCIATION: AUDIO: gmt, g-mt KEY
NOUN: A reproductive cell having the haploid number of chromosomes, especially a mature sperm or egg capable of fusing with a gamete of the opposite sex to produce the fertilized egg.
ETYMOLOGY: New Latin gameta, from Greek gamet, wife gamets, husband, from gamein, to marry, from gamos, marriage. See gem- in Appendix

So we have confirmed what the NUTFAH is in the Quran. It is "a germ cell that trickles"

http://www.kumc.edu/instruction/medicin ... e/male.htm

The Quran says this thing the NUTFAH is placed into something that sojourns and implants or "Qararin Makeen" THe arabic words "Qarar" is a masculine noun that means a sojourner or one that temporarily stays or temoprarily resides often applied to a traveler. The second name it is called is "Makeen" an implanter or one that implants or something that implants itself which is also a masculine noun.

What is this "Qararin Makeen" the strickling germ cell is placed in ? The female Ovum. When the female Ovum is released from the Ovary it TEMPORILY RESIDES in the Fallopian Tube until fertilization by a SINGLE Germ Cell called a Sperm that trickles to its destined location or if not fertilized within a due time the Ovum will erupt resulting into a female's menstral cycle. After fertilization the Ovum proceeds to the Utterus wher it Implants its self. This is called the egg implantation. Note: At this stage the cells cannot be seen with the human eye.

Quote:
Then We made the sperm as a thing that clings


After the implantation of the fertilized ovum it starts to cling to the walls of the Utterus of its mother in which the Umblimical Cord is developed from

Quote:
and then We made the thing that clings as something that is chewed, and then We made the chewing as bones and then We clothed the bones with muscle then He (Allah) brings it out as another creation; and sublime is Allah the best of makers


This goes far as the clothing of bones with muscle. This is identified as the 12th stage of development in which you CANNOT IDINTIFY WITH THE NAKED EYE, cause the embro as this stage is at 3-5 mm! Go and ask any Embrologist. I worked in the medical field and in order for us to look at the embro at this stage is through a microscope.


Unlike Christianity, muslims do not regard translations of the Quran as divine or inspired, which put more dependability and stringintness on the Arabic text its self.

So, say you have HARD CORE LOGICAL PROOFS, can you explain to us what truth really is, and what are these proofs which seem to elevate Islam above everything else?


Truth is depending on what a person consideres REALITY on their own Logical bases. What may be logical to me may not be logical to you which all lies on perception. "... elevate islam above everything else ?" I dont really know hot to answer that. In what particular manner do you mean by "elevate above everything else" ?
Download Quran and Hadeeth for Free here http://www.islamasoft.co.uk/downloads.html Learn about Islam from a Non dictatorial view

Omega

Postby Omega » Tue Jun 15, 2004 10:05 pm

The Lord told me too write:

H2O wrote:Truth is depending on what a person consideres REALITY on their own Logical bases. What may be logical to me may not be logical to you which all lies on perception. "... elevate islam above everything else ?" I dont really know hot to answer that. In what particular manner do you mean by "elevate above everything else" ?



Theology and your search for God is in vain and as of now you are continuing to search for God because you have not Truly found Him, otherwise you would not keep searching for the Truth, you cannot bring those who already have the Truth sealed within them to your beliefs. And as for you, you are still searching but are searching in the dark and fumbling as you go by. You will know that you have found God with Absolute certainty when your search for God ends.

2 Timothy 3:7 - Ever learning, and never able to come to the knowledge of the truth.

The Spoken Words which were uttered out of the very mouth of God, has been revealed to you by the Word incarnate, but you believe not, Do you believe that every word Jesus uttered to be the Truth? If yes, then do you believe that He is the Son of God and that He made Himself a sacrifice for your sins so that you may enter into eternal rest?

You see with your very two eyes but have not believed. You put your trust on mere man and not on Gods Word alone in regards to True Faith!

Now I would like to ask you a question my friend, Do you consider yourself blessed?

Then saith he to Thomas, Reach hither thy finger, and behold my hands; and reach hither thy hand, and thrust it into my side: and be not faithless, but believing. And Thomas answered and said unto him, My LORD and my God. Jesus saith unto him, Thomas, because thou hast seen me, thou hast believed: blessed are they that have not seen, and yet have believed. And many other signs truly did Jesus in the presence of his disciples, which are not written in this book: But these are written, that ye might believe that Jesus is the Christ, the Son of God; and that believing ye might have life through his name. John 20:27-31


God Bless!

User avatar
webmaster
Admin
Admin
Posts: 5186
Joined: Fri Mar 15, 2002 12:00 am
Location: Tobaccoville NC

Postby webmaster » Wed Jun 16, 2004 02:13 am

This is the sequence of the composition of the words. As the numbers increase the words are harder in speach that affects the rythmicization to a higher pitch in sound.


I guess the timbrels and pipes can be turned into a Language/Book also!

(Ezekiel 28:13-14 " You were in Eden, the Garden of God; every precious stone was your covering: The sardius, topaz and diamond, Beryl, onyx, and jasper, Sapphire, turquoise, and emerald with gold. The workmanship of your timbrels and pipes was prepared for you on the day you were created. You were anointed cherub who covers; I established you; you were on the holy mountain of God; you walked back and forth in the midst of fiery stones.")

(Ezekiel 28:15-17 " You were perfect in your ways from the day you were created , till iniquity was found in you. By the abundance of your trading you became filled with violence within, and you sinned; Therefore I cast you as a profane thing out of the mountain of God; and I destroyed you o covering cherub from the midst of the fiery stones. Your heart was lifted up because of your beauty; you corrupted your wisdom for the sake of your splendor; I cast you to the ground, I laid you before the kings, that they might gaze at you." )

H2O
Preacher
Preacher
Posts: 782
Joined: Thu Jun 03, 2004 09:00 pm
Location: Boca Raton, Florida

Postby H2O » Wed Jun 16, 2004 05:33 am

From a few verses in your koran, with the host of volumes of hadith you are unable to show me one clear cut case of any pagan associating hubal as a mediator to get to allah.


Let do this in the reverse. Show me one clear cut case that where it says in hadith that Allah was Hubal ? No speculation, No conjecture. Also you changed the initiative to your Question.

where is the evidence in the hadiths that the pagans were using their idols as mediators to get to allah?
http://www.jesus-christ-forums.com/home/viewtopic ... c&start=40 Sun Jun 13, 2004 04:16 pm


You were given the answer:

Book 030, Hadith Number 4260.
------------------------------

Narated By Sa'id b. Jubair : I asked Ibn 'Abbas (about the verse relating to intentional homicide in Surat al-Nisa'). He said: When the verse "Those who invoke not with Allah any other god, nor slay such life as Allah has made sacred, except for just cause (Qur'an xxv. 6" was revealed, the polytheists of Mecca said: We have killed the soul prohibited by Allah, invoked another god along with Allah for worship, and commited shameful deed. So Allah revealed the verse "unless he repents, beleives and works righteous deeds, for Allah will change the evil of such persons into good. (Qur'an xxv. 70)" This is meant for them. As regards the verse "If a man kills a beleiver intentionally, his recompense is Hell (Quran iv. 93)" he said: If a man knows the command of Islam and intentionally kills a beleiver, his repentance will not be accepted. I then mentioned it to Mujahid. He said: Except the one who was ashamed (of his sin).


Also I showed from Quran where it was commanded to SHUN Idolotry, what was Hubal? An Idol.

'O you (i.e. Muhammad)! wrapped up in garments!' Arise and warn, and magnify your Lord (Allah), and your garments (of righteousness) be purified and shun idolotry.' (74.1-5)

"Tabari VI:70 “In the beginning of the Messenger’s prophetic mission he used to spend a month every year in religious retreat on Hira. This was part of the practice of Tahannuth in which the Quraysh used to engage during the Jahiliyyah. Tahannuth means self-justification.’”"

Tahannuth from that hadith means self justification


Hmm interesting some added words in the hadeeth that are not in the original source. The original source of Tabari is from Sahih Muslim :

'A'ishah, the wife of Allah's Messenger may Allah be pleased with her, reported:
The first (form) with which was started the revelation to Allah's Messenger (may peace be upon him) was the true vision in sleep. And he did not see any vision but it came out like the bright gleam of dawn. Then, solitude became dear to him and he used to seclude himself in the Cave of Hira', where he would engage in tahannuth (and that is a worship for a number of nights)......" http://hadith.al-islam.com/bayan/displa ... =eng&ID=93


Also you last post said :

Tabari VI:67 “Aisha reported: ‘Solitude became dear to Muhammad and he used to seclude himself in the cave of Hira where he would engage in the Tahannuth worship for a number of nights before returning to Khadija and getting provisions for a like period, till truth came upon him while he was in a cave. The first form of revelation was a true vision in sleep. He did not see any vision but it came like the break of dawn.’”


Why the change in words ? Where did "...Tahannuth means self-justification...’" come from ? What are you trying to do here make a new version of hadith , this is not the Bible. The word tahannuth does not mean that http://alqamoos.sakhr.com/idrisidic_1.a ... a%cd%e4%cb . You need to stop trying to alter the text of the hadeeth. Whats so funny is you dont even know what collection of Hadeth Tabari is quoting from. I posted the original source where Tabari is quoting.

First of all I would like everyone to know who Tabari is :

Tabari


(Abu Jafar Muhammad ibn Jarir at-Tabari) (täbä´rē) , c.839—c.923, Arab historian and commentator. The name Tabari was given him because he was born in Tabaristan, Persia. He traveled widely in Syria and Egypt, setting finally in Baghdad. He was admired for his erudition, his memory, and his industry. He wrote two great works, a commentary on the Qur'an and Annals of the Apostles and the Kings. The commentary became a standard from which later commentators drew. The annals are an attempt at recounting universal history from the creation to 915. Condensed from an even longer work, they are not a continuous narrative but contain differing versions of the same story and are thus a prime collection of Arabic sources. Tabari also taught law.http://education.yahoo.com/reference/en ... y?id=46030


Tabari drew his work from other commentators work. Such commentors are Sahih Bukhari and Sahih Muslim. The hadith you (liberate) are quoted from Tabari is part of the work of Sahih Muslims.

I think this draws the line between you and I (Liberate). I think there is more than sufficient information to let people make up there own minds on this issue. I do not guide, Alllaah does.

Verily is it the same to those who disbelieve that you warn them or do not warn them they will not believe ? Alllaah has sealed a covering upon their hearts, and their Hearing, and upon their sight...(Quran 2:6)
Download Quran and Hadeeth for Free here http://www.islamasoft.co.uk/downloads.html Learn about Islam from a Non dictatorial view

Omega

Postby Omega » Wed Jun 16, 2004 05:50 am

H2O wrote:I am a Graduate of St. Thomas University in Miami Florida with a Masters Degree in world theology.


Just by your signature i can come to the conclusion that a spirit within you is attempting to decieve you{Host}

  • I am :lol:
  • St. Thomas :lol:
  • University :lol:
  • Masters Degree :lol:
  • World{Worldly} :lol:
  • Theology
:lol:

It is funny, and yet it makes me also deeply sad.

Someday!

God Bless!

H2O
Preacher
Preacher
Posts: 782
Joined: Thu Jun 03, 2004 09:00 pm
Location: Boca Raton, Florida

Postby H2O » Wed Jun 16, 2004 03:08 pm

Theology and your search for God is in vain and as of now you are continuing to search for God because you have not Truly found Him, otherwise you would not keep searching for the Truth, you cannot bring those who already have the Truth sealed within them to your beliefs. And as for you, you are still searching but are searching in the dark and fumbling as you go by. You will know that you have found God with Absolute certainty

Just by your signature i can come to the conclusion that a spirit within you is attempting to decieve you{Host}


Unlike Christianity, in which Omega has been so proudly to present, it does not teach people to go out and seek knowledge but it is confined to it self. (Note: I know there are Christians who disagree with Omega and beleive that Seeking Knowledge is vital)
However, in islaam, seeking knowledge is vital and a thing that is OBLIGATORY. It is a pity to say though many muslims through out the word have not made such a teaching a practice in life now a dayswhom have become like their opposers.

http://www.islam1.org/khutub/Seek_Knowledge.htm

http://www.missionislam.com/knowledge/seekknow.htm

So as Omega has expressed in his/her posts, his/her form of Christianity does not seek knowledge for curriculum purposes out side Christianity. It is concidered a "satanic cause". However, we do see Christians that do seek such knowledge like "Liberate" whom I have been dialogueing with, whom only sought knowledge out side of Christinity if it is to benifit Christianity even if it means to "alter texts of other relgious sources" in order to persuade people, whose study is primarily dependent opon other Christian's work of criticism against Islam. So did he earnestly study in trying to understand the religion or do we see bias and prejudice conceit, looking for flaw and error, which he as demonstrated his motive of intention.
For those Christians and all who want to earnestly study islam for your selves rather than have it dictated to you by another Christian, you can download the Quran and the authentic (Sahih) hadeeths for free at http://www.islamasoft.co.uk/downloads.html .
Download Quran and Hadeeth for Free here http://www.islamasoft.co.uk/downloads.html Learn about Islam from a Non dictatorial view

Omega

Postby Omega » Wed Jun 16, 2004 04:11 pm

To H2O!

This may be off topic but must be said.

You can say whatever you want about me, but i know unlike anyone else here on this forum who cannot catch on to your deception, you are planting evil seeds among the straight and narrow paths that many are striving to travel through. Deception is almost at its peak as of this day and age, and the return of the Lord is at hand. And i am here to put a stop to the false shepards who lead the Chief Shepards flock Astray!

I have told you before, but the spirit within you that is at work is holding you hostage until the day of Judgment. Crazy as it may seem to mostly all people on this forum, but the Truth is the Truth.

So whose side am i on?
Can Satan cast out Satan?
He/She that is not with Christ is against Him. I am for Christ, and since His return is right at the doors, an invitation has been given unto you. The Door is wide open my friend! But will soon be shut by the Lord Himself. And as of now, many are growing weary by the lusts of this world and the sin that enslaves them, even with you. The Quran makes every bit of effort to undermine the Deity of Christ and the most important aspects that was accomplished by Him.

Let me show you something here:
For God doth know that in the day ye eat thereof, then your eyes shall be opened, and ye shall be as gods, knowing good and evil. Genesis 3:5
Seemingly True but masked in deception, you must understand that His lies are beyond the boundaries of normal lies, but his lies are supernatural. The Quran mentions that Allah is the most merciful{Such is correct with the True God}, However that is to none effect if the atoning blood of Christ and His DEATH on the Cross is taken away.

And for that cause being taken out of the way will lead millions upon millions to condemnation, do you not find that very serious?

This is what happens to those who are not cleansed by the blood of Christ upon phyisical death.

Revelation 14:10 - The same shall drink of the wine of the wrath of God, which is poured out without mixture into the cup of his indignation; and he shall be tormented with fire and brimstone in the presence of the holy angels, and in the presence of the Lamb:

And as of now, I know the Absolute Truth. I am 100% sure that the Quran is a book of lies conjured up by the Spirit of the False prophet who was given authority by the Spirit of the Antichrist.

By Carefully studying both books, you can see that there are many similarities between the nature of the god of the Quran and the God of the Bible. Seems like both Gods are one in the same correct?
Wrong!

Allah may appear to be the same God, but one thing is missing thats for sure, and that is the redemption from sin which is purchased by the Precious Blood of Christ.

Do you believe that it is possible for scholars and historians to devise lies?
Do you believe that they are capable of error?
The Absolute Truth as compared to just logical research and factual evidence is not the absolute Truth. Because the Absolute Truth is found by Faith in believing and Trusting on the Word of God and not humans.

Christ was given unto the world, given meaning A Sacrifice for the remission of sins.

God Bless!

For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life. For God sent not his Son into the world to condemn the world; but that the world through him might be saved. He that believeth on him is not condemned: but he that believeth not is condemned already, because he hath not believed in the name of the only begotten Son of God.
John 3:16-18

H2O
Preacher
Preacher
Posts: 782
Joined: Thu Jun 03, 2004 09:00 pm
Location: Boca Raton, Florida

Postby H2O » Wed Jun 16, 2004 06:52 pm

H2O wrote:
What is this Tahannuth worship?, so Mohammed goes to a cave to practice this tahannuth worship and goes back to his pagan wife to obtain provisions to go back to this cave for a like period, am I to believe his pagan wife is giving him provisions to go retreat himself in a cave and worship the one true God?


You didnt prove anything here. It was already explained from islamic doctrine that the pagan worshiped idols in association with Allah. "Tahannuth" Do you know what this word means ? It is to withdraw to seclusion in the cause of religous purification, which is indeed and act of worship. Muhammad did withdraw to the cave on Mount Hira in the mountain to worship Allah. This is not a pagan pratice exclusively, Christian monks or Monophisite Christians did the same and the Essenes.
Now tell me If Allah is Hubal how could he go to Mount Hira in a cave for a month to worship Allah which is three miles north of Makka and that took 4 hours to climb when Hubal was in the Ka'abah in Makkah ?

Tabari VI:67: “The Prophet said, ‘I had been standing, but fell to my knees; and crawled away, my shoulders trembling. I went to Khadija and said, ‘Wrap me up! When the terror had left me, he came to me and said, ‘Muhammad, you are the Messenger of Allah.’ Muhammad said, ‘I had been thinking of hurling myself down from a mountain crag, but he appeared to me as I was thinking about this and said, ‘I am Gabriel and you are the Messenger.’ Then he said, Recite!’ I said, ‘What shall I recite?’ He took me and pressed me three times. ‘I fear for my life.’ She said, ‘Rejoice, for Allah will never put you to shame.”

I would like you to focus on the quote in bold, this is from Khadijah Mohammed's first wife a notable pagan, what does she mean by this? is she worshipping the one true God as a pagan!?


Just like the first one, your quote doesnt prove a thing. We already pointed out the fact from doctrine that the pagans worshiped the Idols as Intercessors with Allah. The Quotes on [ ] are interpolations, must be yours. All that assaulting has nothing to do with the topic.

As was the custom of the pagan Quraysh as noted in this hadith they would practice ramadan, and "Tahannuth worship" in seclusion in a cave all the while calling the name of allah, Mohammed was simply a pagan, he even incorporated the paganistic rites of walking around the ka'ba 7 times, and had the nerve to justify it by claiming this is the religion of Abraham, that Abraham, Isaac, Jacob, Moses, and the prophets all circumnavigated and kissed that abomination you call a black stone, how do you justify this?


You are mixing your christian perspective here. Who cares what you think, what does the doctrine say ? This has nothing to do with what you believe and that is what you are introducing "..Mohammed was simply a pagan, he even incorporated the paganistic rites of walking around the ka'ba 7 times, and had the nerve to justify it by claiming this is the religion of Abraham, that Abraham, Isaac, Jacob, Moses, .." You just cant keep you own personal vandata out of this. You believed this before you even got a whole of Hadith. It is common that if you are not a Christian then you are automatically a PAGAN.

This is from a verse in the koran written after the facts with the intention of aligning the god of the koran with the God of the bible, it is nothing major, more like a haphazard attempt to deflect focus, the hadiths indicate otherwise, where is the evidence in the hadiths that the pagans were using their idols as mediators to get to allah?


According to who ? Where is this comming from ? Again this is your own conjecture, your wishful thinking. Where is the proof ? we dont wanna here YAP YAP YAP ! Show some proof of this .

Remember what we agreed on scriptures and our God given logic, I am using your sunnah in that process, if indeed there is a conflict between the sunnah and the quran I would rather use my God given logic to decipher what is the more logical story.


No you are not. You are using hadith and you own unbias perspective in the light of Christianity. you have a habit of throwing sucker punches. You go off an attack another part of islam that doesnt have nothing to do with the topic.

Again read my post above, and please I would like to see your evidence the jews prayed to Yahweh through baal


I read your post. I disagree with you interpretation. Now you asking me to do something I dont want to do, but since you asked then sure:


Jeremiah 31:31-32:

"Behold, the days come, saith Yahweh, that I will make a new covenant with the house of Israel, and with the house of Judah:

"Not according to the covenant that I made with their fathers in the day that I took them by the hand to bring them out of the land of Egypt; which My covenant they brake, although I was husband (hebrew ~ Baal) unto them, saith Yahweh."


Please go back to your bible, get a concordance to get its Lexical # and then GO to a lexicon. Now why were christians translators trying to hide this by translating Baal in Hebrew as Husband ? Well to behonest. The Word Baal just doesnt only mean lord but its expresses to be married. I know what the hebrew says in my Tanakh. In the Hebrew the word Baal is not a common noun ending in tanween or that is to say a grammatical mark indicating the noun as being indefinite, it is a Proper noun refering to the pagan god BAAL.

The Verse above is explaining a particular history of the Jews of what they did after they broke their covenant they associated Baal with Yhwh. It is undisputed that they worshiped Baal. Our dispute is if they associated Baal with Yhwh. Note: A concordance is NOT a lexicon.

How can you 'purify' a religion from paganistic practices by still incorporating those paganistic practices?


Well the Jews after following the way of the heathen, their religion was REFORMED, mostly by the Sanhedrin after they reuturned from Babylon in which Christianity centuries later emerged from.

The difference being the religion was not 'purified' by making sacred pilgrimages to the idol sanctuaries the idol temples were destroyed and they were brought back to the worship of Yahweh without any pagan rituals, pilgrimages or lascivious rites.


Again this is your perspective. Your taking what you want out of the religion to claim it as pagan derived. Remember you dont believe whatsoever about anything of the religion having any ties to Abraham.
You are still on this issue when we have shown from doctrine about the history of the religion that is traced to Abraham from islamic doctrine. You want to use what you want out of the doctrine of islam but ignoring the other crucial evidence of Quranic versus that explain the descent of the religion.

There is no evidence Abraham Isaac or Jacob set foot anywhere near that black stone, there is no evidence it came from heaven, and there is no evidence it turned black because of menstruating women.


How did Isaac and Jacob get into this ? THe Quran only speaks of Abraham and Ishmael in connection with the Ka'abah this shows how much you dont know and you have never read the Quran before. By the way what evidence are you talking about ? I hope you are not talking about evidence out side islam teaching cause you would be reneging on what you said cause the only evidence we are going by is that which in islamic teachings. I guess the only evidence you are talking about is evidence out side Islam. YOu have a big problem sticking to what you said in the begining.

Also when I made the Quotes from those other writers it was that they understood the hadith the way I understood it to confirm that I was not interpolating, and also they recognized the same versus in Quran the as making a distinction that Alla is nto and Idol. I didnt want to quote a muslim source cause then it could be said to be biased so I quoted enemies of islam.
I quoted them on the bases that we agreed on one particular issue even though they were critics.

I believe there are lies in the koran, lies in the hadiths too, fabricated commentaries, conversations e.t.c, like Abraham calling himself a muslim, and Jesus speaking to His mother in the womb and commanding dates and water to come forth. Where are the hadith references that state that the Quraish believed this?, you have just the word of the koran alone but ofcourse you are looking at it from the perception that it is the word of God and perfect. Mohammed was the son of a caravan merchant and a politician I would give him that much, he first said the high flying cranes which were the daughters of allah were to be consulted, this was to appeal to the pagan section of his community to get them to accept islam


Exactly what I was talking about. Being that you look at islam as false, also means that you are not going to follow our chain of authority in Doctrine. So you will pick and choose what you want that you see fit you can use against us. Part of the islamic teaching is that the Quran supersedes hadith that you keep quoting. Also if the Hadith contradicts Quran or a particular INTERPRETATION that conflicts with QUran then it is also rejected as being a part of islamic Orthodaxical Teaching. Just like the Apocrypha Gospels. IF they contradict the Cannon versions they are rejected and not considered a part of the teaching of Chrisitianity.

The Quran is the supreme authority, not the Hadith. You will have to come from Quran to prove you allegation cause it is the supreme authority in islam this is part of the islamic teaching. By you rejecting this then you are not following your own words :

You know it becomes pointless if all anybody does is quote and plagiarise what academics have to say on a matter, what about their own God given logic when applied to their scruptures? what exactly does the holy books have to say, what does the quran and sunnah have to say this should take precedence over any apologetic material.


"..what does the quran and sunnah.." You showed nothing from Quran. You only Quoted hadith. Hadith in islam are not divine and they are not the words of Allah. Only the Quran is the word of Allah :

[3:1] Alif Lam Mim.

[3:2] Allah! there is no god but He, the Living, the Self-Subsisting, Eternal.

[3:3] It is He Who sent down to thee (Muhammad), in truth, the Book, truth verify for whatever is before it; and He sent down the Torah (of Musa) and the Injeel (Gospel) [


If the Quran authenticates something as false then it is rejected which is not recognised as a teaching of islam. This is islamic teaching you did not follow. You made up your own rules of authority and interpretation.

Quote:
[37:125-126] "Will ye call upon Baal and forsake the Best of Creators Allah your Lord and Cherisher and the Lord and Cherisher of your fathers of old?"


Sorry the lord and cherisher of their fathers of old was the moon god hubal. Need I remind of Mohammed's grandfather's prayer to the moon god for help against Abrah's army?


You amaze me. Ok lets see what else the Quran says Allah being LORD of :

[1:2] Praise be to Allah, the Lord and Cherisher of all worlds

[114:1] Say(Muhammad): I seek refuge with the Lord and Cherisher of Mankind,


So lets see here according to your form of thinking then Allah then must be Jesus, Yhwh, and whatever else mankind worships? Ma'aadzallah ! The statement is a statement of demand, and reality of whom mankind's Lord is even if they accept it or not.

Let us have a look at this 'miracle' in embryonal description already well known in Mohammed's time

Clay : Sura 15:26 (Al-Hijr (Stoneland, Rock City)) "We created man from sounding clay, from mud moulded into shape;" Hardly an original creation story. From the pre-bible Epic Of Gilgamesh (I:101-104)

"The Goddess Aruru, she washed her hands, took a pinch of clay, threw it down in the wild. In the wild she created Endiku, the hero, offspring of silence, knit strong by Ninurta.". A much better story, too.

Water > Sura 25:54 (The Criterion (The Standard)) "It is He Who has created man from water: ... "

Hardly original a woman breaking her water during child birth could easily cause a superstitious and unlearned individual to believe people came from water.


Dust > Sura 30:20 (The Romans (The Byzantines)) "Among His Signs in this, that He created you from dust; ... "

The bible was already in circulation another case of plagiarism

Blood > Sura 96:2 (The Clot (Read!)) "Created man, out of a (mere) clot of congealed blood:"

With Mohammed's alledge 9 wives and umpteen concubines he would have seen lots of miscarriages, the only time a foetus looks like congealed blood!.

Your standard islamic response to this 'miracle' is to claim it is one thing and another, separate mentions of separate 'components', despite each being mentioned in isolation (and unnecessary if all he needs to do is say 'be'), but this is contradicted by the sequence shown below

Sura 23:12-14 (The Believers) "Man We did create from a quintessence (of clay); Then We placed him as (a drop of) sperm in a place of rest, firmly fixed; Then We made the sperm into a clot of congealed blood; then of that clot We made a (foetus) lump; then we made out of that lump bones and clothed the bones with flesh; then we developed out of it another creature."

This is not a miracle, it is the utterings of a superstitious mind using already existent material

I would like to show a quote from an arab christian about the koran:



LOL ! When you get a correct translation let me know ok. By the way the challenge was EMBRYOLOGY. Man being made out of clay was not the issue of debate. I mentioned embryology and you went off into the clay issue...lol
You keep on going off the topic. Attack the topic it self not those things out side it.

Below is the correct translation of that verse. Have this reveiwed by you Christian Arab brothers at www.arabicbible.com

[23:13] And indeed We have Created Man (male and female) from an extaction of clay

[23:14] Then We placed him as a sperm into a thing that sojournes and implants

[ 24:15] Then We made the sperm as a thing that clings and then We made the thing that clings as something that is chewed, and then We made the chewing as bones and then We clothed the bones with muscle then He (Allah) brings it out as another creation; and sublime is Allah the best of makers


Sorry to say the word "alaqah" original means " a thing that clings" which is derived from the root word "aliqa" ~ to hang , dangle, cling . The meaning "a clot of congealed blood" are modern medical terminologies of the arabic word. The root of alaqah does not SUPORT the meaning of "a clot of congealed blood"

Have you ever studied Embryology ? How can you make a statement of "This is not a miracle, it is the utterings of a superstitious mind using already existent material" ? If you are a male more than likely you would know nothing about Embryology which is typical in this country.

Then We placed him as a sperm into a thing that sojournes and implants


Sperm is translated from the word "NUTFAH". However again the word sperm also is a modern medical terminolgy and is NOT the original meaning of the word. The word "NUTFAH" is a feminine verbal noun which is derived from the arabic word "natafa" meaning to trickle, or dribble, whereas the orignial meaning is "a thing that trickles".

This "Nutfah" or thing that trickles is defined by another name in the Quran:

[80:19] Verily We create mankind from a tricking gamete (Nutfatin amshaajin) for Us to try him, and We made for him hearing and sight


The thing that Trickles ie NUTFAH is defines as AMSHAAJ meaning "a gemete or germ". So tell me what is a sperm ?

germ
PRONUNCIATION: AUDIO: jûrm KEY
NOUN: 1. Biology A small mass of protoplasm or cells from which a new organism or one of its parts may develop.
2. The earliest form of an organism; a seed, bud, or spore.
3. A microorganism, especially a pathogen.
4. Something that may serve as the basis of further growth or development: the germ of a project.

gamete
SYLLABICATION: gam·ete
PRONUNCIATION: AUDIO: gmt, g-mt KEY
NOUN: A reproductive cell having the haploid number of chromosomes, especially a mature sperm or egg capable of fusing with a gamete of the opposite sex to produce the fertilized egg.
ETYMOLOGY: New Latin gameta, from Greek gamet, wife gamets, husband, from gamein, to marry, from gamos, marriage. See gem- in Appendix


So we have confirmed what the NUTFAH is in the Quran. It is "a germ cell that trickles"

http://www.kumc.edu/instruction/medicin ... e/male.htm

The Quran says this thing the NUTFAH is placed into something that sojourns and implants or "Qararin Makeen" THe arabic words "Qarar" is a masculine noun that means a sojourner or one that temporarily stays or temoprarily resides often applied to a traveler. The second name it is called is "Makeen" an implanter or one that implants or something that implants itself which is also a masculine noun.

What is this "Qararin Makeen" the strickling germ cell is placed in ? The female Ovum. When the female Ovum is released from the Ovary it TEMPORILY RESIDES in the Fallopian Tube until fertilization by a SINGLE Germ Cell called a Sperm that trickles to its destined location or if not fertilized within a due time the Ovum will erupt resulting into a female's menstral cycle. After fertilization the Ovum proceeds to the Utterus wher it Implants its self. This is called the egg implantation. Note: At this stage the cells cannot be seen with the human eye.

Then We made the sperm as a thing that clings


After the implantation of the fertilized ovum it starts to cling to the walls of the Utterus of its mother in which the Umblimical Cord is developed from

and then We made the thing that clings as something that is chewed, and then We made the chewing as bones and then We clothed the bones with muscle then He (Allah) brings it out as another creation; and sublime is Allah the best of makers


This goes far as the clothing of bones with muscle. This is identified as the 12th stage of development in which you CANNOT IDINTIFY WITH THE NAKED EYE, cause the embro as this stage is at 3-5 mm! Go and ask any Embrologist. I worked in the medical field and in order for us to look at the embro at this stage is through a microscope.

You making the statement of "With Mohammed's alledge 9 wives and umpteen concubines he would have seen lots of miscarriages, the only time a foetus looks like congealed blood!." showed the visitors of this Forum your wantonness. Obviously you are unaware of the stages of embryology and I provided a link for your convienience in which the Quran is Identifying at its stage. Also please click on the picture for a closer look and see what looks like teeth marks that is the spinal development and also the Embryo its self looks like something chewed . These pics are microscopical images not poloride pics.

http://anatomy.med.unsw.edu.au/cbl/embr ... Stages.htm

Present this to an Embryolgist and have him send me his report that this is inaccurate with his PHD signiture and Medical facility and I will renounce Islam. However though, I would go back to Judaism, not Christianity, and reject Jesus as an imposter and a lier as being a former Jew beleived just like the charged you brong against Muhammad.

Also, If you doubt the translation that I posted then go to www.arabicbible.com email them (your arabic speaking Christian brothers) the translation with your choice of translation and ask them which one is more accurate. :D Have a Nice Day !
Download Quran and Hadeeth for Free here http://www.islamasoft.co.uk/downloads.html Learn about Islam from a Non dictatorial view

Omega

Postby Omega » Wed Jun 16, 2004 06:57 pm

You have ignored the Most Important message of all Forever!!!
Especially when you Copy and Paste!

Farewell!

H2O
Preacher
Preacher
Posts: 782
Joined: Thu Jun 03, 2004 09:00 pm
Location: Boca Raton, Florida

Postby H2O » Wed Jun 16, 2004 07:31 pm

OOPS
Download Quran and Hadeeth for Free here http://www.islamasoft.co.uk/downloads.html Learn about Islam from a Non dictatorial view

Liberate
Preacher
Preacher
Posts: 200
Joined: Sat Apr 10, 2004 04:41 pm

Postby Liberate » Wed Jun 16, 2004 07:34 pm

From a few verses in your koran, with the host of volumes of hadith you are unable to show me one clear cut case of any pagan associating hubal as a mediator to get to allah.


Let do this in the reverse. Show me one clear cut case that where it says in hadith that Allah was Hubal ? No speculation, No conjecture. Also you changed the initiative to your Question.


where is the evidence in the hadiths that the pagans were using their idols as mediators to get to allah?
http://www.jesus-christ-forums.com/home/viewtopic ... c&start=40 Sun Jun 13, 2004 04:16 pm


You were given the answer:


Book 030, Hadith Number 4260.
------------------------------

Narated By Sa'id b. Jubair : I asked Ibn 'Abbas (about the verse relating to intentional homicide in Surat al-Nisa'). He said: When the verse "Those who invoke not with Allah any other god, nor slay such life as Allah has made sacred, except for just cause (Qur'an xxv. 6" was revealed, the polytheists of Mecca said: We have killed the soul prohibited by Allah, invoked another god along with Allah for worship, and commited shameful deed.



"We have killed the soul prohibited by Allah, invoked another god along with Allah for worship" I find it implausible you would believe this equates invoking another god as a mediator to get to allah, any logical individual can see that that verse is not that explicit, you are assuming the conclusion that the verse means that you own personal bias to get to the conclusion that the polytheists were usng mediators to get to allah ( the rules of the arabic language you use to translate any given quranic verse to the likeness of your choice won't work here). When the more logical explanation and supported by the early hadiths were that they served several gods, including allah.

When was the last time you as a pagan did something and were happy to declare "I have committed that which is shameful" This type of logical fallicies pertrudes throughout the hadths of Bukhari Muslim, Abu Dawod and Malik, ridiculous commentaries to esteem islam amongst the 'barbaric' polytheists/jews. Remember our friend Abd Allah ibn Salam the jew who asked Mohammed three things to confirm that he was a prophet? This is what he had to say according to Ishaq and Tabari:

“‘If they learn I’ve become a Muslim, they’ll utter slanderous lies against me.’ So the prophet gave me a house, and when the Jews came, I emerged and said, ‘O Jews, fear Allah and accept what He has sent you. For you know that he is the Apostle of Allah. You will find him described in your Torah and even named.’ They accused me of lying and reviled me. I told Muhammad, ‘The Jews are a treacherous, lying, and evil people.’”

I find it improbable anyone but a diehard islamic fundamentalist can believe a word of this hadith, number one apostle was strictly a christian idea, the jews didn't evangelise, if Abd Allah ibn Salam really was a jew and really did exist surely he could have cited one passage where Mohammed is named in the Torah, no jewish scholar for the last 1400+ yrs has found Mohammed mentioned in the Torah. Look at how vile and quick to ridicule and demonise his own people this Abd Allah ibn Salam is all the while asking for a house.


Tabari VII:29 “When Abu Sufyan heard that Muhammad’s Companions were on their way to intercept his caravan, he sent a message to the Quraysh. ‘Muhammad is going to intercept our caravan, so protect your merchandise.’ When the Quraysh heard this, the people of Mecca hastened to defend their property and protect their men as they were told Muhammad was lying in wait for them.”

Ishaq:290 “Some of the Meccans got up to circumambulate the Ka’aba…. Sitting around the mosque, they wondered why they had allowed this evil rascal to attack their men.”

Mohammed conducted some 80+ raids ( for booty) against the pagan businessmen without reply, the early hadiths conducted by Ishaq and Tabari does not demonise the pagan caravan merchants at all, it is what any reasonable individual would do defend their property and bring the crook to justice. Let me remind you what I said on the very first post to you:

Tabari VII:20/Ishaq:288 “The Quraysh said, ‘Muhammad and his Companions have violated the sacred month, shed blood, seized property, and taken men captive.’ The polytheists spread lying slander concerning him, saying, ‘Muhammad claims that he is following obedience to Allah, yet he is the first to violate the holy month and to kill our companion in Rajab

Have a look at the above hadith, why on earth would the ploytheists associate allah with a sacred month this is directly implied by the statement "Muhammad claims that he is following obedience to Allah, yet he is the first to violate the holy month and to kill our companion in Rajab"


The early hadiths of Ishaq Tabari show the polytheists to be actually more honourable than Mohammed and his despots for hire.


Also I showed from Quran where it was commanded to SHUN Idolotry, what was Hubal? An Idol.


And I stressed to you that Mohammed emphasised that allah does not reside in an idol as the pagans believed, but he is everywhere in lieu with the beliefs of the jews and christians.


"Tabari VI:70 “In the beginning of the Messenger’s prophetic mission he used to spend a month every year in religious retreat on Hira. This was part of the practice of Tahannuth in which the Quraysh used to engage during the Jahiliyyah. Tahannuth means self-justification.’”"

Tahannuth from that hadith means self justification


Hmm interesting some added words in the hadeeth that are not in the original source. The original source of Tabari is from Sahih Muslim :


Let us be clear on this, Ishaq completed his Siratrasullah circa 750AD over 100 years after the death of Mohammed, he is the earliest and first of the islamic historians, all the subsequent hadith narrators borrow from him, Bukhari ( Bukhari completed his work over two centuries after the death of Mohammed http://www.sabawoon.com/library/Hadith/ ... efault.asp, circa 850AD) and Muslim included, Ishaq's Siratrasullah and Tabari's ( Done between 870 and 920 A.D) history of islam are laid in chronological order, the hadiths of Bukhari and Muslim are not in chronological order they are to do with rules and regulations, shariah if you like, it is no surprise if they focus on certain paths of a hadith and omit others. I did not interpolate words into that hadith , as I said to you from the very beginning I am quoting from www.prophetofdoom.net purely for the sunnah material using Al Tabari translation by the New York University Press over a period of 10 years. I have tried not to include the author's personal view of islam but mine. Coincidentally Ishaq's biography was lost but his student Hisham made an edition of his biography ( in 830 AD) and he said and I paraphrase from memory "I am editing that which is shameful", however Tabari's history quotes the original Ishaq's biography, what makes you think the hadiths of Muslim are not quoting from the edited biography?

'A'ishah, the wife of Allah's Messenger may Allah be pleased with her, reported:
The first (form) with which was started the revelation to Allah's Messenger (may peace be upon him) was the true vision in sleep. And he did not see any vision but it came out like the bright gleam of dawn. Then, solitude became dear to him and he used to seclude himself in the Cave of Hira', where he would engage in tahannuth (and that is a worship for a number of nights)......" http://hadith.al-islam.com/bayan/displa ... =eng&ID=93


Also you last post said :


Tabari VI:67 “Aisha reported: ‘Solitude became dear to Muhammad and he used to seclude himself in the cave of Hira where he would engage in the Tahannuth worship for a number of nights before returning to Khadija and getting provisions for a like period, till truth came upon him while he was in a cave. The first form of revelation was a true vision in sleep. He did not see any vision but it came like the break of dawn.’”


Why the change in words ? Where did "...Tahannuth means self-justification...’" come from ? What are you trying to do here make a new version of hadith , this is not the Bible. The word tahannuth does not mean that http://alqamoos.sakhr.com/idrisidic_1.a ... a%cd%e4%cb . You need to stop trying to alter the text of the hadeeth. Whats so funny is you dont even know what collection of Hadeth Tabari is quoting from. I posted the original source where Tabari is quoting.

First of all I would like everyone to know who Tabari is :

Tabari


(Abu Jafar Muhammad ibn Jarir at-Tabari) (täbä´re) , c.839—c.923, Arab historian and commentator. The name Tabari was given him because he was born in Tabaristan, Persia. He traveled widely in Syria and Egypt, setting finally in Baghdad. He was admired for his erudition, his memory, and his industry. He wrote two great works, a commentary on the Qur'an and Annals of the Apostles and the Kings. The commentary became a standard from which later commentators drew. The annals are an attempt at recounting universal history from the creation to 915. Condensed from an even longer work, they are not a continuous narrative but contain differing versions of the same story and are thus a prime collection of Arabic sources. Tabari also taught law.http://education.yahoo.com/reference/en ... y?id=46030




Tabari drew his work from other commentators work. Such commentors are Sahih Bukhari and Sahih Muslim.


It does not say this, The commentary became a standard from which later commentators drew., rather it says the reverse of what you are trying to imply, please read my post above.



I think this draws the line between you and I (Liberate). I think there is more than sufficient information to let people make up there own minds on this issue. I do not guide, Alllaah does.


I didn't lie or interpolate my own meanings into that hadith that hadith is on www.prophetofdoom.net which I encourage everybody, to read purely for the sunnah material alone that is unavailable to many muslims who do not speak or read arabic to know the foundations of their religion. There are several questions you have not answered which tells me you are not entirely sure of your beliefs, avoiding them is not the answer, and since you appear to be fluent in arabic you cannot take those questions to a scholar and ask for their interpretion when the answer and your conscience will defeat the purpose of your fluency in arabic.

From our conversation it seems to me you base your entire belief in islam from the stages of embryology it mentions, I also noticed you chose not to respond to my comments on it, basing your entire belief system on a few lines on a 7th century recital tells me your beliefs are not that firmly established, in my humble opinion. Mohammed was a smart man for his age period on that there is no doubt but today's standards Mohammed is found wanting, if any of the apostles had declared that they deserved a fifth of booty, or indeed sanctioned booty, the hacking of arms and limbs for minor offences and the demonisation of entire ethnic groups and then declared this is divine revelation, millions would never have embraced christianity, they would have been laughed to scorn for their selfish motivations disguised as coming from God ( which is precisely what the pagans and jews did to Mohammed hence the hatred, vitriol and eternal doom for them on the pages of your koran). A message of love, a relationship between a loving father and son is more palatable as coming from the Divine than "we are fuel for hell" predestined by the pen to our own dooms and jubilations .

You also seem to focus on the poetic aspects of the koran, as if it is divine on this as well, I don't need to remind you of the sahih hadiths that says that Mohammed hated poets, he wanted to commit suicide because he thought he had become a poet that tells us Mohammed was not unique, Hassan Bin Thabbit his contemporary was also a poet and himself admitted to have obtained his poetic powers by 'possession' by a jinn, but for some strange reason Mohammed then claims his poetic utterings are proof of his divine calling, his one and only 'miracle' I know they are hadiths that say he split the moon, made water come forth for washing (ablution) (which coincidentally islam teaches as you wash your sins are washed away, Judiasm or christianity never teaches this, was this part of the divine mandate that got corrupted successively?). I notice you never quoted any of these as a source of his miracles, I wonder if you believe them too?

I noticed you mentioned the numerical miracles in the koran, I have to ask you if all jewish writings have this numerical number of 19 or alludes to this number as being from the Divine or a symbol of the Divine? why don't you ask a simple logical question for the 1300+ yrs of the quranic existence how come it is now that the miracle is dawning on us, how about the muslims for the 1300 years surely one of them would have figured out that there is this numerical miracle in the koran why recently did allah have to wait to expose the alledge miracle to us via aid of a computer what about the muslims that didn't have access to a computer for the previous centuries of islam didn't they deserve to know?, what makes you so sure that this alledge mathematical miracle would not show up in any other book in their native language, the works of Shakespeare, Josephus, Galen, Epic of gilgamesh e.t.c. Here is a numerical 'miracle' there are 6,666 verses in the koran, to a christian the 'miracle' is very symbolic indeed.

Verily is it the same to those who disbelieve that you warn them or do not warn them they will not believe ? Alllaah has sealed a covering upon their hearts, and their Hearing, and upon their sight...(Quran 2:6)
[/quote]

Mohammed would utter sound bites like these thoughout the koran, when the pagans and jews laughed at him that he was using plagiarised material from "the ancients" he would say they didn't know anything, when almost every ritual of islam could be traced to it's superstitious and paganistic roots.

Islam fails on many levels, by christianity's standards it is demonic, on humanistic standards it is immoral. You accuse me of using hadith that contradict the quran to disprove islam but do they really contradict islam? where do they contradict the koran, you are prepared to use those hadiths to justify a case, but what about the hadiths that show Mohammed in a terrible light are they to be blanked out like they don't exist, we cannot pick what parts of a religion we believe when the authorities use those same laws we in the liberal west chose to ignore to inflict injustices on our fellow man in the name of "shariah law". Like I said from the beginning we can only judge a religion by our logic and what it's scriptures say.

Omega

Postby Omega » Wed Jun 16, 2004 10:22 pm

H2O wrote:OOPS


:lol: You have just exposed yourself my friend!
I believe that oops means that you have made a mistake.
Does this make any sense to you?

You might say that it was sarcasm, but then again you have been deceived by evil spirits making you believe that you are correct!
Now that you have slipped, stand up and take hold of the Lords hand.

Of course you will reject it because The Lord said that you will, but i still have to say it. And you do not understand what i mean from this.

Don't respond?
Search your heart and your soul.

God Bless!

H2O
Preacher
Preacher
Posts: 782
Joined: Thu Jun 03, 2004 09:00 pm
Location: Boca Raton, Florida

Postby H2O » Thu Jun 17, 2004 01:33 am

Why don't you want to do it?, if you believe you have the monopoly on truth you should have no qualms exposing what you believe to be lies.


Because I am not like you. Our religion teaches us to have respect for other religions.

(16:82)But if they turn away, thy duty is only to preach the Clear Message.

(16:125) Invite (all) to the Way of thy Lord with wisdom and beautiful preaching; and argue with them in ways that are best and most gracious: for thy Lord knoweth best, who have strayed from His Path, and who receive guidance.


I don't see the problem here this is not the same as baal/ha'baal the idol, and if you recall we agreed baal meant lord, the language existed before it was applied to the pagan idol:


The point is, what is actually meant in that verse. Does Baal in the hebrew mean "lord" in association with Baal the idol or does Baal mean husband ? I told you that I agree that that word Baal also meant "to be married".

Please go back to your bible, get a concordance to get its Lexical # and then GO to a lexicon. Now why were christians translators trying to hide this by translating Baal in Hebrew as Husband ? Well to behonest. The Word Baal just doesnt only mean lord but its expresses to be married


I did not hide this as you are trying to make me look like a lier. We already stablished that Baal meant "lord", and I was honest with the readers of the forum. Christians have translated it as "a husband" the Jewish Tanakh has translated it as "a lord" from the hebrew Baal . Who should we believe ?

Jeremiah 31:32..... not according to the covenant that I made with their fathers in the day that I took them by the hand to bring them out of the land of Egypt; forasmuch as they broke My covenant, although I was a lord over them, saith HaShem. http://www.us-israel.org/jsource/Bible/Jeremiah31.html

I was reading from my Tanakh in Hebrew. The meaning is deciphered by the context "..forasmuch as they broke My covenant, although I was
a lord
over them.." YHWH was not the only lord there was another. This is speaking of whenever the Jews broke their covenant with YHWH He became only "a lord" upon them meaning one out many other lords the Jews had. This is speaking of the times when they strayed in the past they took other lords ie gods in which Yhwh was worshiped in association with them as he was "
a lord
" only among them and not "The Lord".

Am I to believe your beliefs do not stress Abraham and his sons circumnavigated that abomination you call a shrine?


This isnt about what you believe. It is about the concept of Allah in Islamic Teaching and Islamic History. You would be better off going in the direction of Omega he/she stuck to the name of G-D in the Bible. The reality is that Allah was not an idol which would still not matter to you, cause you only identify him by the names you are taught in your Bible and cause we not worship Jesus, so yes indeed we worship two different entities. The Jews dont worship Jesus, so do they worship another entity?. If you was to tell a Jew that you and him worship the same G-D and you say Jesus is G-D he would throw up.

The Christian translation changed the meaning of the word from what the context has deciphered it to be from the hebrew. Why dont you go learn some hebrew then we will have a better arguemnet.

The Question comes down to this. Being that you dont know hebrew, which translation is correct. The Christians translation " Baal" as "a husband", or the Jewish translation as "a lord" ?

I see; so you agree that allah is derived from the sky god el? This is like using the arguments of an atheist as a muslim to disprove christianity


This is irrelevant. The Quran nore any Islamic literature can be found using the word "el" to refer to a deity. Also "el" in the Arabic language is the definite article "the" which is an egyptian dialect of "al"

You are right my apologies I couldn't believe that you would honestly believe this was an accurate description of embryology, it sounded more like the many variations of man's creation.

Let us examine those verses using your translation :

.........[23:14] Then We placed him as a sperm into a thing that sojournes and implants [ man's seed is implanted into the woman, this has been known since the dawn of mankind, hardly a miracle]


Why are you using KJ language here now with "SEED" ? "Man's seed is implanted into the Woman.." Man does not emit one single sperm into a woman, there are billions of sperm. Also the sperm does not implant into a woman. The KJ language "Seed" from the hebrew refers to either descendants or semen.


YOu should pay more attention to what you read also :

The Quran says this thing the NUTFAH is placed into something that sojourns and implants or "Qararin Makeen" THe arabic words "Qarar" is a masculine noun that means a sojourner or one that temporarily stays or temoprarily resides often applied to a traveler. The second name it is called is "Makeen" an implanter or one that implants or something that implants itself which is also a masculine noun.


Obviously you are taking "a thing that sojournes and implants" as to be refering Women. The gender of "a thing that sojournes and implants" in Arabic "Qararin Makeen" are Masculine not femine.

The Sperm or "Nutfah" in Arabic is Feminine which orginally means " a trickling germ "

Sperm is translated from the word "NUTFAH". However again the word sperm also is a modern medical terminolgy and is NOT the original meaning of the word. The word "NUTFAH" is a feminine verbal noun which is derived from the arabic word "natafa" meaning to trickle, or dribble, whereas the orignial meaning is "a thing that trickles".

This "Nutfah" or thing that trickles is defined by another name in the Quran:

Quote:
[80:19] Verily We create mankind from a tricking gamete (Nutfatin amshaajin) for Us to try him, and We made for him hearing and sight


The thing that Trickles ie NUTFAH is defines as AMSHAAJ meaning "a gemete or germ". So tell me what is a sperm ?


This "Nutfah" ~ a trickling germ which is femine is placed INTO "Qararin Makeen" ~ something that sojourns and implants which is masculine.

The Feminine of "Nutfah" ~ a trickling germ is ascribed to the Feminine genes the sperm carries from the Male host. The male Sperm carries both X and Y chromosomes in which feminine gene is the dominant

The Masculine of "Qararin Makeen" ~ a thing that sojourns and implants is ascribed to the masculine gene of the Ovum that carries only one chromosome that is X

Aristotle was already dissecting the stomachs of pregnant animals to have a look at the foetus, the practice of looking at foetuses was done thousands of years before Mohammed, even Cleopatra did it, this is not a miracle, I am amazed you think it so.


O really I also read Platos work also. Why dont you quote Aristotle's work that you claim the Quran was influenced by. Aristotle couldnt see Microscopic images. In the time of Aristotle and Plato the telescope and Microscope was not invented until after the 16-17 century. Go look it up.
To perform a surgery looking for something that is microscopic 3 mm would be impossible to identify in all that blood gunk and tissue. Yucky !

http://anatomy.med.unsw.edu.au/cbl/embr ... Stages.htm

Again the reason why I chose hadiths is they make logic sense of koranic verses, this does not contradict the koran at all, are you being truthful that this verse on it's own makes logical sense to you? the hadiths expose islam for the fraud it is.

Sahih Muslim Number 6390: `Abdullah (b. Mas'ud) reported that Allah's Messenger ... said: "Verily your creation is on this wise. The constituents of one of you are collected for forty days in his mother's womb in the form of blood [sperm?], after which it becomes a clot of blood in another period of forty days. Then it becomes a lump of flesh and forty days later Allah sends his angel to it ..."

This does not contradict the koran that is why it is a sahih, since you are of the opinion I am quoting hadiths that contradict the koran I would like you to show me where they do. Sperm does not survive in the mother's womb for 40 days, according to Mohammed 120 days later the sperm is now a lump of flesh the word is alaqa (you interpret it as a thing that clings) and means something that can be chewed like a piece of meat. 120 days later the foetus does not look like anything that can be chewed, from your website source by the 60th day the foetus has a rounded head body and limbs hardly a piece of meat that can be chewed like plasticine.



Hmm Let me help you with the hadith it seem you have a problem of properly posted the location numbers of the hadith



Book 033, Hadith Number 6390.
------------------------------
Chapter : The growth of a child in the womb of a mother and his destiny in regard to his livelihood, his deeds. both good and evil.

Abdullah (b. Mas'ud) reported that Allah's Messenger (may peace be upon him) who is the most truthful (of the human beings) and his being truthful (is a fact) said: Verily your creation is on this wise. The constituents of one of you are collected for forty days in his mother's womb in the form of blood, after which it becomes a clot of blood in another period of forty days. Then it becomes a lump of flesh and forty days later Allah sends His angel to it with instructions concerning four things, so the angel writes down his livelihood, his death, his deeds, his fortune and misfortune. By Him, besides Whom there is no god, that one amongst you acts like the people deserving Paradise until between him and Paradise there remains but the distance of a cubit, when suddenly the writing of destiny overcomes him and he begins to act like the denizens of Hell and thus enters Hell, and another one acts in the way of the denizens of Hell, until there remains between him and Hell a distance of a cubit that the writing of destiny overcomes him and then he begins to act like the people of Paradise and enters Paradise. http://hadith.al-islam.com/bayan/displa ... ng&ID=1521


Now that is indeed a contradiction to the Quran. But as for me I do not read hadith in english nor the Quran nor the Bible. This is what the hadith says in Arabic of the phrase"


"...‏إن أحدكم يجمع خلقه في بطن أمه أربعين يوما ثم يكون في ذلك ‏ ‏علقة ‏ ‏مثل ذلك ثم يكون في ذلك ‏ ‏مضغة..."

..inna (verily) ahadu (everyone) kum (you all) yujma'u (accumulates) khalqa(creation) hu (it) fee (in) baTni (inside) ummi (mothers) hu (it) arba'ien (fourty days) yawman (days) thumma (and then/later) yakoona (become) fee (in) dzaalika (that) alaqatan (a something that clings) mathlu (likewise) dzaalika (that) thumma (and then/later) yakoona (become) fee (in) mudhghatan ( a thing that is chewed)..

http://hadith.al-islam.com/Display/Disp ... =&Tag=&SP=

..Verily the creation of everyone of you accumulates inside its mother for fourty days and then (later) it becomes in that a thing that clings, Likwise that (thing) then (later) becomes into a chewing...

I will maek this clear again to you. I said before Quran supersedes hadith if the hadith contradicts the Quran this means EVEN if ti was SAHIH. However, this is not the case witht he Arabic cause the men who collected the hadith in Arabic when english did not even exist at that. They compared the Aabic with the Arabic of the Quran.

Remember "Nutfah" or Sperm is feminine. In the hadith "hu" ~" it " is masculine which is not refering to "Nutfah" which is feminine. The gender here of "hu" is refering to the female Ovum or the "Qararin Makeen" ~ "a thing that sojourns and implants" which is masculine.

In the the light of the Quran, the "hu" ~ "it" that is refered to in the Hadith is the "Qararin Makeen" or the Ovum that takes 40 days or 5-6 weeks as a Follicles to be produced as an Ovum within the Ovary before being released from it.

http://www.endotext.com/female/female13 ... rame13.htm

http://edrv.endojournals.org/cgi/conten ... 18/1/71/F1


Human ovarian follicle development takes about 70 days to Ovulation when the Ovum has reach full maturity. The first 40 days of this are Primordial follicles stages before reaching the begining stages of an Ovum, or in Quranic Terms a "Qararin Makeen". 30 days of this are Ovum regulated growth phases in which Ovulation starts

Errors Mr. Galen Makes

..The first is that in which. as is seen both in abortions and in dissection, the form of the semen prevails (Arabic nutfah)...


Mr Galen obviously didnt study Quran to well. The Quran makes a distinction between the "Nutfah" ~ Sperm and Semen ~ "Maniy" are distinguished in the Quran.

alam (not ?) yaku (he is) nutfatan (a trickling germ) min (from) maniyyin (semen) yamnaa (emitted)

Is he (man) not a Nutfah from semen emitted ( Quran 75:37)


Mr Galen errors in saying the Nutfah is the Semen. The Nutfah in the Quran says it comes from the Semen (Maniy). Also I Already showed previous that Nutfah is also identified as "Amshaaj" ~ a germ or germ cell" in the Quran.

But when it has been filled with blood (Arabic alaqa), and heart, brain and liver are still unarticulated and unshaped yet have by now a certain solidarity and considerable size, this is the second period;


Another error by Galen is that "alaqah" is from the root "aliqa" meaning to cling, dang, or hang, whih expresses "a thing that clings". The Root of alaqah does not support blood or blood clot.

Basim Musallam, Director of the Centre of Middle Eastern Studies at the University of Cambridge concludes


Basim Musallam, Director of the Centre of Middle Eastern Studies at the University of Cambridge concludes

"The stages of development which the Qur'an and Hadith established for believers agreed perfectly with Galen's scientific account ... There is no doubt that medieval thought appreciated this agreement between the Qur'an and Galen , for Arabic science employed the same Qur'anic terms to describe the Galenic stages


The Quran contradicts Galen's phylosophy. So your arguements are baseless. And I will contect any arabic speaker to this. The termonology that are given to the arabic words are MODERN MEDICAL TERMINOLOGIES.

Why has Mohammed decided to only list 4 stages of embryonic development, are you honestly going to comply that the embryo has only 4 stages?


There is total logical answer to that. IF Allah is all knowing he knows what people will say in the future about the Quran and knows how man will increase in knowledge. The first begining stages are MICROSCOPIC which is beyond human perception.
Many of the Scientifical indications are based on the realities of unseen phenomenon which was beyong human comprehension with out sophisticated technology.

I could ask a few embryologists giving them that sequence and telling them it came from the 7th century on embryological development I don't know if they would laugh or cry, if I then told them it is alledgedly from the Almighty, when such a scenario can easily be deduced just from stages of miscarriages alone.


Make sure you give them a good translation cause your still stuck up on using horrible translations. Of course you woudl do this it meets you needs for you to take advantage of it.
Download Quran and Hadeeth for Free here http://www.islamasoft.co.uk/downloads.html Learn about Islam from a Non dictatorial view

Liberate
Preacher
Preacher
Posts: 200
Joined: Sat Apr 10, 2004 04:41 pm

Postby Liberate » Thu Jun 17, 2004 11:43 am

Why don't you want to do it?, if you believe you have the monopoly on truth you should have no qualms exposing what you believe to be lies.


Because I am not like you. Our religion teaches us to have respect for other religions.


This is what you said earlier

Present this to an Embryolgist and have him send me his report that this is inaccurate with his PHD signiture and Medical facility and I will renounce Islam. However though, I would go back to Judaism, not Christianity, and reject Jesus as an imposter and a lier as being a former Jew beleived just like the charged you brong against Muhammad.



You followed it with this:


We come now to our beloved Messiah Jesus Son of Maryam , He was assisted with wonders by G-D of healing the blind, raising the dead, curing the sick, speaking from the time of infancy to protect his mother from being stoned for alleged fornication [ Where is this in the koran, all I recall is speaking to date trees and making water come out whilst in the womb] , and brought to life something that was made out of mud. These miracles challenged the predominant science of their time which was doctors and physicians etc in which the miracles of Jesus contested with, and prevailed over.


Several questions pop up on reading this statement alone, anybody reading this will be wondering why you are so quick to condemn Jesus (as an imposter and liar) and go back to Judaism if someone can prove to you that embryology as described in the koran is inaccurate (and it is), and in the next breath you call Jesus ["Our beloved Messiah" ] but does islam even afford for you to comprehend the enormity of what you have just said?. What is the term of Messiah in islam, what does it mean to you? Is it just one of the koran's many soundbites? everybody is a messiah just like everybody and his dog is a prophet. If you admit as a former jew turned muslim that Jesus is the Messiah that puts you in a catch 22 situation, if Jesus is the Messiah islam is false. I have to ask you Messiah of what? islam? What is the function of the Messiah? This is what your lexicon source says about Messiah:

http://www.studylight.org/lex/heb/view.cgi?number=04899 Mashiyach
anointed, anointed one
of the Messiah, Messianic prince
of the king of Israel
of the high priest of Israel
of Cyrus
of the patriarchs as anointed kings


Even you called Jesus " Messiah" <---Proper noun

On a side note remember our discussion about the koran amending the arabic language, this is a classic example, Mohammed was confused about the name of the mother of Jesus, he confused her with Miriam, Moses and Aaron's sister:

One of the best known errors in the quran (I wonder if you will be addressing this error in your thread about contradictions in the koran) is that concerning the confusion between Mary, recorded in the Qur'an as the sister of Aaron and the daughter of Imran (Biblical Amran) as well as the mother of Jesus (by implication in suras 19:28; 66:12; 20:25-30), though the two, Mary and Miriam, lived 1,570 years apart.

"Carrying the child, (Jesus), she (Mary) came to her people, who said to her: "Mary, this is indeed a strange thing! Sister of Aaron, your father was never a whore-monger, nor was your mother a harlot."" sura 19:27-28

This mistake was discerned by the Arabic Christians of Najran. There is a record of them exposing Muhammad's mistake about Mary

In Sahih Muslim, the Hadith related by Mughirah ibn Shu'bah,book 24 #5326, says: "When I came to Najran, they (the Christians of Najran) asked me: You read "Sister of Harun", (i.e. Mary), in the Qur'an, whereas Moses was born well before Jesus. When I came back to Allah's Messenger I asked him about that, and he said: "The (people of the old age) used to give names (to their persons) after the names of Apostle and pious persons who had gone before them."" [Sahih Muslim, translated by Abdul Siddiqi].

In effect, when Muhammad was confronted with the mistake of confusing Mary as the sister of Aaron he said that Mary was called the "sister of Aaron" because Aaron was a pious person and Mary was called after Aaron. Muhammad meant that the use of the idiom "sister of Aaron" was not literal, but metaphorical. Nowhere in the Torah new testament, Talmud, Jewish or christian apocryphal wiritngs is anyone mentioned as a brother or sister of an ancestor

It is always son of so and so, or daughter of so and so, this is a blatant lie by Mohammed to deceive, when confronted.

So to minimise the defamation of character, a public relations exercise had Maryam to mean both Mary and Miriam, and also Mariyam, and Miriam in arabic even though your lexicon source has two different transliteration in hebrew for Mary and Miriam, since arabic is related to hebrew the transliterated names should be close enough in the arabic:

Miriam http://www.studylight.org/lex/heb/view.cgi?number=04813 transliterated word Miryam

Mary http://www.studylight.org/lex/heb/search.cgi?word=Mary Transliterated word Maryah (Which coincidentally was the same pre islam in arabic, as it was the name of one of Mohammed's christian concubines he used as a sex slave)


(16:82)But if they turn away, thy duty is only to preach the Clear Message.

(16:125) Invite (all) to the Way of thy Lord with wisdom and beautiful preaching; and argue with them in ways that are best and most gracious: for thy Lord knoweth best, who have strayed from His Path, and who receive guidance.


I don't see the problem here this is not the same as baal/ha'baal the idol, and if you recall we agreed baal meant lord, the language existed before it was applied to the pagan idol:


The point is, what is actually meant in that verse. Does Baal in the hebrew mean "lord" in association with Baal the idol or does Baal mean husband ? I told you that I agree that that word Baal also meant "to be married".


You will have to run through what you mean again, the verse says (paraphrasing) I was " like a husband to you", you say above you agree baal also meant to be married, where is the conflict?

Am I to believe your beliefs do not stress Abraham and his sons circumnavigated that abomination you call a shrine?


This isnt about what you believe. It is about the concept of Allah in Islamic Teaching and Islamic History. You would be better off going in the direction of Omega he/she stuck to the name of G-D in the Bible. The reality is that Allah was not an idol which would still not matter to you, cause you only identify him by the names you are taught in your Bible and cause we not worship Jesus, so yes indeed we worship two different entities. The Jews dont worship Jesus, so do they worship another entity?. If you was to tell a Jew that you and him worship the same G-D and you say Jesus is G-D he would throw up.


I would tell a jew that Jesus is the Messiah first, and that He didn't come to destroy the roman armies as was expected but came to deal with the SIN of the world.

I see; so you agree that allah is derived from the sky god el? This is like using the arguments of an atheist as a muslim to disprove christianity


This is irrelevant. The Quran nore any Islamic literature can be found using the word "el" to refer to a deity. Also "el" in the Arabic language is the definite article "the" which is an egyptian dialect of "al"


I think it is very relevant, el is the sky god, baal is his son the god of nature, hubal is a god of nature his symbol is the moon his sister is ashtoreth the god of harvests rains and thunderstorms, who both accepted the sacrifice of little children, it is all very relevant.

Aristotle was already dissecting the stomachs of pregnant animals to have a look at the foetus, the practice of looking at foetuses was done thousands of years before Mohammed, even Cleopatra did it, this is not a miracle, I am amazed you think it so.


O really I also read Platos work also. Why dont you quote Aristotle's work that you claim the Quran was influenced by. Aristotle couldnt see Microscopic images. In the time of Aristotle and Plato the telescope and Microscope was not invented until after the 16-17 century. Go look it up.
To perform a surgery looking for something that is microscopic 3 mm would be impossible to identify in all that blood gunk and tissue. Yucky !

http://anatomy.med.unsw.edu.au/cbl/embr ... Stages.htm


Again the reason why I chose hadiths is they make logic sense of koranic verses, this does not contradict the koran at all, are you being truthful that this verse on it's own makes logical sense to you? the hadiths expose islam for the fraud it is.

Sahih Muslim Number 6390: `Abdullah (b. Mas'ud) reported that Allah's Messenger ... said: "Verily your creation is on this wise. The constituents of one of you are collected for forty days in his mother's womb in the form of blood [sperm?], after which it becomes a clot of blood in another period of forty days. Then it becomes a lump of flesh and forty days later Allah sends his angel to it ..."

This does not contradict the koran that is why it is a sahih, since you are of the opinion I am quoting hadiths that contradict the koran I would like you to show me where they do. Sperm does not survive in the mother's womb for 40 days, according to Mohammed 120 days later the sperm is now a lump of flesh the word is alaqa (you interpret it as a thing that clings) and means something that can be chewed like a piece of meat. 120 days later the foetus does not look like anything that can be chewed, from your website source by the 60th day the foetus has a rounded head body and limbs hardly a piece of meat that can be chewed like plasticine.



Now that is indeed a contradiction to the Quran. But as for me I do not read hadith in english nor the Quran nor the Bible. This is what the hadith says in Arabic of the phrase"


..inna (verily) ahadu (everyone) kum (you all) yujma'u (accumulates) khalqa(creation) hu (it) fee (in) baTni (inside) ummi (mothers) hu (it) arba'ien (fourty days) yawman (days) thumma (and then/later) yakoona (become) fee (in) dzaalika (that) alaqatan (a something that clings) mathlu (likewise) dzaalika (that) thumma (and then/later) yakoona (become) fee (in) mudhghatan ( a thing that is chewed)..

http://hadith.al-islam.com/Display/Disp ... =&Tag=&SP=

..Verily the creation of everyone of you accumulates inside its mother for fourty days and then (later) it becomes in that a thing that clings, Likwise that (thing) then (later) becomes into a chewing...


I will maek this clear again to you. I said before Quran supersedes hadith if the hadith contradicts the Quran this means EVEN if ti was SAHIH.


This is your own explanation of that hadith to get out of a difficult situation, if you are being honest with yourself you would not be so quick to dismiss that hadith, the koran doesn't give any days that hadith does, it does not contradict the koran.



Human ovarian follicle development takes about 70 days to Ovulation when the Ovum has reach full maturity. The first 40 days of this are Primordial follicles stages before reaching the begining stages of an Ovum, or in Quranic Terms a "Qararin Makeen". 30 days of this are Ovum regulated growth phases in which Ovulation starts


I have to wonder if you obtained all this detailed information from the three or four lines in the koran.

Errors Mr. Galen Makes


..The first is that in which. as is seen both in abortions and in dissection, the form of the semen prevails (Arabic nutfah)...


Mr Galen obviously didnt study Quran to well. The Quran makes a distinction between the "Nutfah" ~ Sperm and Semen ~ "Maniy" are distinguished in the Quran.


Galen was a greek doctor born 400 years before Mohammed, his medical knowledge was used in the formation of a Jandi-shapur medical school in Persia a school a certain Harith Ben Kalada attended, a contemporary of Mohammed who Mohammed sent sick people to meet, it is very logical Mohammed would have asked the doctor about child birth. The interpolations of the arabic meanings into his text was to show the similarity.

Basim Musallam, Director of the Centre of Middle Eastern Studies at the University of Cambridge concludes

"The stages of development which the Qur'an and Hadith established for believers agreed perfectly with Galen's scientific account ... There is no doubt that medieval thought appreciated this agreement between the Qur'an and Galen , for Arabic science employed the same Qur'anic terms to describe the Galenic stages




I could ask a few embryologists giving them that sequence and telling them it came from the 7th century on embryological development I don't know if they would laugh or cry, if I then told them it is alledgedly from the Almighty, when such a scenario can easily be deduced just from stages of miscarriages alone.


Make sure you give them a good translation cause your still stuck up on using horrible translations. Of course you woudl do this it meets you needs for you to take advantage of it.


You have so far dismissed the english translations of the quran I have showed you, and instead have interpreted it in your own words, is there any translation that suits you as opposed to your own?

H2O
Preacher
Preacher
Posts: 782
Joined: Thu Jun 03, 2004 09:00 pm
Location: Boca Raton, Florida

Postby H2O » Fri Jun 18, 2004 06:39 am

. and reject Jesus as an imposter and a lier as being a former Jew beleived just like the charged you brong against Muhammad

v.s.
We(H2O) come now to our beloved Messiah Jesus Son of Maryam


Liberate says:

Several questions pop up on reading this statement alone, anybody reading this will be wondering why you are so quick to condemn Jesus (as an imposter and liar) and go back to Judaism if someone can prove to you that embryology as described in the koran is inaccurate (and it is), and in the next breath you call Jesus ["Our beloved Messiah" ]

You been having some bad reading comprehension from since we started. What part didnt you get " and reject Jesus as an imposter and a lier as being a former Jew "........ "as former Jew"..... You may have forgotten Jews do not believe in Jesus. In Judaism Jesus is considered a Lier, and Imposter. It was not until I came to islam that i believed in him as the promissed Messiah to the Jews.

The link is a Christian finding in Talmud about Jesus
http://watch.pair.com/HRChrist.html

In Islam you must believe in Jesus in order to be a Believing Muslim per the conditions in the Quran.

does islam even afford for you to comprehend the enormity of what you have just said?.


Jesus is Honored in Islam and His example is followed per the Teaching of the Quran how he respected and guarded his mother.

Behold! the angels said: "O Maryam! Allah giveth Thee glad tidings of a Word from Him: his name will be Al-Masih 'Isa (Jesus). The son of Maryam, held in honour in this world and the Hereafter and of (the company of) those nearest to Allah;(Quran 3:45)

And they(the Christians) say: "(Allah)The Most Gracious has begotten Son." Glory to Him! Rather is he(Jesus) is but a servant raised to honour.


If you want more go read the Quran, oviously you havent, But yet you claim to have arguements against islam when you your have never Read the Quran before nore the Hadeeths in their perspective. Seems all your studing of islam come from other Christians and their dictations.

What is the term of Messiah in islam, what does it mean to you?


Doent your Christian websites on Islam provide you with this info ? Why ask me ? You seem to know to know everything about islam.

if Jesus is the Messiah islam is false. I have to ask you Messiah of what? islam? What is the function of the Messiah? This is what your lexicon source says about Messiah:


No that is according to your Christian perspective. If islam is false then Jesus is false thats what I expressed up top, in which I would rather go back to Judaism than any other religion.

http://www.studylight.org/lex/heb/view.cgi?number=04899 Mashiyach
anointed, anointed one
of the Messiah, Messianic prince
of the king of Israel
of the high priest of Israel
of Cyrus
of the patriarchs as anointed kings


One thing I have noticed abotu Christians as your self that are striving their hardest against islam looking for every avenue there is to get gain upon your opossers you have a bad habbit of editing things : You should post the lexicon correctly :

1. anointed, anointed one
a. of the Messiah, Messianic prince
b. of the king of Israel
c. of the high priest of Israel
d. of Cyrus
e. of the patriarchs as anointed kings

http://www.studylight.org/lex/heb/view.cgi?number=04899


Anointed, anointed one is the prime meaning. The submeanings listed as a,b,c,d,.. are referenced application of the word. The Root "Mashach" of the word Mishyach (Messiah) does not support any other meaning but "one who is anointed"

http://www.studylight.org/lex/heb/view.cgi?number=04886

The word is used for even a pagan http://www.studylight.org/isb/bible.cgi ... nt=na&sr=1

Jesus was not the ONLY Messiah, the levitical preists are also called Messiahs .

Even you called Jesus " Messiah" <---Proper noun


No incrorrect. "messiah" is comon noun like how it is used in your bible the same word used for Jesus. The Link you posted for the Lexicon shows it to you to the bottom passage reference.

"The Messiah" <~~~ That is a proper Noun and a designated title. Jesus him self is called "Al-Masih" ~ "The Messiah" in The Quran. The Arabic word "Masih" means "anointed one" coming from the arabic root "masaha" ~ to anoint,.

In effect, when Muhammad was confronted with the mistake of confusing Mary as the sister of Aaron he said that Mary was called the "sister of Aaron" because Aaron was a pious person and Mary was called after Aaron. Muhammad meant that the use of the idiom "sister of Aaron" was not literal, but metaphorical. Nowhere in the Torah new testament, Talmud, Jewish or christian apocryphal wiritngs is anyone mentioned as a brother or sister of an ancestor


Hmm lets see for a person who have bad reading comprehension you also lack in the meaing of words.

sister
SYLLABICATION: sis·ter
PRONUNCIATION: AUDIO: sstr KEY
NOUN: 1. A female having the same parents as another or one parent in common with another.
2. A girl or woman who shares a common ancestry, allegiance, character, or purpose with another or others, specifically: a. A kinswoman. b. A woman fellow member, as of a sorority. c. A fellow woman. d. A close woman friend or companion. e. A fellow African-American woman or girl. f. A woman who advocates, fosters, or takes part in the feminist movement.
3. Informal Used as a form of address for a woman or girl.
4.
abbr. Sr. Ecclesiastical a. A member of a religious order of women
; a nun. b. Used as a form of address for such a woman, alone or followed by the woman's name.
5. Chiefly British A nurse, especially the head nurse in a ward.
6. One identified as female and closely related
http://education.yahoo.com/reference/di ... 36500.html


In arabic for sister is ~ "ukht" brother is ~ "akh " as used in the Quran.
If I call an Arab, Chinese, Pakistani, or European who is muslim my brother (akh) or sister (ukht) does this mean we are biological brother and sister?
You obviously are so blind you dont know what idioms are.

"O sister of Aaron" ~ Yaa ukhta haaroona". You didnt even have to quote hadeeth. I automatically knew its indicated religious affiliation. This is Jewish idiom expressing her sisterhood of the Aronites. Go ask a Jew about this type of Idiom reference and if they use it among them selves like "brother of levite", which is a honoured rank in Judaism. Anyone that can relate to this would be a Jew.

Sahih Muslim Book 025, Hadith Number 5326.
------------------------------
Chapter : Forbiddance in calling one (other than Allah's Apostle) with the Kunya of Abdu'l-Qasim and the fact pertaining to good names.

Mughira b. Shu'ba reported: When I came to Najran, they (the Christians of Najran) asked me: You read "O sister of Harun" (i.e. Hadrat Maryam) in the Qur'an, whereas Moses was born much before Jesus. When I came back to Allah's Messenger (may peace be upon him) I asked him about that, whereupon he said: The (people of the old age) used to give names (to their persons) after the names of Apostles and pious persons who had gone before them.



Note: It was a Christian not a Jew who obviously, like Liberate, are ignorant of Jewish Idioms and Culture.

As again if you present a hadeeth that conflicts with Quran it will be bound for rejection cause this we commanded in the Quran.

[3:3] It is He Who sent down to thee (step by step), in truth, the Book,as truth verifier for whatever is before it; and He sent down the Torah (of Musa) and the Gospel (of 'Isa).


Nowhere in the Torah new testament, Talmud, Jewish or christian apocryphal wiritngs is anyone mentioned as a brother or sister of an ancestor


Talmud ? You read the Talmud before? Ok if you read the Talmud before then what is is the name of the First book in the Talmud and what is Chapter one pertaining to ? I made it easy. You should be able to tell us with know problem if you read the Talmud before. Other wise your statement above is that your guessing and have never read the Talmud before.

It is always son of so and so, or daughter of so and so, this is a blatant lie by Mohammed to deceive, when confronted.


Go to any Jewish website or to an Orthadox Jew, I would recommend a Rabi instead, and email or ask them or him what does "Sister of Aaron" and "Brother of Levi" in Jewish Idiom meain. :lol:

So to minimise the defamation of character, a public relations exercise had Maryam to mean both Mary and Miriam, and also Mariyam, and Miriam in arabic even though your lexicon source has two different transliteration in hebrew for Mary and Miriam, since arabic is related to hebrew the transliterated names should be close enough in the arabic:


And you can go back to all my posts where I used Jesus's Mother's name as "Maryam" which is the Quranic Usage of the name. "Miriam in arabic" there is no such spelling in Arabic. Those are english trasliterated variances of the mother of Jesus. In the Quran it is spelled, meem, raa, yaa, meem,{ mrym } read "Maryam". Do you see that name to have an "h" to the end of it like in your "Maryah" wishfull thinking ? The Quranic "Maryam" is the same as "Miryam" http://www.studylight.org/lex/heb/view.cgi?number=04813 . Learn how to use a dictionary please. And stop trying to turn peaches into apples. The mother of Jesus is called Mary in english which is translated from the greek Mariða = Maria http://www.studylight.org/lex/grk/view.cgi?number=3137 that is derived from Miryam in Hebrew http://www.studylight.org/lex/heb/view.cgi?number=4813.

You will have to run through what you mean again, the verse says (paraphrasing) I was " like a husband to you", you say above you agree baal also meant to be married, where is the conflict?


Jewish tranlation:

Jeremiah 31:32..... not according to the covenant that I made with their fathers in the day that I took them by the hand to bring them out of the land of Egypt; forasmuch as they broke My covenant, although I was a lord over them, saith HaShem. http://www.us-israel.org/jsource/Bible/Jeremiah31.html

The word "Baal" has two meanings 1) husband or 2) lord

The word "Elohim" has two meanings 1) gods or 2) God(and His majesty)

The word "almah" has two meanings 1) virgin or 2) young woman (or maiden)

If the Hebrew word Baal does not take a dual form in the context of the Hebrew nor a Definite form (the) but and idefinite from meaning it could mean "a husband" or "a lord". When a word is abigious the context defines its meaning.
The Jewish translation is more accurate that the Christian translation.

I would tell a jew that Jesus is the Messiah first, and that He didn't come to destroy the roman armies as was expected but came to deal with the SIN of the world.


Why beat around the bush. When you go to a muslim you preach JESUS IS THE ONLY GOD THE SON OF GOD ! So why wont you go to a Jew with same preaching ?

I think it is very relevant, el is the sky god, baal is his son the god of nature, hubal is a god of nature his symbol is the moon his sister is ashtoreth the god of harvests rains and thunderstorms, who both accepted the sacrifice of little children, it is all very relevant.


:roll: There you go stuck on Hubal again. Hmm lets see so I guess all the Arab Christians are going to Hell cause they use the Name Alllaah that you assume was an Idol called Hubal.

THE ARABIC BIBLE SAYS IN JOHN 3:16

16 &#1604;&#1575;&#1606;&#1607; &#1607;&#1603;&#1584;&#1575; &#1575;&#1581;&#1576; &#1575;&#1604;&#1604;&#1607; &#1575;&#1604;&#1593;&#1575;&#1604;&#1605; &#1581;&#1578;&#1609; &#1576;&#1584;&#1604; &#1575;&#1576;&#1606;&#1607;

16: Alllaah so loved the word that he gave His only begotten Son......

http://www.arabicbible.com/bible/nt/joh/3.htm


The Arabic speaking Christians use this name every day when they go to Church. So. According to you they are praying to Hubal and not GOD so are they going to Hell ?

This is your own explanation of that hadith to get out of a difficult situation, if you are being honest with yourself you would not be so quick to dismiss that hadith, the koran doesn't give any days that hadith does, it does not contradict the koran.


No it wasnt a difficult situation. It was easy. If I didnt know how to read arabic to clearify the horrible translation then YES it would have been a sticky situation, but still yet I would have to Reject that hadeeth if it contradicted the Quran. Thus we are commanded in the Quran :D
Trying to Debate with a person like me about islamic teaching would make it things futile, especially when you dont know how to read arabic. As a matter of fact my sefl and Many other muslims Reject a SAHIH hadeeth that says Muhammad (s.a.w.) married Aisha at 6 years old and consumated the marriage at 9. Many of us reject this hadeeth cause it contradicts the Quran and other Hadeeth which you dont know about.

Galen was a greek doctor born 400 years before Mohammed, his medical knowledge was used in the formation of a Jandi-shapur medical school in Persia a school a certain Harith Ben Kalada attended, a contemporary of Mohammed who Mohammed sent sick people to meet, it is very logical Mohammed would have asked the doctor about child birth. The interpolations of the arabic meanings into his text was to show the similarity.


Hmm lets see, which is it ? Did muhammad learn it from one of Glens contemporaries or as you said before :

"With Mohammed's alledge 9 wives and umpteen concubines he would have seen lots of miscarriages, the only time a foetus looks like congealed blood!


So what is it ? Did he learn from his wives miscarriages or did he learn it from one of Galen's contemporaries ?

Also I will my hand on Galens writtings and post them here cause you have a habbit of "COPY AND PASTE" and never go back and read Galen's work for you self.

You have so far dismissed the english translations of the quran I have showed you,


Yes Indeed. One the Quran is in arabic not english. The Translators made alot fo errors in their work and you shoudl read their prefaces. Oops I fogot you dont have Quran you depend on Christian critcs work to learn about Quran.
Any Arab or person who reads Arabic would throw that translation in the garbage. Why do you think we encouragage our brothers and sisters to learn arabic ?
The Quran I believe in that is the WORD OF ALLLAAH is in Arabic. You need to go debate with a muslim who doesnt speak Arabic. Your Criticism is on a translation, not the Quran, I criticize the translation to. Those men who translated into english their mother tongue was not English. English was a third language for them. Please go read the hisotry of those translators. If you want to defeat islam go learn arabic then come debate. I will even pay for your classes to learn arabic. You should have learn this a long time ago. You should have learnt this long ago about debating with people who speak arabic, When I am coming directly fromteh source and you are coming from something watered down.
Download Quran and Hadeeth for Free here http://www.islamasoft.co.uk/downloads.html Learn about Islam from a Non dictatorial view

H2O
Preacher
Preacher
Posts: 782
Joined: Thu Jun 03, 2004 09:00 pm
Location: Boca Raton, Florida

Postby H2O » Fri Jun 18, 2004 10:44 pm

Remember our friend Abd Allah ibn Salam the jew who asked Mohammed three things to confirm that he was a prophet? This is what he had to say according to Ishaq and Tabari:


Lets resurrect this question from before. Did the Arabic speaking Jews use the name Allah ? You have acknowledged that Abd Allah ibn Salam was a Jew. Obviously the evidence that Jews used the name Allah even in their names show that they did not recognize Allah as Hubal which was an Idol.

“‘If they learn I’ve become a Muslim, they’ll utter slanderous lies against me.’ So the prophet gave me a house, and when the Jews came, I emerged and said, ‘O Jews, fear Allah and accept what He has sent you. For you know that he is the Apostle of Allah. You will find him described in your Torah and even named.’ They accused me of lying and reviled me. I told Muhammad, ‘The Jews are a treacherous, lying, and evil people.’”

I find it improbable anyone but a diehard islamic fundamentalist can believe a word of this hadith, number one apostle was strictly a christian idea,the jews didn't evangelise,...


Umm "Apostle of Allah" is translated from "Rasool Allah" in Arabic of the Hadeeth. The english you are reading is a traslation of the Hadith in Arabic. So your problem is with the translator not the hadeeth. The Arabic "rasool" means "messenger" why the translator used "apostle" he obviously was not grounded in the english who, like all of them, english was a third language for them that they properly didnt understand.

And I stressed to you that Mohammed emphasised that allah does not reside in an idol as the pagans believed, but he is everywhere in lieu with the beliefs of the jews and christians


If that be so true then why would Jews and Christians use the name Allah as part of their religious names which shows that they used the name to refer to G-D ? My whole point is that Allaah was also used by Arabic speaking Jews and Christians in which they named themselves by. Obviously they never saw or recognized Allah as being an Idol. The concept of Allah to the pagans is stipulated below:

[17:90] They(the pagans) say: "We shall not believe in thee(Muhammad), until thou cause a spring to gush forth for us from the earth,

[17:91] "Or (until) thou have a garden of date trees and vines, and cause rivers to gush forth in their midst, carrying abundant water,

[17:92] "Or thou cause the sky to fall in pieces, as thou sayest (will happen), against us, or thou bring Allah and the angels before (us) face to face; [ angels are invisible and Allah is invisable]

[20:210] Will they(the pagans) wait until Allah comes to them in canopies of clouds, with angels (in His train) and the question is (thus) settled? But to Allah do all questions go back (for decision).


So we have here evidence from the Quran(The Supreme Islamic teaching) that the pagans did not believe Allah could be seen as that to an idol, and He was in the Sky and not at the Ka'abah.

You accuse me of using hadith that contradict the quran to disprove islam but do they really contradict islam? where do they contradict the koran


Yes, some hadeeth contradict Quran, for example the Quran says:
...marry women of your choice, two, or three, or four; but if ye fear that ye shall not be able to deal justly (with them), then only one,... (Quran 4:3)

The Arabic word for woman or women is "nisaa'a" only applicable to adult females that are pass the age of puberty. A female not pass the age of puberty is called "ghulaamah". The Quran strickly says to mary Women (nisaa'a) and it did not say to mary females (unthaa) ~ which are females by nature and gender. This is the standard, Muhammad did not go against this regardless what hadeeth says. You may agrue this with a Muslim who regards hadith to the same level as the Quran. But as for Muslims as my self if it contradicts Quran then it is false and rejected.

The Following is some insight on the conflicts with that hadeeth :

Qualities of Aisha and her role in Islam

In any discussion on the age of Aisha (ra: may Allah be pleased with her) at the time of her marriage with the Holy Prophet Muhammad (may peace and the blessings of Allah be upon him), it is of the greatest relevance to note the pivotal role she played as a teacher, exponent and interpreter of the religion of Islam. Aisha was an exceptionally intelligent and astute woman, a young prodigy, and this was the main reason why she was got married to the Holy Prophet, as is clearly proved by events after the Holy Prophet’s life. She entered his household, shortly after his emigration to Madina, just at the time when the teachings of Islam in all fields of life for the Muslim community were starting to be revealed to the Holy Prophet and demonstrated by him by his example and practice. An intellectually gifted person was required who would have daily contact with the Holy Prophet at the closest and most personal level, so as to absorb the teachings that he was giving on all aspects of life by his words and actions. Such a person would need to possess the following qualities:
an excellent, precise memory to retain a vast amount of detail accurately,
the understanding to grasp the significance and the principles of the teachings,
powers of reasoning, criticism and deduction to resolve problems on the basis of those teachings,
the skills to convey knowledge to a wide range of audience,
and, finally, have the prospect of living for a considerable period of time after the death of the Holy Prophet in order to spread his message to distant generations.
That Aisha possessed all these qualities and carried out this mission is an absolutely positive and undeniable, historical fact. After the Holy Prophet’s death, she acted as a teacher and interpreter of Islam, providing guidance to even the greatest of the male Companions of the Holy Prophet Muhammad. They made a special point of going to her to gain knowledge and seek her opinion. A vast number of sayings and actions of the Holy Prophet are reported from her in books of Hadith. She not only quoted his sayings and reported her observations of events, but interpreted them to provide solutions to questions. Whenever necessary, she corrected the views of the greatest of the Companions of the Holy Prophet. She made rulings and judgments on which Islamic law is based.
The following are two examples of what the Holy Prophet’s male Companions said about her:
“Abu Musa said: Whenever there was any hadith that was difficult [to understand] for us, the Companions of the Messenger of Allah, and we asked Aisha we always found that she had knowledge about that hadith.”
“Musa ibn Talha said: I never saw anyone more eloquent than Aisha.” [1]
In the famous compilation of the lives of saints in Islam, Tadhkirat-ul-Auliya, the author Farid-ud-Din Attar, who lived eight centuries ago, introduces the life of the early female saint Rabia of Basra as follows:
“If anyone says, ‘Why have you included Rabia in the rank of men?’, my answer is that the Prophet himself said, ‘God does not regard your outward forms’. … Moreover, if it is proper to derive two-thirds of our religion from Aisha, surely it is permissible to take religious instruction from a handmaid of Aisha.” [2]
It is thus recognised, from the earliest times in Islam, that some two-thirds of Islamic Sharia is based on reports and interpretations that have come from Aisha.
In view of these exceptional qualities of Aisha and the towering role played by her in the transmission of the teachings of Islam, it is simply preposterous and outrageous to suggest that she was the victim of some form of child and marital abuse. We ask in particular the Christian and Jewish critics of Islam, who are reviling the Holy Prophet Muhammad on the basis of his marriage with Aisha, whether they can point out any example of a woman in their religions who played a role like that of Aisha in learning the religion from its founder and becoming the teacher and instructor of all his followers, including men, after his death.
Age of Aisha at time of marriage with Holy Prophet Muhammad
It is believed on the authority of some Hadith reports that the marriage ceremony (known as nikah, amounting to betrothal) of Aisha with the Holy Prophet Muhammad took place when she was six years of age, and that she joined the Holy Prophet as his wife three years later at the age of nine. We quote below from two such reports in Bukhari.
“It is reported from Aisha that she said: The Prophet entered into marriage with me when I was a girl of six … and at the time [of joining his household] I was a girl of nine years of age.”
“Khadija died three years before the Prophet departed to Medina. He stayed [alone] for two years or so. He married Aisha when she was a girl of six years of age, and he consummated that marriage when she was nine years old.” [3]
As to the authenticity of these reports, it may be noted that the compilers of the books of Hadith did not apply the same stringent tests when accepting reports relating to historical matters as they did before accepting reports relating to the practical teachings and laws of Islam. The reason is that the former type of report was regarded as merely of academic interest while the latter type of report had a direct bearing on the practical duties of a Muslim and on what was allowed to them and what was prohibited. Thus the occurrence of reports such as the above about the marriage of Aisha in books of Hadith, even in Bukhari, is not necessarily a proof of their credibility.
Determination of the true age of Aisha
It appears that Maulana Muhammad Ali was the first Islamic scholar directly to challenge the notion that Aisha was aged six and nine, respectively, at the time of her nikah and consummation of marriage. This he did in, at least, the following writings: his English booklet Prophet of Islam, his larger English book Muhammad, the Prophet, and in the footnotes in his voluminous Urdu translation and commentary of Sahih Bukhari entitled Fadl-ul-Bari, these three writings being published in the 1920s and 1930s. In the booklet Prophet of Islam, which was later incorporated in 1948 as the first chapter of his book Living Thoughts of the Prophet Muhammad, he writes in a lengthy footnote as follows:
“A great misconception prevails as to the age at which Aisha was taken in marriage by the Prophet. Ibn Sa‘d has stated in the Tabaqat that when Abu Bakr [father of Aisha] was approached on behalf of the Holy Prophet, he replied that the girl had already been betrothed to Jubair, and that he would have to settle the matter first with him. This shows that Aisha must have been approaching majority at the time. Again, the Isaba, speaking of the Prophet’s daughter Fatima, says that she was born five years before the Call and was about five years older than Aisha. This shows that Aisha must have been about ten years at the time of her betrothal to the Prophet, and not six years as she is generally supposed to be. This is further borne out by the fact that Aisha herself is reported to have stated that when the chapter [of the Holy Quran] entitled The Moon, the fifty-fourth chapter, was revealed, she was a girl playing about and remembered certain verses then revealed. Now the fifty-fourth chapter was undoubtedly revealed before the sixth year of the Call. All these considerations point to but one conclusion, viz., that Aisha could not have been less than ten years of age at the time of her nikah, which was virtually only a betrothal. And there is one report in the Tabaqat that Aisha was nine years of age at the time of nikah. Again it is a fact admitted on all hands that the nikah of Aisha took place in the tenth year of the Call in the month of Shawwal, while there is also preponderance of evidence as to the consummation of her marriage taking place in the second year of Hijra in the same month, which shows that full five years had elapsed between the nikah and the consummation. Hence there is not the least doubt that Aisha was at least nine or ten years of age at the time of betrothal, and fourteen or fifteen years at the time of marriage.” [4] (Bolding is mine.)
To facilitate understanding dates of these events, please note that it was in the tenth year of the Call, i.e. the tenth year after the Holy Prophet Muhammad received his calling from God to his mission of prophethood, that his wife Khadija passed away, and the approach was made to Abu Bakr for the hand of his daughter Aisha. The hijra or emigration of the Holy Prophet to Madina took place three years later, and Aisha came to the household of the Holy Prophet in the second year after hijra. So if Aisha was born in the year of the Call, she would be ten years old at the time of the nikah and fifteen years old at the time of the consummation of the marriage.
Later research
Research subsequent to the time of Maulana Muhammad Ali has shown that she was older than this. An excellent short work presenting such evidence is the Urdu pamphlet Rukhsati kai waqt Sayyida Aisha Siddiqa ki umar (‘The age of Lady Aisha at the time of the start of her married life’) by Abu Tahir Irfani.[4a] Points 1 to 3 below have been brought to light in this pamphlet.
1. The famous classical historian of Islam, Ibn Jarir Tabari, wrote in his ‘History’:
“In the time before Islam, Abu Bakr married two women. The first was Fatila daughter of Abdul Uzza, from whom Abdullah and Asma were born. Then he married Umm Ruman, from whom Abdur Rahman and Aisha were born. These four were born before Islam.” [5]
Being born before Islam means being born before the Call.
2. The compiler of the famous Hadith collection Mishkat al-Masabih, Imam Wali-ud-Din Muhammad ibn Abdullah Al-Khatib, who died 700 years ago, has also written brief biographical notes on the narrators of Hadith reports. He writes under Asma, the older daughter of Abu Bakr:
“She was the sister of Aisha Siddiqa, wife of the Holy Prophet, and was ten years older than her. … In 73 A.H. … Asma died at the age of one hundred years.” [6]
(Go here to see an image of the full entry in Urdu.)
This would make Asma 28 years of age in 1 A.H., the year of the Hijra, thus making Aisha 18 years old in 1 A.H. So Aisha would be 19 years old at the time of the consummation of her marriage, and 14 or 15 years old at the time of her nikah. It would place her year of birth at four or five years before the Call.
3. The same statement is made by the famous classical commentator of the Holy Quran, Ibn Kathir, in his book Al-bidayya wal-nihaya:
“Asma died in 73 A.H. at the age of one hundred years. She was ten years older than her sister Aisha.” [7]
Apart from these three evidences, which are presented in the Urdu pamphlet referred to above, we also note that the birth of Aisha being a little before the Call is consistent with the opening words of a statement by her which is recorded four times in Bukhari. Those words are as follows:
“Ever since I can remember (or understand things) my parents were following the religion of Islam.” [8]
This is tantamount to saying that she was born sometime before her parents accepted Islam but she can only remember them practising Islam. No doubt she and her parents knew well whether she was born before or after they accepted Islam, as their acceptance of Islam was such a landmark event in their life which took place just after the Holy Prophet received his mission from God. If she had been born after they accepted Islam it would make no sense for her to say that she always remembered them as following Islam. Only if she was born before they accepted Islam, would it make sense for her to say that she can only remember them being Muslims, as she was too young to remember things before their conversion. This is consistent with her being born before the Call, and being perhaps four or five years old at the time of the Call, which was also almost the time when her parents accepted Islam.
Two further evidences cited by Maulana Muhammad Ali
In the footnotes of his Urdu translation and commentary of Sahih Bukhari, entitled Fadl-ul-Bari, Maulana Muhammad Ali had pointed out reports of two events which show that Aisha could not have been born later than the year of the Call. These are as follows.
1. The above mentioned statement by Aisha in Bukhari, about her earliest memory of her parents being that they were followers of Islam, begins with the following words in its version in Bukhari’s Kitab-ul-Kafalat. We quote this from the English translation of Bukhari by M. Muhsin Khan:
“Since I reached the age when I could remember things, I have seen my parents worshipping according to the right faith of Islam. Not a single day passed but Allah’s Apostle visited us both in the morning and in the evening. When the Muslims were persecuted, Abu Bakr set out for Ethiopia as an emigrant.” [9]
Commenting on this report, Maulana Muhammad Ali writes:
“This report sheds some light on the question of the age of Aisha. … The mention of the persecution of Muslims along with the emigration to Ethiopia clearly shows that this refers to the fifth or the sixth year of the Call. … At that time Aisha was of an age to discern things, and so her birth could not have been later than the first year of the Call.” [10]
Again, this would make her more than fourteen at the time of the consummation of her marriage.
2. There is a report in Sahih Bukhari as follows:
“On the day (of the battle) of Uhud when (some) people retreated and left the Prophet, I saw Aisha daughter of Abu Bakr and Umm Sulaim, with their robes tucked up so that the bangles around their ankles were visible hurrying with their water skins (in another narration it is said, ‘carrying the water skins on their backs’). Then they would pour the water in the mouths of the people, and return to fill the water skins again and came back again to pour water in the mouths of the people.” [11]
Maulana Muhammad Ali writes in a footnote under this report:
“It should also be noted that Aisha joined the Holy Prophet’s household only one year before the battle of Uhud. According to the common view she would be only ten years of age at this time, which is certainly not a suitable age for the work she did on this occasion. This also shows that she was not so young at this time.” [12]
If, as shown in the previous section above, Aisha was nineteen at the time of the consummation of her marriage, then she would be twenty years old at the time of the battle of Uhud. It may be added that on the earlier occasion of the battle of Badr when some Muslim youths tried, out of eagerness, to go along with the Muslim army to the field of battle, the Holy Prophet Muhammad sent them back on account of their young age (allowing only one such youngster, Umair ibn Abi Waqqas, to accompany his older brother the famous Companion Sa‘d ibn Abi Waqqas). It seems, therefore, highly unlikely that if Aisha was ten years old the Holy Prophet would have allowed her to accompany the army to the field of battle.
We conclude from all the evidence cited above that Aisha (may Allah be pleased with her) was nineteen years old when she joined the Holy Prophet as his wife in the year 2 A.H., the nikah or betrothal having taken place five years previously.


There is alot more criticism on this by Muslims them sleves.

http://www.icgt.org/SpecialArticles/Aiysha.htm
http://www.geocities.com/WestHollywood/ ... ayesha.htm
http://www.beyond-the-illusion.com/file ... aisha.html

I hope you take that time to read those sites and I hope you know how to add and subtract to. Its pure mathmatics. So again I of course am a Muslim that ONLY accepts that which is Authenticated by the Quran regardless if it is Sahih or by Ishaq or Tabari. I have noticed you keep quoting hadeeth but you never quote the foundation of our Religion ie The Quran. My faith and trust is not in Hadeeth, nor should it be for any muslim, unless the Quran authenticates it.

Have you ever read all of Tabari, Ishaq, Bukhari, Muslim, etc ? I would answer this as no, cause obviously you are unaware of this cause all you are doing is studying from a christian view of islam. All of them contradict each other and themselves in some way or manner.

The Difference between SUNNAH and HADEETH .

I woudl like to point out the difference of Hadeeth and Sunnah. The word Sunnah means "practice" the word hadeeth means "narration".
The "Sunnah" is the practice of Muhammad of how he fulfilled Quranic commands. For example: Allah says in the Quran before we make Salah we must wash our hands to the elbows , and wash our face(heads) and feet.(5:6) We follow the Prophets SUNNAH or PRACTICE of how he did this.
The Sunnah is contained within Hadeeth "Narration" of what people heard and saw the prophet do "HEAR SAY" that was traditionally transmitted and then collected for publication after a period of time.

we cannot pick what parts of a religion we believe when the authorities use those same laws we in the liberal west chose to ignore to inflict injustices on our fellow man in the name of "shariah law".


You got it all wrong. If a scholar or some person of authority contradicts Quran and we are aware of it the people are responsible to make the corrections. Also, obviously you have been unable to distinguish Arab, Paki etc cultures that have nationalized islam in eatern countries. Isalamic law and teaching are now dictated and interpreted in their cultural aspects. If you have not studyed Quran for your self and the Sunnah then you would be blind to this.
When I studied islam directly from the Quran and the Sunnah before and up to the time of embracing it, I saw and witnessed the Islam taught in the Quran and Sunnah is not the islam practiced by most muslims cause of cutlural inlfuences and tribalistic ideologies that now have tainted the true concept of the religion
Download Quran and Hadeeth for Free here http://www.islamasoft.co.uk/downloads.html Learn about Islam from a Non dictatorial view

Liberate
Preacher
Preacher
Posts: 200
Joined: Sat Apr 10, 2004 04:41 pm

Postby Liberate » Sat Jun 19, 2004 05:11 am

Several questions pop up on reading this statement alone, anybody reading this will be wondering why you are so quick to condemn Jesus (as an imposter and liar) and go back to Judaism if someone can prove to you that embryology as described in the koran is inaccurate (and it is), and in the next breath you call Jesus ["Our beloved Messiah" ]


You been having some bad reading comprehension from since we started. What part didnt you get " and reject Jesus as an imposter and a lier as being a former Jew "........ "as former Jew"..... You may have forgotten Jews do not believe in Jesus. In Judaism Jesus is considered a Lier, and Imposter. It was not until I came to islam that i believed in him as the promissed Messiah to the Jews.


Pay particular attention to the rest of my comment (underlined), I find it fascinating you accepted Jesus as the Messiah once you came to islam, personally I think those statements are oxymorons.

Jesus is Honored in Islam and His example is followed per the Teaching of the Quran how he respected and guarded his mother.


All counterfeits will have an ounce of truth, or else the con will never work, feigning respect for Jesus all the while talking about a Mahdi that will come and break the cross is an insult to what Jesus came to do, tell me what is the purpose of Jesus's coming if at the end of it another fellow was going to come, wouldn't it have been better if Jesus didn't bother to come at all, and what on earth was Jesus's message in this phantom injil that has been lost when allah says none of his revelations does he cause to be forgotten?

One thing I have noticed abotu Christians as your self that are striving their hardest against islam looking for every avenue there is to get gain upon your opossers you have a bad habbit of editing things : You should post the lexicon correctly :


My apologies for not pasting the letters of the submeanings!, my highlighting simply didn't catch it. Your comment about me striving against islam is a non issue, for me islam contradicts all the God of the old and new testament represents, a God who forgets and abrogates things within a 23 yr span can't be the same God, a God who sanctions rape for captured captives can't be the same God, a god who sends epileptic fits while his protege of a prophet is having sex with his underage wife can't be the same God, a god who sanctions hatred for an ethnic group, the same ethnic group in previous revelations He says He would never forsake, can't be the same God, a god who has no prophecies or miracles whatsoever except poetry (jinn inspired) cannot be the same God, you make it sound like all my questions have been answered to my satisfaction, the truth is this conversation is not about about striving against islam, there is no need for that, the faults in islam are exposed for all to see translation or otherwise, islam is 90% poetic confetti with good works as soundbites you don't need religion for that, especially when the God in the previous revelations calls our good works "filthy rags", I find it fascinating anyone is prepared to do their utmost to defend this so called religion, do you honestly believe as you wash your elbows ankles and beard you are washing your sins away? those are symptoms of a very superstitious mind coupled with obsessive compulsive disorders, this is not from God, I was hoping to show you islam is derived from paganism and so is it's god.

And you can go back to all my posts where I used Jesus's Mother's name as "Maryam" which is the Quranic Usage of the name. "Miriam in arabic" there is no such spelling in Arabic. Those are english trasliterated variances of the mother of Jesus. In the Quran it is spelled, meem, raa, yaa, meem,{ mrym } read "Maryam". Do you see that name to have an "h" to the end of it like in your "Maryah" wishfull thinking ? The Quranic "Maryam" is the same as "Miryam"


It seems my point was lost on you, Mohammed made a mistake, he confused Mary the mother of Jesus with Miriam Aaron's sister, regardless of wether the language was amended to make Maryam mean both Miriam and Mary ( which I find a bit strange since this language is so ambiguous you can get anything you want why should two different names mean the same).

The Biblical record says that Amran was Moses', Aaron's, and Miriam's
father (Numbers 26:59). The Quran also gives this name to Mary's father. In Sura 66:12, Mary is identified as the daughter of Imran, but the new testament puts Eli as the father of Mary. So here is a double connection. "Mary" is Aaron's sister, and the daughter of Imran.
Maybe the standard islamic response kicks in at this stage bible is corrupt and Mary's real father was Imran, who had the same name as Moses's and Aaron's father, to a rational mind Mohammed heard the name of Mary and Moses's sister and thought they were one and the same, what do you think?

Have a look at the sequence of names in this verse

Surah 4:163:

"We have revealed our will to you as we have revealed it to Noah and to the prophets who came after him; as we revealed it to Abraham, Ishmael, Isaac, Jacob, and the tribes, to Jesus, Job, Jonah, Aaron, Solomon, and to David to whom we gave the Psalms."


If you have ever been to sunday school or read the old testament you would know who ever wrote that is confused.

Personally I believe that hadith is one of many forgeries.


Nowhere in the Torah new testament, Talmud, Jewish or christian apocryphal wiritngs is anyone mentioned as a brother or sister of an ancestor


Go to any Jewish website or to an Orthadox Jew, I would recommend a Rabi instead, and email or ask them or him what does "Sister of Aaron" and "Brother of Levi" in Jewish Idiom meain.


I think it is time I call your bluff on this, if it is in there would you care to show us where it is, other christians have already done an extensive search in the quran, hadiths, jewish and christian scriptures and apocrypha no such idiom of naming someone as a sibling of an ancestor has been found except they were real contemporarty siblings the idiom has always been daughter of the ancestor or son of the ancestor, if it is in there don't beat around the bush show us.

I would tell a jew that Jesus is the Messiah first, and that He didn't come to destroy the roman armies as was expected but came to deal with the SIN of the world.


Why beat around the bush. When you go to a muslim you preach JESUS IS THE ONLY GOD THE SON OF GOD ! So why wont you go to a Jew with same preaching ?


I believe in little steps. You are quick to tell us the koran is in suras (steps) but refuse to accept the steps in christianity, so you would accept if the koran just jumped to the crux of it's message and said "oh servant of allah there is a jew behind me come and kill him"

I think it is very relevant, el is the sky god, baal is his son the god of nature, hubal is a god of nature his symbol is the moon his sister is ashtoreth the god of harvests rains and thunderstorms, who both accepted the sacrifice of little children, it is all very relevant.


There you go stuck on Hubal again. Hmm lets see so I guess all the Arab Christians are going to Hell cause they use the Name Alllaah that you assume was an Idol called Hubal.

THE ARABIC BIBLE SAYS IN JOHN 3:16
16: Alllaah so loved the word that he gave His only begotten Son......
http://www.arabicbible.com/bible/nt/joh/3.htm

The Arabic speaking Christians use this name every day when they go to Church. So. According to you they are praying to Hubal and not GOD so are they going to Hell ?


I believe God is just and will look at the heart, obviously the arabic christians are not focusing their prayers to the east or that abomination of a shrine. You might as well say everybody who doesn't wash their elbows and ankles and bow down to the east 5 times a day and force their wives to wear a face blanket is going to hell.

As a matter of fact my sefl and Many other muslims Reject a SAHIH hadeeth that says Muhammad (s.a.w.) married Aisha at 6 years old and consumated the marriage at 9. Many of us reject this hadeeth cause it contradicts the Quran and other Hadeeth which you dont know about.


Oh I see you believe in abrogation but somehow abrogation doesn't apply when it comes to the prophet's sexual depravity didn't allah reveal it in steps too?, so all those hadiths narrated Aisha: "The prophet..consumated the marriage when I was 9 years old" is a forgery? if it is a forgery what else is a forgery?
This is the same man that decapitated a jewish woman's husband killed her father, uncle several relatives and raped her the same day, this is the same man that took another jewish woman for his wife while his mujaheddins took her sisters to be raped, it is unbelievable the levels muslims will go to defend the indefensible.

Hmm lets see, which is it ? Did muhammad learn it from one of Glens contemporaries or as you said before


"With Mohammed's alledge 9 wives and umpteen concubines he would have seen lots of miscarriages, the only time a foetus looks like congealed blood!


So what is it ? Did he learn from his wives miscarriages or did he learn it from one of Galen's contemporaries ?


Why can't it be both, Mohammed in his desperation to get a son and prove the superstitious pagans wrong that he was a real man would have seen various stages of miscarriages topple that with a galenic doctor down the road you have your thing that sojourns..congealed blood and flesh and bones.

The Quran I believe in that is the WORD OF ALLLAAH is in Arabic. You need to go debate with a muslim who doesnt speak Arabic. Your Criticism is on a translation, not the Quran, I criticize the translation to. Those men who translated into english their mother tongue was not English. English was a third language for them. Please go read the hisotry of those translators. If you want to defeat islam go learn arabic then come debate. I will even pay for your classes to learn arabic


Save your money for the close to 1 billion muslims who don't understand what they are chanting 5 times a day. If the last message for all mankind for all eternity can only be understood in an ambiguous original language open to interpretation then allah has failed.


Remember our friend Abd Allah ibn Salam the jew who asked Mohammed three things to confirm that he was a prophet? This is what he had to say according to Ishaq and Tabari:


Lets resurrect this question from before. Did the Arabic speaking Jews use the name Allah ? You have acknowledged that Abd Allah ibn Salam was a Jew


If you read the original post you would realise I was being sarcastic by calling him "our friend" there is a theme which I find through those type of hadiths logical fallacies that make it suspect the narrated scenarios took place or indeed if the person/s existed.

I hope you take that time to read those sites and I hope you know how to add and subtract to. Its pure mathmatics.


I have already met those arguments before, I am curious are you a believer of www.submission.org? Why don't you look at it like this
a) Narrated Aisha "..I was 9 years old..." is true
b) The hadith is a lie she was not 9 yrs old but much older as the dates from the battle of badr and Uhud seem to indicate. (at the ripe mature age of 14)
c) Those contradicting dates are also fabrications.

Personally I don't think you have much ground to stand on, first you are dismissing the hadiths that say she was 9 years old, some of it narrated by Aisha herself, second if she was 14 years old at the battle of Uhud she must have been with the prophet beforehand we can speculate how far back she was with him, third wasn't Aisha suppose to have been married at a young age so she can tell us thousands of ahadith? that puts all those hadiths in jeopardy as forgeries do you want to go along that path? Fourth before you convince us convince your imams, they are the ones sanctioning marriage of preteen girls.

Tabari IX:128 When the Prophet married Aisha, she was very young and not yet ready for consummation.

H2O
Preacher
Preacher
Posts: 782
Joined: Thu Jun 03, 2004 09:00 pm
Location: Boca Raton, Florida

Postby H2O » Sun Jun 20, 2004 03:18 am

Several questions pop up on reading this statement alone, anybody reading this will be wondering why you are so quick to condemn Jesus (as an imposter and liar) and go back to Judaism if someone can prove to you that embryology as described in the koran is inaccurate (and it is), and in the next breath you call Jesus ["Our beloved Messiah" ] .......
Pay particular attention to the rest of my comment (underlined), I find it fascinating you accepted Jesus as the Messiah once you came to islam, personally I think those statements are oxymorons.


This is is facinating. This was based on the presentation of the Arabic Text of The Quran that was exaustfully explained by us, not by other translators inaccurate works that you kept retreating to who were not fully grounded in the english language.

To show flaw in the translators works that you and your contemporaries took advantage of I produced legitimate grounds of why their translations are rejected as an authoritive and credible Tafsir (explanation):

1) We provided the root words in which each particular word is derived from and their original meaning associated with its root,
2) We also provided transliterations of the text with the closest literal meaning in (english) to show other translators interpolations,
3) the general meaning given to the arabic words in which their roots do not support are modern medical terminologies of the which was not the original meaning the arabic words as understood in the time of Muhammad,
4) and their translations are their own interpretation of the Arabic text which was not based on the literacy of the Arabic words and their root meanings.

You were to disprove and show inaccuracy in our Tafsir. This is where the challenge was at. However, your critic sources that you posted was not based on our Tafsir, but based on another translators work that was inaccurate and poor. I am an arabic speaker you cannot debate with with me showing that the Arabic Quran is inaccurate in its discription of human embryology by relying on an english translation. You would have to come from the Arabic text its self with Tafsir in english to show how it is inaccurate, or use the Tafsir we gave you and have an embryologist to find it inaccurate.

Your contemporary critics have relied on translations of Quran rather than going to the Arabic text it self, the same with hadeeth you posted about the accumulation of 40 days inside of our mothers. I used the same grounds of 1-4 above was applied to that hadeeth as well. Their finding of inaccuracies are on translations and not the original source.

All counterfeits will have an ounce of truth, or else the con will never work, feigning respect for Jesus all the while talking about a Mahdi that will come and break the cross is an insult to what Jesus came to do, tell me what is the purpose of Jesus's coming if at the end of it another fellow was going to come, wouldn't it have been better if Jesus didn't bother to come at all, and what on earth was Jesus's message in this phantom injil that has been lost when allah says none of his revelations does he cause to be forgotten?


Obviously you know nothing of islam. Not all muslims BELIEVE in a second coming of Jesus. As a matter of fact the Quran REJECTS such a second coming. If the Hadith that mentions the second coming of Jesus is taken literally then it would contradict the Quran as the Quran makes it very clear he will not be seen again until the Day of Judgement.

And they (the enemies of Jesus) plotted (to kill him) and Allah to plotted, and Allah is the best of plotters. When Allah said : "O Jesus ! Verily I am causing you to decease (mutawafee) while raising you to my self and purifying you from those who are disbelievers".....(Quran 3:54-55)

and in their (the Jews) disbelief they spoke against Maryam grave false charges, and they said: " Verily we have killed The Messiah Jesus Son of Maryam the Messenger of Allah !" And they (the enemies of Jesus) killed him not nor crucified him but however it appeared to them so. And verily those who differed there in (that he was not crucified nor killed) were indeed in doubt about it. They had no knowledge about it except that they followed conjecture, and for surety they killed him not, rather Allah raised him up to himself (ref. 3:54-55) and Allah is almighty all wise (Quran 4:157-157)

[On the Day of Judgement Jesus will say] I did not say to them (the Jews and my followers) but what you commanded me to say that "Worship Allah (In Aramaic Aalah) my Lord and your Lord" and I was a witness over them (the Jews) when I dwelt among them whereas you caused me to decease (ref. 3:54-55) you were the watcher over them and you are a witness over everything (5:116-118)


When Jesus was raised up to Allah in the Heaven he became DECEASED (mutawafan). There is no second return in which he will only appear for the second time on the Day of Judgment after the physical resurrection of all mankind.

Jesus was a Prophetic Messenger of Allah in Islam, for him to come again after Muhammad would mean there would be another prophet to come after Muhammad which contradicts Quran:

Muhammad is not the father of any of you men, but a Messenger of Allah, and the seal of the prophets and Allah is omniscient with everything (Quran 33:40)


The Hadith you follow reported by Tabari , Ishaq, Bukhari, and Muslim, if taken literally contradicts Quran. However you should have paid more attention to the Hadith then you would see it is symbolical.

BukhariVolumn 004, Book 055, Hadith Number 657.
-----------------------------------------
Narated By Abu Huraira : Allah's Apostle said, "By Him in Whose Hands my soul is, surely (Jesus,) the son of Mary will soon descend amongst you and will judge mankind justly (as a Just Ruler); he will break the Cross and kill the pigs and there will be no Jizya (i.e. taxation taken from non Muslims). Money will be in abundance so that nobody will accept it, and a single prostration to Allah (in prayer) will be better than the whole world and whatever is in it." Abu Huraira added "If you wish, you can recite (this verse of the Holy Book): 'And there is none Of the people of the Scriptures (Jews and Christians) But must believe in him (Jesus) before his (the people of the book's) death. And on the Day of Judgment He will be a witness Against them." (4.159) (See Fateh Al Bari, Page 302 Vol 7)


"The Cross" What cross is this that he is going to "break" ? There are millions of crosses in Christianity. "The Cross" is a symbol and representation of "The Crucifixion of Christ". The breaking the cross is the annihilation of the crucifixion belief.

" The Pigs" and in some hadith it is singular as "The Pig". What pigs is he going to kill ? There are millions of pigs all over the word. In other Hadiths Jesus is to comback to kill an imposter Messiah called "Al-Masiha Dajjal" and those who follow him.

"There will be no Jizya" this means if taken literally he would abrogate the Quranic law on Jizya [SubhaanaAllah] as a prophet and would contradict Quran. Rather at this time there will be no Jew or Christian or none muslim at this time whom Jizya can be applied to in which the second coming of Jesus is a symbolical return not literal when islam will be the dominant relgion in the world (may this post last until that time)

and what on earth was Jesus's message in this phantom injil that has been lost when allah says none of his revelations does he cause to be forgotten?


Allah never said such a thing in the Quran to what you are implying :

We do not abrogate any of our revelations or cause it to be forgotten unless We provide something better than it or its like. Do you not know that Allah is omnipotent over everything ? (2:106)

If the revelation is fogotten it is replaced with something better than it or something simular to it.

...the faults in islam are exposed for all to see translation or otherwise,..


Translations do not give 100% accuracy of the language it is being translated from. It must be aided by Tafsir or Explanation of the text to fully have an understand of the text it self. You obviously dont understand this cause you are not bi or tri lingual. It is fact you cannot translate from one language into anther language word for word in which you lose meaning, and in some case some words cannot be translated but have to be expressed. This is a general problem with not only the Quran or Hadiths but also with the Bible and Jewish literature and any religious literature, thats why they keep coming out with english REVISED versions.
English out of all the Langauges is completely Alien to the Semetic language which has more vague content in it character than in any other language in the world thus being a bastard language.

It seems my point was lost on you, Mohammed made a mistake, he confused Mary the mother of Jesus with Miriam Aaron's sister, regardless of wether the language was amended to make Maryam mean both Miriam and Mary ( which I find a bit strange since this language is so ambiguous you can get anything you want why should two different names mean the same).

The Biblical record says that Amran was Moses', Aaron's, and Miriam's
father (Numbers 26:59). The Quran also gives this name to Mary's father. In Sura 66:12, Mary is identified as the daughter of Imran, but the new testament puts Eli as the father of Mary. So here is a double connection. "Mary" is Aaron's sister, and the daughter of Imran.


There you go again interjecting your beliefs, this again is not about the teachings of Christianity is about Islam. You keep interjecting your Christian belief. As I have said your study of islam is not scientific but passive bias based on a Christian perspective.

You have a brain but cant use it. Maybe because it is too focused on one thing. In the Quran Maryam is "the daughter of Imran" in which she is also called "Sister of Aaron" as you mentioned it.
How many Jesus' are there in the Bible, How many Jews called them selves Moses, Aaron, Miryam, Levi, David, etc.. You make it sound like after all those years that none of the Levite and Aaronite descendants didnt call themself by the name of their forefathers.
I mean you got a whole possie of Marys running around in the new testament. So dont you think the Levites also named them selves after their forfathers ?

Also you forgot a valuable part of the Quran, Maryam was the only child and daughter of Imran and his wife. After her parents died she was put into the custody of Zakariyya (Zechariah) according to Jewish custom.

[3:35] Behold! Imran's wife said: "O my Lord! I do dedicate unto Thee what is in my womb for Thy special service: so accept this of me: for Thou hearest and knowest all things."

[3:36] When she was delivered, she said: "O my Lord! behold! I am delivered of a female child!" - and Allah knew best what she brought forth - "and no wise is the male like the female. I have named her Maryam, and I commend her and her offspring to Thy protection from the Evil One, the Rejected."

[3:37] Right graciously did her Lord accept her: He made her grow in purity and beauty; to the care of Zakariya was she assigned. Every time that he entered (her) chamber to see her, he found her supplied with sustenance. He said: "O Maryam! Whence (comes) this to you?" She said: "From Allah: for Allah provides sustenance to whom He pleases, without measure".....................................

[3:44] "This is part of the tidings of the things unseen, which We reveal unto thee (O Muhammad) by inspiration: thou wast not with them when they cast lots with arrows, as to which of them should be charged with the care of Maryam: nor wast thou with them when they disputed (the point).


Maryam was an Aaronite of the levite tribe

Luke 1
5In the time of Herod king of Judea there was a priest named Zechariah, who belonged to the priestly division of Abijah; his wife Elizabeth was also a descendant of Aaron. 6Both of them were upright in the sight of God, observing all the Lord's commandments and regulations blamelessly..............
35 And the angel answered and said unto her[Maryam], The Holy Ghost shall come upon thee, and the power of the Highest shall overshadow thee: therefore also that holy thing which shall be born of thee shall be called the Son of God.
36 And, behold, thy cousin Elisabeth, she hath also conceived a son in her old age: and this is the sixth month with her, who was called barren.
37 For with God nothing shall be impossible.

Maryam was the cousin of Elizabeth who was an Aaronite in which Maryam's uncle or aunt was her father or mother. Thus Maryam's Father or Mother was the sister or brother of Elizabeths mother or father.

Heli (Eli) was not the father of Maryam but was the father of Joseph according to the bible

The Genealogy of Jesus I

Mathew 1:1A record of the genealogy of Jesus Christ the son of David, the son of Abraham:
2Abraham was the father of Isaac,
Isaac the father of Jacob,
Jacob the father of Judah and his brothers,
3Judah the father of Perez and Zerah, whose mother was Tamar,
Perez the father of Hezron,
Hezron the father of Ram,
4Ram the father of Amminadab,
Amminadab the father of Nahshon,
Nahshon the father of Salmon,
5Salmon the father of Boaz, whose mother was Rahab,
Boaz the father of Obed, whose mother was Ruth,
Obed the father of Jesse,
6and Jesse the father of King David.
David was the father of Solomon, whose mother had been Uriah's wife,
7Solomon the father of Rehoboam,
Rehoboam the father of Abijah,
Abijah the father of Asa,
8Asa the father of Jehoshaphat,
Jehoshaphat the father of Jehoram,
Jehoram the father of Uzziah,
9Uzziah the father of Jotham,
Jotham the father of Ahaz,
Ahaz the father of Hezekiah,
10Hezekiah the father of Manasseh,
Manasseh the father of Amon,
Amon the father of Josiah,
11and Josiah the father of Jeconiah[1] and his brothers at the time of the exile to Babylon.
12After the exile to Babylon:
Jeconiah was the father of Shealtiel,
Shealtiel the father of Zerubbabel,
13Zerubbabel the father of Abiud,
Abiud the father of Eliakim,
Eliakim the father of Azor,
14Azor the father of Zadok,
Zadok the father of Akim,
Akim the father of Eliud,
15Eliud the father of Eleazar,
Eleazar the father of Matthan,
Matthan the father of Jacob,
16and Jacob the father of Joseph, the husband of Mary, of whom was born Jesus, who is called Christ.
http://www.biblegateway.com/cgi-bin/bib ... ersion=NIV

The Genealogy of Jesus II

Luke 3:23Now Jesus himself was about thirty years old when he began his ministry. He was the son, so it was thought, of Joseph,
24the sonof Heli, the son of Matthat,
the son of Levi, the son of Melki,
the son of Jannai, the son of Joseph,
25the son of Mattathias, the son of Amos,
the son of Nahum, the son of Esli,
26the son of Naggai, the son of Maath,
the son of Mattathias, the son of Semein,
the son of Josech, the son of Joda,
27the son of Joanan, the son of Rhesa,
the son of Zerubbabel, the son of Shealtiel,
28the son of Neri, the son of Melki,
the son of Addi, the son of Cosam,
the son of Elmadam, the son of Er,
29the son of Joshua, the son of Eliezer,
the son of Jorim, the son of Matthat,
30the son of Levi, the son of Simeon,
the son of Judah, the son of Joseph,
the son of Jonam, the son of Eliakim,
31the son of Melea, the son of Menna,
the son of Mattatha, the son of Nathan,
32the son of David, the son of Jesse,
the son of Obed, the son of Boaz,
the son of Salmon,[4] the son of Nahshon,
33the son of Amminadab, the son of Ram,[5]
the son of Hezron, the son of Perez,
34the son of Judah, the son of Jacob,
the son of Isaac, the son of Abraham,
the son of Terah, the son of Nahor,
35the son of Serug, the son of Reu,
the son of Peleg, the son of Eber,
36the son of Shelah, the son of Cainan,
the son of Arphaxad, the son of Shem,
the son of Noah, the son of Lamech,
37the son of Methuselah, the son of Enoch,
the son of Jared, the son of Mahalalel,
38the son of Kenan, the son of Enosh,
the son of Seth, the son of Adam,
the son of God.
http://www.biblegateway.com/cgi-bin/bib ... howxref=on


Look at that genealogy and tell me how many times you see the name Levi, Judah etc..being used for the descendants of that Tribe.
The two genealogies are of Joseph not Mary. Heli (Eli) is not the father of Mary.

In the Quran Maryam was addressed as " Sister of Aaron" this is Jewish idiom. The arabic word "ukhti" = "sister" in english have the same multiple meaning.

Merriam-Webster Online Dictionary
Main Entry: sis·ter
Pronunciation: 'sis-t&r
Function: noun
Etymology: Middle English suster, sister, partly from Old English sweostor and partly of Scandinavian origin; akin to Old Norse systir sister; akin to Latin soror sister, Sanskrit svasr
1 : a female who has one or both parents in common with another

2 often capitalized a : a member of a women's religious order (as of nuns or deaconesses); especially : one of a Roman Catholic congregation under simple vows b : a woman or girl who is a member of a Christian church .


Maryam was an Aaronite, A sister of the Aaronhood. "Sister of Aaron" was her respectable title whom belonged to the sisterhood of the Aaronites

I have already met those arguments before, I am curious are you a believer of www.submission.org? Why don't you look at it like this
a) Narrated Aisha "..I was 9 years old..." is true
b) The hadith is a lie she was not 9 yrs old but much older as the dates from the battle of badr and Uhud seem to indicate. (at the ripe mature age of 14)
c) Those contradicting dates are also fabrications.

Personally I don't think you have much ground to stand on, first you are dismissing the hadiths that say she was 9 years old, some of it narrated by Aisha herself, second if she was 14 years old at the battle of Uhud she must have been with the prophet beforehand we can speculate how far back she was with him, third wasn't Aisha suppose to have been married at a young age so she can tell us thousands of ahadith? that puts all those hadiths in jeopardy as forgeries do you want to go along that path? Fourth before you convince us convince your imams, they are the ones sanctioning marriage of preteen girls.

Tabari IX:128 When the Prophet married Aisha, she was very young and not yet ready for consummation.


That hadith like many others contradict each others and the Quran. I told you to go do the math. The hadith CONTRADICTS historical time lines an events. I gave you the facts and evidence that are clean cut and clear on my former post. 2+2 does not equal 6, maybe in Christianity with blind faith, but not in Islam

Personally I believe that hadith is one of many forgeries.


Imagine that. We do to, however we distinguish what is false and true with the Quran. And your statement for it self manifests your motives.
Download Quran and Hadeeth for Free here http://www.islamasoft.co.uk/downloads.html Learn about Islam from a Non dictatorial view

H2O
Preacher
Preacher
Posts: 782
Joined: Thu Jun 03, 2004 09:00 pm
Location: Boca Raton, Florida

Postby H2O » Sun Jun 20, 2004 07:37 pm

that puts all those hadiths [about Aisha] in jeopardy as forgeries do you want to go along that path?


Exactly, they contradict Quran. The Quran says to marry "nisaa'a" ~ adult women who are pass puberty. We do not believe Muhammad married Aisha until after the age of puberty. As for what other muslims believe in ? Its a matter of blind faith for them.

Fourth before you convince us convince your imams, they are the ones sanctioning marriage of preteen girls.


You obviously were not aware, that this is "madzhab" among muslims. Convince you ? LOL...You see the contradiction and then you say "Personally I believe that hadith is one of many forgeries" So there should be no CONVINCING for you, you already:

1) believe they are forgeries

2) they contradict each other and

3) you still use hadith that you know are false (2+2=6 ?) to win over your opposers

Your intent for using such hadith is malicious. I can understand if you were using such a thing against muslims who believe such a thing to discredit the hadith, but no , instead you are using it to bash a man that you and your contemporaries hold soo much emity towards and the religion it self.

The Imams know about the madzhabs. For many of them it is apart of their culture in their country. You cannot be an Imam without being acquinted with the madzhabs. As for my self I have debated with muslims and showed them the FACTS and what they do is incline to blind faith just like a christian would do.

Many muslims especially those are born muslim are more indoctrinated with hadith than with the Quran. If you sincerly intent is to learn more about islam then you got a long way to go, but if not, you will continue the course you have laid.

Another prime example is where in the Quran does is tell us to stone adulterers and fornicators ? Yes you will find it in hadith but the question is did the Quran abrogate that pre-islamic practice which is also part of the teaching of Judaism ? The answer is yes.

"The woman and the man guilty of adultery or fornication [zina] flog each of them with a hundred stripes: let not compassion move you in their case, in a matter prescribed by Allah, if ye believe in Allah and the Last Day: and let a party of the Believers witness their punishment. (Quran 24:2)"


We have this command in the Quran but still some muslim countries still practice stoning when it is not supported in the Quran but can only be found in hadith that contradicts Quran.

O ye who believe! eat not up your property among yourselves in vanities: but let there be amongst you traffic and trade by mutual good-will: do not kill yourselves: for verily Allah hath been to you Most Merciful! (Quran 4:29)


The Quran prohibits one from killing him or her self or suicide but we still have some muslims out there doing the contrary.
Dont worry we have been preaching this to our brothers and sisters but we are also to tell others that that practice has nothing to do with islamic teaching.
Download Quran and Hadeeth for Free here http://www.islamasoft.co.uk/downloads.html Learn about Islam from a Non dictatorial view

Liberate
Preacher
Preacher
Posts: 200
Joined: Sat Apr 10, 2004 04:41 pm

Postby Liberate » Tue Jun 22, 2004 06:10 pm

Several questions pop up on reading this statement alone, anybody reading this will be wondering why you are so quick to condemn Jesus (as an imposter and liar) and go back to Judaism if someone can prove to you that embryology as described in the koran is inaccurate (and it is), and in the next breath you call Jesus ["Our beloved Messiah" ] .......
Pay particular attention to the rest of my comment (underlined), I find it fascinating you accepted Jesus as the Messiah once you came to islam, personally I think those statements are oxymorons.


This is is facinating. This was based on the presentation of the Arabic Text of The Quran that was exaustfully explained by us, not by other translators inaccurate works that you kept retreating to who were not fully grounded in the english language.


Us? exactly how many people am I talking to?
Yusuf Ali was educated in the uk, he was sufficiently grounded in the language to know what he was doing, I agree his work was inaccurate but not in the way you imply, he and other english translators knew exactly the people they were translating to, they bent over backwards to make the koran mild, so maakiren instead of cheater vis-a-vis allah is the best of cheaters, allah is now the best of plotters, instead of beat your wives, it is beat(lightly) and many more like it without their interpolations () the koran does not make any sense to the conscience or to a rational mind.

To show flaw in the translators works that you and your contemporaries took advantage of I produced legitimate grounds of why their translations are rejected as an authoritive and credible Tafsir (explanation):


Read above
Rejected by whom?
Exactly what splinter group do you represent?


You were to disprove and show inaccuracy in our Tafsir. This is where the challenge was at. However, your critic sources that you posted was not based on our Tafsir, but based on another translators work that was inaccurate and poor.


Have a look at the original post, I used your tafsir, I found it amusing how you came to such a detailed description of embryology given ..thing that sojourns, clinging thing, flesh on bones.

I am an arabic speaker you cannot debate with with me showing that the Arabic Quran is inaccurate in its discription of human embryology by relying on an english translation. You would have to come from the Arabic text its self with Tafsir in english to show how it is inaccurate, or use the Tafsir we gave you and have an embryologist to find it inaccurate.


If allah cannot pass on his message except via a language 90% of his converts do not speak or do not comprehend, and translations lose their meanings then the last message for all mankind for all eternity is a failure.



All counterfeits will have an ounce of truth, or else the con will never work, feigning respect for Jesus all the while talking about a Mahdi that will come and break the cross is an insult to what Jesus came to do, tell me what is the purpose of Jesus's coming if at the end of it another fellow was going to come, wouldn't it have been better if Jesus didn't bother to come at all, and what on earth was Jesus's message in this phantom injil that has been lost when allah says none of his revelations does he cause to be forgotten?


Obviously you know nothing of islam. Not all muslims BELIEVE in a second coming of Jesus. As a matter of fact the Quran REJECTS such a second coming. If the Hadith that mentions the second coming of Jesus is taken literally then it would contradict the Quran as the Quran makes it very clear he will not be seen again until the Day of Judgement.


Again which splinter group in islam do you represent?


And they (the enemies of Jesus) plotted (to kill him) and Allah to plotted, and Allah is the best of plotters. When Allah said : "O Jesus ! Verily I am causing you to decease (mutawafee) while raising you to my self and purifying you from those who are disbelievers".....(Quran 3:54-55)


Several questions pop up why did the jews want to kill Jesus, what was His crime? why did allah want to raise Jesus up dead? what for? what purpose surely God would do things for a purpose?

and in their (the Jews) disbelief they spoke against Maryam grave false charges, and they said: " Verily we have killed The Messiah Jesus Son of Maryam the Messenger of Allah !" And they (the enemies of Jesus) killed him not nor crucified him but however it appeared to them so. [Why would allah make it appear so, what possible reason?] And verily those who differed there in (that he was not crucified nor killed) were indeed in doubt about it. They had no knowledge about it except that they followed conjecture, and for surety they killed him not, rather Allah raised him up to himself (ref. 3:54-55) and Allah is almighty all wise (Quran 4:157-157)
[Is this a valid reason for all of the above?]




Jesus was a Prophetic Messenger of Allah in Islam, for him to come again after Muhammad would mean there would be another prophet to come after Muhammad which contradicts Quran:


BINGO

Muhammad is not the father of any of you men, but a Messenger of Allah, and the seal of the prophets and Allah is omniscient with everything (Quran 33:40)


I am curious do you believe the "seal of the prophets" to be a cancerous lump between the shoulder blades?

The Hadith you follow reported by Tabari , Ishaq, Bukhari, and Muslim, if taken literally contradicts Quran. However you should have paid more attention to the Hadith then you would see it is symbolical.

BukhariVolumn 004, Book 055, Hadith Number 657.
-----------------------------------------
Narated By Abu Huraira : Allah's Apostle said, "By Him in Whose Hands my soul is, surely (Jesus,) the son of Mary will soon descend amongst you and will judge mankind justly (as a Just Ruler)[ What part in the above statement is figurative?]; he will break the Cross and kill the pigs and there will be no Jizya ...


" The Pigs" and in some hadith it is singular as "The Pig". What pigs is he going to kill ? There are millions of pigs all over the word. In other Hadiths Jesus is to comback to kill an imposter Messiah called "Al-Masiha Dajjal" and those who follow him.


I see, you are basically saying the followers of the false messiah will be killed, do you realise the followers of the false messiah will be the jews? so you are implying that jews are the pigs being referred to here? as a former jew as you claim I find it truly amazing you would utter such a thing.

and what on earth was Jesus's message in this phantom injil that has been lost when allah says none of his revelations does he cause to be forgotten?


Allah never said such a thing in the Quran to what you are implying :

We do not abrogate any of our revelations or cause it to be forgotten unless We provide something better than it or its like. Do you not know that Allah is omnipotent over everything ? (2:106)

If the revelation is fogotten it is replaced with something better than it or something simular to it.


Do you honestly believe God would utter such a thing, this sounds like what a man would say when he has forgotten the things he was suppose to remember.

...the faults in islam are exposed for all to see translation or otherwise,..


Translations do not give 100% accuracy of the language it is being translated from. It must be aided by Tafsir or Explanation of the text to fully have an understand of the text it self.


Isn't this religion so simple a child can understand it, if the religion can only be understood by elaborate tafsirs which have no prophetic mandate, why should anybody believe them?



It seems my point was lost on you, Mohammed made a mistake, he confused Mary the mother of Jesus with Miriam Aaron's sister, regardless of wether the language was amended to make Maryam mean both Miriam and Mary ( which I find a bit strange since this language is so ambiguous you can get anything you want why should two different names mean the same).

The Biblical record says that Amran was Moses', Aaron's, and Miriam's
father (Numbers 26:59). The Quran also gives this name to Mary's father. In Sura 66:12, Mary is identified as the daughter of Imran, but the new testament puts Eli as the father of Mary. So here is a double connection. "Mary" is Aaron's sister, and the daughter of Imran.


There you go again interjecting your beliefs, this again is not about the teachings of Christianity is about Islam. You keep interjecting your Christian belief. As I have said your study of islam is not scientific but passive bias based on a Christian perspective.


Let me remind you of what we said:

Nowhere in the Torah new testament, Talmud, Jewish or christian apocryphal wiritngs is anyone mentioned as a brother or sister of an ancestor


Go to any Jewish website or to an Orthadox Jew, I would recommend a Rabi instead, and email or ask them or him what does "Sister of Aaron" and "Brother of Levi" in Jewish Idiom meain.


I think it is time I call your bluff on this, if it is in there would you care to show us where it is, other christians have already done an extensive search in the quran, hadiths, jewish and christian scriptures and apocrypha no such idiom of naming someone as a sibling of an ancestor has been found except they were real contemporarty siblings the idiom has always been daughter of the ancestor or son of the ancestor, if it is in there don't beat around the bush show us.


You have a brain but cant use it. Maybe because it is too focused on one thing. In the Quran Maryam is "the daughter of Imran" in which she is also called "Sister of Aaron" as you mentioned it.
How many Jesus' are there in the Bible, How many Jews called them selves Moses, Aaron, Miryam, Levi, David, etc.. You make it sound like after all those years that none of the Levite and Aaronite descendants didnt call themself by the name of their forefathers.
I mean you got a whole possie of Marys running around in the new testament. So dont you think the Levites also named them selves after their forfathers ?


Is this your excuse for an explanation?, the term was "sister of Aaron" yes we can both agree that they named themselves after their ancestors, the question was where in the whole of judaism do they name themselves as a sibling of an ancestor that was not their real life contemporary sibling?

Also you forgot a valuable part of the Quran, Maryam was the only child and daughter of Imran and his wife. After her parents died she was put into the custody of Zakariyya (Zechariah) according to Jewish custom.


I see, according to you Mary was put into the care of Zechariah which makes him her uncle as a guardian and her as his daughter, and since he is a descendant of Aaron this makes her a "sister of aaron" impressive deduction but...your koran states Mary is a literal "sister of harun", when Mohammed was confronted about this lie in the koran he said another lie that..The (people of the old age) used to give names (to their persons) after the names of Apostles and pious persons who had gone before them. The onus is on you to prove that the jews had this idiom, if it is in there spit it out.



Maryam was an Aaronite of the levite tribe


Any christian reading this will seriously start to doubt if you were ever jewish, you remind me of the many muslims I meet who claim to be former christians but are unable to state basic christian tenets.

Where did you get this information from that Mary was a descendant of Aaron?, if Mary was a descendant of Aaron, even your koran would have known better to call her a "DAUGHTER OF AARON"

Mary was a descendant of Judah not Levi, I ask again are you really jewish?. If you are prepared to perform acrobatics in jewish idioms to deduce that Mary was being looked after by Zechariah which makes him her uncle/guardian and her his daughter therefore she is a "sister of Aaron" I find it perplexing you are unable to deduce what the two genealogies you showed represent, unless you were never jewish.


Look at that genealogy and tell me how many times you see the name Levi, Judah etc..being used for the descendants of that Tribe.
The two genealogies are of Joseph not Mary. Heli (Eli) is not the father of Mary.


You are jewish right?
Do you know which tribe the Messiah was suppose to come from?

In the Quran Maryam was addressed as " Sister of Aaron"
this is Jewish idiom
. The arabic word "ukhti" = "sister" in english have the same multiple meaning... Maryam was an Aaronite, A sister of the Aaronhood. "Sister of Aaron" was her respectable title whom belonged to the sisterhood of the Aaronites


Would you care to cite for us where this jewish idiom is found?



I have already met those arguments before, I am curious are you a believer of www.submission.org? Why don't you look at it like this
a) Narrated Aisha "..I was 9 years old..." is true
b) The hadith is a lie she was not 9 yrs old but much older as the dates from the battle of badr and Uhud seem to indicate. (at the ripe mature age of 14)
c) Those contradicting dates are also fabrications.

Personally I don't think you have much ground to stand on, first you are dismissing the hadiths that say she was 9 years old, some of it narrated by Aisha herself, second if she was 14 years old at the battle of Uhud she must have been with the prophet beforehand we can speculate how far back she was with him, third wasn't Aisha suppose to have been married at a young age so she can tell us thousands of ahadith? that puts all those hadiths in jeopardy as forgeries do you want to go along that path? Fourth before you convince us convince your imams, they are the ones sanctioning marriage of preteen girls.

Tabari IX:128 When the Prophet married Aisha, she was very young and not yet ready for consummation.


That hadith like many others contradict each others and the Quran. I told you to go do the math. The hadith CONTRADICTS historical time lines an events.


Have you thought maybe the hadiths also contain fabrications of historical time line of events, a fabrication containing more fabrications...it would explain why they contradict each other.

I gave you the facts and evidence that are clean cut and clear on my former post. 2+2 does not equal 6, maybe in Christianity with blind faith, but not in Islam


Your blind faith is the koran is inerrant, and everything must be discarded if it contradicts the koran or if it sheds light on it that shows it is no more divine than the utterings of a demon possessed man.

Personally I believe that hadith is one of many forgeries.


Imagine that. We do to, however we distinguish what is false and true with the Quran. And your statement for it self manifests your motives.


Since those hadiths are all we have on the formation of islam, we can only apply logic on those hadiths, far from contradicting the koran like you would have us all believe they shed light on it. I also believe the koran is a forgery on human and demonic proportions.

Exactly, they contradict Quran. The Quran says to marry "nisaa'a" ~ adult women who are pass puberty. We do not believe Muhammad married Aisha until after the age of puberty. As for what other muslims believe in ? Its a matter of blind faith for them.


Would you care to point us to where it says alnissa means adult women who have passed puberty?

"The woman and the man guilty of adultery or fornication [zina] flog each of them with a hundred stripes: let not compassion move you in their case, in a matter prescribed by Allah, if ye believe in Allah and the Last Day: and let a party of the Believers witness their punishment. (Quran 24:2)"


We have this command in the Quran but still some muslim countries still practice stoning when it is not supported in the Quran but can only be found in hadith that contradicts Quran


The hadiths say the quranic verse on stoning was abrogated by a goat, read into it what you will.


I would like to remind you what Jesus said:
"For false messiahs and false prophets will appear and produce great signs and omens, to lead astray, if possible, even the elect. Take note, I have told you beforehand." Matt 24:24 If this is not a prophecy about Mohammed I don't know what is.

H2O
Preacher
Preacher
Posts: 782
Joined: Thu Jun 03, 2004 09:00 pm
Location: Boca Raton, Florida

Postby H2O » Wed Jun 23, 2004 12:10 am

Us? exactly how many people am I talking to?
Yusuf Ali was educated in the uk, he was sufficiently grounded in the language to know what he was doing, I agree his work was inaccurate but not in the way you imply, he and other english translators knew exactly the people they were translating to, they bent over backwards to make the koran mild, so maakiren instead of cheater vis-a-vis allah is the best of cheaters, allah is now the best of plotters, instead of beat your wives, it is beat(lightly) and many more like it without their interpolations () the koran does not make any sense to the conscience or to a rational mind.



For a person that does not know how to read arabic how can you stipulate the degree of which I implied inaccuracy of his translation or any other translators work ?

YOu mean the Quran doesnt make sense to the indoctrinated Christian mind. What you and your contemporaries dont relate to others who are not muslim do.

Quote:
To show flaw in the translators works that you and your contemporaries took advantage of I produced legitimate grounds of why their translations are rejected as an authoritive and credible Tafsir (explanation):


Read above
Rejected by whom?
Exactly what splinter group do you represent?


Quote:

You were to disprove and show inaccuracy in our Tafsir. This is where the challenge was at. However, your critic sources that you posted was not based on our Tafsir, but based on another translators work that was inaccurate and poor.


Have a look at the original post, [u]I used your tafsir[/u], I found it amusing how you came to such [u]a detailed description of embryology given ..thing that sojourns, clinging thing, flesh on bones[/u].


By those who agree with our Madzhab that speak arabic

You used my Tafsir then used a critic source that expounded on a different Tafsir translation that dated back before my post. I told you to go and present it to an Embryologiest not refer to criticism that already exist on an invalid translation.

Interesting, Lets see, here is the arabic :

23:13 thumma (and then) Ja'al (Placed) naa (We) hu (him/it) nutfatan (a trickler) fee (into) qararin (a sojourner/settler) makeenin (an implanter)

23:14 thumma (and then) khalaq (made) naa (We) annutfata (the trickler) alaqatan (a clinger) fa (then) khalaq (made) naa (We) al-alaqata (the clinger) mudhghatan (a chewing) fa (then) khalaq (made) naa (We) al-mudhghata (the chewing) 'izhaaman ( bones) fa (then) kasaw (clothed) naa (We) al-'izhaama (the bones) lahman (muscle) thumma (and then) anshaa' (produced) naa (We) hu (it) khalqan (creation) aakhar (another)....

Translation

...and then We placed him (man) as a trickler into a thing that sojourns (settles) and implants, and then We made the trickler as something that clings and then We made the thing that clings as a chewing and then We made the chewing as bones and then We clothed the bones with muscle, and then we produced it as another creation...

Arabic Nutfah means Trickler derived from its Arabic root natafa ~ to trickle, or dribble

Nutfah is described as an Amshaaj ~ a germ

76:2 inna (verily) khalaq (made) naa (We) al-insaana ( Man[male&female]) min (from) nutfatin (a trickler) amshaajin (a germ)...

Translation

Verily We made man [male&female] from a Trickling Germ...

The Nutfatin Amshaajin ~ a Trickling Germ is from Semen

75:37 alam (not ?) yaku (was he) nutfatan (a trickler) min (from) maniyyin (semen) yumnaa (emitted)

Translation

Was he[man] not a trickler from semen emitted ?

The Nutfah Amshaajin ~ a trickling germ, is from semen. It is placed into something that sojourns or settles and implants in Arabic called Qararin Makeen.

Nutfah = Trickler that is a Germ from Semen.

* Does not the Sperm trickle ?
* Is not the Sperm a germ?
* Is not Sperm from Semen ?


Qararin Makeen = something that sojourns(settles) and implants

* Does not the Ovum sojourn in the Falopian Tube ?
* Does not the Ovum implant it self to the uterus ?

....and then We made the trickler as something that clings and then We made the thing that clings as a chewing and then We made the chewing as bones and then We clothed the bones with muscle, and then we produced it as another creation...

The above is tha stage by stage embryo developement after the fertilization and Ovum implantation.

The Trickling germ after being placed into the thing that sojourns and implants in the Quran is made into "alaqatan" ~ a clinger or something that clings.

After the ovum is fertilized by a single sperm it then moves to the Uterus where it implants it self to the walls of the Uterus where it literally starts to cling

...and then We made the thing that clings as a chewing and then We made the chewing as bones and then We clothed the bones with muscle, and then we produced it as another creation...

The above is the next stages of development mentioned in the Quran after the clinging stage:

* then it is made as a chewing or something that looks chewed (mudhghatan)

* then the bones ('izhaaman) are made

* then the bones are clothes with muscle (lahman)

Above are the stage by stage developments in the Quran that can be compared with the microscopic images of the stages of embryo development in its early stages before it can be seen with the naked eye

http://anatomy.med.unsw.edu.au/cbl/embr ... Stages.htm



There you have it. We gave a transliteration of everyword and its literal meaning.
I asked you to refute this by taking it to an embryologiest asking him/her if this is accurate.

If allah cannot pass on his message except via a language 90% of his converts do not speak or do not comprehend, and translations lose their meanings then the last message for all mankind for all eternity is a failure.


Wow ! I wonder why you have 76 revised editions of the Bible in English. Hmm, lets see, in order to properly undersand the bible you have to find aid in another language inorder to define its meaning.

For the student of the Bible the Arabic language is of interest, first, as one of the members of the Semitic group of languages, to which belong the Hebrew and Aramaic tongues of the Bible; secondly, as one of the languages into which the Bible and other church literature were early translated and in which a Christian literature was produced; and thirdly, as the vernacular of Mohammed and his followers, the classical tongue of that religious system which is the offspring of a degenerate Judaism and Christianity......

For the interpretation of the Old Testament the Arabic language has been of service in a variety of ways. In the department of lexicography it has thrown light not only on many a word used but once in the Bible or too seldom for usage alone to determine its meaning, but also on words which had seemed clear enough in their Biblical setting, but which have received illustration or correction from their usage in the immense bulk and range of Arabic literature with its enormous vocabulary. For the modern scientific study of Hebrew grammar, with its genetic method, Arabic has been of the greatest value, through the comparison of its cognate forms, where, in the main, the Arabic has the simpler, fuller and more regular morphology, and through the comparison of similar constructions, for which the highly developed Arabic syntax furnishes useful rubrics.

http://www.jesus-christ-forums.com/home/viewtopic ... c&start=60





Several questions pop up why did the jews want to kill Jesus, what was His crime? why did allah want to raise Jesus up dead? what for? what purpose surely God would do things for a purpose?


This has nothing to do with the subject

Quote:
and in their (the Jews) disbelief they spoke against Maryam grave false charges, and they said: " Verily we have killed The Messiah Jesus Son of Maryam the Messenger of Allah !" And they (the enemies of Jesus) killed him not nor crucified him but however it appeared to them so. [Why would allah make it appear so, what possible reason?] And verily those who differed there in (that he was not crucified nor killed) were indeed in doubt about it. They had no knowledge about it except that they followed conjecture, and for surety they killed him not, rather Allah raised him up to himself (ref. 3:54-55) and Allah is almighty all wise (Quran 4:157-157)
[Is this a valid reason for all of the above?]


Hmm bad reading. It didnt say Allah made it to appear to them so, it says it appeared to them so. Where do you see that Allah had something to do with it of it appearing to them so ?

I am curious do you believe the "seal of the prophets" to be a cancerous lump between the shoulder blades?


Nope the Quran doesnt confirm such a thing.

Quote:
BukhariVolumn 004, Book 055, Hadith Number 657.
-----------------------------------------
Narated By Abu Huraira : Allah's Apostle said, "By Him in Whose Hands my soul is, surely (Jesus,) the son of Mary will soon descend amongst you and will judge mankind justly (as a Just Ruler)[ What part in the above statement is figurative?]; he will break the Cross and kill the pigs and there will be no Jizya ...


Well he is not coming back according to Quran so what does it matter?


Quote:

" The Pigs" and in some hadith it is singular as "The Pig". What pigs is he going to kill ? There are millions of pigs all over the word. In other Hadiths Jesus is to comback to kill an imposter Messiah called "Al-Masiha Dajjal" and those who follow him.


I see, you are basically saying the followers of the false messiah will be killed, do you realise the followers of the false messiah will be the jews? so you are implying that jews are the pigs being referred to here? as a former jew as you claim I find it truly amazing you would utter such a thing.


Easy, Just like a former Christian who became muslim as Jews become muslims. That statement doesnt bother me in least. Tell me what you think about these other Jews that became muslim. http://www.jews-for-allah.org/Jewish-Converts-to-Islam/ http://www.convertstoislam.org/cboard/show.php?fid=7 http://www.msnusers.com/JewishRevertsToIslam

Do you honestly believe God would utter such a thing, this sounds like what a man would say when he has forgotten the things he was suppose to remember.


Remember ! God's thoughts are not you thoughts

Isn't this religion so simple a child can understand it, if the religion can only be understood by elaborate tafsirs which have no prophetic mandate, why should anybody believe them?


Except when you start to get into criticizm and science translations are not meant for such a task.

Is this your excuse for an explanation?, the term was "sister of Aaron" yes we can both agree that they named themselves after their ancestors, the question was where in the whole of judaism do they name themselves as a sibling of an ancestor that was not their real life contemporary sibling?


Nope. The point is Muslims do not understand Sister of Aaron as you precieve it. We understand the statement Sister of Aaron as a respectable title of her sisterhood of the Aaronites, which expresses she was an Aaronite.

I see, according to you Mary was put into the care of Zechariah which makes him her uncle as a guardian and her as his daughter, and since he is a descendant of Aaron this makes her a "sister of aaron" impressive deduction but...your koran states Mary is a literal "sister of harun", when Mohammed was confronted about this lie in the koran he said another lie that..The (people of the old age) used to give names (to their persons) after the names of Apostles and pious persons who had gone before them. The onus is on you to prove that the jews had this idiom, if it is in there spit it out.
,



Nope. Go back and read what I said. I stated her uncle or aunt was one of Elizabeth's parents, thus reject your statement. You not paying attention.


Where did you get this information from that Mary was a descendant of Aaron?, if Mary was a descendant of Aaron, even your koran would have known better to call her a "DAUGHTER OF AARON"


Nope. Imran was an Aaronite, Maryam was the only child of Imran contrary to the Amram in the old testament.

Have you thought maybe the hadiths also contain fabrications of historical time line of events, a fabrication containing more fabrications...it would explain why they contradict each other.


When I come accross such hadith I delete them or mark them with a big X or they go straight to the garbage.

Your blind faith is the koran is inerrant, and everything must be discarded if it contradicts the koran or if it sheds light on it that shows it is no more divine than the utterings of a demon possessed man


Exactly, Quran comes first as it says. It is th Truth verifier for WHATEVER is before it.

So tell me, why would Muhammad need to copy from the Bible to get his info if he was possessed by the devil as you say? If he was possessed by the devil then he woudlnt need to copy from the Bible when he can get it all info from the evil dude himself. :roll:

Since those hadiths are all we have on the formation of islam, we can only apply logic on those hadiths, far from contradicting the koran like you would have us all believe they shed light on it. I also believe the koran is a forgery on human and demonic proportions.


A Christian perspective of course would think like that. The Quran was written first before hadith so it has preference over the hadith. Plus. The Quran is regarded as divine and the hadith are not. So how could you take that which is believed to be NOT divine to supersede that which is believed to be divine?

Would you care to point us to where it says alnissa means adult women who have passed puberty?


Sure turn to chapter 3 the name of the chapter is annisaa (al nisaa) meaing Women. What is a woman ?



woman
SYLLABICATION: wom·an
PRONUNCIATION: AUDIO: wmn KEY
NOUN: Inflected forms: pl. wom·en (AUDIO: wmn)
1. An adult female human.
2. Women considered as a group; womankind: “Woman feels the invidious distinctions of sex exactly as the black man does those of color” (Elizabeth Cady Stanton).
3. An adult female human belonging to a specified occupation, group, nationality, or other category.

http://education.yahoo.com/reference/di ... 03400.html


A woman is an adult female. Females did not become adults until after puberty.

The hadiths say the quranic verse on stoning was abrogated by a goat, read into it what you will.


Hmm, maybe its a hadith reported by a goat that said that. Who cares.
Download Quran and Hadeeth for Free here http://www.islamasoft.co.uk/downloads.html Learn about Islam from a Non dictatorial view

H2O
Preacher
Preacher
Posts: 782
Joined: Thu Jun 03, 2004 09:00 pm
Location: Boca Raton, Florida

Postby H2O » Wed Jun 23, 2004 09:09 pm

Maryam, Sister of Aaron



Christian missionaries have been calling Mary addressed as Sister of Aaron(P) a contradiction. Below is the verse:



At length she brought the (babe) to her people, carrying him (in her arms). They said: "O Mary! truly an amazing thing hast thou brought! "O sister of Aaron! Thy father was not a man of evil, nor thy mother a woman unchaste!" [Qur'an 19:27-28]



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


It turns out that Christians in Najran during the time of the Prophet(P) raised a similar objection and it was answered by the Prophet(P). In Sahih Muslim, the hadith related by Mughirah ibn Shu`bah [5326] says:

When I came to Najran, they (the Christians of Najran) asked me: You read "O sister of Harun" (i.e. Maryam) in the Qur'an, whereas Moses was born much before Jesus. When I came back to Allah's Messenger(P) I asked him about that, whereupon he said: The (people of the old age) used to give names (to their persons) after the names of Apostle and pious persons who had gone before them.

This claim of contradiction is apparently mistaken because it disregards both the Arabic idiom and the context of the verse. In Arabic the word akhun or ukhtun (Underlined with Red colour in the images) carries two meanings.

Blood brother or sister and
Brotherhood/sisterhood in clan and faith.
The above verse has used the word ukhtun in the second sense. This is not unusual as the Qur'an uses the same idiomatic expression in several earlier verses. In chapter 11 verse 78, Prophet Lot refers to the women folk of his community as my daughters.



And his people came rushing towards him, and they had been long in the habit of practising abominations. He said: "O my people! Here are my daughters: they are purer for you (if ye marry)! Now fear Allah, and cover me not with shame about my guests! Is there not among you a single right-minded man?" [Qur'an 11:78]



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


In Chapter 7 verses 65, 73 and 85 Prophets Hud, Saleh and Shuaib(P) are referred to as "brothers" of their respective peoples.



And unto (the tribe of) A'ad (We sent) their brother, Hud. He said: O my people! Serve Allah. Ye have no other Allah save Him. Will ye not ward off (evil)? [Qur'an 7:65]



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------




And to (the tribe of) Thamud (We sent) their brother Salih. He said: O my people! Serve Allah. Ye have no other Allah save Him. A wonder from your Lord hath come unto you. Lo! this is the camel of Allah, a token unto you; so let her feed in Allah's earth, and touch her not with hurt lest painful torment seize you. [Qur'an 7:73]



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------




And unto Midian (We sent) their brother, Shu'eyb. He said: O my people! Serve Allah. Ye have no other Allah save Him. Lo! a clear proof hath come unto you from your Lord; so give full measure and full weight and wrong not mankind in their goods, and work not confusion in the earth after the fair ordering thereof. That will be better for you, if ye are believers. [Qur'an 7:85]



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


The people of Lot are also mentioned in chapter 50 verse 13 as the brothers of Lot except for the word "banatii" which means my daughters in 11:78, all other references have used the word "akhun" which means brother.



The 'Ad, Pharaoh, the brethren of Lut, (Qur'an 50:13)



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


And in another place, the Qur'an addresses the believers as brothers-in-faith.



The Believers are but a single Brotherhood: So make peace and reconciliation between your two (contending) brothers; and fear Allah, that ye may receive Mercy. [Qur'an 49:10]



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


George Sale in his translation of the Qur'an says:

From the identity of names it has been generally imagined by Christian writers that the Koran here confounds Mary the mother of Jesus with Mary of Miriam, the sister of Moses and Aaron; which intolerable anachronism, if it were certain, is sufficient of itself to destroy the pretended authority of this book. But though Mohammed may be supposed to have been ignorant enough in ancient history and chronology, to have committed so gross a blunder; yet I do not see how it can be made out from the words of the Koran. For it does not follow, because two persons have the same name, and have each a father and brother who bear the same names, that they must therefore necessarily be the same whereby it manifestly appears that Mohammed well knew and asserted that Moses preceded Jesus several ages. And the commentators accordingly fail not to tell us, that there had passed about one thousand eight hundred years between Amran the father of Moses and Amrean the father of the Virgin Mary: they also make them the sons of different persons; the first, they say, was the son of Yeshar, or Izhar (though he was really his brother) the son of Kahath, the son of Levi; and the other was the son of Matthan, whose genealogy they trace, but in a very corrupt and imperfect manner, up to David and thence to Adam. It must be observed that though the Virgin Mary is called in the Koran, the sister of Aaron, yet she is nowhere called the sister of Moses.[1]

In the Bible, Elizabeth was called daughters of Aaron(P). Was she literally a daughter of Aaron?

In the days of Herod, King of Judea, there was a priest named Zechari'ah, of the division of Abi'jah; and he had a wife of the daughters of Aaron, and her name was Elizabeth. [Luke 1:5, RSV]

Or Jesus(P) was addressed as Son of David in the Bible. Was he literally Son of David(P)?

And the crowds that went before him and that followed him shouted, "Hosanna to the Son of David! Blessed is he who comes in the name of the Lord! Hosanna in the highest!" [Matthew 21:9 RSV]

But when the chief priests and the scribes saw the wonderful things that he did, and the children crying out in the temple, "Hosanna to the Son of David!" they were indignant; [Matthew 21:15 RSV]

If we take that literally then it is also a contradiction in the Bible.


The Above was copied from http://www.islamic-awareness.org/Quran/ ... /mary.html which includes the Arabic text of the Quran.
[This forum has stoped me from posting the original Arabic text. I was only able to do it once before then I couldnt do it again.]

We muslims believe that Maryam the Mother of Jesus and her son were both Aaronites descendants of Levi, not descendants of David, thus Jesus and his mother came from a Priestly family.

They bible gives Jesus a linage through Joseph to whom the people at that time believed was the son of the carpenter (Joseph) whereas Joseph was a descendant of David.

The Genealogy of Jesus I [through Joseph]

Mathew 1:1A record of the genealogy of Jesus Christ the son of David, the son of Abraham:
2Abraham was the father of Isaac,
Isaac the father of Jacob,
Jacob the father of Judah and his brothers,
3Judah the father of Perez and Zerah, whose mother was Tamar,
Perez the father of Hezron,
Hezron the father of Ram,
4Ram the father of Amminadab,
Amminadab the father of Nahshon,
Nahshon the father of Salmon,
5Salmon the father of Boaz, whose mother was Rahab,
Boaz the father of Obed, whose mother was Ruth,
Obed the father of Jesse,
6and Jesse the father of King David.
David was the father of Solomon, whose mother had been Uriah's wife,
7Solomon the father of Rehoboam,
Rehoboam the father of Abijah,
Abijah the father of Asa,
8Asa the father of Jehoshaphat,
Jehoshaphat the father of Jehoram,
Jehoram the father of Uzziah,
9Uzziah the father of Jotham,
Jotham the father of Ahaz,
Ahaz the father of Hezekiah,
10Hezekiah the father of Manasseh,
Manasseh the father of Amon,
Amon the father of Josiah,
11and Josiah the father of Jeconiah[1] and his brothers at the time of the exile to Babylon.
12After the exile to Babylon:
Jeconiah was the father of Shealtiel,
Shealtiel the father of Zerubbabel,
13Zerubbabel the father of Abiud,
Abiud the father of Eliakim,
Eliakim the father of Azor,
14Azor the father of Zadok,
Zadok the father of Akim,
Akim the father of Eliud,
15Eliud the father of Eleazar,
Eleazar the father of Matthan,
Matthan the father of Jacob,
16and Jacob the father of Joseph, the husband of Mary, of whom was born Jesus, who is called Christ. http://www.biblegateway.com/cgi-bin/bible?passage=MATT+1&language=english&version=NIV

The Genealogy of Jesus II [through Joseph]

Luke 3:23Now Jesus himself was about thirty years old when he began his ministry. He was the son, so it was thought, of Joseph,
24the son of Heli, the son of Matthat,
the son of Levi, the son of Melki,
the son of Jannai, the son of Joseph,
25the son of Mattathias, the son of Amos,
the son of Nahum, the son of Esli,
26the son of Naggai, the son of Maath,
the son of Mattathias, the son of Semein,
the son of Josech, the son of Joda,
27the son of Joanan, the son of Rhesa,
the son of Zerubbabel, the son of Shealtiel,
28the son of Neri, the son of Melki,
the son of Addi, the son of Cosam,
the son of Elmadam, the son of Er,
29the son of Joshua, the son of Eliezer,
the son of Jorim, the son of Matthat,
30the son of Levi, the son of Simeon,
the son of Judah, the son of Joseph,
the son of Jonam, the son of Eliakim,
31the son of Melea, the son of Menna,
the son of Mattatha, the son of Nathan,
32the son of David, the son of Jesse,
the son of Obed, the son of Boaz,
the son of Salmon,[4] the son of Nahshon,
33the son of Amminadab, the son of Ram,[5]
the son of Hezron, the son of Perez,
34the son of Judah, the son of Jacob,
the son of Isaac, the son of Abraham,
the son of Terah, the son of Nahor,
35the son of Serug, the son of Reu,
the son of Peleg, the son of Eber,
36the son of Shelah, the son of Cainan,
the son of Arphaxad, the son of Shem,
the son of Noah, the son of Lamech,
37the son of Methuselah, the son of Enoch,
the son of Jared, the son of Mahalalel,
38the son of Kenan, the son of Enosh,
the son of Seth, the son of Adam,
the son of God.
http://www.biblegateway.com/cgi-bin/bib ... howxref=on



The above genealogy is through Joseph not through Maryam. The bible has no record of the genealogy of Maryam.
So who was Maryam a descandant of in the Bible ? Let just see what the Bible says:

Luke 1:
5 In the time of Herod king of Judea there was a priest named Zechariah, who belonged to the priestly division of Abijah; his wife Elizabeth was also a descendant of Aaron. 6Both of them were upright in the sight of God, observing all the Lord's commandments and regulations blamelessly..............

35 And the angel answered and said unto her[Maryam], The Holy Ghost shall come upon thee, and the power of the Highest shall overshadow thee: therefore also that holy thing which shall be born of thee shall be called the Son of God.

36 And, behold, thy cousin Elisabeth, she hath also conceived a son in her old age: and this is the sixth month with her, who was called barren.
37 For with God nothing shall be impossible.


Maryam was the cousin of Elizabeth who was an Aaronite. So what does this make Maryam the mother of Jesus ? Thus either the mother or father of Elizabeth was Maryam's uncle or aunt contrary to Liberate's allegation saying that we were ascribing Zacheriah as her uncle, in which he didnt pay attention to the post before, or better yet tried to ignore it.

In Islam Maryam was the only daughter of Imran [Amram] as taught in the Quran which is also contrary to the Maryam daughter of Amram in the old testament. When Maryam's family died the Aaronites casted lots to see who would get custody over the blessed child [Maryam]. Thus she was placed into the care of Zacheriah [which does not make him her uncle but only as her guardian]

The Holy Quran says:

[3:35] Behold! Imran's wife said: "O my Lord! I do dedicate unto Thee what is in my womb for Thy special service: so accept this of me: for Thou hearest and knowest all things."

[3:36] When she was delivered, she said: "O my Lord! behold! I am delivered of a female child!" - and Allah knew best what she brought forth - "and no wise is the male like the female. I have named her Maryam, and I commend her and her offspring to Thy protection from the Evil One, the Rejected."

[3:37] Right graciously did her Lord accept her: He made her grow in purity and beauty; to the care of Zakariya was she assigned. Every time that he entered (her) chamber to see her, he found her supplied with sustenance. He said: "O Maryam! Whence (comes) this to you?" She said: "From Allah: for Allah provides sustenance to whom He pleases, without measure".....................................

[3:44] "This is part of the tidings of the things unseen, which We reveal unto thee (O Muhammad) by inspiration: thou wast not with them when they cast lots with arrows, as to which of them should be charged with the care of Maryam: nor wast thou with them when they disputed (the point).


There is no conflict or confusement in the Quran as to this. However there is Christian criticism lack of study on the Quranic teaching.
Download Quran and Hadeeth for Free here http://www.islamasoft.co.uk/downloads.html Learn about Islam from a Non dictatorial view

Liberate
Preacher
Preacher
Posts: 200
Joined: Sat Apr 10, 2004 04:41 pm

Postby Liberate » Thu Jun 24, 2004 03:52 am

Us? exactly how many people am I talking to?
Yusuf Ali was educated in the uk, he was sufficiently grounded in the language to know what he was doing, I agree his work was inaccurate but not in the way you imply, he and other english translators knew exactly the people they were translating to, they bent over backwards to make the koran mild, so maakiren instead of cheater vis-a-vis allah is the best of cheaters, allah is now the best of plotters, instead of beat your wives, it is beat(lightly) and many more like it without their interpolations () the koran does not make any sense to the conscience or to a rational mind.



For a person that does not know how to read arabic how can you stipulate the degree of which I implied inaccuracy of his translation or any other translators work ?


You were quick to state the translators had english as their third language and implied they didn't know what they were talking about, typical muslim attitude it must be corrupt.

YOu mean the Quran doesnt make sense to the indoctrinated Christian mind. What you and your contemporaries dont relate to others who are not muslim do.


Religion aside islam does not make any sense to a rational mind.

Quote:
To show flaw in the translators works that you and your contemporaries took advantage of I produced legitimate grounds of why their translations are rejected as an authoritive and credible Tafsir (explanation):


Read above
Rejected by whom?
Exactly what splinter group do you represent?


Quote:

You were to disprove and show inaccuracy in our Tafsir. This is where the challenge was at. However, your critic sources that you posted was not based on our Tafsir, but based on another translators work that was inaccurate and poor.


Have a look at the original post, [u]I used your tafsir[/u], I found it amusing how you came to such [u]a detailed description of embryology given ..thing that sojourns, clinging thing, flesh on bones[/u].


By those who agree with our Madzhab that speak arabic


You used my Tafsir then used a critic source that expounded on a different Tafsir translation that dated back before my post. I told you to go and present it to an Embryologiest not refer to criticism that already exist on an invalid translation.


Interesting, Lets see, here is the arabic :



Hold on a sec, where are you getting the translations for the transliterational words? I find it a bit strange your translation contradicts Hiliali and Khan. Yusuf Ali, Sale, Sher et al are you trying to tell us EVERYBODY got the translation wrong bar you. would you care to show the arabic to english dictionary you are using to obtain these very convenient translations.

And please don't be patronising by showing us the english dictionary of the english word.

If allah cannot pass on his message except via a language 90% of his converts do not speak or do not comprehend, and translations lose their meanings then the last message for all mankind for all eternity is a failure.


Wow ! I wonder why you have 76 revised editions of the Bible in English. Hmm, lets see, in order to properly undersand the bible you have to find aid in another language inorder to define its meaning.


Has the message changed?
Several questions pop up why did the jews want to kill Jesus, what was His crime? why did allah want to raise Jesus up dead? what for? what purpose surely God would do things for a purpose?


This has nothing to do with the subject


Well if you have the mentality that God does things for absolutely no reason you are not serving the same God.


Hmm bad reading. It didnt say Allah made it to appear to them so, it says it appeared to them so. Where do you see that Allah had something to do with it of it appearing to them so ?


If you want to argue on the fine points of the semantics, who made it appear so to them?



Quote:
BukhariVolumn 004, Book 055, Hadith Number 657.
-----------------------------------------
Narated By Abu Huraira : Allah's Apostle said, "By Him in Whose Hands my soul is, surely (Jesus,) the son of Mary will soon descend amongst you and will judge mankind justly (as a Just Ruler)[ What part in the above statement is figurative?]; he will break the Cross and kill the pigs and there will be no Jizya ...


Well he is not coming back according to Quran so what does it matter?


Exactly where does the quran stipulate this? Again which splinter group do you represent do you not have a name? or you are worried to reveal the name of your splinter sect?

Quote:

" The Pigs" and in some hadith it is singular as "The Pig". What pigs is he going to kill ? There are millions of pigs all over the word. In other Hadiths Jesus is to comback to kill an imposter Messiah called "Al-Masiha Dajjal" and those who follow him.


I see, you are basically saying the followers of the false messiah will be killed, do you realise the followers of the false messiah will be the jews? so you are implying that jews are the pigs being referred to here? as a former jew as you claim I find it truly amazing you would utter such a thing.


Easy, Just like a former Christian who became muslim as Jews become muslims. That statement doesnt bother me in least. Tell me what you think about these other Jews that became muslim. http://www.jews-for-allah.org/Jewish-Converts-to-Islam/ http://www.convertstoislam.org/cboard/show.php?fid=7 http://www.msnusers.com/JewishRevertsToIslam


Personally I don't believe for one second that you were a former jew if your recent answers are anything to go by, you sound like another islamic imposter to me, muslims are the only people I have met that employ this tactic pretending to be a jew or a christian to gain some kudos when they are unable to answer basic tenets of the alledge faith they are no longer a part of, do you realise how bad it makes you look?

Do you honestly believe God would utter such a thing, this sounds like what a man would say when he has forgotten the things he was suppose to remember.


Remember ! God's thoughts are not you thoughts


But there is no dispute the thoughts of allah are those of Mohammed in fact there is no diffference between the two; when Mohammed needs to rape allah sanctions it, when Mohammed needs to have sex with his slave girls without paying them dowry allah sanctions it, when Mohammed needs to steal his son's wife allah sanctions it and says he saw Moahmmed's lust and made him give her up to him imagine that a god that sanctioned lust for his prophet when the God of the previous revelation punished David for such a thing.


Is this your excuse for an explanation?, the term was "sister of Aaron" yes we can both agree that they named themselves after their ancestors, the question was where in the whole of judaism do they name themselves as a sibling of an ancestor that was not their real life contemporary sibling?


Nope. The point is Muslims do not understand Sister of Aaron as you precieve it. We understand the statement Sister of Aaron as a respectable title of her sisterhood of the Aaronites, which expresses she was an Aaronite.


Exactly who are you trying to mislead with such a statement?

Let me remind you what we discussed:

Quote:
Nowhere in the Torah new testament, Talmud, Jewish or christian apocryphal wiritngs is anyone mentioned as a brother or sister of an ancestor


Quote:
Go to any Jewish website or to an Orthadox Jew, I would recommend a Rabi instead, and email or ask them or him what does "Sister of Aaron" and "Brother of Levi" in Jewish Idiom meain.



Quote:
I think it is time I call your bluff on this, if it is in there would you care to show us where it is, other christians have already done an extensive search in the quran, hadiths, jewish and christian scriptures and apocrypha no such idiom of naming someone as a sibling of an ancestor has been found except they were real contemporarty siblings the idiom has always been daughter of the ancestor or son of the ancestor, if it is in there don't beat around the bush show us.


The koran says " sister of Aaron" Who were the people in the koran calling Mary "sister of Aaron", JEWS.

Who did Mohammed said called themselves after pious people..."PEOPLE OF THE OLD AGE" <--- Those same jews in the koran. For you to now tell me that muslims "do not understand Sister of Aaron as you precieve it. We understand the statement Sister of Aaron as a respectable title of her sisterhood of the Aaronites, which expresses she was an Aaronite" is a contradiction in terms, you are the one who was prepared to back the koran that the jews called themselves names like "sister of Aaron" e.t.c a sibling of an ancestor that was not their real life contemporary sibling, I reiterate for you to show me where in the whole of judaism this was done



I see, according to you Mary was put into the care of Zechariah which makes him her uncle as a guardian and her as his daughter, and since he is a descendant of Aaron this makes her a "sister of aaron" impressive deduction but...your koran states Mary is a literal "sister of harun", when Mohammed was confronted about this lie in the koran he said another lie that..The (people of the old age) used to give names (to their persons) after the names of Apostles and pious persons who had gone before them. The onus is on you to prove that the jews had this idiom, if it is in there spit it out.
,



Nope. Go back and read what I said. I stated her uncle or aunt was one of Elizabeth's parents, thus reject your statement. You not paying attention.


Please listen to yourself...her uncle or aunt was one of Elizabeth's parents...so what would that make Zechariah who is the father of Elizabeth. according to you who was looking after her?


Where did you get this information from that Mary was a descendant of Aaron?, if Mary was a descendant of Aaron, even your koran would have known better to call her a "DAUGHTER OF AARON"


Nope. Imran was an Aaronite, Maryam was the only child of Imran contrary to the Amram in the old testament.


Can you not see that Mohammed heard that Amran was the father of Moses, Aaron, and Miriam, and that Jesus's mother was called Mary a derivation of Miriam and was confused that they were one and the same, to the point that the same Amran is now the father of Mary in the koran, even a child can see this.

Have you thought maybe the hadiths also contain fabrications of historical time line of events, a fabrication containing more fabrications...it would explain why they contradict each other.


When I come accross such hadith I delete them or mark them with a big X or they go straight to the garbage.



Your blind faith is the koran is inerrant, and everything must be discarded if it contradicts the koran or if it sheds light on it that shows it is no more divine than the utterings of a demon possessed man


Exactly, Quran comes first as it says. It is th Truth verifier for WHATEVER is before it.


So tell me, why would Muhammad need to copy from the Bible to get his info if he was possessed by the devil as you say? If he was possessed by the devil then he woudlnt need to copy from the Bible when he can get it all info from the evil dude himself. :roll:


You forget the 114 demonic epileptic utterings you called divine suras, and you forget the message from the previous revelation that satan pretends to be an angel of light, vis a vis satan is pretending to be God.

Since those hadiths are all we have on the formation of islam, we can only apply logic on those hadiths, far from contradicting the koran like you would have us all believe they shed light on it. I also believe the koran is a forgery on human and demonic proportions.


A Christian perspective of course would think like that. The Quran was written first before hadith so it has preference over the hadith. Plus. The Quran is regarded as divine and the hadith are not. So how could you take that which is believed to be NOT divine to supersede that which is believed to be divine?


Let me get this straight, you believe the quran to be divine, you do not believe the hadith to be divine, you chose the quran over the hadith, but you need a tafsir to understand the koran, I have not yet read a tafsir that didn't incorporate hadiths, but the hadiths are not divine and could be forgeries and the tafsirs are written years after the formation of the quran and hadiths, relying on both of them , yet if the hadith contradicts the koran it is to be rejected but you need a tafsir to understand the koran which relies on hadiths.... do you see my point?

You are not fooling anyone here, the quran makes no sense without a tafsir which relies on hadiths, unless you are not a sunni muslim you are an apostate.

Would you care to point us to where it says alnissa means adult women who have passed puberty?


Sure turn to chapter 3 the name of the chapter is annisaa (al nisaa) meaing Women. What is a woman ?


Would you like to tell us when this sura was revealed? (There is a reason for this question but I suspect it will be lost on you)



The hadiths say the quranic verse on stoning was abrogated by a goat, read into it what you will.


Hmm, maybe its a hadith reported by a goat that said that. Who cares.[/
quote]

It is a sahih hadith not contradicted in the koran, the whole abrogation nonsense fits in well with being eaten by a goat, the suckling of an adult was written on the same piece of paper that was eaten by a goat, the hadiths of Muslim, Abu dawood, Malik are filled with such stupidity yet it is not in the koran, the hadiths even give the valid reasons why it is not in the koran, but you chose to disbelieve it, keep deluding yourself.

H2O
Preacher
Preacher
Posts: 782
Joined: Thu Jun 03, 2004 09:00 pm
Location: Boca Raton, Florida

Postby H2O » Thu Jun 24, 2004 06:10 am

You were quick to state the translators had english as their third language and implied they didn't know what they were talking about, typical muslim attitude it must be corrupt.


If you knew how to read Arabic or better yet if you were bi-lingual then you would understand.

Hold on a sec, where are you getting the translations for the transliterational words? I find it a bit strange your translation contradicts Hiliali and Khan. Yusuf Ali, Sale, Sher et al are you trying to tell us EVERYBODY got the translation wrong bar you. would you care to show the arabic to english dictionary you are using to obtain these very convenient translations.


Yup they made some grave errors. They didnt use the original meanings of the words but instead they used the modern medical terms of the words. Our Translation is LITERAL of the Arabic words as they were understood in the time of Muhammad. I already told you if you have doubt about the translation take it to an Arabic speaking Christian. They will tell you like I told you the translation is more literal. Also there are many Arabic speakers that chriticize those translators works.

And please don't be patronising by showing us the english dictionary of the english word.


They have the same meanings. you didnt stipulate rules. now if you want me to give you reference to an online Arabic Lexicon then here http://alqamoos.sakhr.com/ you just got to learn arabic so you can use it... :lol:

Quote:
If allah cannot pass on his message except via a language 90% of his converts do not speak or do not comprehend, and translations lose their meanings then the last message for all mankind for all eternity is a failure.


Quote:
Wow ! I wonder why you have 76 revised editions of the Bible in English. Hmm, lets see, in order to properly undersand the bible you have to find aid in another language inorder to define its meaning.


Has the message changed?


Hmm well lets see.

King James Version

1 John 5
5 Who is he that overcometh the world, but he that believeth that Jesus is the Son of God?
6 This is he that came by water and blood, even Jesus Christ; not by water only, but by water and blood. And it is the Spirit that beareth witness, because the Spirit is truth.
7 For there are three that bear record in heaven, the Father, the Word, and the Holy Ghost: and these three are one.

http://www.biblegateway.com/cgi-bin/bib ... howxref=on

New International Version

1 John 5
5Who is it that overcomes the world? Only he who believes that Jesus is the Son of God.
6This is the one who came by water and blood--Jesus Christ. He did not come by water only, but by water and blood. And it is the Spirit who testifies, because the Spirit is the truth. 7For there are three that testify:

http://www.biblegateway.com/cgi-bin/bib ... &x=17&y=11



Where did verse 7 in the KJV go, and why isnt it in the NIV. Christians use the KJV of verse 7 in 1 John for the Doctrine of the Trinity, but in the NIV its not included which changes a whole lot of things.

Quote:
Several questions pop up why did the jews want to kill Jesus, what was His crime? why did allah want to raise Jesus up dead? what for? what purpose surely God would do things for a purpose?


Quote:
This has nothing to do with the subject


Well if you have the mentality that God does things for absolutely no reason you are not serving the same God.


No one has the mentality that G-D does. His thoughts are not our Thoughts.


Quote
BukhariVolumn 004, Book 055, Hadith Number 657.
-----------------------------------------
Narated By Abu Huraira : Allah's Apostle said, "By Him in Whose Hands my soul is, surely (Jesus,) the son of Mary will soon descend amongst you and will judge mankind justly (as a Just Ruler)[ What part in the above statement is figurative?]; he will break the Cross and kill the pigs and there will be no Jizya ...


Quote:
Well he is not coming back according to Quran so what does it matter?


Exactly where does the quran stipulate this? Again which splinter group do you represent do you not have a name? or you are worried to reveal the name of your splinter sect?


What happened didnt you pay attention to what I posted last time.

Obviously you know nothing of islam. Not all muslims BELIEVE in a second coming of Jesus. As a matter of fact the Quran REJECTS such a second coming. If the Hadith that mentions the second coming of Jesus is taken literally then it would contradict the Quran as the Quran makes it very clear he will not be seen again until the Day of Judgement.

Quote:
And they (the enemies of Jesus) plotted (to kill him) and Allah to plotted, and Allah is the best of plotters. When Allah said : "O Jesus ! Verily I am causing you to decease (mutawafee) while raising you to my self and purifying you from those who are disbelievers".....(Quran 3:54-55)

and in their (the Jews) disbelief they spoke against Maryam grave false charges, and they said: " Verily we have killed The Messiah Jesus Son of Maryam the Messenger of Allah !" And they (the enemies of Jesus) killed him not nor crucified him but however it appeared to them so. And verily those who differed there in (that he was not crucified nor killed) were indeed in doubt about it. They had no knowledge about it except that they followed conjecture, and for surety they killed him not, rather Allah raised him up to himself (ref. 3:54-55) and Allah is almighty all wise (Quran 4:157-157)

[On the Day of Judgement Jesus will say] I did not say to them (the Jews and my followers) but what you commanded me to say that "Worship Allah (In Aramaic Aalah) my Lord and your Lord" and I was a witness over them (the Jews) when I dwelt among them whereas you caused me to decease (ref. 3:54-55) you were the watcher over them and you are a witness over everything (5:116-118)


When Jesus was raised up to Allah in the Heaven he became DECEASED (mutawafan). There is no second return in which he will only appear for the second time on the Day of Judgment after the physical resurrection of all mankind.


There will be no literal return of Jesus. Keep on waiting like Paul did, you'll be dispointed like he was.

Personally I don't believe for one second that you were a former jew if your recent answers are anything to go by, you sound like another islamic imposter to me, muslims are the only people I have met that employ this tactic pretending to be a jew or a christian to gain some kudos when they are unable to answer basic tenets of the alledge faith they are no longer a part of, do you realise how bad it makes you look?


Want to test my skills, Want to test my knowldge in Hebrew ? Just give me a passage in Hebrew and I will transliterate it for you with its meaning, want to test me in the Jewish prayer and what it is. I can give it to you in Hebrew as well. Want to test me in how many Laws in the Torah there are ? Or Want to test me in Kabalaism or in Thalmud ? Anything you like ask of Judaism I will tell you.

Amazing how you make it sound like if anyone became a muslim they could not have been a Christian or Jew when we got converts all over the world. But of course you would say then they were never TRUE JEWS OR CHRISTIANS. Ok OK if you want to call me that I would accept it cause the Rabbis use to dislike me anyhow :D

But there is no dispute the thoughts of allah are those of Mohammed in fact there is no diffference between the two; when Mohammed needs to rape allah sanctions it, when Mohammed needs to have sex with his slave girls without paying them dowry allah sanctions it, when Mohammed needs to steal his son's wife allah sanctions it and says he saw Moahmmed's lust and made him give her up to him imagine that a god that sanctioned lust for his prophet when the God of the previous revelation punished David for such a thing.


Thats what you believe.

Quote:
Nope. The point is Muslims do not understand Sister of Aaron as you precieve it. We understand the statement Sister of Aaron as a respectable title of her sisterhood of the Aaronites, which expresses she was an Aaronite.


Exactly who are you trying to mislead with such a statement?


Its not the matter of misleading here it is the matter of what WE as muslims believe. Again here you are interjectiing your own beliefs. This is suppose to be what does islam believe not what Christians believe

The koran says " sister of Aaron" Who were the people in the koran calling Mary "sister of Aaron", JEWS.

Who did Mohammed said called themselves after pious people..."PEOPLE OF THE OLD AGE" <--- Those same jews in the koran. For you to now tell me that muslims "do not understand Sister of Aaron as you precieve it. We understand the statement Sister of Aaron as a respectable title of her sisterhood of the Aaronites, which expresses she was an Aaronite" is a contradiction in terms, you are the one who was prepared to back the koran that the jews called themselves names like "sister of Aaron" e.t.c a sibling of an ancestor that was not their real life contemporary sibling, I reiterate for you to show me where in the whole of judaism this was done


And we already showed how the Quran uses the same simular idiom through out its text with other people. The word Ukht in arabic has two meanings 1) Sister by blood and 2) Sister by fraternity/sisterhood

Quote:
I see, according to you Mary was put into the care of Zechariah which makes him her uncle as a guardian and her as his daughter, and since he is a descendant of Aaron this makes her a "sister of aaron" impressive deduction but...your koran states Mary is a literal "sister of harun", when Mohammed was confronted about this lie in the koran he said another lie that..The (people of the old age) used to give names (to their persons) after the names of Apostles and pious persons who had gone before them. The onus is on you to prove that the jews had this idiom, if it is in there spit it out.
,



Quote:
Nope. Go back and read what I said. I stated her uncle or aunt was one of Elizabeth's parents, thus reject your statement. You not paying attention.


Please listen to yourself...her uncle or aunt was one of Elizabeth's parents...so what would that make Zechariah who is the father of Elizabeth. according to you who was looking after her?




Zacheriah was the father of Elizabeth ? Wow!! you want to study islam but you dont even know your own Bible. Lets see what the Bible says.

Luke 1:

5 In the time of Herod king of Judea there was a priest named Zechariah, who belonged to the priestly division of Abijah; his wife Elizabeth was also a descendant of Aaron. 6Both of them were upright in the sight of God, observing all the Lord's commandments and regulations blamelessly. 7But they had no children, because Elizabeth was barren; and they were both well along in years....

11 Then an angel of the Lord appeared to him, standing at the right side of the altar of incense. 12 When Zechariah saw him, he was startled and was gripped with fear. 13 But the angel said to him: "Do not be afraid, Zechariah; your prayer has been heard. Your wife Elizabeth will bear you a son, and you are to give him the name John.



Now your starting to make this sound like the Jerry Springer Show. The Bible says Elizabeth was the Wife of Zacheriah. What version of the Bible are you reading that says she was his daughter ? IF you dont even know this simple Sunday School teaching why should I even continue with you :wink: ?

You forget the 114 demonic epileptic utterings you called divine suras, and you forget the message from the previous revelation that satan pretends to be an angel of light, vis a vis satan is pretending to be God


There you go again. A man who doesnt even know a simple Bible sunday school teaching. Seems you are possessed saying Zacheriah was the father of Elizabeth

Let me get this straight, you believe the quran to be divine, you do not believe the hadith to be divine, you chose the quran over the hadith, but you need a tafsir to understand the koran, I have not yet read a tafsir that didn't incorporate hadiths, but the hadiths are not divine and could be forgeries and the tafsirs are written years after the formation of the quran and hadiths, relying on both of them , yet if the hadith contradicts the koran it is to be rejected but you need a tafsir to understand the koran which relies on hadiths.... do you see my point?


As I said before you got alot of islam to learn. But first you got to pass sunday school

You are not fooling anyone here, the quran makes no sense without a tafsir which relies on hadiths, unless you are not a sunni muslim you are an apostate.


Lets see I am an apostate former Jew now I am an apostate muslim..hmmm.. this is getting interesting. I read Hebrew, Arabic, now learning greek :D .

Your right though I am not a Sunni, Salafi, Shia, I am nothing in which muslims of today call them selves that the Quran does not give any authority. I am Haneef, if you havent met one of us then, Hello Nice to Meet you.

As for those who divide their religion and break up into sects, thou hast no part in them in the least: their affair is with Allah: He will in the end tell them the truth of all that they did. { Quran 6:159 }..

Ibrahim was not a Jew nor yet a Christian; but he was a Haneef Muslim (, and bowed his will to Allah's (which is Islam), and he joined not gods with Allah. Without doubt, among men, the nearest of kin to Ibrahim, are those who follow him, as are also this Prophet and those who believe: and Allah is the Protector of those who have Faith. { Quran 3:68 }

Say(Muhammad): "Allah speaketh the Truth: follow the religion of Ibrahim, a Haneef; he was not of the Pagans." { Quran 9:95 }



Find me where in the Quran it gives us authority to call our selves Sunni, Shia, Salafi, or Sufi etc other than Haneef or a Haneef Muslim ?
Regardless, they are still my brothers in faith, if they wish to follow a way other than what has been ascribed in the Quran then that is between them and our Lord.

Would you like to tell us when this sura was revealed? (There is a reason for this question but I suspect it will be lost on you)


Your the Islamic expert why dont you know this ?

It is a sahih hadith not contradicted in the koran, the whole abrogation nonsense fits in well with being eaten by a goat, the suckling of an adult was written on the same piece of paper that was eaten by a goat, the hadiths of Muslim, Abu dawood, Malik are filled with such stupidity yet it is not in the koran, the hadiths even give the valid reasons why it is not in the koran, but you chose to disbelieve it, keep deluding yourself.


While your fishing for the answer for the dating of that Surah , you might as well find out the dating of Surah 24 , then go find out the date period of stoning in hadith. :o

Seems like you got a lot of studying to do
Download Quran and Hadeeth for Free here http://www.islamasoft.co.uk/downloads.html Learn about Islam from a Non dictatorial view

H2O
Preacher
Preacher
Posts: 782
Joined: Thu Jun 03, 2004 09:00 pm
Location: Boca Raton, Florida

Postby H2O » Thu Jun 24, 2004 07:33 am

بِسْمِ اللّهِ الرَّحْمَنِ الرَّحِيمِ (1)

الْحَمْدُ للّهِ رَبِّ الْعَالَمِينَ (2)

الرَّحْمنِ الرَّحِيمِ (3)

مَلِكِ يَوْمِ الدِّينِ (4)

إِيَّاكَ نَعْبُدُ وإِيَّاكَ نَسْتَعِينُ (5)

اهدِنَا الصِّرَاطَ المُستَقِيمَ (6)

صِرَاطَ الَّذِينَ أَنعَمتَ عَلَيهِمْ غَيرِ المَغضُوبِ عَلَيهِمْ وَلاَ الضَّالِّينَ (7)


‏حدثني ‏ ‏سويد بن سعيد ‏ ‏حدثنا ‏ ‏حفص بن ميسرة ‏ ‏حدثني ‏ ‏زيد بن أسلم ‏ ‏عن ‏ ‏عطاء بن يسار ‏ ‏عن ‏ ‏أبي سعيد الخدري ‏ ‏قال ‏
‏قال رسول الله ‏ ‏صلى الله عليه وسلم ‏ ‏لتتبعن سنن الذين من قبلكم شبرا بشبر وذراعا بذراع حتى لو دخلوا في جحر ضب لاتبعتموهم قلنا يا رسول الله ‏ ‏آليهود ‏ ‏والنصارى ‏ ‏قال فمن ‏
‏و حدثنا ‏ ‏عدة من أصحابنا ‏ ‏عن ‏ ‏سعيد بن أبي مريم ‏ ‏أخبرنا ‏ ‏أبو غسان وهو محمد بن مطرف ‏ ‏عن ‏ ‏زيد بن أسلم ‏ ‏بهذا الإسناد ‏ ‏نحوه ‏ ‏قال ‏ ‏أبو إسحق إبراهيم بن محمد ‏ ‏حدثنا ‏ ‏محمد بن يحيى ‏ ‏حدثنا ‏ ‏ابن أبي مريم ‏ ‏حدثنا ‏ ‏أبو غسان ‏ ‏حدثنا ‏ ‏زيد بن أسلم ‏ ‏عن ‏ ‏عطاء بن يسار ‏ ‏وذكر الحديث نحوه ‏
Download Quran and Hadeeth for Free here http://www.islamasoft.co.uk/downloads.html Learn about Islam from a Non dictatorial view


Return to “Archived Christian/Muslim Threads”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests